These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dev blog: Skill trading in New Eden

First post First post First post
Author
Josef Djugashvilis
#1341 - 2016-01-26 07:28:55 UTC
Zappity wrote:
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Here's a radical suggestion for CCP if they need more money.

Instead of cash for skills, they could try to attract new players and keep the ones they already have by fixing the bugs and improving the game with new content etc

They have done nothing but fix bugs since Incarna. Only recently have they started introducing new content again. Seriously, review the patch notes for the last few years and count how many times you read the word 'fixed'.

It is time for new things.


Yeah, and cash for skills should not be one of them,

This is not a signature.

Daniela Doran
Doomheim
#1342 - 2016-01-26 07:29:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Daniela Doran
Zee Zaugg wrote:
This thread has become stupid. Theres like 5 pro injector people having constant repetitive arguments with 5 anti injector people, while everyone else realized that CCP doesnt give a **** and went home. CCP doesnt care about feedback anymore, they stopped caring about feedback when they ignored all the negative feedback the first time around, and just left this forum up for everyone to vent. Even discussing what the price will be is stupid, because CCP set the price they want it at a month ago and its not going to change based on any suggestions in this forum they arent reading.

I dont think this will kill the game, eve will be around in 18 months. People will use this new travesty of an idea, even people that argued it, and CCP knows this, so they dont care. Short of another Jita riot no players are going to impact any form of development here at all. Which is sad, because this is a game prided for individuality and listening to feedback. If ccp chooses to ignore that, then it wont break the game, I wont quit, Eve wont die, but it will make it significantly less special, which is already being done by altering the unique Skill system.

Really im just disappointed. In the players too blind, impatient or greedy to see why this is bad. But mostly disappointed with CCP, who are not only introducing a terrible change, which is bad but excusable, but also breaking promises, ignoring feedback, and not even bothering to put the majority of naysayers minds at ease, or even respond to the supporters really. The lack of communication during this whole ordeal tells me that CCP knows they shouldnt be doing this, but are going forward with it anyways.


Exactly. If CCP came straight out and told the truth saying:

"Eve is in trouble financially and needs extra cash influx to stay alive so we apologize for breaking a golden rule we prided ourselves in upholding till now, but we're in financial trouble and have no other choice but to add a feature we never intended on implementing". (or something along those lines)

Then I would've began suggesting ideas to help them achieve those goals without damaging the game's core. But instead they ignore player feedback like we're mindless supporters and will eventually conform to the master's wishes because we have no other choice but to follow the masters (CCP) ways. It's a flatout display of lack of respect for the loyal customer base to do something like disregarding all player feedback. I'm still waiting for more details on how this feature is unfolding, but not a word from CCP. Lack of communication is what's causing my anger and distrust from all this silence.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#1343 - 2016-01-26 08:06:37 UTC
Daniela Doran wrote:
I get it that you're in favor with the rest of the scrubs who fancy the idea of pay2win coming to Eve and want to stay behind your masters at CCP regardless of whether or not of what they're doing to Eve is good for the game or not, but whatever. Going down with a sinking ship is all scrubs are good for so CCP should be happy that players like you are still in the game.
Except this does have the potential to be good, but it's clear you're determined to not see that.

Not sure if those words are intended to sting, but from someone who's demonstrated selective memory about having "courage" to change the game and a complete failure to actually explain how this will cause anything to fail save inserting your sense of accomplishment over putting skills in a queue I'm still making the judgement call that you're a less than sound source of reasonable opinions.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#1344 - 2016-01-26 08:09:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Tyberius Franklin
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Zappity wrote:
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Here's a radical suggestion for CCP if they need more money.

Instead of cash for skills, they could try to attract new players and keep the ones they already have by fixing the bugs and improving the game with new content etc

They have done nothing but fix bugs since Incarna. Only recently have they started introducing new content again. Seriously, review the patch notes for the last few years and count how many times you read the word 'fixed'.

It is time for new things.


Yeah, and cash for skills should not be one of them,
This isn't cash for skills. We already have that in the form of a sub. It's isk for someone else' skills. Not this proposals fault no one decided to question the wisdom of cash for isk all those years ago while claiming to bemoan P2W in any form.

