These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Can we get rid of CSM after the recent PLEX insider trading fiasco?

First post
Author
Cade Windstalker
#301 - 2017-04-03 20:16:36 UTC
Girka Kring wrote:
Why are you linking your own post? Just read what others already wrote about this.

What caused the shift in supply? Again, read the topic. Confidential info that leaked caused the shift in both demand and supply. Ppl who knew that PLEX will be 20% more expensive in a few days decided either to not sell PLEX and wait or to buy PLEX when they are still cheap. Obviously.

It seems like you assume there was neither demand, nor supply changed. I'm really curious how do you explain 20% higher prices with same volume.



That's right, you don't. Roll


Okay the fact that this idea is still holding on to dear life is mildly insulting to the intelligence of this entire community. Eve is supposed to be a game of people who are *good* at economics and rational thinking.

First off, you still have no evidence of any leak, or of any kind of insider trading. As half this thread has pointed out to you the announced PLEX changes will push prices down and you've been able to point to nothing that's actually driving prices up, let alone a connection beyond a vague one in time to the current rise in prices.

As for the actual economics, I've pulled some data from our dear Fuzzysteve's site going back to October of last year, before the Ascension patch hit and the price dropped in the first place. This seems like a good time to reitterate that patches tend to send the price of PLEX running off in one direction or another as people react to the patch.

I took that data, pasted it into a spreadsheet, and calculated a 7 day rolling average for volume, Average Price, and number of orders. I then normalized the price down to thousands of ISK so it would display nicely on the same graph with the quantities and number of orders.


This is the graph that produced.

Note how the Average Price goes up and down more or less inversely with the number of orders and the volume of PLEX being bought and sold on the market.

This shows that Supply and Demand are working normally, this whole wonky theory that Supply hasn't changed is bunk, and a drop in supply is *very clearly* driving the spike in prices.

This is why we graph things and check our assumptions instead of just eyeballing some tiny little volume lines and deciding they look about the same.
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#302 - 2017-04-03 20:27:27 UTC
PLEX prices fluctuate based on the same concerns and emotions that cause fluctuations in the real life marketplace.

Greed, panic, fear, ignorance, idiocy, etc.

This thread has probably done more to shift buying patterns than anything the CSM did.

Mr Epeen Cool
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#303 - 2017-04-03 20:56:52 UTC
Mr Epeen wrote:
PLEX prices fluctuate based on the same concerns and emotions that cause fluctuations in the real life marketplace.

Greed, panic, fear, ignorance, idiocy, etc.

This thread has probably done more to shift buying patterns than anything the CSM did.

Mr Epeen Cool


I was wondering that too. P

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#304 - 2017-04-03 23:02:17 UTC
Piugattuk wrote:
Speculation happens, corruption happens, CSM is only good for those big alliances, the general public as always is left paying the bill, not much we can do doo.

Well, you could always vote for someone.

It's entirely possible for someone to be elected without the support of a big alliance.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#305 - 2017-04-04 06:17:36 UTC
Well, I must have talked some sense into the conspirators or something, looks like they might be abandoning their grand scheme of cornering the PLEX market or whatever it was, prices appear to have stopped going up and are down about 6 million ISK from last time I checked.

[/sarcasm]

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#306 - 2017-04-04 06:36:26 UTC
Steve Ronuken wrote:
Piugattuk wrote:
Speculation happens, corruption happens, CSM is only good for those big alliances, the general public as always is left paying the bill, not much we can do doo.

Well, you could always vote for someone.

... who might be another face for the same "big alliance".

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#307 - 2017-04-04 06:37:25 UTC
March rabbit wrote:
Steve Ronuken wrote:
Piugattuk wrote:
Speculation happens, corruption happens, CSM is only good for those big alliances, the general public as always is left paying the bill, not much we can do doo.

Well, you could always vote for someone.

... who might be another face for the same "big alliance".



I keep saying, like how voting mechanisms are supposed to work.... Lol

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Brigadine Ferathine
Presumed Dead Enterprises
Against ALL Authorities.
#308 - 2017-04-04 15:50:29 UTC
Sullen Decimus wrote:
This entire thread is ******* hilarious. You're literally spewing **** while shooting yourself in the foot for your own arguments you're presenting. Before I get to that though if we leaked anything why the hell wouldn't we have done it months ago? We were never informed when this dev blog was even going up. So there is no way we would have known about it going up the days leading up. Now how your'e literally wrong and proved it yourself.

This image has been linked in the forum already http://i.imgur.com/69fHmVs.png

You point to the 20% increase as us buying up the market. Here's the thing. see those blue bars across the bottom? Those are the daily volume traded. Notice how it literally didn't change at all during the increase. It actually had a small decrease! So you're argument is shot. There is no backing of it at all. In fact, it supports we didn't leak anything because the market volume didn't change at all. PLEX is known to have waterfall effects in it's price so if anything it's much more likely plex sellers started to see the price going up (from natural market fluctuation) and decided to hold their plex while it was rising as any knowledgeable market person would do. This happens all the time in this market.

