These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dev Blog: Introducing Clone States & the Future of Access to EVE

First post First post First post
Author
Kenrailae
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#501 - 2016-08-31 20:46:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Kenrailae
Keebler Wizard wrote:
Kenrailae wrote:
Venture's are accounted for in the skill plans. They can learn mining frigate 4Maybe you should go read it. Gnosis and Yacht's have never been tied from, nor excluded from any race. So perhaps you should chill out.


Nah maybe you should learn to read. Gnosis is above cruiser first off. And yacht? If youre an amarr pilot who can only fly amarr, why would that make the yacht eligible?



I can read. In fact, I can read what is and what is NOT there. There is no specific mention of either ship. What that tends to mean with CCP is someone over looked something.


And the answer to your question is simple: Because every single character in the game can fly it. So it's a very valid question: In absence of a specific statement one way or another(again, the skills for ventures are included in the trainable skills, and ventures are another of those 'well technically it's ORE but all the racial career mining agents give them out' type ships) does that statement of 'racial ship type only', which again appears to allow for consideration for the venture, allow for consideration for other ships which EVERY character in the game can fly?


So, relax, go bad post on reddit a bit, vent your angst, then come back and relax.


EDIT in response to EDIT:

Because the Yacht and Gnosis both can also be flown by trial accounts

The Law is a point of View

The NPE IS a big deal

Titus Cole Dooley
Fuel Blocks for Dante
#502 - 2016-08-31 20:48:15 UTC
mining alts for days... well that is 3 accounts i will not have to pay for any more. nope with rorqual changes make that 4.
Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#503 - 2016-08-31 20:52:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Gogela
Higgs Foton wrote:
Keebler Wizard wrote:
Kenrailae wrote:
Higgs Foton wrote:
A lot of players coming in who can fly T1 fitted T1 cruisers at max (keep in mind these people can also fly the Gnosis! That ship is going to be the top dog for alpha clones)? Seems like a lot of profit can be made for people who produce this stuff.

I have a fully researched venture BPO on one of my accounts. I smell PROFIT. :)



That's a good point. Luxury Yacht's and Gnosisisisis



Another couple idiots who can't read.

They said you will be limited to the ships of YOUR RACE.

Unless yatchs, gnossisisisisiissisisidsiofjiosdjfslk's and ventures are one of the starting races, you guys better go back to the drawing board.


Good sir, you might want to read in on the requirements for the Gnosis.
It only required Spaceship Command 1 to fly. It has no racial skill requirements. As far as i can see an alpha clone should be able to fly these ships, because an alpha clone will be able to train Spaceship Command.
Personally i see no problem in alpha clones being able to fly the Gnosis. Its a pretty good ship for them, maybe even the best, and i have about 40 of them in my hangar. :)

PROFIT

That's true... but it would be game breaking if Alpha accounts could fly them. Gnosis are Jove-related ships, and absolutely classified as faction. They are too versatile and powerful for free accounts, though. If you have 40 in your hanger, you know that damn well yourself. Free accounts will not be flying the Gnosis. If they could, there'd be no point in restricting race or faction frigs.

Signatures should be used responsibly...

Kenrailae
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#504 - 2016-08-31 20:54:57 UTC
Gogela wrote:

That's true... but it would be game breaking if Alpha accounts could fly them. Gnosis are Jove-related ships, and absolutely classified as faction. They are too versatile and powerful for free accounts, though. If you have 40 in your hanger, you know that damn well yourself. Free accounts will not be flying the Gnosis. If they could, there'd be no point in restricting race or faction frigs.



Yet I can make a trial account and sit in one right now. At least according to the required skills and lack of 'not usable by trial accounts' on the traits tab.

The Law is a point of View

The NPE IS a big deal

Ocean Ormand
Bagel and Lox
#505 - 2016-08-31 20:55:45 UTC
Just curious - the punishment for botting is banning - but now its free to make accounts - so ccp would have to ban the ip. But I think (I may be wrong) that you can manipulate your ip address if you want. So CCP just effectively threw in the towel on botting - a botter gets banned - he just keeps making new accounts - since there is no cost or punishment to him there is no disincentive to botting.
FT Cold
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#506 - 2016-08-31 20:57:52 UTC
I think I'm OK with this, so long as players have very limited access to specialized ships, modules, equipment and that the skill/hour penalty is appropriate.
Kenrailae
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#507 - 2016-08-31 20:58:38 UTC
Ocean Ormand wrote:
Just curious - the punishment for botting is banning - but now its free to make accounts - so ccp would have to ban the ip. But I think (I may be wrong) that you can manipulate your ip address if you want. So CCP just effectively threw in the towel on botting - a botter gets banned - he just keeps making new accounts - since there is no cost or punishment to him there is no disincentive to botting.