I honestly wonder, because PLEX was here before I was, did no one realize back then that anything CCP decided to allow in game trade of would be parroted as "cash for 'x'" as a result of PLEX, or was it just genuinely thought back then that isk wasn't any sort of advantage despite being the primary medium of trade?
Tiddle Jr
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1345 - 2016-01-26 08:15:06 UTC
Daniela Doran wrote:


Exactly. If CCP came straight out and told the truth saying:

"Eve is in trouble financially and needs extra cash influx to stay alive so we apologize for breaking a golden rule we prided ourselves in upholding till now, but we're in financial trouble and have no other choice but to add a feature we never intended on implementing". (or something along those lines)

Then I would've began suggesting ideas to help them achieve those goals without damaging the game's core. But instead they ignore player feedback like we're mindless supporters and will eventually conform to the master's wishes because we have no other choice but to follow the masters (CCP) ways. It's a flatout display of lack of respect for the loyal customer base to do something like disregarding all player feedback. I'm still waiting for more details on how this feature is unfolding, but not a word from CCP. Lack of communication is what's causing my anger and distrust from all this silence.


Should we start Kickstarter thread to give a hand to CCP and support their annual budgeting? Or we could donate them PLEXs like PLEX for Good programm?

"The message is that there are known knowns. There are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know" - CCP

Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#1346 - 2016-01-26 08:24:34 UTC
Why do all these negative posters think that CCP is in financial trouble? They have just spent a considerable sum fully upgrading their servers. It speaks to confidence in the future.

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

Daniela Doran
Doomheim
#1347 - 2016-01-26 08:46:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Daniela Doran
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Daniela Doran wrote:
I get it that you're in favor with the rest of the scrubs who fancy the idea of pay2win coming to Eve and want to stay behind your masters at CCP regardless of whether or not of what they're doing to Eve is good for the game or not, but whatever. Going down with a sinking ship is all scrubs are good for so CCP should be happy that players like you are still in the game.
Except this does have the potential to be good, but it's clear you're determined to not see that.

Not sure if those words are intended to sting, but from someone who's demonstrated selective memory about having "courage" to change the game and a complete failure to actually explain how this will cause anything to fail save inserting your sense of accomplishment over putting skills in a queue I'm still making the judgement call that you're a less than sound source of reasonable opinions.

I have my doubts that this is a a good idea for several reasons:
1) CCP is not being honest with the players about their true agendas.
2) CCP is betraying the trust of loyal players who spent years refining their characters by implementing a feature they said they would never do that completely devalues our time of dedication to this game.
3) CCP is not communicating with the community and is ignoring player feedback.
4) CCP should be gathering data and taking their time getting the details right with this delicate feature that has been the heart & soul of Eve for over 10 years (if they really need the cash influx) intead of rushing it into the game to suck the cash out of the willing scrubbies pockets ASAP.
5) Training for a suicide ganking toon can now be done in less than one week making Hi-Sec almost as dangerous as Null-Sec.

If you cannot comprehend why this is a major cause of many concerns it is because:
1)You never went through char develop yourself and bought all if not most of your chars from Eve Bazaar (Eve scrub extraordinaires).
2) You specialize in Char Trades from Eve Bazaar and have stockpiles of chars and see the potential value of SP skyrocketing (personal interest).
3) All you care about is PVP and see the opportunity for hunting clueless fresh meat noobies in T2 ships in abundance (personal interest again).
4) You wish to create an army of suicide, corp thieving or spying alts to spread further malice in Hi-Sec or major alliances (more personal interest).


These are just some I can think up atm, but I'm sure there are tons more. The bottom line is this feature only benefits CCP wallets and players (who're in agreement) personal interest. Aside from personal greed and agendas, the community is still waiting to see how this feature will actually help the game.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#1348 - 2016-01-26 09:19:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Tyberius Franklin
Daniela Doran wrote:
I have my doubts that this is a a good idea for several reasons:
1) CCP is not being honest with the players about their true agenda
2) CCP is betraying the trust of loyal players who spent years refining their characters by implementing a feature they said they would never do that completely devalues our time of dedication to this game.
3) CCP is not communicating with the community and is ignoring player feedback
4) CCP should be gathering data and taking their time getting the details right with this delicate feature that has been the heart & soul of Eve for over 10 years (if they really need the cash influx) intead of rushing it into the game to suck the cash out of the willing scrubbies pockets ASAP.

If you cannot comprehend why this is a major cause of many concerns it is because:
1)You never went through char develop yourself and bought all if not most of your chars from Eve Bazaar (Eve scrub extraordinaire).
2) You specialize in Char Trades from Eve Bazaar and have stockpiles of chars and see the potential value of SP skyrocketing (personal interest).
3) All you care about is PVP and see the opportunity for hunting clueless fresh meat noobies in T2 ships in abundance (personal interest again).

