These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dev Blog: Exploring The Character Bazaar & Skill Trading

First post First post First post
Author
Tiberius Heth
Doomheim
#3581 - 2015-10-19 10:58:27 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
Tiberius Heth wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
i, ccp terminus, and the devblog have answered this question. idiotic questions like this are why the thread is so long.

do read.



No, you haven't. We can be sure that you're not in this "for the good of the game" so again, why do YOU want this in the game?


it already is - the character bazaar. why are you all so assblasted that ccp are making something we already have less convoluted?


So you're, per usual, avoiding the question. DO explain to us why you put in all this effort and time into this thread, surely there must be a personal reason for it.
Levi Belvar
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#3582 - 2015-10-19 10:58:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Levi Belvar
Quote:
the advantage of not having your character arbitrarily deleted by CCP in order to create a skillpoint pool for people.you're saying that paying should give you the advantage of not being deleted by CCP. i thought you were firmly against paying for an advantage?


There is no advantage to anyone, there is nothing arbitrary in its selection. You have not played for 12 months, get sent an email to either activate or lose. There is no personal gain it it. It is nothing personal to anyone, its just freeing up resources to be recycled and taking some load of the client base to be used for new players.

what is wrong with it is what im saying, you have no vested interest in anything remotely connected with the values of the game. Your interest is personal gain. My way the new players benefit as much as CCP

“Stupidity and wisdom meet in the same centre of sentiment and resolution, in the suffering of human accidents.”

Horiz Rin
Homebase69
#3583 - 2015-10-19 10:58:48 UTC
Syn'Drakkahr wrote:
[


You are now restricted to that toon, his SP skills and past history. Each individual character has fundimental Values and standards which make EVE, EVE.




Thats the essence.

From the bazaar you get the good and the bad, and it's a trade off - you weigh up if the things you want against those you don't - and like most of the best parts of EVE, its a compromise that takes thinking about.

Getting rid of unused SP to trade in for cherry picked skills smacks of pandering to players immediate gratification - and with immediate gratification you lose both the time, and the emotional investment in the game, and with nothing invested, where's the attachment?

I'm a fairly new player, I already have skills I wish I hadn't trained - but training them meant I had time to learn, and time to anticipate and look forward to things I wanted to do - it kept me interested ! If I could pay to get what I wanted...... I'd probably have tried everything in a few months, not bothered to learn any of the games subtleties, and been gone by now.



Dave Stark
#3584 - 2015-10-19 11:02:09 UTC
Tiberius Heth wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
Tiberius Heth wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
i, ccp terminus, and the devblog have answered this question. idiotic questions like this are why the thread is so long.

do read.



No, you haven't. We can be sure that you're not in this "for the good of the game" so again, why do YOU want this in the game?


it already is - the character bazaar. why are you all so assblasted that ccp are making something we already have less convoluted?


So you're, per usual, avoiding the question. DO explain to us why you put in all this effort and time into this thread, surely there must be a personal reason for it.


i didn't avoid anything.

i just told you it's already in the game. ccp aren't adding anything we don't already have.

my answer not fitting your narrative isn't me avoiding questions.
Moac Tor
Cyber Core
Immediate Destruction
#3585 - 2015-10-19 11:02:52 UTC
Zappity wrote:
Moac Tor wrote:
Zappity wrote:
It would not be called a 'sacred cow' if it were uncontroversial. But this is one that needs to be turned into a steak.

Judging from the feedback in this thread it would seem that your stance on the subject is not shared by the majority of people in this thread and would not be too healthy for subscription numbers.

Yes you could just write this all off as idle threats, but if you are in CCPs position would you want to really risk it and be the one who bought a 12 year old game to its knees just so you can implement this?

Everyone realised that jump fatigue and the sov changes needed to be done, and so despite the negative reactions players stuck with CCP as we knew we could not keep the status quo. This on the other hand is much more dangerous as it all to close to Incarna.

