These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance Part 2

First post First post First post
Author
d0cTeR9
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#301 - 2015-04-11 01:58:20 UTC
Royally wrote:
I think GSF pilots are too confident in their ability to hold onto all of their space because "numbers and organization".
Sure, I'm 100% certain that the absolutely critical areas will receive adequate coverage, but it'll be impossible to hold onto all the outlying regions when the entrance bar gets lowered this much.

Its basicly a case of having a far shorter "warmup" phase prior to flipping a system here and there. I'm certain the CFC could deploy 5 or 6 full fleets if they have to, but that wont be enough when you have 10 to 15 flies swatting at sov in 7 different constellations.
They could be engaged ofcourse, but unless one chooses to concentrate on one or two groups, they wont be horribly outblobbed anywhere.

That is why I think the pessimistic fozziesov predictions made in here are bogus.

The most powerful fleet will still win, true. The side that comes early and prepares blockades on all relevant gates in an area will also enjoy a distinct advantage.
But the entire point of fozziesov is that the attacker can decide to just ignore the area they were going to attack and where you just piled all your active people in. They can then move in smaller groups and engage two different constellations. What will your fleets do then? Pick one to defend or split up? That will be a choice to be made. Especially considering the fact that whilst you can rely on several fleets on a regular basis for a big coalition, you cant rely on people keeping that up for months indefinately.


LOL have you looked which alliance you are in?

Been around since the beginning.

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#302 - 2015-04-11 03:19:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Alavaria Fera
d0cTeR9 wrote:
Royally wrote:
I think GSF pilots are too confident in their ability to hold onto all of their space because "numbers and organization".
Sure, I'm 100% certain that the absolutely critical areas will receive adequate coverage, but it'll be impossible to hold onto all the outlying regions when the entrance bar gets lowered this much.

Its basicly a case of having a far shorter "warmup" phase prior to flipping a system here and there. I'm certain the CFC could deploy 5 or 6 full fleets if they have to, but that wont be enough when you have 10 to 15 flies swatting at sov in 7 different constellations.
They could be engaged ofcourse, but unless one chooses to concentrate on one or two groups, they wont be horribly outblobbed anywhere.

That is why I think the pessimistic fozziesov predictions made in here are bogus.

The most powerful fleet will still win, true. The side that comes early and prepares blockades on all relevant gates in an area will also enjoy a distinct advantage.
But the entire point of fozziesov is that the attacker can decide to just ignore the area they were going to attack and where you just piled all your active people in. They can then move in smaller groups and engage two different constellations. What will your fleets do then? Pick one to defend or split up? That will be a choice to be made. Especially considering the fact that whilst you can rely on several fleets on a regular basis for a big coalition, you cant rely on people keeping that up for months indefinately.


LOL have you looked which alliance you are in?

Yeah. We can't keep mobile fleets up for months indefinitely

But Moa can.


... our 0.0 nightmare will be ended by such people huh

Not like we can sustain larger numbers always simply because we're larger in general or anything... not like people larger than moa haven't found this out in borefests. But hey.

Shooting EntosisHitPoints will be different

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Raphael Celestine
Celestine Inc.
#303 - 2015-04-11 10:22:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Raphael Celestine
Alavaria Fera wrote:
d0cTeR9 wrote:
snip

Yeah. We can't keep mobile fleets up for months indefinitely

But Moa can.


... our 0.0 nightmare will be ended by such people huh

Not like we can sustain larger numbers always simply because we're larger in general or anything... not like people larger than moa haven't found this out in borefests. But hey.

Shooting EntosisHitPoints will be different

The CFC is very, very good at putting numbers on the field and keeping them there - there's no question about that. I doubt that many attackers can match you one-to-one with 255-man cap fleets at all, let alone keep doing so for longer than you can.