These are just some I can think up atm, but I'm sure there are tons more. The bottom line is this feature only benefits CCP wallets and players (who're in agreement) personal interest. Aside from personal greed and agendas, the community is still waiting to see how this feature will actually help the game.

1) CCP puts their spin on an idea they had, news at 11. No really, this is very much the same pace as any unpopular decision. Some good in the end, many made good after tweaking, others... eh. Welcome to Eve, where we're used to this ride.
2) See, I seriously don't get this. CCP never said SP would never be tradable to my knowledge. If they did please point me to it. The possibilities from combining PLEX and skill injectors are real, but it's a convenient argument to state one of the most prevalent forms of consequence, the need to replace lost assets, can be trivialized while at the same time claiming CCP hasn't "betrayed" this concept prior to now (Think for a moment about the importance of isk for Eve's function and how PLEX already affects it. For the promise to exclude SP while including isk it means the entire in game market and economy, as well as every item in it, was somehow less of a game play factor than SP).
3) The are communicating, just not the communications you want, which is limited to a retraction of the proposal. There isn't really anything productive to say to accusations of malice and incompetence or general insults.
4) As someone who doesn't have the details they have regarding what's going on in the game, how do you know they're not? You don't, you make the assumption from I'm not sure what anymore. It ranges from CCP being poor to CCP not knowing what their doing to CCP maliciously breaking promises they never really made

As stated before, it's not a lack of comprehension, it's pointing out reasoning based on conveniently forgetting or downplaying Eve's P2skip elements when convenient. And further telling players who have trained since before your character existed that they should be clutching their SP as if it were the sum of their game experience when it's not.

I'm not in any of the situations you mention, I don't need to be because I can think past my own benefit, and further see this doesn't act against anyone save those who only see value in their characters when other have to do the same thing they did. My characters do have value in what they have trained (a decision making process fully preserved by the way), but that isn't changing. What they don't have value in is how others chose to train if the option is presented.

It's not like we're in a race as is, not with current mechanics in place.

But if we're making suggestions of self interest, what is it that you're doing in game that you need to keep potential competition out of? What capacity is it that you "earned" that feels so threatened by "week old players in marauders" I think you stated? Why do you need them to not have access to that or any other toolset?

This doesn't benefit me at all, but you're methods of protest make you seem rather invested somehow. Do share.
Tiddle Jr
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1349 - 2016-01-26 09:33:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Tiddle Jr
Zappity wrote:
Why do all these negative posters think that CCP is in financial trouble? They have just spent a considerable sum fully upgrading their servers. It speaks to confidence in the future.


Sure, but but i thought we are not going to interface those TiDi cool down effect ... Sigh...

"The message is that there are known knowns. There are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know" - CCP

beakerax
Pator Tech School
#1350 - 2016-01-26 09:34:21 UTC
Since this is going through, might as well look on the positive side: tradable SP creates a wonderful opportunity for CCP to nerf link alts into the ground.

:optimism:
Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#1351 - 2016-01-26 09:36:57 UTC
I'm not at all invested. Yet. But I will be. I'll make a killing as usual. Looking forward to it!

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#1352 - 2016-01-26 09:39:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Zappity
Tiddle Jr wrote:
Zappity wrote:
Why do all these negative posters think that CCP is in financial trouble? They have just spent a considerable sum fully upgrading their servers. It speaks to confidence in the future.

Sure, but but i thought we are not going to interface thos TiDi cool down... Sigh...

Sorry, I don't understand what you are saying.

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

MajorBean
HandelsGilde-De
Outsmarted
#1353 - 2016-01-26 10:08:34 UTC
- The investment of money in EVE should not give you an unfair advantage over the investment of time. The CSM, under NDA, has been presented with CCP‘s plans for continued evolution of the business model and agrees that nothing they saw breaks this principle. CCP has committed to sharing their plans with the CSM on this front on an ongoing basis.
Corraidhin Farsaidh
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#1354 - 2016-01-26 10:19:17 UTC
MajorBean wrote:
- The investment of money in EVE should not give you an unfair advantage over the investment of time. The CSM, under NDA, has been presented with CCP‘s plans for continued evolution of the business model and agrees that nothing they saw breaks this principle. CCP has committed to sharing their plans with the CSM on this front on an ongoing basis.


I'm guessing that whoever developed this idea thinks it doesn't break this promise since when you buy SP you are buying someone elses invested time (transferring advantage as opposed to buying new advantage???).