I actually think a lot of players have already let micro transactions slip in through the back door in the form of ship SKINs, a feature that nearly everyone had wanted, but somehow CCP cleverly managed to tie it to microtransactions without much of a fuss from the players. It was explained away at the time that it is fine as ship skins are cosmetic items; this idea on the other hand is going to be different as SPs are far from cosmetic.

Rubbish. People won't quit over this. Why would they?

Of course some people will definitely quit over this. The only question would is how many.

You seem to be ignorant or in denial of the opinion in this thread, CCP don't have that same luxury though.
Tiberius Heth
Doomheim
#3586 - 2015-10-19 11:09:52 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
Tiberius Heth wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
Tiberius Heth wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
i, ccp terminus, and the devblog have answered this question. idiotic questions like this are why the thread is so long.

do read.



No, you haven't. We can be sure that you're not in this "for the good of the game" so again, why do YOU want this in the game?


it already is - the character bazaar. why are you all so assblasted that ccp are making something we already have less convoluted?


So you're, per usual, avoiding the question. DO explain to us why you put in all this effort and time into this thread, surely there must be a personal reason for it.


i didn't avoid anything.

i just told you it's already in the game. ccp aren't adding anything we don't already have.

my answer not fitting your narrative isn't me avoiding questions.


So you persist in not answering a very basic, and quite important, question. Which is all a bit weird given all the effort and spamming you do in this thread.
Amanda Orion
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#3587 - 2015-10-19 11:14:16 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:

it already is - the character bazaar. why are you all so assblasted that ccp are making something we already have less convoluted?


There is a difference...

Although characters can change hands, and a PERSON can gain a lot of SP in a short time by paying ISK, CHARACTERS still gain SP using the existing mechanics which are speed limited.

This change would allow CHARACTERS to gain a lot of SP in a short time, bypassing the existing, speed limited mechanic.

If you threw enough money at it you could create any custom, perfect character in a short time, without regard to what may or may not be available on the character bazaar, and without interference from the vagaries of supply and demand, or the necessity to tolerate stupid names or poor reputation / history.

Syn'Drakkahr
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#3588 - 2015-10-19 11:15:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Syn'Drakkahr
Dave Stark,

Hyperthetical,

Mark: has been playing EVE for 10 years, he has 200MSP, contributed alot to EVE community, CCP and developed a presence in the EVE universe.

Dave: Has seen an advert, likes the look of EVE, decided to play EVE and realises he's starting way off from the pack. Dave desides f*ck it, I'll purchase 200M SP and gain the significat bonuses that come with it.

EvE is a sandbox, players run the lore of the universe and create history. EvE is unique, EvE has values, standards, it takes time to develop your self and promote yourself in this already small community / universe.

1.) Mark has seen EVE grow, gained a substanial wealth. Taking his past history, contribution, away from him because SP is now Pay 2 Win for Dave.

2.) Dave does not give a sh*t, he can fly his pimped out Vargur after 1 day and does not care about Marks history or the lore of EVE, he just wants to fly and kill.

Yes, Dave could achieve this on the Character Bazaar but he also has to live with the fact that the new character he is purchasing has time value and history. All part of what make EVE the greatest sandbox created.

Making SP so ready available reduces the Values and standards of what makes EVE a sandbox and Pay 2 Win
Jared Khanar
#3589 - 2015-10-19 11:16:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Jared Khanar
Moac Tor wrote:

Of course some people will definitely quit over this. The only question would is how many.
You seem to be ignorant or in denial of the opinion in this thread, CCP don't have that same luxury though.


Infact CCP has the luxury to do so - still waiting on your response CCP Terminus ^^

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6110431#post6110431
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6110534#post6110534

3 accs running out and only returning if this mess gets stopped - maybe others unsubbing, like to share here, too
Ofcourse it´s not a bad thing and i have no hatred in this. if ccp likes to follow this road further (as they did in the past) - the one´s liking this will stay and pay - the one´s don´t will leave. Others waiting for features like this may come and leave again. (someone who has observed the behaviour of f2p communities may know what i mean, although the effects might not be that strong in eve, as its features, supporting this, are a bit more hidden under the ground than elsewhere) It´s simply a shift in the community (or a something one can call a recreation - which fits well as eve gets recreated and reconfigured, too). Nothing to be sad about.