I can believe that Moa or someone like them could field two or three 30-man cruiser fleets (or BLOPs gangs, or interceptor wings...) for each CFC 255-man cap fleet, and keep those in the field essentially indefinitely.

The question then is whether those 30-man fleets can use their superior mobility to beat the defenders to enough of the capture nodes to pose a serious threat. There's no way they'll win any contest that a defending heavy fleet gets to, but they've got at least five possible targets at any one time, spread over half-a-dozen potential systems, respawning in locations that the defenders cannot predict in advance. At that point, 'drop so much force in one place that the defenders can't engage' starts looking a lot less like a guaranteed victory.

Of course, that's assuming only one defending heavy fleet. No doubt the CFC could field half-a-dozen at once if they really needed to - enough to dedicate one to each possible capture node, and still have forces left to camp the gates. That should be enough to guarantee victory against virtually any attack... any one attack.

What happens when Gevlon digs a little deeper into his warchest and hires mercenaries to attack five constellations at once? When WH corps are hitting OAs behind the front lines at the same time, to weaken the defences against raiders looking for ratters to hunt? When half-a-dozen NPC-null groups see the chaos, and decide to pile in and see how many mining/customs office kill-mails they can extract?

"Numbers and organisation" can win a war very effectively. If you mobilise them against a specific enemy, you're 100% right in saying that you either wouldn't lose any space at all, or would just take it back immediately. But winning a war is one thing; stamping out brushfires is another one entirely. When the barrier to entry for attacking sov is a handful of subcaps, large coalitions aren't going to have the luxury of mobilising all their forces against a single target, they're going to be playing whack-a-mole against an endless stream of smaller groups, with new ones always waiting in the wings to take over as the old ones get bored or run out of resources. They might not have much chance of actually holdling sov once they take it, but they'll come anyway - there's always someone convinced that they're going to be the lucky one-in-a-thousand who does. And others won't even try - they'll attack because "GRRR GOONS", or for the fights, or just to watch the world burn...
Cade Windstalker
#304 - 2015-04-11 12:22:09 UTC
Yun Kuai wrote:
Think of it like this. You run the other fleet off grid, but they leave a scout on grid and see that some of the ships have started activating the entosis link. The defenders then switch into a) bombers b) Sniper ABCs c) Sniper HACs d) CODE gank cats e) gank comets f) DERPTRONS! etc and proceed to gank all of the entosis linking ships because they're stuck on grid and can't receive reps.

You hold the grid, but the defenders still have every chance to make you not be able to capture the node. That's exactly why remote reps can't be used because the give the defender a chance even thought you have thousands of ships all set up with sentries out. Now if you start using your titans to capture the node....well lets just hope PL/other Super Cap entity gets wind and is interested.


If the enemy can come on grid and blap off your Entosis ships then you're not actually controlling grid, are you? You controlled the grid, but the enemy came on and changed that. At that point you have to react. Maybe you put something tankier on Entosis duty, maybe you throw up bubbles, catch their fleet, and blap it off the grid.

It's not like we're talking about one ship showing up and shooting your Frigate that's the lynch pin of the whole cap, you can be running this thing off of an over-tanked Command Ship, HIC, or T3 easily.

Varyah wrote:
Kagura Nikon wrote:


because otherwise you will have fleets of 1 t3 and 50 logis ignoring the defenders and simply drilling trough the capture points.


There won't be any drilling because the defenders only need to tank 1 t3 and whatever dps 50 logis can do, which won't be much. So absolutely no problem tanking such a fleet and keeping your entosis up as well, i.e. at the worst: deadlock. But then again if both sides can't break the opposing fleet then neither side has control of the grid which is what we want to measure.