If so they should consider a career in politics...
Rebel Gunn
Doomheim
#1355 - 2016-01-26 11:20:29 UTC
Tiddle Jr wrote:
Daniela Doran wrote:


Exactly. If CCP came straight out and told the truth saying:

"Eve is in trouble financially and needs extra cash influx to stay alive so we apologize for breaking a golden rule we prided ourselves in upholding till now, but we're in financial trouble and have no other choice but to add a feature we never intended on implementing". (or something along those lines)

Then I would've began suggesting ideas to help them achieve those goals without damaging the game's core. But instead they ignore player feedback like we're mindless supporters and will eventually conform to the master's wishes because we have no other choice but to follow the masters (CCP) ways. It's a flatout display of lack of respect for the loyal customer base to do something like disregarding all player feedback. I'm still waiting for more details on how this feature is unfolding, but not a word from CCP. Lack of communication is what's causing my anger and distrust from all this silence.


Should we start Kickstarter thread to give a hand to CCP and support their annual budgeting? Or we could donate them PLEXs like PLEX for Good programm?


What they really need is advice on how to run a business and serve customers properly. I give them credit for having created this one good game, but they've otherwise squandered most of the goodwill you can generate from this.

It very much feels like they stumbled onto success, did enough things right from time to time to make up for missteps, and then began to lose their way by taking customers for granted. However, I'm not sure that the owner(s) / top management ever really understood what they had created, it was more the rank-and-file that probably kept things alive. Now top management is going the pay-to-win route to try to bleed us all dry, thinking we'll all just happily go along with it. So out-of-touch and disdainful they are.

CCP is about to receive a very brutal lesson in market forces. Losing long loyal customers in favor of new customers that are extremely fickle, have short attention spans, and demand instant gratification has rarely been a road to long-term business success.
Funky Death
Doomheim
#1356 - 2016-01-26 11:55:16 UTC
I can see this is not pay to win. Theres no magic creation of sp happening.
Daniela Doran
Doomheim
#1357 - 2016-01-26 12:09:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Daniela Doran
Tyberius Franklin wrote:

1) CCP puts their spin on an idea they had, news at 11. No really, this is very much the same pace as any unpopular decision. Some good in the end, many made good after tweaking, others... eh. Welcome to Eve, where we're used to this ride.
2) See, I seriously don't get this. CCP never said SP would never be tradable to my knowledge. If they did please point me to it. The possibilities from combining PLEX and skill injectors are real, but it's a convenient argument to state one of the most prevalent forms of consequence, the need to replace lost assets, can be trivialized while at the same time claiming CCP hasn't "betrayed" this concept prior to now (Think for a moment about the importance of isk for Eve's function and how PLEX already affects it. For the promise to exclude SP while including isk it means the entire in game market and economy, as well as every item in it, was somehow less of a game play factor than SP).
3) The are communicating, just not the communications you want, which is limited to a retraction of the proposal. There isn't really anything productive to say to accusations of malice and incompetence or general insults.
4) As someone who doesn't have the details they have regarding what's going on in the game, how do you know they're not? You don't, you make the assumption from I'm not sure what anymore. It ranges from CCP being poor to CCP not knowing what their doing to CCP maliciously breaking promises they never really made

As stated before, it's not a lack of comprehension, it's pointing out reasoning based on conveniently forgetting or downplaying Eve's P2skip elements when convenient. And further telling players who have trained since before your character existed that they should be clutching their SP as if it were the sum of their game experience when it's not.

I'm not in any of the situations you mention, I don't need to be because I can think past my own benefit, and further see this doesn't act against anyone save those who only see value in their characters when other have to do the same thing they did. My characters do have value in what they have trained (a decision making process fully preserved by the way), but that isn't changing. What they don't have value in is how others chose to train if the option is presented.

It's not like we're in a race as is, not with current mechanics in place.

But if we're making suggestions of self interest, what is it that you're doing in game that you need to keep potential competition out of? What capacity is it that you "earned" that feels so threatened by "week old players in marauders" I think you stated? Why do you need them to not have access to that or any other toolset?

This doesn't benefit me at all, but you're methods of protest make you seem rather invested somehow. Do share.

I took me 14 months to train my Alts to fly Paladins. And now some scrub can get into one within 1-4 weeks?? Don't know about you but that makes me feel cheated.

Training skills will become meaningless since all you have to do know is buy a skill injector for skilling. Meaning the feeling of progression and evolution will be gone from Eve forever. Don't know about you but for role-playing type players that is a very addictive feature that keeps us in the game.