From CCPs point of few i would guess it´s simply the question which decission could potentially lead to more income (in a specific timeframe) than the other. And this has only on answer, so i doubt this would get stopped.

As we got told: eve´s income is not here to create the best possible eve game, it´s dedicated to diversify in different products and securing the (hopefully rising) income and future of a company. And thats ok.

Just put your thoughts about what you want to play and what eve may be beside, just see what this is, for what this is, and simply decide if you want to be part of it with your time, dedication and your money

Economic Services

trading spacepixels

Dave Stark
#3590 - 2015-10-19 11:16:43 UTC
Tiberius Heth wrote:
So you persist in not answering a very basic, and quite important, question. Which is all a bit weird given all the effort and spamming you do in this thread.



i've answered it every time you've asked it. you just seem to be illiterate.
Don ZOLA
Omniscient Order
#3591 - 2015-10-19 11:18:38 UTC
Luscius Uta wrote:
Don ZOLA wrote:
Luscius Uta wrote:
Don ZOLA wrote:
Luscius Uta wrote:
tl;dr of this dev blog:

You'll be able to trade ISK for SP.

So nothing that you couldn't do on Character Bazaar before. Yet it somehow offends many of the bittervets, even people who I held in high regard, like Ripard Teg. Probably because conversion rates are basically useless for bittervets (I personally belong in >80M SP category as well but I shed no tears).

First thing, bittervets shouldn't be so greedy about their SP and could instead use this new feature to make new alts and quickly train them up.

Second thing,skill trading isn't going to turn EVE into a Pay2Win game...now, I wasn't around when PLEX was introduced, but I can bet on both my arms and legs that it caused a huge outrcy from people who did their best to convince everyone that PLEX is going to turn EVE into (another) Pay2Win, instant gratification game.

If there's one thing that I think it's bad for the future of EVE, that would be ever-rising PLEX prices. Why? Because they are driving new players away. When I started playing in 2011, PLEX was around 400 millions and grinding for enough ISK to PLEX your account was acceptable deal to much greater percentage of newer players than it is today. Of course, nobody ever had to grind for ISK, but "pay to play" MMOs are outdated and that concept isn't going to attract many new players.

So move along, nothing to see here.


Incorrect. You were able to buy characters with higher sp. You were not able to buy sp for a char. kktnxbye.



And why is the former acceptable, but the latter is not? Why would anyone in their right mind buy a new alt just to save few days or weeks from skill training?
The fact that skill trading benefits low SP characters much more than vets is the main reason I don't have any problems with it. Anything that benefits newer players is good for EVE, especially with current PLEX prices.


I wrote 4 WOT`s on the subject. Read everything and inform yourself before jumping in discussion if you want to be seen as proper interlocutor, worth time needed for posting explanations.


Would rather not browse through 170 pages just because there might be an answer to my question in a post of yours somewhere, kthxbye.


Then do not be surprised if no one cares to provide you one. kktnxbye.

There are 2 rules in a successful life: 1. Don't tell people everything you know

Dave Stark
#3592 - 2015-10-19 11:20:01 UTC
Syn'Drakkahr wrote:
Dave Stark,

Hyperthetical,

Mark: has been playing EVE for 10 years, he has 200MSP, contributed alot to EVE community, CCP and developed a presence in the EVE universe.

Dave: Has seen an advert, likes the look of EVE, decided to play EVE and realises he's starting way off from the pack. Dave desides f*ck it, I'll purchase 200M SP and gain the significat bonuses that come with it.

EvE is a sandbox, players run the lore of the universe and create history. EvE is unique, EvE has values, standards, it takes time to develop your self and promote yourself in this already small community / universe.

