These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!!

First post
Author
Solecist Project
#2741 - 2015-12-09 17:17:19 UTC
Funny how I am completely opposite ...

I love losing. There's no improving myself in winning.
I don't have the need to boost my ego with constantly winning.

Funnily enough it's carebears too who you are talking about,
because PvE is nothing more than constantly winning in eayymode.

Have you people, who bash on PvPers like this, ever actually considered that?

Bet you didn't ...

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Indahmawar Fazmarai
#2742 - 2015-12-09 17:29:39 UTC
Solecist Project wrote:
Funny how I am completely opposite ...

I love losing. There's no improving myself in winning.
I don't have the need to boost my ego with constantly winning.

Funnily enough it's carebears too who you are talking about,
because PvE is nothing more than constantly winning in eayymode.

Have you people, who bash on PvPers like this, ever actually considered that?

Bet you didn't ...


Have you considered that not everybody plays to "win"?
Solecist Project
#2743 - 2015-12-09 17:34:37 UTC
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
Solecist Project wrote:
Funny how I am completely opposite ...

I love losing. There's no improving myself in winning.
I don't have the need to boost my ego with constantly winning.

Funnily enough it's carebears too who you are talking about,
because PvE is nothing more than constantly winning in eayymode.

Have you people, who bash on PvPers like this, ever actually considered that?

Bet you didn't ...


Have you considered that not everybody plays to "win"?

Irrelevant to the point.

Bashing on people who want to win easymode should not be restricted to PvPers,
yet all your kind are ever complaining about is exactly that.

Pick on your own people too. They are absolutely not different,
yet you behave as if it was only PvPers who have self esteem issues.

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Indahmawar Fazmarai
#2744 - 2015-12-09 17:41:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Indahmawar Fazmarai
Solecist Project wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
Solecist Project wrote:
Funny how I am completely opposite ...

I love losing. There's no improving myself in winning.
I don't have the need to boost my ego with constantly winning.

Funnily enough it's carebears too who you are talking about,
because PvE is nothing more than constantly winning in eayymode.

Have you people, who bash on PvPers like this, ever actually considered that?

Bet you didn't ...


Have you considered that not everybody plays to "win"?

Irrelevant to the point.

Bashing on people who want to win easymode should not be restricted to PvPers,
yet all your kind are ever complaining about is exactly that.

Pick on your own people too. They are absolutely not different,
yet you behave as if it was only PvPers who have self esteem issues.


LOL, irrelevant? Come on! All your judgement is based on "win" and you think that the fact that people does not play to win is irrelevant?

Since they don't play to win, then they are not interested on whether they bash or not NPCs in easymode or whatever. That is YOUR narrow minded view of the matter as someone who thinks that winning in a videogame is relevant to the identity of other people...
Rzed Wombat
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#2745 - 2015-12-09 18:26:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Rzed Wombat
LOL I would never say something like how someone plays a game is a reflection of their personal insecurities.
I have a very good friend, that loves nothing better than to kill unprepared players, he lights up with delight at a gank or a killmail, really really likes it!
In real life, nicest person you could ever meet. He is just playing the game the way he likes it. I don't have a thing against PVPers or Pirates or scammers or any of that. They are simply playing the game by the rules that are made. And Eve would in fact be a very boring place without them.

Carebears...yeah they play the game they like as well. Nothing wrong with that either. I recall a carebear friend of mine being extremely happy about blowing up a ship that was flipping his cans (yeah been a while). So really no better, I don't subscribe to the PVP vs Carebear things at all. I would just like to see more people enjoy more of the game and more ships getting blow up :)

Side carebears have their own type of griefing of other players (ninja salvage the .01 market game just to name a couple).
PVPers are not the source of all evil. In fact, I would like to see a lot MORE pvp.

I do think that under the current system that there are very large parts of the game that are out of the reach of new players, and that the risk for new folks is a great deterrent to PVP. Don't fly what you cant lose...well if you cant afford to lose anything...yada

Imagine a bunch of miners descending on a low sec astreoid field... You come in with your ship and kill them all.
They appear back in their home stations in their ship, but all the ore they mined is dumped in the belt. They will be back and you will get to do it again..they will probably even bring "protection" so you get to kill them AND their "uber" buddy. This as opposed to that lone dude that is crazy enough to go to low sec and mine..and never come back when he gets blown up... LESS RISK = More PVP. Simple as that... Not gonna happen of course..but damn it would be FUN!

