CSM Campaigns

And yet you'll have time to be on the CSM? History shows it's a very busy role to fill.

You have my vote. I have a question though. Do you have any ideas on how to improve the bounty system?

I've provided answers to the Just For Crits lowsec questionaire. Look for them on their website sometime soon.

Feyd, I'd love some questions from you. Both difficult and friendly questions encouraged.

Changed your quote slightly. Please keep the hostilities strictly in-game.

:)

Given that she's an Amarrian, I assume the flogging was meant in-game. As far as shooting, I assume stolen/reappropriated projectile weapons.

I don't have the time or patience to read this entire thread.

How do you feel about ganking innocent miners and haulers in high sec?

I'm trying really hard to envision guilty miners...

I don't see miners as guilty, but then I don't see anyone else as guilty either. We're all just having a lot of fun in the sand box. People need to realize it's just a game.

Ganking barges in highsec can be a method to boost mineral prices, or a tool for boosting the value of one's killboard, or perhaps even as a way to fulfill one's own belief that miners should be eliminated. And these purposes as well as many other possible purposes can all have a wide variety of motives and specific reasoning behind them. All in all, everyone has their own reason for doing what they do, and we group together with people who have similar yet not the same interests.

Whelp. I'm ashamed of having initially written you off simply due to your alliance ticker - I should know better than that.

After having actually read your OP, I have to say I'm rather impressed with your platform and a lot of the points that you've made regarding highsec. I'm going to have to take a listen to the soundclouds you've posted, and I must say I'm looking forward to your interviews with both cap stable and just for crits. Too many who have come before you simply spew the same old tired lines about theme parks and tears; it's quite refreshing to hear a well reasoned and passionate voice supporting highsec conflict.

I have three questions for you, all of which I have chosen to ask because I myself have not formed an opinion on them one way or another - I'd love to hear what you think and why. Please don't assume that these questions are asked with a bias, as I have none, and I most certainly won't be upset if you answer the question in a certain way, as long as your opinions are backed up.

My first question is regarding the formation of highsec groups and corporations. Prefacing this with my opinion that "conflict in Eve is always a good thing," do you feel that the current corporation mechanics are sufficient for non-PvP groups to handle wardecs and other forms of non-consensual PvP? If no, what changes to corporations and alliance would allow for groups of players to form highsec based entities and still be able to resist or, better yet, fight back against a PvP centric organization?

Again with wardecs, what do you think about changing wardecs to a regional or decentralized system instead of the current universal license to ignore concord? For example, maybe the war is only valid if your target is in a mining barge, or located in Jita. A much more detailed version of this idea was proposed by Marlona Sky if you'd like to look it up for reference, I don't have the link handy.

Lastly, Mike Azariah half jokingly proposed a "peace dec" mechanic where instead of one corporation essentially forcing the PvP playstyle upon a non-PvP entity, the tables are reversed. In essence, it would be conducting non-consensual PvE against a PvP target, forcing them to do some sort of non-PvP activity. Ignoring the specifics of the proposed mechanic, what do you think about a concept of the "peace dec"?

That's all for now.