1.) Mark has seen EVE grow, gained a substanial wealth. Taking his past history, contribution, away from him because SP is now Pay 2 Win for Dave.

2.) Dave does not give a sh*t, he can fly his pimped out Vargur after 1 day and does not care about Marks history or the lore of EVE, he just wants to fly and kill.

Yes, Dave could achieve this on the Character Bazaar but he also has to live with the fact that the new character he is purchasing has time value and history. All part of what make EVE the greatest sandbox created.

Making SP so ready available reduces the Values and standards of what makes EVE a sandbox and Pay 2 Win


a value and history nobody gives a **** about, because the character has changed hands.

nobody cares that xxawox420mcblueshooterxx is a known corp theif - because that character is no longer played by a corp thief.

if chribba were to sell his character tomorrow, whatever character he were to use afterwards would still be refered to as "chribba" since we're talking about a PERSON not a character. pretending reputation is tied to the character not the person is laughable.
Tiberius Heth
Doomheim
#3593 - 2015-10-19 11:20:25 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
Tiberius Heth wrote:
So you persist in not answering a very basic, and quite important, question. Which is all a bit weird given all the effort and spamming you do in this thread.



i've answered it every time you've asked it. you just seem to be illiterate.


No, you haven't.


If it's "the same" as you put it (which it is not, obviously) then you wouldn't care whether or not it would be implemented and while you might have an opinion for or against it wouldn't incite your hilarious **** spamming spin doctoring. The very FACT that you sperg all over this thread proves there's a vested interest somewhere which goes beyond "it's the same so meh who cares".

So again: why do you clown all over this thread, what is your personal motivation? Given how outspoken you are on the subject I'm sure you can explain it to us. Heck you might even convince us!
Dave Stark
#3594 - 2015-10-19 11:21:21 UTC
Tiberius Heth wrote:
you wouldn't care whether or not it would be implemented


correct. i have stated this several times.
Don ZOLA
Omniscient Order
#3595 - 2015-10-19 11:22:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Don ZOLA
Tiberius Heth wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
Tiberius Heth wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
Tiberius Heth wrote:

No, you haven't. We can be sure that you're not in this "for the good of the game" so again, why do YOU want this in the game?


it already is - the character bazaar. why are you all so assblasted that ccp are making something we already have less convoluted?


So you're, per usual, avoiding the question. DO explain to us why you put in all this effort and time into this thread, surely there must be a personal reason for it.


i didn't avoid anything.

i just told you it's already in the game. ccp aren't adding anything we don't already have.

my answer not fitting your narrative isn't me avoiding questions.


So you persist in not answering a very basic, and quite important, question. Which is all a bit weird given all the effort and spamming you do in this thread.


He is trolling, in nice manner. Basically it seems he cannot be banned as mods can advocate that to his not understanding of question, or stupidity or whatever but majority of his posts in this topic is just making noise, "challenging" people who are against this, stating that he provided counter arguments without a single one actually being provided, pulling things out of context, twisting out,repeating already easily flawed statements like they are correct etc.

There are 2 rules in a successful life: 1. Don't tell people everything you know

Tiberius Heth
Doomheim
#3596 - 2015-10-19 11:23:58 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
Tiberius Heth wrote:
you wouldn't care whether or not it would be implemented


correct. i have stated this several times.


Righ right, so you don't care. Then why are you sperging in this thread, F5ing it like you have Tourette's?
Dave Stark
#3597 - 2015-10-19 11:25:29 UTC
Tiberius Heth wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
Tiberius Heth wrote:
you wouldn't care whether or not it would be implemented


correct. i have stated this several times.


Righ right, so you don't care. Then why are you sperging in this thread, F5ing it like you have Tourette's?


also said that before, but for your benefit since you seem to be unable to read; cos i wanted to see what all the negativity was about since it only seems to exist here in eve-o.

y'all seem very upset CCP are trying to make things we already have less hassle. usually when they do this we applaud and cheer but apparently this time because it's rise/terminus/whatever team they're on rather than karkur/punkturis/whatever teams they're on you're all throwing your rattle out of the pram.
Sgt Ocker
What Corp is it
#3598 - 2015-10-19 11:28:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Sgt Ocker
CCP Terminus wrote:
Aerasia wrote:
Mag's wrote:
This reply just makes it look like a done deal.
How many features have even made it to the Dev blog stage without being implemented?

