These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE New Citizens Q&A

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Full API for corp recruitment

Author
Erica Dusette
Division 13
#21 - 2015-06-23 08:25:52 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
you sound really difficult, maybe explains why you're in an npc corp Roll

Oh you have no idea how difficult.

I don't apply to corps, I'm invited to them.

Lan Wang wrote:
whenever i join a corp first thing i ask is what ships you fly, no better feeling than showing up to a fleet in the best ship they have in the doctrines and the fc knowing you because you turn up in what he needs in a fleet, i always prioritise doctrine ships when joining a corp, may just be me but i dont see an issue with catering a skillplan to what the rest of your team fly or what your fc needs in a fleet

Agreed, but there's a big difference between demanding doctrine and skillplans, and merely recommending preferences.

Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate Full-Time Supermodel

worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕвσss

Savi'eska
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#22 - 2015-06-23 08:35:36 UTC
You tell 'em Aunt Erica.

I even had to put a note in my bio telling people to stop ******* inviting me to corps, urrrgg.

I have my own plan, thank you very much.

Erica Dusette
Division 13
#23 - 2015-06-23 08:36:43 UTC
Please don't call me that ...


Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate Full-Time Supermodel

worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕвσss

Lan Wang
African Atomic.
OnlyFleets.
#24 - 2015-06-23 08:39:16 UTC
as said if you dont like what the corp flies then dont join, but when checking api's people will usually want to look at skills to see if you fit into what they need, if a corp didnt look at my skills then id be a bit concerned about joining.

Erica Dusette - then you can clearly fly most relevant ships and have a record to prove you can work as a team and understand how fleets work ;)

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Erica Dusette
Division 13
#25 - 2015-06-23 08:55:59 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
as said if you dont like what the corp flies then dont join, but when checking api's people will usually want to look at skills to see if you fit into what they need, if a corp didnt look at my skills then id be a bit concerned about joining.

My requirements are simple - you won't get a full API and while I will work toward, or fly, required ship doctrines at the end of the day I'll fly what I want and still contribute as best as I can. I'm there to have fun with people, and I don't have fun flying an Orca even if it's what you need most right now. Most reasonable corps have no issue with that, or a polite request to leave out parts of an API (such as mails).

But some corps don't care about you, or how much fun you have with them, or even respect the privacy of your mails, they just want an extra ship on grid so they can win the next fight and don't give a damn about the pilots in the group beyond ensuring they're not here to rob them. Who wants to be a part of a group like that?

Some people do, I guess.

Lan Wang wrote:
Erica Dusette - then you can clearly fly most relevant ships and have a record to prove you can work as a team and understand how fleets work ;)

In my case when people invite me to a corp it's got very little to do with flying ships as it does people just wanting me around so they can enjoy the other things I bring.

Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate Full-Time Supermodel

worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕвσss

Lan Wang
African Atomic.
OnlyFleets.
#26 - 2015-06-23 09:32:56 UTC
and if you dont want to give a full api then thats when you stop your application right? but if you really wanted to be in the corp then you would probably jump through the hoops they ask, and even some "leet" corps ask some crazy things in order to be accepted.

but as a noob and joining you're first corp you gonna have to bite the bullet and show them your skills, they are probably only trying to help you out, especially if you have never been involved with anything pvp. Or whatever youre into (incursions even have specific doctrines). once you can fly the basic doctrines (most doctrines contain the standard t3's, hacs etc anyway) you can basically train whatever you want.

yes ive been part of the groups like that who only care about having 300 machariels on grid, its not really for me tbh but others like it, and i dont mind switching my capital skillplan to cater for the new doctrine as its a new ship instead of constant ishtar fleets.

But again if you dont want to give full api then you should look for another corp but skills are usually a standard requirement for any app

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Cara Forelli
State War Academy
Caldari State
#27 - 2015-06-23 21:04:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Cara Forelli
Syrilian wrote:
I can see people dictating skill plans and things like that and basically playing the game for me.

This has nothing do with APIs. It's a separate issue entirely. Yeah, APIs CAN help FCs keep track of who can fly what in an organized corp with doctrines. But withholding your API isn't going to prevent them from finding out you can't fly xyz when they ask you to ship into it and you can't. They can still tell you what to train without ever seeing your API.

Or you can join a group that doesn't dictate training at all. Or one with suggested but flexible doctrines. Most of which will also require an API check. It's really up to you.

FWIW most groups with doctrines are understanding of newer players and allow lower-skilled substitutes for a while. Most people won't complain if you are working on core skills, because that's going to improve your doctrine ship anyway. The problem usually comes when you are training something like Mauraders because you feel like it when you still can't fly a HAC for your doctrine. This just shows your corp you don't really care about participating in their fleets or helping them reach peak effectiveness.