Also IF WE DID leak anything, plex is one of the single easiest items to track. Our accounts/alts are the most scrutinized in the game. Even if we told friends about it to get a benefit that **** is easy to track. Your argument is dead. Leave it in the grave and lay off the conspiracy koolaide awhile.

Like you would be dumb enough to do it in game... Every spy knows you use exterior comms to do things like that. You lashing out just makes me more suspicious.
Zarek Kree
Lunatic Legion Holdings
#309 - 2017-04-04 16:53:38 UTC
Brigadine Ferathine wrote:
Like you would be dumb enough to do it in game... Every spy knows you use exterior comms to do things like that. You lashing out just makes me more suspicious.


I find your finger pointing to be even more suspicious. As they say, "Admit nothing, deny everything and make counter accusations." I always get suspicious when people make accusations without evidence of any kind. You're clearly trying to create a smokescreen to hide something.
Cade Windstalker
#310 - 2017-04-05 03:07:14 UTC
Zarek Kree wrote:
Brigadine Ferathine wrote:
Like you would be dumb enough to do it in game... Every spy knows you use exterior comms to do things like that. You lashing out just makes me more suspicious.


I find your finger pointing to be even more suspicious. As they say, "Admit nothing, deny everything and make counter accusations." I always get suspicious when people make accusations without evidence of any kind. You're clearly trying to create a smokescreen to hide something.


The irony is strong with this post... Lol
Salvos Rhoska
#311 - 2017-04-05 07:20:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Zarek Kree wrote:
How about 15 pages of analysis demonstrating that there is no logic or economic rationale for blaming the spike on insider trading? .

Info may have nonetheless been leaked, contributing in some extent to the timing and magnitude of the spike.

For example if info had been leaked to me, and me alone, you would have seen almost zero effect on the plex market, cos I lack capital to act much on the info. But nonetheless, there would have been an info leak.
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#312 - 2017-04-05 07:45:50 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Zarek Kree wrote:
How about 15 pages of analysis demonstrating that there is no logic or economic rationale for blaming the spike on insider trading? .

Info may have nonetheless been leaked, contributing in some extent to the timing and magnitude of the spike.

For example if info had been leaked to me, and me alone, you would have seen almost zero effect on the plex market, cos I lack capital to act much on the info. But nonetheless, there would have been an info leak.


There is no reason to believe other than "It might have happened." That is really really thin. You could say that pretty much of every CSM. Lets put them under continuous investigation. Roll

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Salvos Rhoska
#313 - 2017-04-05 07:53:52 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Zarek Kree wrote:
How about 15 pages of analysis demonstrating that there is no logic or economic rationale for blaming the spike on insider trading? .

Info may have nonetheless been leaked, contributing in some extent to the timing and magnitude of the spike.

For example if info had been leaked to me, and me alone, you would have seen almost zero effect on the plex market, cos I lack capital to act much on the info. But nonetheless, there would have been an info leak.


There is no reason to believe other than "It might have happened." That is really really thin. You could say that pretty much of every CSM. Lets put them under continuous investigation. Roll


Not an issue of belief.
The issue is its a real and constant risk regarding all inside info CCP shares with CSM.
No need for constant investigation, just oversight and vigilance.

Its a rare person that has never revealed a secret whilst drunk, unwary or for personal benefit.
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#314 - 2017-04-05 08:02:38 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Zarek Kree wrote:
How about 15 pages of analysis demonstrating that there is no logic or economic rationale for blaming the spike on insider trading? .

Info may have nonetheless been leaked, contributing in some extent to the timing and magnitude of the spike.

For example if info had been leaked to me, and me alone, you would have seen almost zero effect on the plex market, cos I lack capital to act much on the info. But nonetheless, there would have been an info leak.


There is no reason to believe other than "It might have happened." That is really really thin. You could say that pretty much of every CSM. Lets put them under continuous investigation. Roll


Not an issue of belief.
The issue is its a real and constant risk regarding all inside info CCP shares with CSM.
No need for constant investigation, just oversight and vigilance.

Its a rare person that has never revealed a secret whilst drunk, unwary or for personal benefit.


As noted already, the CSM accounts are already highly scrutinized. Seems reasonable to me that CCP would do that for CSM members.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Salvos Rhoska
#315 - 2017-04-05 08:29:08 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:
As noted already, the CSM accounts are already highly scrutinized. Seems reasonable to me that CCP would do that for CSM members.


I hope so.

Trust no one in EVE, that includes CSMs, even moreso.
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#316 - 2017-04-05 08:30:00 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
As noted already, the CSM accounts are already highly scrutinized. Seems reasonable to me that CCP would do that for CSM members.