Suicide gankers can now easily fully train up to fly Catalysts within 7-10 days, making Hi-sec a gankers paradise. I live in hi-sec atm flying Marauders and don't want to see them getting exploded by nooblets who just got into the game one week ago. This means that Corps like Code are gonna be more powerful than ever. Not to mention concorde won't prevent them from forming in mass in any given system. Hi-sec is gonna become Gank-Sec with the implementation of this SP trading garbage.
Shova'k
The Bank Of Jita
#1358 - 2016-01-26 12:14:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Shova'k
the only real issue with this is that it will devalue characters being sold in the bazaar other then that it is not much different then the ability to buy pre-trained characters. other then the fact that you get to pick the name yourself and since the limits on how much sp you get out of it at higher sp levels its basiclly only useful to remove and sell sp for those in the 50+ mill range and those of us over 100 mill it wont be worth buying sp to add at all lol

most of the whining is prolly alts of people who farm characters or do buy/sell flipping raging that their income is gonna drop or they dont understand this is a weaker variations of the character bazaar we already have. then again most people have a hard time with common sense.

Daniela Doran wrote:

I took me 14 months to train my Alts to fly Paladins. And now some scrub can get into one within 1-4 weeks?? Don't know about you but that makes me feel cheated.

Training skills will become meaningless since all you have to do know is buy an injector for skilling. Meaning the feeling of progression or evolution will be gone from Eve forever. Don't know about you but for role-playering type players that is a very addictive feature that keeps us in the game.

Suicide gankers can now easily train up to fly Catalysts within 7-14 days, making Hi-sec a gankers paradise. I live in hi-sec atm flying Marauders and don't want to see them getting exploded by nooblets who just got into the game one week ago. This means that Corps like Code are gonna be more powerful than ever. Not to mention concorde won't prevent them from forming in mass in any given system. Hi-sec is gonna become Gank-Sec with the implementation of this SP trading garbage.


as mentioned above all of that is already possible droping some isk on a character from the bazaar only difference is this new system will cost a crap ton more (player controlled market and all) and reduce in efficiency rapidly the higher the sp goes. also gankers are not gonna use this to train their gank alts up faster unless they really have to much money or isk and hate waiting. since they can just use throw away trial act's over and over and not even have to bother subbing them (sure its against the rules but ccp never catches them so they do it anyway)

training will still be far more valuable since this system wont create sp from thin air some one still has to train it first. and the cost of the skill injectors will prolly be so insanely high that it would be cheaper to buy a char instead so over all this has no real impact on the game outside of the character bazaar and redistributing isk within the economy.
Tiddle Jr
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1359 - 2016-01-26 12:41:05 UTC
If Character Bazar is also p2w as many pointed that out why would we need another one with similar purpose?

"The message is that there are known knowns. There are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know" - CCP

Corraidhin Farsaidh
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#1360 - 2016-01-26 12:41:08 UTC
Shova'k wrote:
...
as mentioned above all of that is already possible droping some isk on a character from the bazaar only difference is this new system will cost a crap ton more (player controlled market and all) and reduce in efficiency rapidly the higher the sp goes. also gankers are not gonna use this to train their gank alts up faster unless they really have to much money or isk and hate waiting. since they can just use throw away trial act's over and over and not even have to bother subbing them (sure its against the rules but ccp never catches them so they do it anyway)

training will still be far more valuable since this system wont create sp from thin air some one still has to train it first. and the cost of the skill injectors will prolly be so insanely high that it would be cheaper to buy a char instead so over all this has no real impact on the game outside of the character bazaar and redistributing isk within the economy.


The issues I have with the idea (beyond simply removing any character building element from the game or at the very least heavily degrading it) is that it will not help new players as claimed but will almost certainly funnel most of the SP generated up to the space rich who already play the game.

This allows for the already accrued SP in existing characters to be drained away into the hands of those with the most ISK. Whether they just inject them (just to be the first to max SP) or it is a larger nullsec group simply controlling the market whilst ensuring all alts have perfect skills for their niche ensuring that other groups are at a bigger disadvantage.

As far as large ISK rich nullsec groups go they would be stupid not to do this, they would control the market whilst gaining a bigger advantage. Note that I don't have a problem with these groups doing this if they are playing within the rules (again, they would be stupid not to), but rather with a mechanic being introduced that allows them to do so.

This will not in my opinion help new players at all.