I don't see that as really the case. The alpha clones will learn skills slower, and are not able to learn most the stuff that makes botting profitable. I mean sure there will probably be some of that because 50% of a cookie is still more than 0% of a cookie, but the limitations on the clones look like they'll be rather effective at curbing their usefulness for botting.

The Law is a point of View

The NPE IS a big deal

Dopenose Lameth
Black Aces
Goonswarm Federation
#508 - 2016-08-31 21:00:35 UTC
My fear is that existing (paying) players will abuse this system by making a large number of free alts. Every fight will involve 20+ meta fitted Logi. In highsec one can expect suicide ganks happening a lot more. In low/null i expect to see 50man free2play caracal fleets being piloted by 1 person.

"But Dopenose, how could anyone control 50 accounts at once?" you might ask. Well they would do so the same way multiboxers do now: using multibox programs that are "technically bannable. Only you can now hide behind a VPN / Proxy and not care if your accounts get banned, since they didn't cost you anything to begin with.

Hope CCP has considered the amount of abuse they are making possible with this system.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#509 - 2016-08-31 21:01:41 UTC
PotatoOverdose wrote:
Liang Nuren wrote:
Allus Nova wrote:
Wait really? free2play is the gateway to pay2win. If eve goes Free2Play I'm donating my **** to eve uni and biomassing.



This isn't a gateway to pay2win. This is exactly pay2win out the gate. Free players are nothing but fodder with the SP limits they have set.

-Liang

Couldn't you make the exact same case about trial players in eve as compared to subscribers? In point of fact, you could make this case for any mmo that has a free trial with some form of restriction (e.g. character level limits).

Doesn't seem to be a major problem to me, but w/e. Eve is still a subscriber game, just with an extended free trial.

Personally don't have a problem with it as long as they keep multiboxing with alphas in check.


no because trial players never became a class of players like alphas will in the new model
Tipa Riot
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#510 - 2016-08-31 21:01:54 UTC
Ocean Ormand wrote:
Just curious - the punishment for botting is banning - but now its free to make accounts - so ccp would have to ban the ip. But I think (I may be wrong) that you can manipulate your ip address if you want. So CCP just effectively threw in the towel on botting - a botter gets banned - he just keeps making new accounts - since there is no cost or punishment to him there is no disincentive to botting.

Yeah, that's a valid point. With unlimited free alts, there is almost no chance of enforcing any EULA rule on a particular player. Make a throwaway account with throwaway email address and fake data, go to rookie system, gank players, get banned, make new account, go to ...

I'm my own NPC alt.

Kitosa Hinoyosha
Doomheim
#511 - 2016-08-31 21:02:03 UTC
Ok now eve jumps on the downwards spiral that all games go through on their way out the door...free to play...get ready for eve to be sold to a 3rd person company and CS to go in the toilet...but no seriously wtf ccp...this isnt going to bring in more players because its free...gankers and greifers are still a problem...and now you make it to where they can be even more anonymous...thanks for making it easier for them...and while your at it why not just let CODE run your entire Customer service department and you guys just retire...how about you actually fix whats wrong with new eden instead of giving up on us and hoping the word *free* will save us...it wont...a sad day in new eden history when that goes live...
T Nis
Doomheim
#512 - 2016-08-31 21:02:42 UTC  |  Edited by: T Nis
wish ccp just changed what people complained the most about instead of changing the whole core
there are so many changes in short timeframes lately
worries me
if u want an alt in wh space, ya need cloacking, in null people are in local anyway so being an alt 1000km off a gate is less of a problem, lets see howmany "free eye's" there are in null soon
ccp always wanted more subs, now they change it to be free, paying gives perks, quite big perks, but would be funny if in a year time they lose even more subscribers and most people just fly T1 stuff
seeing the amount of people stating they soon dont have to pay for their alts anymore is hilarious
T1 meta4 guns is gonna be the baseline, and there are "some" people that fly it bigger and stronger
geegee
why pay if u can shoot people for free
cheap losses that can easily be recovered anyway, people not flying expensive T2 bling ships anymore but just have 100 T1 cruisers ready for the shredder
And the slower skilling doesn't matter, we as community have proven over years that we are willing to spend money on what couldve been considered slow, now you make it look fast cause theres a 2nd clone state being introduced.
Now we are all still debating, but i can't wait to see in 1 or 2 years what this game has turned into.
Anke Eyrou
Hades Sisters
#513 - 2016-08-31 21:03:10 UTC
Limiting Alpha accounts to T1 cruisers and below including T1 equipment where does meta level 4 equipment belong? Will alpha clones have access to it as some meta 4 equipment is better than T2 equipment.