The counter to 50 Logi and 1 T3 is 25 Griffins, 10 T1 Logi cruisers, and a Bhaalgorn. Lol
MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#305 - 2015-04-11 14:38:31 UTC  |  Edited by: MeBiatch
lets say every ihub/tcu/outpost in the RFY constellation in deklein gets reinforced. how would the CFC defend up to 370 capture annoms over 13 systems? and this is just one constellation lets say that the entire deklein region gets reinforced that would be well over 1000 caputre events... that would spread those large fleets rather thin if you ask me... making smaller 3rd party high skill level pvp alliances viable. vs the 1000 people on one grid f1 monkeys

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.

Nolak Ataru
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#306 - 2015-04-11 16:13:10 UTC
MeBiatch wrote:
lets say every ihub/tcu/outpost in the RFY constellation in deklein gets reinforced. how would the CFC defend up to 370 capture annoms over 13 systems? and this is just one constellation lets say that the entire deklein region gets reinforced that would be well over 1000 caputre events... that would spread those large fleets rather thin if you ask me... making smaller 3rd party high skill level pvp alliances viable. vs the 1000 people on one grid f1 monkeys


First: How do you think they'll reinforce 370 anoms?
Second: How do you think they'll reinforce 370 anoms without anyone putting up resistance?

As of right now, there's 635 online in GSF alliance chat. I wonder how high that will go with an emergency CTA ping...
MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#307 - 2015-04-11 16:21:09 UTC
Nolak Ataru wrote:
MeBiatch wrote:
lets say every ihub/tcu/outpost in the RFY constellation in deklein gets reinforced. how would the CFC defend up to 370 capture annoms over 13 systems? and this is just one constellation lets say that the entire deklein region gets reinforced that would be well over 1000 caputre events... that would spread those large fleets rather thin if you ask me... making smaller 3rd party high skill level pvp alliances viable. vs the 1000 people on one grid f1 monkeys


First: How do you think they'll reinforce 370 anoms?
Second: How do you think they'll reinforce 370 anoms without anyone putting up resistance?

As of right now, there's 635 online in GSF alliance chat. I wonder how high that will go with an emergency CTA ping...


they dont have to reinforce 370 annoms... they have to reinforce things like ihubs and outposts which spawn 10 capture annoms each.

lets say cfc is busy in delve and a group of players take advantage of the primetime and reinforce all of the rfy constellation that will result in 370 caputure annoms when reinforce is done...

now lets say that time is the same time that a caputre for nol is going on... now the cfc has to split its forces once between nol and rfy and then 13 more times to caputre the annoms...

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.

Nolak Ataru
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#308 - 2015-04-11 16:50:29 UTC
MeBiatch wrote:
Nolak Ataru wrote:
MeBiatch wrote:
lets say every ihub/tcu/outpost in the RFY constellation in deklein gets reinforced. how would the CFC defend up to 370 capture annoms over 13 systems? and this is just one constellation lets say that the entire deklein region gets reinforced that would be well over 1000 caputre events... that would spread those large fleets rather thin if you ask me... making smaller 3rd party high skill level pvp alliances viable. vs the 1000 people on one grid f1 monkeys


First: How do you think they'll reinforce 370 anoms?
Second: How do you think they'll reinforce 370 anoms without anyone putting up resistance?
As of right now, there's 635 online in GSF alliance chat. I wonder how high that will go with an emergency CTA ping...

they dont have to reinforce 370 annoms... they have to reinforce things like ihubs and outposts which spawn 10 capture annoms each.
lets say cfc is busy in delve and a group of players take advantage of the primetime and reinforce all of the rfy constellation that will result in 370 caputure annoms when reinforce is done...
now lets say that time is the same time that a caputre for nol is going on... now the cfc has to split its forces once between nol and rfy and then 13 more times to caputre the annoms...


