Player Features and Ideas Discussion

CCP should do this for April Fools next year. Change the item portrait for all charges and fuel to Exotic Dancers.

But I digress, I think the fuel requirement is fine so far, but we won't know for sure until we get a chance to test this in practical terms. It's possible the fuel requirements may need a small bump, but even doubling them to 2 could have a significant impact on the progress of a long fight.

IMO better for them to low-ball it and have the fuel not matter too much, since it's not hard-stopping any obvious problems that I can see, rather than have the fuel completely grind Sov Warfare to a halt until CCP can patch in a fix.

There's no point to this except to abuse the weight increase for bumping or something of the sort.

I don't see any reason to make capital ships have a longer duration. Sure, they're more difficult to shoot down, but they're also more difficult to get into position and a lot more valuable of a target. It's not like shooting a linking subcap is going to reset the timer for that side, in fact it likely won't even stop their timer since many forces will use multiple entosis links on a single structure.

Yes, an entire fleet of dreadnoughts and carriers will easily win a link. Is that a bad thing? I say we should have more reasons to put capital ships in the line of fire, not less.

Well, I agree with you! Entosis-mechanisms gets rid of blobbing to do hit-point damage, but introduces blobbing to control the battlefield when entosising sov-structures. Status quo. And carriers? I can easily see Supers do this - can't be jammed, difficult for smaller groups like yours to kill them, they can ECM-burst both your DPS and logis. And the defenders have all the time in the world, they're not in a hurry.

So, yes, there will be blobbing again. Sadly.

But then blobbing has been the case all the time, entosis or no entosis - to gain control over the battlefield, you will need to blob in one way or another. Killing a ratter - conrol the battlefield by dropping and blob him with SBs, Recons and Black Ops. Small annoying 10-man Swedish pvp-gang in cruisers in Fountain - run away or blob them with Battleships. Usually run away though :-)

I think the 1 stront per cycle is too low
it should be 10, meaning if you intend on taking multiple systems you need stront haulers with you.

How about the e link will make ewar immune ships vulnerable to ewar while to module is active. You really going to use your super with an elink if you csnt br rr and you can be jammed?

Well, there's also controlling the grid and alphaing anything off the field with a deployed slowcat fleet to support said super that's using the e-link.

Encouraging the use of capitals to gain an advantage only contributes to the n+1 problem. If supers can be used, then alliances that can field enough supers/capital support to contest all the beacons will be at a great advantage. Granted, even with the penalty you can still do this, but at least it's discouraged.

all true but now remember there are 10 capture annoms in tge constellation you have to capture. Lets say cfc has taken 9 tgat means they only need one more to take the system. So now 5 new capture annoms have appeared. As n3 which one will you defend with carriers and supers? If you start jumping around willy nilly your jump fatigue willbgo threw the roof and if you split your firces equal tgen pl will jump in on a small group of supers and dd them to death.

250km range on T2 Link, but what if you damp the ship or it moves off grid? Please set to 150km range -where most combat is.

Penalty -counteracts bubble immunity when fit.

Increase size of mobile depot so it can't fit in a ceptor.

WOOO Go go Golems and Ravens!