I expect to get this post deleted or locked. So much for freedom of expression.

Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#514 - 2016-08-31 21:03:19 UTC
Kenrailae wrote:
Gogela wrote:

That's true... but it would be game breaking if Alpha accounts could fly them. Gnosis are Jove-related ships, and absolutely classified as faction. They are too versatile and powerful for free accounts, though. If you have 40 in your hanger, you know that damn well yourself. Free accounts will not be flying the Gnosis. If they could, there'd be no point in restricting race or faction frigs.



Yet I can make a trial account and sit in one right now. At least according to the required skills and lack of 'not usable by trial accounts' on the traits tab.

A ship on it's own isn't a worry. Just because you can fly it doesn't mean you can be combat effective. An Alpha account will be able to max skills, which a trail cannot. Moreover, they can use it forever, instead of having to constantly make new accounts and train throwaway characters. It's much more convenient, which will make it more commonplace. Ultimately I think it comes down to common sense. CCP said no faction ships. Is the Genosis a faction ship? Do YOU really think they will let Alphas fly the Genosis?

Signatures should be used responsibly...

Droodid
Antec Enterprises
#515 - 2016-08-31 21:03:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Droodid
One question:

Will Alphas have a capped maximum wallet balance?

Apologies if this have already been asked.

Edit: Answered my own question, thanks.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#516 - 2016-08-31 21:03:26 UTC
Dopenose Lameth wrote:
My fear is that existing (paying) players will abuse this system by making a large number of free alts. Every fight will involve 20+ meta fitted Logi. In highsec one can expect suicide ganks happening a lot more. In low/null i expect to see 50man free2play caracal fleets being piloted by 1 person.

"But Dopenose, how could anyone control 50 accounts at once?" you might ask. Well they would do so the same way multiboxers do now: using multibox programs that are "technically bannable. Only you can now hide behind a VPN / Proxy and not care if your accounts get banned, since they didn't cost you anything to begin with.

Hope CCP has considered the amount of abuse they are making possible with this system.


just want to clarify multiboxing programs are not bannable so long as you do no input broadcast
Lugh Crow-Slave
#517 - 2016-08-31 21:04:24 UTC
Droodid wrote:


What happens to existing skills when reverting to Alpha from Omega? If losing access to them, do I regain access when upgrading again?

Apologies if these have already been asked.




try reading the blog b4 posting maybe... or at least watch the video
Galaxy Mule
Galaxy Farm Carebear Repurposing
#518 - 2016-08-31 21:06:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Galaxy Mule
There was much talk on the reddit thread of preventing alpha clones from going criminal, but no justification was given for discriminating against a legitimate play style (criminal).

How am I supposed to recruit from this influx of noobs if they can't even set their safeties to red?

I know none of this is set in stone, but just please be sure to consider ALL professions in EVE while you iron this out, noobs suicide gank too.

Thanks.
Roenok Baalnorn
Baalnorn Heavy Industries
#519 - 2016-08-31 21:07:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Roenok Baalnorn
CCP Phantom wrote:
That is a bunch of awesome feedback here so far! Thank you.

As a quick reminder, if you disagree with something or if you think that something will be bad, please explain why you are thinking that. Knowing the reasons and your train of though is incredibly more helpful than just learning about the end result.

Ill nutshell it for you...

The good:

1) Allows current subs more flexibility with alts
2) Allows new players to experience eve without time constraints.
3) Provides subs with more targets.

The bad:
1) Subs keep out a certain type of player many here will find undesirable. While people say well you can just avoid them, ignore them, etc... its like avoiding the white elephant in the room... lots of white elephants. At some point, it becomes easier to just stop playing.

2) Lots of free players do not always mean lots more paying customers. In a F2P/P2W game about 50% of the players will never pay 2 play despite the fact they are at a significant disadvantage. The Clone model of eve doesnt put them at a significant disadvantage. They can still do everything paying players can, just in crappier ships with crappier mods.