What part of "GSF has 12,443 members do people not understand? We can field 48 255-man fleets if needed. Our coalition has god-knows how many members. Do people honestly think that we cannot defend our Sov, or steamroll others?
MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#309 - 2015-04-11 17:04:26 UTC
Nolak Ataru wrote:
MeBiatch wrote:
Nolak Ataru wrote:
MeBiatch wrote:
lets say every ihub/tcu/outpost in the RFY constellation in deklein gets reinforced. how would the CFC defend up to 370 capture annoms over 13 systems? and this is just one constellation lets say that the entire deklein region gets reinforced that would be well over 1000 caputre events... that would spread those large fleets rather thin if you ask me... making smaller 3rd party high skill level pvp alliances viable. vs the 1000 people on one grid f1 monkeys


First: How do you think they'll reinforce 370 anoms?
Second: How do you think they'll reinforce 370 anoms without anyone putting up resistance?
As of right now, there's 635 online in GSF alliance chat. I wonder how high that will go with an emergency CTA ping...

they dont have to reinforce 370 annoms... they have to reinforce things like ihubs and outposts which spawn 10 capture annoms each.
lets say cfc is busy in delve and a group of players take advantage of the primetime and reinforce all of the rfy constellation that will result in 370 caputure annoms when reinforce is done...
now lets say that time is the same time that a caputre for nol is going on... now the cfc has to split its forces once between nol and rfy and then 13 more times to caputre the annoms...


What part of "GSF has 12,443 members do people not understand? We can field 48 255-man fleets if needed. Our coalition has god-knows how many members. Do people honestly think that we cannot defend our Sov, or steamroll others?


Honestly if you guys can pull off 48 full fleets you win eve... do i think it will happen? no... most fleets i have seen from cfc is what like 5-6 full fleets?

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.

Nolak Ataru
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#310 - 2015-04-11 18:40:37 UTC
MeBiatch wrote:
Honestly if you guys can pull off 48 full fleets you win eve... do i think it will happen? no... most fleets i have seen from cfc is what like 5-6 full fleets?


Still more than enough if we split those fleets into smaller groups and drive out whoever is trying to take our SOV.
MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#311 - 2015-04-11 19:05:03 UTC  |  Edited by: MeBiatch
Nolak Ataru wrote:
MeBiatch wrote:
Honestly if you guys can pull off 48 full fleets you win eve... do i think it will happen? no... most fleets i have seen from cfc is what like 5-6 full fleets?


Still more than enough if we split those fleets into smaller groups and drive out whoever is trying to take our SOV.


255*6 = 1530 people now lets say you split those even between those 13 systems now thats 117 per system and even less per annom... that is low enough for a medium sized force to engage... basically what i am saying is the new system is going to make small to medium high skilled forces rather effective.

and what happens when you have the bulk of your forces deployed and you have to pick defend or take?

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#312 - 2015-04-11 22:08:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Alavaria Fera
Some people are oddly desperate to defend their fantasy of ending our 0.0 dream nightmare.

Relax.

CCP has you covered.

Lasers.


If it doesn't work out I'm sure there'll be some "rebalancing" to give you new hope. Maybe making everyone more tired or something like that.

Gate jumping fatigue that interceptors get a role bonus to the reduction of.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Wanda Fayne
#313 - 2015-04-11 23:32:45 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Some people are oddly desperate to defend their fantasy of ending our 0.0 dream nightmare.

Relax.

CCP has you covered.

Lasers.


If it doesn't work out I'm sure there'll be some "rebalancing" to give you new hope. Maybe making everyone more tired or something like that.

Gate jumping fatigue that interceptors get a role bonus to the reduction of.


Maybe you could rent out those lasers? Blink

"your comments just confirms this whole idea is totally pathetic" -Lan Wang-

  • - "hub humping station gamey neutral logi warspam wankery" -Ralph King-Griffin-
Rowells
Blackwater USA Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#314 - 2015-04-12 00:44:16 UTC
what page did this become a epeen swinging competition?
Anhenka
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#315 - 2015-04-12 00:52:19 UTC
Rowells wrote:
what page did this become a epeen swinging competition?