Flags = if you have the flag on you can not initiate combat with an unflagged ship. An unflagged ship however can initate combat with you
No flag - ship destroyed just like today
Flag - you and your ship appear in the home station - your cargo, or ore.
Flag vs Flag - either player can initiate combat YES YOU COULD STILL GATECAMP.. And I would say that all their cargo drops :) just cause you should get something.
Unflag vs Unflag - either player can initiate combat (same as today)

Its not voluntary PVP, just a LOT less risk involved.

Wars would rage!!! People would pimp their ships with every isk they had. You would see awesome fights and have LOTS of targets. Yeah I would like that.

I was just saying what I thought would get more people in the game, I will leave all the psychological judgments to others folks :)
Solecist Project
#2746 - 2015-12-09 18:41:03 UTC
Rzed Wombat wrote:
LOL I would never say something like how someone plays a game is a reflection of their personal insecurities.
I have a very good friend, that loves nothing better than to kill unprepared players, he lights up with delight at a gank or a killmail, really really likes it!
In real life, nicest person you could ever meet. He is just playing the game the way he likes it. I don't have a thing against PVPers or Pirates or scammers or any of that. They are simply playing the game by the rules that are made. And Eve would in fact be a very boring place without them.


One can not ever detach someone's behaviour from someone's self.
"He just likes it" is the equivalent of saying "I do not know what causes him to feel that way but I accept that it is like it is, because I don't know better". Alternatively it's like believing that people dress completely randomly and that there is absolutely no connection between their taste and their personality. That's simply not how things work.

It's not about the killing or losing, it's about the feelings the person gets from their actions.

When I pop Indah's autopiloting pod and she contacts me about how I am a loser for shooting at defenseless people and rages at me for whatever reason, then that is CLEARLY a sign of self esteem issues. There is no denying that, no matter how much you want to spin it. And it is easily noticable if someone is genuinly butthurt or simply playing and pretending to be.

I have had my fair share of people who went totally batshit insane at me just for mentioning that I am/was a suicide ganker. They stopped caring/liking me immediately and some sick hate-patterns emerged, exposing who the person really is.

I never got any feelings from people who I kill. I did it for a purpose, which had nothing to do with me.
It was all about killing them simply because they deserve it. When you deliberately expose yourself to danger,
then you absolutely deserve that danger coming to you.

Yet I had to read people telling me I'm a loser, I pray only on easy-targets, I'm not a real PvPer (lol), etc. etc.

What needs to be looked at is the feelings of the person doing things. A carebear going crazy about other people shooting someone who does not defend himself absolutely HAS personal issues, just like a suicide ganker has personal issues for deliberately trying to make others feel bad, including additionally rubbing salt into the injury.

Anyone who claims that people *just* behave somehow for no reason completely ignores that people absolutely never have and never will behave in a random fashion. Being unaware of these reasons "just for fun/I like it" does not mean they do not exist.


TL;DR: Just because a person seems nice to you, does not mean the person really is nice deep down. You do not know until you tickle it and force them to unintentionally remove their social mask.

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Rzed Wombat
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#2747 - 2015-12-09 18:49:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Rzed Wombat
Yeah I have hear people put forward the masks theory many times.
We act in games like we would act in real life if there were no consequences etc...
The same could be said of people that like to play chess...eve just takes longer :)

I think people overthink it, I have no issue whatsoever with you being a ganker..I put forth absolutely no judgment towards you, your playing a game by the rules of that game, that's all.
Yeah I do think that there are some folks that lose their **** when they lose a ship.. I think they should find another game. Same kind of assholes that turn over the table when they lose at checkers...Eve doesn't cause this...anger management causes this.

Like I said, if CCP made the changes I would like to see... I don't know if the game would really be eve anymore..but to me, it would be more fun.
Solecist Project
#2748 - 2015-12-09 19:00:09 UTC
Rzed Wombat wrote:
Yeah I have hear people put forward the masks theory many times.
We act in games like we would act in real life if there were no consequences etc...
The same could be said of people that like to play chess...eve just takes longer :)

I think people overthink it, I have no issue whatsoever with you being a ganker..I put forth absolutely no judgment towards you, your playing a game by the rules of that game, that's all.
Yeah I do think that there are some folks that lose their **** when they lose a ship.. I think they should find another game. Same kind of assholes that turn over the table when they lose at checkers...Eve doesn't cause this...anger management causes this.

