Wormholes

Sounds awsome Corbexx, hopefully this will be more productive than the cancerous abortion the wormhole community had last time.

I will miss this due to work but look forward to listening afterwards.


Also.........


Corbexx via Fozzie and crew

Is there any chance for curiosity sake to see numbers for amount of wormholes generated and killed less then an hour after spawning in an average day? Is that even something you guys track backend wise?

2300 hours UK time so I will attempt to be there.

Will go round my alliance and ask if anyone wants anything brought to the attention of anyone / air their thoughts.

good ******* question i will ask.

My airhorn soundboard is ready

As the CEO of a C4 wolf-rayet corp, it is my duty to attend this. While all of wormhole space is affected by these changes, it is hard to think of a class/effect wormhole that is more affected. With the addition of a static, as well as the drastic increase in small weapon damage, as well as the roaming frigate wormholes, that will have the previously noted damage bonus, there is a lot to consider.

I will be representing my members, many of which I have lived with in a C4 for well over a year.

I'll be there to listen so +1.

BTW would someone teach me how to vote for the next CSM elections, I need to vote for corbexx...

Corbexx, if possible, could you get a answer from Fozzie if they have considered giving all wormholes a timer to automatically spawn the k162 ? And thus making it harder to isolate a system over an extended period of time?

Corbexx, just a suggestion, when anyone quotes isk per hour earned in a WH, can the question be asked, is that rate achieved with using an alt for security scanning or wormhole control? Or is the testing done on the test server and therefore not requiring security.

The reason is that if one is using alts, the rate should take that into account, as alts like minerals for a miner are not free.
And dscanning every few seconds does slow down mission completion time.

And of course, one may be disturbed, which either ends income generation or turns into PVP.

There is also the reality that running sleeper sites, requires time to secure the system, either through wormhole control, or through pos scanning and evaluation, and setting up safe points.

These need to be understood so that when comparing to null income deep in the blue or hisec, they do not appear out of balance.

Only a small part of the time spent in clearing sleeper sites is actually killing sleepers, especially in lower class holes where a response fleet is less likely to be available.

If a balance is decided without these points being taken into account Wormhole space will end up in real terms the lowest paying area in EVE.

Please point this out in the town hall.

Just another Plex for Ax it seems.