EVE General Discussion

It's highly relevant, you just want to discard it because it goes against your narrative. He's not the liar here, you are, desperately spinning around trying to avoid the elephant in the room, that highsec incursions are absolutely broken.

Many won't open fire. The gank attempts I saw were always missed by lack of alpha or dps and CONCORD killed their ABC. Not the fleet killing them off.

I'll repeat this proposal a few times... I think it has merrit;

- Make it so the Sansha NPC's (are they called that?) put a sort of bounty on incursion runners to attract gankers and make it potentially profitable to execute a well organised gank on an incursion fleet. Sansha paying 'merc' capsuleers to kill their opposition makes sense, doesn't it?

- Slow down concord response times by a lot in incursion systems.

Profit.

D.

But, Danalee! That would mean that the carebears can't go right on with the extremely unbalanced status quo! That's not fair!

I don't want them removed unless it's out of the question to just make incursions systems default to lowsec. In which case, yes, I want them gone.

But I'd much rather the former, it would be fun to see pockets of lowsec pop up in different places every day.

There are still people running ISboxer 20 man incusion fleets.

Then I guess you would delete them as the usage would be extremely low...Why keep the code running at that point...

I might be wrong but I don't forsee risk being added. At least not directly like spawning only in low sec. Corp/wardec changes maybe but don't hold your breath for that.

Oh get off it. Risk/Reward is not a balancing point. You know it, I know it, everyone who plays this game knows it is a lemon. Its something whiners say to attempt to legitimize their complaint and gain support from other tryhards who pretend to believe risk/reward is actually relevant.

Case in point, LS is the most risky and dangerous space in the game...and also the poorest.

NS is where you go if you want to build sandcastles
LS is where you go it you want to do a bit of everything, or nothing at all.
WH space is where you go if you want to build slightly different sandcastles.
HS is where you go if you want to enjoy the PVE aspect of EVE.

Fun thing about it, anyone can go anywhere, whenever they want.

EVE isn't fair, EVE isn't equal. Different places offer different things. NS puts down billions in infrastructure to get statistically the best production, they put down billions in POS to get the best moon minerals, they have access to the best loot drops, they have access to the best array of mining minerals (which got better today).

Lots and lots of stuff NS has that no one else gets in KSpace, and on the individual level, risk doesn't get any more volatile from the moment you spawn in your very first rookie ship.

Seems to me like I said before, lots of whine in here simply because HS offers something that NS doesn't, a liscence to print isk. Boo hoo. Ask CCP to make NS income better, because reducing HS income from one event isn't going to change the fact that HS is just a better place to live if you want to bang out pure isk/hr.

I'm on the fence because of a lack of information to form a fully legitimate opinion. One must take everything you read on these forums with a sceptical eye/pinch of salt.

I've not had time with incursions to work out where all the variables sit so I cannot make a fully informed judgement around them.

tl;dr: A lack of enough pertinent facts prevents me from making a substantive conclusion.