1
d0cTeR9
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#316 - 2015-04-12 01:15:33 UTC  |  Edited by: d0cTeR9
MeBiatch wrote:
lets say every ihub/tcu/outpost in the RFY constellation in deklein gets reinforced. how would the CFC defend up to 370 capture annoms over 13 systems? and this is just one constellation lets say that the entire deklein region gets reinforced that would be well over 1000 caputre events... that would spread those large fleets rather thin if you ask me... making smaller 3rd party high skill level pvp alliances viable. vs the 1000 people on one grid f1 monkeys


I saw a move-OP with over 1000 supers and caps a few weeks ago. Those were alts in CFC moving SOME of their caps and supers to fountain.

Multiple of those OPs happened during that week with similar numbers.

So yes, CFC can hold its sov. Just like the other large coalitions can.

Those new changes will only reinforce teamwork between alliances. So.... Bigger coalitions will form.

Been around since the beginning.

Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#317 - 2015-04-12 01:23:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Iroquoiss Pliskin
Absent further information, the respectable participants of this completely non-biased, non-Illusions de Grandeur discussion have determined the following TL;DR:

Bigger Better.

BUT THEY'RE BRINGING IN RIFTERS WITH INQ SUPPORT, MAN - Rifters! \m/
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#318 - 2015-04-12 03:05:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Alavaria Fera
d0cTeR9 wrote:
MeBiatch wrote:
lets say every ihub/tcu/outpost in the RFY constellation in deklein gets reinforced. how would the CFC defend up to 370 capture annoms over 13 systems? and this is just one constellation lets say that the entire deklein region gets reinforced that would be well over 1000 caputre events... that would spread those large fleets rather thin if you ask me... making smaller 3rd party high skill level pvp alliances viable. vs the 1000 people on one grid f1 monkeys


I saw a move-OP with over 1000 supers and caps a few weeks ago. Those were alts in CFC moving SOME of their caps and supers to fountain.

Multiple of those OPs happened during that week with similar numbers.

So yes, CFC can hold its sov. Just like the other large coalitions can.

Those new changes will only reinforce teamwork between alliances. So.... Bigger coalitions will form.

People make amazing assumptions about how many FCs we have. Maybe you should come down with a sov laser and see deklein

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Sarah Eginald
Git R Done Resources
#319 - 2015-04-12 03:45:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Sarah Eginald
I hope these changes might make it easier for smaller groups to take sov. Not because of superior force but lack of interest in the large powers to keep outer non crucial systems.

An example would be say a non useful that does not have any high value moons. A small alliance can take the system. The larger alliance may keep them neutral but not take the system back because it gives them targets to kill. The smaller alliance would have a foothold in null sec.

Also larger alliances can use the small alliances as buffer against invasion from another large group.

Most alliances that may want to take sov would be no match for the mega alliances and coalitions like the CFC or any other mega alliance.
Rowells
Blackwater USA Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#320 - 2015-04-12 05:26:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Rowells
d0cTeR9 wrote:
MeBiatch wrote:
lets say every ihub/tcu/outpost in the RFY constellation in deklein gets reinforced. how would the CFC defend up to 370 capture annoms over 13 systems? and this is just one constellation lets say that the entire deklein region gets reinforced that would be well over 1000 caputre events... that would spread those large fleets rather thin if you ask me... making smaller 3rd party high skill level pvp alliances viable. vs the 1000 people on one grid f1 monkeys


I saw a move-OP with over 1000 supers and caps a few weeks ago. Those were alts in CFC moving SOME of their caps and supers to fountain.

Multiple of those OPs happened during that week with similar numbers.

So yes, CFC can hold its sov. Just like the other large coalitions can.

Those new changes will only reinforce teamwork between alliances. So.... Bigger coalitions will form.

Goons holding dek? sure.

CFC members keeping the same level of control in their own space? not so much.

E: unless, of course, every current sov holding entity sets aside their differences and focuses efforts against non-sov holders. That would be, to say the least, an interesting development.