Someone with a truly silver tongue may be able to get CCP to tweak some settings, but this was a 'done deal' by the time it hit the CSM Summit.

What I'm looking forward to? The threadnaught spawned from the first Epic Arc that rewards completion with a skill packet. Twisted

Which is why we're taking extra care with this feature. In this case the dev blog came out before any implementation.

I do like how I can sell off my no longer used mining skills for X amount, then be able to spend 100 times that amount to replace those skills with something more useful - Oh no wait, I can just train the way we do now and wait a month to get that battleship skill to 5 - While someone who has a quarter of my skills, spent no RL time training his character, etc, can do the same for 100 times less isk - instantly.

Yes maintaining the value of keeping highly skilled characters is built right into this.


1 Main + 2 alts @ 50 mil SP each, specialized into different classes, all trained up in a few days. Then just keep training 1 - well you have to pay a subscription fee anyway, may as well keep training.

My opinions are mine.

  If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - - Just don't bother Hating - I don't care

It really is getting harder and harder to justify $23 a month for each sub.

Don ZOLA
Omniscient Order
#3599 - 2015-10-19 11:29:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Don ZOLA
Dave Stark wrote:
Tiberius Heth wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
Tiberius Heth wrote:
you wouldn't care whether or not it would be implemented


correct. i have stated this several times.


Righ right, so you don't care. Then why are you sperging in this thread, F5ing it like you have Tourette's?


also said that before, but for your benefit since you seem to be unable to read; cos i wanted to see what all the negativity was about since it only seems to exist here in eve-o.

y'all seem very upset CCP are trying to make things we already have less hassle. usually when they do this we applaud and cheer but apparently this time because it's rise/terminus/whatever team they're on rather than karkur/punkturis/whatever teams they're on you're all throwing your rattle out of the pram.


Yea, we all believe you. Please say that out loud. Then realize how it smells on bs after having you 3+ days here, posting like mad without much contribution. Out of simple curiosity (as you just wanted to see what`s all the fuss) you are wasting hours and hours of your time, yea right :D Well you have seen whats the fuss about, why are you still trolling? :D

You are caring a lot and you are pushing a lot in support of this.

Why? I do not know since you did not come up with real arguments to back it up why it would be good for the game, so it has to be some personal interest. Either alt of someone who came with this [sarcasm]brilliant[/sarcasm] idea or someone who has already thought a way to abuse it.

There are 2 rules in a successful life: 1. Don't tell people everything you know

Tiberius Heth
Doomheim
#3600 - 2015-10-19 11:30:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Tiberius Heth
Dave Stark wrote:
Tiberius Heth wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
Tiberius Heth wrote:
you wouldn't care whether or not it would be implemented


correct. i have stated this several times.


Righ right, so you don't care. Then why are you sperging in this thread, F5ing it like you have Tourette's?


also said that before, but for your benefit since you seem to be unable to read; cos i wanted to see what all the negativity was about since it only seems to exist here in eve-o.

y'all seem very upset CCP are trying to make things we already have less hassle. usually when they do this we applaud and cheer but apparently this time because it's rise/terminus/whatever team they're on rather than karkur/punkturis/whatever teams they're on you're all throwing your rattle out of the pram.


Yeah right, so you're posting like an idiot, feverishly clinging to a single view point trying to beat others into submission by spam posting.... JUST to see what the problem is.

So what you're saying is "I'm a troll and everything I post isn't actually true, I just construct it just to get a reaction. Please ignore everything I said on the subject". It's either that or it's "I have a personal interest in these changes but if I'd state as such then I'd lose credibility".

Which of the two is it?