I hope so.

Trust no one in EVE, that includes CSMs, even moreso.


Well of course.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Zarek Kree
Lunatic Legion Holdings
#317 - 2017-04-05 14:03:09 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Zarek Kree wrote:
How about 15 pages of analysis demonstrating that there is no logic or economic rationale for blaming the spike on insider trading? .

Info may have nonetheless been leaked, contributing in some extent to the timing and magnitude of the spike.

For example if info had been leaked to me, and me alone, you would have seen almost zero effect on the plex market, cos I lack capital to act much on the info. But nonetheless, there would have been an info leak.


Had info been leaked to you or me, we also would have sold PLEX, driving the price down - not bought it up. That's the logical disconnect in the leak theory that you're simply refusing to accept. Prices did spike, but there wasn't anything in the announcement that would have led anyone to believe that they would.
Salvos Rhoska
#318 - 2017-04-05 15:29:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Zarek Kree wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Zarek Kree wrote:
How about 15 pages of analysis demonstrating that there is no logic or economic rationale for blaming the spike on insider trading? .

Info may have nonetheless been leaked, contributing in some extent to the timing and magnitude of the spike.

For example if info had been leaked to me, and me alone, you would have seen almost zero effect on the plex market, cos I lack capital to act much on the info. But nonetheless, there would have been an info leak.


Had info been leaked to you or me, we also would have sold PLEX, driving the price down - not bought it up. That's the logical disconnect in the leak theory that you're simply refusing to accept. Prices did spike, but there wasn't anything in the announcement that would have led anyone to believe that they would.


I would have bought it, not sold it.
(Hence rise in price, as demand)

If I had trillions, I would have bought PLEX at 1bil as it was to no end.

Having a bank of x/500 units of PLEX is much better than a single PLEX.
Allows me to compete per unit, rather than per lump PLEX.
I can -0.01isk much more efficiently, whilst players fight to get 500 PLEX units for sub.

Also, as a smaller operator, that I can sell only as much PLEX as I need in isk, rather than selling it all at once.

The <1000 Aurum wipe, and the fractioning of PLEX, benefits the wealthy and stockpiled.
Having, lets say 100 PLEX, can noe be sold on 1/5000 increments, rather than as lumps.
That is enormous market control.

This fracturing/granulation of PLEX best favors those whom already have PLEX stockpiles.
Zarek Kree
Lunatic Legion Holdings
#319 - 2017-04-05 15:49:19 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
I would have bought it, not sold it.

If I had trillions, I would have bought PLEX at 1bil as it was to no end.

Having a bank of x/500 units of PLEX is much better than a single PLEX.
Allows me to compete per unit, rather than per lump PLEX.
I can -0.01isk much more efficiently, whilst players fight to get 500 PLEX units for sub.

Also, as a smaller operator, that I can sell only as much PLEX as I need in isk, rather than selling it all at once.


Stock splits in the stock market (which is basically what this is) demonstrate that such a theory is misguided. No broker, analyst or financial advisor recommends buying stock before a split. They also don't recommend against it because they have decades worth of data proving that it makes no difference either way. There has never been a real life example of insider trading based on prior knowledge of a stock split announcement because that information alone is largely useless.

Not to mention that any perceived advantage would be negated by the other elements announced by CCP (Aurum conversion and PLEX Lockers) which will increase the supply of PLEX on the market, which will drive prices down.
Salvos Rhoska
#320 - 2017-04-05 16:03:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Zarek Kree wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
I would have bought it, not sold it.

If I had trillions, I would have bought PLEX at 1bil as it was to no end.

Having a bank of x/500 units of PLEX is much better than a single PLEX.
Allows me to compete per unit, rather than per lump PLEX.
I can -0.01isk much more efficiently, whilst players fight to get 500 PLEX units for sub.

Also, as a smaller operator, that I can sell only as much PLEX as I need in isk, rather than selling it all at once.


Stock splits in the stock market (which is basically what this is) demonstrate that such a theory is misguided. No broker, analyst or financial advisor recommends buying stock before a split. They also don't recommend against it because they have decades worth of data proving that it makes no difference either way. There has never been a real life example of insider trading based on prior knowledge of a stock split announcement because that information alone is largely useless.

Not to mention that any perceived advantage would be negated by the other elements announced by CCP (Aurum conversion and PLEX Lockers) which will increase the supply of PLEX on the market, which will drive prices down.


A) Stocksplits are almost always followed by greater net dividends.
I have made a lot of money on that.
(Not to mention an ideal moment to buy up the split stock cheap)

B) The announcement came after the spike.

C) It is far better to have 500 units that comprise a service in total, than a single unit.
Its far easier to sell x/500, than 500, and far easier to find markets that will buy less at a time (albeit at a mark up).