As far as trust being a two way street....

It's not. Not in EVE. The corp is taking a MUCH bigger risk letting in a new member than the member is taking by joining. The worst that can happen to you is your corp mates kill whatever ship you are in and pod you (unless you are very foolish and give them access to your assets without proper collateral). Whereas as soon as you join corp you have access to all kinds of intel that could harm the corporation. Fleet locations, active member counts, active leadership, bookmarks...all kinds of things an enemy fleet would love to have.

WH corps in particular are taking a huge risk even letting you in their POS where their ships are stored. The biggest WH corps usually solve this by having member "tiers" where new members are put on probation and only trusted with each other's POS/assets for a time. It's rarely perfect though, and theft in WH space is much too easy.

So remember, when recruiters are rooting through your API trying to prove that you are a spai, it's not personal, and 9 times out of 10 they don't really care about whatever "private" things you have in your mails etc. They are just trying to establish that you are who you say you are. Any effort to hide things raises red flags, and usually those sort of people are just not worth the effort from a recruiters' standpoint.

Basically the only things I would be worried about in giving out an API

-Sensitive Intel - For example, as a director in my corp, there's plenty of information in my mails and contacts that could harm it even after I left if it was leaked to our enemies.
-Trade Secrets - Industrialists/Traders often need to keep certain things private to protect their financial interests
-Very Personal Info - Mails, etc. about yourself that you wouldn't want anyone to see. Most of the time the recruiter doesn't care about this and it's just your own feeling of privacy that is the concern

Want to talk? Join my channel in game: House Forelli

Titan's Lament

Syrilian
Doomheim
#28 - 2015-06-23 21:37:09 UTC
Cara Forelli wrote:

-Very Personal Info - Mails, etc. about yourself that you wouldn't want anyone to see. Most of the time the recruiter doesn't care about this and it's just your own feeling of privacy that is the concern


Yep you're right. I am well aware of everything you have said and I know the odds of someone doing something nefarious with my api info is very small. Still it makes me uncomfortable given the aformentioned skewed trust dynamic whether it is justified or not.

And given that it is a game meant to be fun and feeling uneasy about someone having information about me is the opposite of that, I don't have to do it. It doesn't have to make logical sense.
Azda Ja
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#29 - 2015-06-23 22:05:30 UTC
Yeah, giving access to mails feels weird. The only time I've ever had to give a full API was to join Green Skull. The only reason I gave access to mail was because I knew and trusted Cara, even though he doesn't handle recruitment, his association with the group made me feel more at ease. I wouldn't even consider giving access to my mail to a corp I've never interacted with in any way. So if I one day leave GSLLC and join a corp without knowing anyone, I will most certainly not let people look at my private conversations. Trust is a big thing in EVE, earning it is hard.

In short, I understand your frustration, when a corp asks for full api, ask if you can omit mail. If they refuse, move on and find another group.

Grrr.

Mephiztopheleze
Laphroaig Inc.
#30 - 2015-06-23 23:09:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Mephiztopheleze
Tarkom Draggunsson wrote:
well, generally speaking, it may be a problem... If you are able fly only half of the doctrines it means you aren't able to fly the other half.


As I said, I am able to fly something in every subcap corp/alliance doctrine for my main (and yes, this is not my main, it's my TMC scribbling/forum posting/Jita Trade alt).

Lan Wang wrote:
When you want to join a corp you are really wanting to play as a team, yeah fair enough if you can fly something in a doctrine but if you cant then you will soon get bored flying mauluses all the time or being told no we dont need that.


What's wrong with flying a Maulus?
I like flying a Maulus.
A Maulus or a Vigil should be pretty welcomed by any discerning FC looking to make use of his newbro contingent. I prefer flying a Kitsune for small gang work (huzzah for 12.8 points of heated jam strength!).

As for being told "we don't need that", yeah, I do sometimes get that.

FC: we need more logi, ship into logi.....
Me: I can bring an Exequror if you like?
FC: Can you fly a Guardian?
Me: If I could fly a Guardian, I'd have mentioned it, how about a Maulus?
FC: Fine....

And this is a large part of the reason I'm determined to climb Mt. Festering Pile Of Core Skillpoints BEFORE rushing to train into HACS or Recons or T2 Logi or T3 cruisers, etc.

