Wormholes

From what I can tell, the first static is tied to the region, and the second static is tied to the constellation. What I've been able to scan so far on SISI seems to agree with this. If you have any information conflicting with this, I'd love to hear it. I'm not giving up on finding a pattern until I have at least pulled together some solid data.

Yes the region and constellation is true. Seen enough examples of that. But beyond that there isnt much pattern.

Try jump it with a cruiser

I don't get it. Why?
This is exactly what ccp is trying to avoid - the control over wh space. Maybe the next step really is loosing the system number.

This is what we are doing, but according to the amount of Wormholes spawning here and there we will have to covert the return from our static (home).

This means instead of 1-2 scouts, it's going to be 3-4 scouts, witch is not worth it.

Psymon

There have been three times in the past 5 years people have jumped in to a wormhole while I was doing sleeper sites. I mean, honestly doing sleeper sites and not actually trying to bait while pretending to do sleeper sites. Three times where there was a brown pants event, and one of those times resulted in me losing a Drake, and 5 of my buds also losing their Drakes and pods For the return price of blapping two Arazus, a fair trade.

The other two times both resulted in me blazing down the foe and Zoidberging out of there. The last one I was in a C3 WR in a shield-tanked Nightmare and we clobbered a Legion, Eos and Keres, and drove off their mates in a VNI and Ishtar. having an alt on the hole didn't prevent the gank, it gave me 5 seconds to shart my lacy panties and reload to Scorch.

I don't think that this is pay-to-win. it's win by method and experience, and having a wee bit of luck.

Your whole Q.Q is based on some idea that you, personally, need 3 accounts to safely churn C4 sites. maybe you do, if you are neckbearding solo Marauders and haven't read the OTHER dev blog.

Secondly, the whole spiel of wormholes is that it is a team-based activity. PVE requires teamwork. So make a ffriend, instead of Q.Qing on the forums about how the game is apparently now "pay to win"because it gets restructured to make it difficult (not impossible) and risky (if you suck at EVE) to solo C4s.

Cry me a river. People like you are what this patch is about.

Just to put this sort of pants-wetting idiocy to bed, I shall use bold font.

If you do not jump through your statics, the other side doesn't spawn. So just roll your damn statics you numpty and don't jump through. Now you don't even NEED one alt to watch the static. You need zero!

Yeah, the inbound won't spawn till the involuntary sexual attack squad is properly formed up and ready to jump through. So that's more risky for you neckbearding carebears. But the inbound sigs never reliably spawned instantly anyway, so you aren't at any greater risk, really.

So. To the guy who got offended I called you all neckbeards, there you go. Yet another crybaby whiner identified on the forums complaining his bear den will have ants in it. You are all the same. Get out of the way, the real men want to move in to C4s to make happy times with the boat violencing.

How do real men fund their pvp stuff?

I'm also wondering why real men didn't go into c4 before - if they wanted to...

"There have been three times in the past 5 years people have jumped in to a wormhole while I was doing sleeper sites"
My numbers are about 5 attempts to catch a care bearing pilot, 10 attempts to catch an orca/pi indie/static rolling bs per month. Being dropped about 3 times per month. And that's a silent c4 with c3 static.

So there are far more posts than I can go through so I apologize if this has already been answered.

Aside from the other unique things about C4's having only one static and no random spawns, their connections were only 16 hours vs 24.

With all of these changes, are they also getting changed to 24 hour WH's or are they staying at 16 hours?