Like I said, if CCP made the changes I would like to see... I don't know if the game would really be eve anymore..but to me, it would be more fun.

I wished I have recorded/screenshottet all the conversations I had with people....

Anyhow ... good attitude. Changing this game for some weird minded people who are delusionally disconnected from reality indeed would not do it any good. And you're definitely not weird minded, because you realize that indeed it would harm the game more than it would do any good. :)

Anyhow, it's really easy to spot them.
Just do or say something that goes against their own belief/actions and see how they react.

People even paid me good ISK to expose bad apples in their corp ...
... because I'm super efficient at doing so. :D


Anyhow ... thank you for not being a crazy person, like some others here.

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#2749 - 2015-12-09 19:11:41 UTC  |  Edited by: La Rynx
Rzed Wombat wrote:

PVPers are not the source of all evil.


No, but they do not own EvE either, nor are they the EvE Masterrace. Nor is EvE a PvP game, it is a sandbox.
But the constant whining that PvElers do not have enough risk for for their earnings.
Drop the rewards , so have to fight too.
Thats not how it works.
Thats not how people work.
People will fight when they are ready for it. When they feel like it! PvPlers too fight only, when they feel like it.
You can not force them.
You can **** them off, but still you can not force them.
I just would like, if you can not **** them off.
Because if they get pissed of to much, they might leave.
Every Player leaving EvE hurts.

So instead babling crap how to force people who do not want to PvP, you have to get more ppl into the game who PvP.
But they do not come, not enough.

Thats the hypocrisy that pisses me off. PvPlers seem not to have enough opponents. Instead of asking how to get more PvPlers into the game, they **** of those people with other playstyles. People who are a major part of EvE. People who pay the subscription.

And even that is all wrong:
Of course i am not talking about all PvPlers.
Its just a certain group, a group that hides behind the arguments that EvE is harsh and EvE newbros should not feel save.
If those guys had "IT" they'd go for strong opponents to win.
But some feel like they can talk big, when all they can do is babyseal clubbing.

Again: what would get more Players?
I say easy early access with fast and steep learning curve, that give some emotional rewards.

Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#2750 - 2015-12-09 19:18:35 UTC  |  Edited by: La Rynx
Solecist Project wrote:

When I pop Indah's autopiloting pod and she contacts me about how I am a loser for shooting at defenseless people and rages at me for whatever reason, then that is CLEARLY a sign of self esteem issues. There is no denying that, no matter how much you want to spin it. And it is easily noticable if someone is genuinly butthurt or simply playing and pretending to be.


Popping those things are not the problem.
But being surprised when victims get angry? Getting angry is natural and not a self esteam issue.
All PvPlers must now this.
So if someone goes nuclear, just ignore it. You caused it.
Does not matter if the victim was just stupid.

Pay respect to others.

But those "babysealclubbers-mainly", they do have this self-esteam issue. They need to be forced into PvP that means PvP not just shoot demilitarised others.

siiiiigh...
which is not that easy either, since much of the fun is, disturbing the production of the enemy early.

Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."

Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#2751 - 2015-12-09 19:24:04 UTC
I am 99.99% sure that there is no correlation between people being mad (ergo sending mad messages) and self esteem issues.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#2752 - 2015-12-09 19:27:18 UTC
Captain Tardbar wrote:
I am 99.99% sure that there is no correlation between people being mad (ergo sending mad messages) and self esteem issues.


i concur!

Again, what might get more players?

Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."

Solecist Project
#2753 - 2015-12-09 19:31:56 UTC
La Rynx wrote:
Solecist Project wrote:

When I pop Indah's autopiloting pod and she contacts me about how I am a loser for shooting at defenseless people and rages at me for whatever reason, then that is CLEARLY a sign of self esteem issues. There is no denying that, no matter how much you want to spin it. And it is easily noticable if someone is genuinly butthurt or simply playing and pretending to be.


Popping those things are not the problem.
But being surprised when victims get angry? Getting angry is natural and not a self esteam issue.
All PvPlers must now this.
So if someone goes nuclear, just ignore it. You caused it.
Does not matter if the victim was just stupid.

Pay respect to others.

But those "babysealclubbers-mainly", they do have this self-esteam issue. They need to be forced into PvP that means PvP not just shoot demilitarised others.

siiiiigh...
which is not that easy either, since much of the fun is, disturbing the production of the enemy early.