I enjoy the EWAR role and I'm happy to fly EWAR ships. I mentioned this to my recruiter, they seemed happy with the idea of an EWAR nut in the corp, so when I turn up in an EWAR ship, it's not exactly a surprise to anyone.
I also don't mind jumping in either a Bantam or Navitas and playing frigate logi on Harpy & Talwar fleets.
Need a CovOps frigate? No wuckers, I can do that.
How about a Bomber with a Covert Cyno? No worries FC, switching ships now.
Need a +1 'ceptor scout FC? Sorted.

But I'm not going to completely change my skillqueue and training plan to rush train into an Ishtar because that's the FOTM ship. I'd rather contribute what I can, how I can and how I enjoy contributing while I get the basic core skills all sorted out.

And you know what? I've NEVER been told to bugger off from a fleet. I've NEVER been told I wasn't welcome to come along in whatever low skillpoint scrub-ship I could fly.

Now, none of this has anything to do with Corp Applications API checks, which are 99% about trying to weed out potential spies and infiltrators.

Occasional Resident Newbie Correspondent for TMC: http://themittani.com/search/site/mephiztopheleze

This is my Forum Main. My Combat Alt is sambo Inkura

Mephiztopheleze
Laphroaig Inc.
#31 - 2015-06-23 23:16:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Mephiztopheleze
oops, double post, my bad.

Occasional Resident Newbie Correspondent for TMC: http://themittani.com/search/site/mephiztopheleze

This is my Forum Main. My Combat Alt is sambo Inkura

ergherhdfgh
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#32 - 2015-06-24 02:37:34 UTC
Syrilian wrote:
I can see people dictating skill plans and things like that and basically playing the game for me.

I've never heard of this or anything even remotely close to it happening. So really strict null sec corps will have doctrine ships that if you want to fly in doctrine fleets that you have train to fly. But I have never ever heard of a corp saying train XY and Z skills or we will boot you. I'm sure it may have happened somewhere at some point and if you ask enough people you will find someone that heard of it happening once. However that is not something that typically happens in eve nor something that you need to concern yourself with ever coming across.

This is not WoW. In eve we don't have a best in slot or an "ideal raiding spec". We are much more laid back and fun loving in this game.

Want to talk? Join Cara's channel in game: House Forelli

Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#33 - 2015-06-24 04:19:47 UTC
When I'm looking to infiltrate a corp, steal everything I can and kill everything I can't steal, I usually use a character that refuses to give an API first.

If your corp doesn't ask for sensibly chosen partial APIs at least, they are doing half of my job for me.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

Savi'eska
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#34 - 2015-06-24 04:24:40 UTC
Azda Ja wrote:
Yeah, giving access to mails feels weird. The only time I've ever had to give a full API was to join Green Skull. The only reason I gave access to mail was because I knew and trusted Cara, even though he doesn't handle recruitment, his association with the group made me feel more at ease. I wouldn't even consider giving access to my mail to a corp I've never interacted with in any way. So if I one day leave GSLLC and join a corp without knowing anyone, I will most certainly not let people look at my private conversations. Trust is a big thing in EVE, earning it is hard.

In short, I understand your frustration, when a corp asks for full api, ask if you can omit mail. If they refuse, move on and find another group.

Likewise I only ever gave it once.

I was so keen to get into that corp that, like Lan Wang alluded to, I would do almost anything at the time.

So I did. And around 6 months later a Director admitted openly to me that he loved my personal mails and would often read them for pure entertainment...

Lesson learned. Full API? Never again.

Sykaotic
Doomheim
#35 - 2015-06-24 05:52:58 UTC
Depends on the corp and what security risks they are trying to protect.

Most do not need full api, most are just monkey see monkey do.

If the corp has a high risk of attracting spys and does not want that risk, perhaps it is useful then.

A full api does not mean someone wont turn into a spy.... Lol

Lastly, the corp you give it to, if they become your enemy... they can use what they learned against you.

Lan Wang
African Atomic.
OnlyFleets.
#36 - 2015-06-24 06:36:14 UTC
Mephiztopheleze wrote:
Tarkom Draggunsson wrote:
well, generally speaking, it may be a problem... If you are able fly only half of the doctrines it means you aren't able to fly the other half.


As I said, I am able to fly something in every subcap corp/alliance doctrine for my main (and yes, this is not my main, it's my TMC scribbling/forum posting/Jita Trade alt).

Lan Wang wrote:
When you want to join a corp you are really wanting to play as a team, yeah fair enough if you can fly something in a doctrine but if you cant then you will soon get bored flying mauluses all the time or being told no we dont need that.


What's wrong with flying a Maulus?
I like flying a Maulus.
A Maulus or a Vigil should be pretty welcomed by any discerning FC looking to make use of his newbro contingent. I prefer flying a Kitsune for small gang work (huzzah for 12.8 points of heated jam strength!).

