EVE Information Portal

It is outside of the 4 hour vulnerable window?

response to #1 did you miss the BL march across eve? I didn't that was very cool watching BL move system by system to get into the fight 7 hours it took them. Impossible? no hard? yes and it should be.

so, to increase interaction between different timezones and to still give alliances incentive to have memebrs over multiple timezones (not just the 4h eve fix nerds), i think it would be useful if, under the assumption that an alliance holds both the ihub and station, both of these timers must be off-set by 12h. You can still decide to defend the station (maybe have the ihub timer be dependent on station timer simply), but byebye all your fancy ratting upgrades - should have gotten some friends to interact with.

There will be blood :D

Ok,


You want a feedback ? 4Hour of prime time is to many, maybe 2 hours is enough because it's means pvp EVERY DAY during this time you. Because yes you have forgot a little thing: people who want easy km g to engage everyday all territory just ' for fun'. And it's recommended to make a break every 2 hours of gaming.


If i have read the devblog: The attacker camp can have a lot of link activate , and the capture will be continue unless defense deploy is own link ? So if we make 50 alliance of 2-3 people to run attack we have 50 link on and enjoy to efenser to defend against this ? Maybe make an interdiction to have more of 1 link for each camp.

Capital and super capital be use for what now ?

Some sov become easier to defend as other : you can have Death star pos near TCU not near other sov structure ... give possibilliy to deploy some defence near other structure to avoid stupid strategy like 3 people in each system of your opponent reconnect an activate link same time in each sov building ?

Nerf perma cloacking because it become to powerful with this new system ?

Why is no one else concerned that GM's are once again playing in and influencing sov warfare with hidden alts.

Cause that went so well before in BoB, didint it!

'Oi Fozzie im poor, spawn me an officer in this belt please'

'Oi Fozziee, Have a look on that ccp graph and tell me the best t3's to build over a 6 month period'

'Oi Fozzie, Develop me a sov system that breaks the current gameplay cause im too lazy to try to take sov and invest me time right now'

About the primetime zone, why don't scale it on member count AND/OR number of TCU, IHUB, stations ?
And make the ability to split the timer in two primetime (who can be close together) if > 6h (for exemple) ?

It should not be too hard to find a function doing that.

Like :
3H Small number of alliance & systems : Phoebe Freeport Republic
5H Medium-Large number of alliance & systems : Curatores Veritatis Alliance or Northern Coalition.
2*4H Huge number of alliance & systems : Northern Associate or Goonswarm Federation.

It resolve some of the problems of the unique primetime & also the bigger you are, the harder it is to protect your space.

What do you think about that ?

Initial thought on this:

* Mining providing defensive bonuses is probably not going to be used in any significant capacity while nullsec mining is in such a hilariously bad place. I mean, check out this mining profitability chart: http://eve-industry.org/mining/ . No one in their right mind is going to call CTA RED PEN MINING OPS to buttress their sov.

Gonna need to let it sink in some more before I think of anything else, I think.

cuz i left my tinfoil hat at home

Good, frankly.