I'm not surprised when people get angry.
I get angry when I lose a ship/pod as well, but I only get angry at myself.
Then I'm angry at myself for making the mistake.
But the common carebear victim isn't angry at himself for doing stupid, he's angry at the one who exposes the stupid.

When I pop your autopiloting pod and you get angry, then it was not me causing that.
It was you causing it. You made the mistake and you don't accept that you made it.

How that makes sense? Easy: You should have seen it coming.
Ignorance does not protect from punishment and does not magically change causality.

You do stupid - You get got for doing stupid - Your fault.

That's why in 99.9% of all engagements I always ALWAYS blame myself and spend time finding the mistake.

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Solecist Project
#2754 - 2015-12-09 19:45:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Solecist Project
La Rynx wrote:
Captain Tardbar wrote:
I am 99.99% sure that there is no correlation between people being mad (ergo sending mad messages) and self esteem issues.


i concur!

Again, what might get more players?
That question as stated is invalid,
because ignoring quality for quantity is a surefire way into killing the game.


We can argue about this.

I am Sol and I'm an elitist jerk. I'm an elitist jerk in real life as well, but that's not important.
I'm a successfull elitist jerk and above average within the realms of EVE ONLINE.

I loved this game for being a game for elitist jerks.
99% of the people who played during or before my prime absolutely were elitist jerks one way or another,
simply because the game demanded that you are, because it was really hard and unforgiving.

Average, or below average, people simply were not cut to make it in this game. The only average people
who made it did ascend into being elitist jerks and they absolutely deserved to be proud of that,
because it exposed them as actually smart, thinking individuals.


NOW the game is being changed for people who *need* it easier than those who did NOT need it easier.

Think about that for a minute. Please!

Ten years ago the game was batshit hard to start, but people made it. People wanted to. People loved the challenge.
Of course that means there's not that many people playing it, but it worked and people joined for years to come.

For years! Subscription numbers only ever went up. Up up up up up.

All these people back then did NOT need it easier!


So ... What does that tell you about the people who do ?


Please think about it and be honest when answering the question.

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#2755 - 2015-12-09 19:53:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Gregor Parud
You're assuming a few things:

a) people can use reasoned logic
b) people won't lie when it suits them
c) dumb people not being smart enough to realise that they're dumb and should probably stay out of a discussion they don't understand, so they keep yapping


The answer is, of course, C
Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#2756 - 2015-12-09 19:55:49 UTC
La Rynx wrote:
Captain Tardbar wrote:
I am 99.99% sure that there is no correlation between people being mad (ergo sending mad messages) and self esteem issues.


i concur!

Again, what might get more players?


I believe it is a cost problem, not a content one.

Subscription models are becoming less and less feasible.

Lowering subscription fees would help, but only so much.

What they could do is keep the sub model but do not make it mandatory.

First make it so the freebies can only play one client at a time per IP address.

Next, give subers training on more that one account.

Next make science and manufacturing available to only subs as well as PI and POS.

Keep plex in game for these benefits, but not required.

That way there be more targets, but you won't be able to mess up the economy since freebies won't be able to manufacture anything.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#2757 - 2015-12-09 20:05:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Gregor Parud
Captain Tardbar wrote:
La Rynx wrote:
Captain Tardbar wrote:
I am 99.99% sure that there is no correlation between people being mad (ergo sending mad messages) and self esteem issues.


i concur!

Again, what might get more players?


I believe it is a cost problem, not a content one.

Subscription models are becoming less and less feasible.

Lowering subscription fees would help, but only so much.

What they could do is keep the sub model but do not make it mandatory.

First make it so the freebies can only play one client at a time per IP address.

Next, give subers training on more that one account.

Next make science and manufacturing available to only subs as well as PI and POS.

Keep plex in game for these benefits, but not required.

That way there be more targets, but you won't be able to mess up the economy since freebies won't be able to manufacture anything.



Are you sure this is a "best thing CCP could do for EVE", or is it a "things I want for Christmas I don't understand the repercussions of"?

I award you a C.
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#2758 - 2015-12-09 20:11:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Mallak Azaria
Gregor Parud wrote:
Captain Tardbar wrote:
La Rynx wrote:
Captain Tardbar wrote:
I am 99.99% sure that there is no correlation between people being mad (ergo sending mad messages) and self esteem issues.


i concur!

Again, what might get more players?