3) I see alliances capitalizing on the free players and creating huge TIDI blobs of cheap fleets to take and hold space.

4) Free players really dont add a lot of value to the game but will suck up a massive amount of resources.

5) Welcome to The Market Chaos Era. This is going to have all kinds of weird effects on the market from a variety of angles.

6) No game that i have played that has started either A) in game advertising( despite you paying for it) or B) a free to play mode has done well after that point. At that point you are on a slippery slope and about to lose your footing.

7) Hi! im Roenok and i have 782 Alt Alpha Clone accounts!

8) You, CCP, claims that support will not be affected. But we know thats not true. There are only two paths support can take with this and both of them hurt sub players. The first is that we have to wait stupidly long for our tickets to make it through a constantly backlogged system because of all the Alpha scrubs filing support tickets for stupid stuff. The Second is that CCP hires more support staff. Guess who is paying for that support staff? Sub players. So we either get shittier service or we provide welfare support for free players.

9) Keeping in line with point #8, taking revenue to spend on more support staff for free players also takes money from CCP staff to develop the game.

10) F2P players are going to crowd sub players out of high sec. They are going to suck up most of the resources in high sec while contributing very little to game play. High sec subs are going to get tired of this and do one of two things. One, they are going to move to low sec or null... which is great. Or they are going to unsub and go play something else where they dont have pay to compete with thousands of free players.

11) We are going to have the same tolerance of free players as we do bots, afk miners/ratters, and other undesirables. We are going to try to kill them to make them go away until they become to frustrating to deal with and then we are going to go away.

12) Honestly we would rather you spend more time on making eve awesome and less time on generating revenue. We have bugs that havent been fixed for months. You guys are fixing things that arent broken ( module tieracide) while neglecting things that we hate ( Fozziesov, SBU sov, Pos bash Sov). We ask for the game to have more entertaining PVE and your answer to that is super rats that will WTFOWN you faster than a cap hot drop. Your answer to everything the last few years is to either nerf it or dumb it down.

The only good thing ive seen in updates these last couple of years are ship rebalancing and possibly new structures but im still reserving judgement on those. Before you start trying to get new subs, try to keep the ones you got.


You want an answer to the trial BS... here it is:

1) Set up a free to play server that is separate from TQ.
2) No restrictions on this server
3) No customer support for this server. You want customer support you have to pay for it.
4) No plexes or skill injectors on this server.
5) The server is wiped clean every 6 months.
6) At any time you may transfer your character and your assets to TQ with your character in its current state. The cost of this transfer is that you buy a 1 month sub plus $5 transfer fee. The transfer fee is waived with a 3 month sub or more.

Play your heart out free player. When your sick of being reset, come join us on TQ. Otherwise take all the time you need to learn game mechanics. You could also leave the trial up on TQ as is and give people that option.


Ive been playing MMOs for 20 years. My first was a text based browser game on dial up. Ive player MMOs from EA, Blizzard, Atari, Trion Worlds, Big Point, Aeria, Kabam, Rockyou, Plarium, Machine Zone, and a host of other developers i cant remember atm, some of which have been defunct for years. And i can tell you from experience... going down this road is never good for the developer nor the paying customer.


But dont take my word for it.... ill quote this post and " i told you so" in a couple of years.
Dopenose Lameth
Black Aces
Goonswarm Federation
#520 - 2016-08-31 21:07:44 UTC
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
Dopenose Lameth wrote:
My fear is that existing (paying) players will abuse this system by making a large number of free alts. Every fight will involve 20+ meta fitted Logi. In highsec one can expect suicide ganks happening a lot more. In low/null i expect to see 50man free2play caracal fleets being piloted by 1 person.

"But Dopenose, how could anyone control 50 accounts at once?" you might ask. Well they would do so the same way multiboxers do now: using multibox programs that are "technically bannable. Only you can now hide behind a VPN / Proxy and not care if your accounts get banned, since they didn't cost you anything to begin with.

Hope CCP has considered the amount of abuse they are making possible with this system.


just want to clarify multiboxing programs are not bannable so long as you do no input broadcast



Ah but that's the issue, it's hard enough already to prove if someone is using input broadcast.
Lets be real here, a large number of people that multibox do use it. Now they can do it on a massive scale without fear of being banned. A minor inconvenience to create new accounts and you're back in action.