As for being told "we don't need that", yeah, I do sometimes get that.

FC: we need more logi, ship into logi.....
Me: I can bring an Exequror if you like?
FC: Can you fly a Guardian?
Me: If I could fly a Guardian, I'd have mentioned it, how about a Maulus?
FC: Fine....

And this is a large part of the reason I'm determined to climb Mt. Festering Pile Of Core Skillpoints BEFORE rushing to train into HACS or Recons or T2 Logi or T3 cruisers, etc.

I enjoy the EWAR role and I'm happy to fly EWAR ships. I mentioned this to my recruiter, they seemed happy with the idea of an EWAR nut in the corp, so when I turn up in an EWAR ship, it's not exactly a surprise to anyone.
I also don't mind jumping in either a Bantam or Navitas and playing frigate logi on Harpy & Talwar fleets.
Need a CovOps frigate? No wuckers, I can do that.
How about a Bomber with a Covert Cyno? No worries FC, switching ships now.
Need a +1 'ceptor scout FC? Sorted.

But I'm not going to completely change my skillqueue and training plan to rush train into an Ishtar because that's the FOTM ship. I'd rather contribute what I can, how I can and how I enjoy contributing while I get the basic core skills all sorted out.

And you know what? I've NEVER been told to bugger off from a fleet. I've NEVER been told I wasn't welcome to come along in whatever low skillpoint scrub-ship I could fly.

Now, none of this has anything to do with Corp Applications API checks, which are 99% about trying to weed out potential spies and infiltrators.


You are missing the point, if you are not willing to train into doctrine ships then what is the point in joining the corp, any fc will prefer a t3 over a maulus and if you are flying a maulus on every fleet instead of even bothering to train into t3's like the fc has requested then whats the point, the skill checks on api has nothing to do with spies its to do with what you can actually fly and contribute to the corp, so yes it has everything to do corp applications otherwise nobody would ask for skills in api

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Lost Greybeard
Drunken Yordles
#37 - 2015-06-24 15:33:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Lost Greybeard
Syrilian wrote:
So will I have a hard time finding a corp if I don't want to give out my full API? Yes I realize it is read-only and "safe".


We've had this thread a few times now, search is your friend. But here's the short version:

Giving out your full API honestly won't hurt you, but if a corp is ASKING for your full API instead of a specific list of things they want to see, and they want it permanently instead of for a very brief recruiting period, then at minimum that corp's recruitment director is mind-numbingly incompetent.

At worst, it's a middling indicator that there's not one single person in the entire corporation with even the slightest idea of what the hell they're doing.

So... in summary, it's a red flag on the _corporation_, and you should probably stay away. If you refuse on what amounts to 'if you can't give me a specific reason you want specific info, I don't trust you with it' grounds, you're not the weird one, that's the default attitude of 99.99% of Eve players and 100% of every member of the human race that's ever had any common sense.
Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#38 - 2015-06-25 06:00:32 UTC
Sykaotic wrote:


A full api does not mean someone wont turn into a spy.... Lol



A prospective recruit can be loyal, opportunistic or disloyal. There's a few red flags an API check will pick up that will weed out most disloyal recruits and some opportunistic ones.

As for someone that starts loyal or opportunistic but then changes allegiance - you need other strategies to deal with that.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

vccv
#39 - 2015-06-25 08:37:22 UTC
Never a full. If you really must see my skills, Ill show them to prove Im able, but it would be obvious as I JF in my gear. Want to see my isk and spending habits, assets? Nope. Want to see my mails? Nope. If your corp isnt set up in such a way that you limit recruits and their abilities to screw the whole thing up, Im not intetested anyway.Dont trust me enough to join, show up with some ships and fleet up, Ill move elsewhere.
Haruchai Khan
Doomheim
#40 - 2015-06-25 09:25:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Haruchai Khan
vccv wrote:
Never a full. If you really must see my skills, Ill show them to prove Im able, but it would be obvious as I JF in my gear. Want to see my isk and spending habits, assets? Nope. Want to see my mails? Nope. If your corp isnt set up in such a way that you limit recruits and their abilities to screw the whole thing up, Im not intetested anyway.Dont trust me enough to join, show up with some ships and fleet up, Ill move elsewhere.



That seems perfectly reasonable as a choice, but I would imagine your choice of corps might be limited. Especially since I note that the character you are posting with has a bio that says 'spy alt'. I'd think such a revelation would be career limiting in addition to your reluctance to give an API, so if I was running a corp, I suspect you'd not be invited to join. Smile

But it is much more useful to know than your API, I'd guess.

The weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is the attribute of the strong.

Previous page123Next page