I believe it is a cost problem, not a content one.

Subscription models are becoming less and less feasible.

Lowering subscription fees would help, but only so much.

What they could do is keep the sub model but do not make it mandatory.

First make it so the freebies can only play one client at a time per IP address.

Next, give subers training on more that one account.

Next make science and manufacturing available to only subs as well as PI and POS.

Keep plex in game for these benefits, but not required.

That way there be more targets, but you won't be able to mess up the economy since freebies won't be able to manufacture anything.



Are you sure this is a "best thing CCP could do for EVE", or is it a "things I want for Christmas I don't understand the repercussions of"?

I award you a C.


His overall point is pretty good, but I'd stop short of giving subscribers game-breaking benefits just for subscribing or making the game incredibly terrible for anyone that doesn't. Aside from that I don't see EVE being a viable fit for a free to play/MT transition. Servers cost money to run & I don't see the real money for crappy ship skin/crappy avatar item being a big money maker in a game full of people that have no end of pixel cash.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#2759 - 2015-12-09 20:17:58 UTC
No they're not, they're terrible. Anyone who says they're good is either trolling or dumb. Choose wisely.
Yonis Kador
KADORCORP
#2760 - 2015-12-09 20:24:22 UTC
Before this topic devolves into a state that gets locked, just figured I'd throw in my 2 cents. Played EVE for 6 years.... been gone 18 months... am back about 2 hours. I left partly because with 4 accounts, I sort of overwhelmed myself with tedium. Nothing special. The game became this huge chore and it just wasn't fun anymore. A lot of that came from trying to PLEX accounts in high sec and the ever-increasing grind that required. I had less free time in RL and game chores were eating up all of it pretty much. Something had to give. But also with the new release schedule, it felt like the game was constantly changing. I had a hard time keeping up with all that ... much less providing feedback. Plus EVE is the first and only MMO I had ever played. So I had a genuine curiosity about what other games were out there.

I took a break from gaming for a couple months. But eventually I found myself mindlessly clicking Diablo 3 and decided I'd see what all the WoW fuss was about. That sure didn't last. Nevermind the fact that the game is oversimplified and cartoonish, everyone I met took themselves way too seriously. (You're playing a gnome. Take a step back.) I leveled up a few characters (I seemed to like creating characters more than actually playing them) but after a couple months, it bored me to tears. So then I ran off to SW:TOR. And, it was... OK. It really felt like no matter what class I created, it was the same thing over and over. So, that didn't last either. I tried STO....a game that wishes it had EVE's graphics. And, most recently, I made my way to ESO just to see what that's about. So for about a month now I've been contemplating my next grand adventure.

I've been getting these "Come Back to EVE" e-mails every now and again.... but so infrequently that they got lost in the shuffle usually. You could probably spam these a little more considering they go out to former players. I rarely saw any EVE banner ads (AdBlock) but what I did see is a continuing stream of news articles. Forbes writes up about one a month and they show up in my Yahoo! news feed. The most recent one was just a couple weeks ago... some guy lost a titan I guess (I tried to find it.) A couple weeks before that there was one about the EVE monument which had me reflecting that my name is on that thing. And I can say with some certainty that the news reporting is what pulled me back in. No other game shows up in my news headlines or has the real-world implications that warrant it. Reading these sparked an emotional response; there was a real sense of nostalgia. I was part of that. I want to be part of that.

EVE may be a niche game but it is great when it knows this and isn't trying to become something it isn't. New Eden should never be safe. Calls to have any part of EVE pvp-free should continue to be ignored. What I would recommend is to avoid "dumbing down" things as much as possible. What I found when I went off mmo testing was a notable lack of complexity. Maybe because EVE was the first mmo I played, I'm ruined for life - I dunno. But I expect complexity now. I suspect anyone else in the same situation - who seeks an intelligent game with consequences - will also arrive at a similar conclusion: that this game is unique. And, in reading these news articles, there's probably ideas to be had (and trolls to be avoided) in the comment sections. A common complaint was with regard to the new player experience. After finishing the tutorials, folks didn't know what to do. Another was about how folks reading these articles believe they can't "catch up" or be effective in-game without investing years and years. That's probably due to the fact that most press is generated when a null sec battle royale goes down and to the uninitated, it can look rather daunting.

So better outreach, complexity, EVE is pvp, and engaging commenters in the press. That's all I came up with.

Glad to be back.

Yonis Kador