These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

CSM Campaigns

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Xenuria: CSM 10

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#81 - 2015-01-07 03:31:17 UTC
Yharvis wrote:
Xenuria wrote:
Statistically 4-7% of the EvE Population is Female.
90%~ of my voting base is Female.

Source?

Source?

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe
Mike Azariah
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#82 - 2015-01-07 03:55:38 UTC
Proclus Diadochu wrote:
Yharvis wrote:
Xenuria wrote:
Statistically 4-7% of the EvE Population is Female.
90%~ of my voting base is Female.

Source?

Source?


The first half may be accurate, I have a lot of doubt that the latter part of the statement is provable given secret balloting.

m

Mike Azariah  ┬──┬ ¯|(ツ)/¯
Asayanami Dei
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
#83 - 2015-01-07 05:45:17 UTC
Xenuria wrote:
Statistically 4-7% of the EvE Population is Female.
90%~ of my voting base is Female.


Source:
Xenuria wrote:
I am not very good with numbers so I am not in a good position to refute your essay on the subject matter.
Maybe I missed something or overlooked something, it's very likely any time numbers are involved.

I'm a leaf on the wind, watch how I--THE CAPACITOR IS EMPTY

Youtube: /asayanami

Twitter: @asayanami

wormholefundamentals.com
Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#84 - 2015-01-07 10:06:58 UTC
Thanks, Mike and Asay. You boys are always the real MVP's. Honestly couldn't imagine anyone having a 90% female voting base after seeing that smoked sardine video. Good luck on your campaign, Xenuria. Honestly can say that if you get elected, I'll be more inclined to read the summit minutes in a single sitting.

On On

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe
Schwa Nuts
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#85 - 2015-01-07 13:46:01 UTC
Not that you are expecting my vote, but sadly I cannot vote for you. Your stated campaign platform is to dramatically change the CSM to the point where many current CSM members would not be elected. Unfortunately for you, I like a lot of our current CSM members.
amber mbd
#86 - 2015-01-07 20:48:44 UTC
Xenuria wrote:
ChYph3r wrote:
Just face it dude, no one wants you, or your ignorance or banter, on the CSM.


Do you have anything constructive to add to the discussion?


everything you've posted has been deflecting direct questions and attacking people who ask them, ie non-constructive things, so why should anyone else have anyting constructive to add?
Xenuria
#87 - 2015-01-07 23:14:18 UTC
amber mbd wrote:
Xenuria wrote:
ChYph3r wrote:
Just face it dude, no one wants you, or your ignorance or banter, on the CSM.


Do you have anything constructive to add to the discussion?


everything you've posted has been deflecting direct questions and attacking people who ask them, ie non-constructive things, so why should anyone else have anyting constructive to add?

Please post with your main.

CSM 12 Candidate
amber mbd
#88 - 2015-01-08 04:33:02 UTC
Xenuria wrote:
amber mbd wrote:
Xenuria wrote:
ChYph3r wrote:
Just face it dude, no one wants you, or your ignorance or banter, on the CSM.


Do you have anything constructive to add to the discussion?


everything you've posted has been deflecting direct questions and attacking people who ask them, ie non-constructive things, so why should anyone else have anyting constructive to add?

Please post with your main.

thanks for making my point bro o7
HarlyQ
harlyq syrokos investment station
#89 - 2015-01-10 07:37:37 UTC  |  Edited by: HarlyQ
Xenuria wrote:
amber mbd wrote:
Xenuria wrote:
ChYph3r wrote:
Just face it dude, no one wants you, or your ignorance or banter, on the CSM.


Do you have anything constructive to add to the discussion?


everything you've posted has been deflecting direct questions and attacking people who ask them, ie non-constructive things, so why should anyone else have anyting constructive to add?

Please post with your main.

Maybe you should just respond to people's questions and statements instead of saying post with your main or how about giving accurate sources for your statements or how about not making up random BS to try and make you look good. No one will vote for a lying sack of dung.

hey xenuria post like a man.

Also why can you not stay with a corp very long?
Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#90 - 2015-01-10 16:17:16 UTC
HarlyQ wrote:
Xenuria wrote:
amber mbd wrote:
Xenuria wrote:
ChYph3r wrote:
Just face it dude, no one wants you, or your ignorance or banter, on the CSM.


Do you have anything constructive to add to the discussion?


everything you've posted has been deflecting direct questions and attacking people who ask them, ie non-constructive things, so why should anyone else have anyting constructive to add?

Please post with your main.

Maybe you should just respond to people's questions and statements instead of saying post with your main or how about giving accurate sources for your statements or how about not making up random BS to try and make you look good. No one will vote for a lying sack of dung.

hey xenuria post like a man.

Also why can you not stay with a corp very long?

Xenuria cant stay with a corp very long because Xenuria has personality conflict issues. Xenuria doesnt get along well with anyone, just a matter of Xenuria being Xenuria, which is only appropriate company for Xenuria. Xenuria hasnt undergone the years of training required for one's of Xenurias nature to acclimate with normal society to a functional degree.

(And so i can stop typing Xenuria, what do you prefer to identify as? He/She/It/Fox/Walrus/Klingon/Wookiee/Visitor/Munchkin? Just dont want any miscommunications)
Seraph IX Basarab
Outer Path
Seraphim Division
#91 - 2015-01-10 17:46:04 UTC
Maybe this is a good thing but I honestly have no idea who you are Xenuria. So my question is, why do you feel like there is such a strong numbered group of people that seemingly despises you? Again I'm only asking because I have no idea.

I've encountered myself groups of people that flat out contradict me simply because I write a few lines of text on EN24. Being in a "somewhat" public light encourages some people to be asshats to me. "Hey people know that guy! Watch this, i'm going to totally tell him off." However I'm not sure that is the case here.
Xenuria
#92 - 2015-01-10 20:38:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Xenuria
Seraph IX Basarab wrote:
Maybe this is a good thing but I honestly have no idea who you are Xenuria. So my question is, why do you feel like there is such a strong numbered group of people that seemingly despises you? Again I'm only asking because I have no idea.

I've encountered myself groups of people that flat out contradict me simply because I write a few lines of text on EN24. Being in a "somewhat" public light encourages some people to be asshats to me. "Hey people know that guy! Watch this, i'm going to totally tell him off." However I'm not sure that is the case here.


It's mostly that, EvE Online is like any other game where people are given anonymity and a voice. The difference is eve is brutal and harsh. This mentality encourages people to attack that which they fear or don't understand. I am controversial in no small part because I cannot be bribed or bought off. I represent a clear and sustained threat to the system as it exists in it's present form. This concerns people.

Nariya Kentaya wrote:


(And so i can stop typing Xenuria, what do you prefer to identify as? He/She/It/Fox/Walrus/Klingon/Wookiee/Visitor/Munchkin? Just dont want any miscommunications)


Ultimately the pronouns used don't bother me but I prefer feminine pronouns in the context of EvE.

amber mbd wrote:

thanks for making my point bro o7

If you are unwilling to read the OP or any of the subsequent posts answering the questions your asking than I really have nothing to say to you. At best your lazy, at worst you are attempting to derail the conversation by asking questions I have already answered.

CSM 12 Candidate
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#93 - 2015-01-11 05:34:08 UTC
Xenuria wrote:
It's mostly that, EvE Online is like any other game where people are given anonymity and a voice. The difference is eve is brutal and harsh. This mentality encourages people to attack that which they fear or don't understand. I am controversial in no small part because I cannot be bribed or bought off. I represent a clear and sustained threat to the system as it exists in it's present form. This concerns people.

I really don't think it does concern people that you can't be bought or bribed. Every once in a while one individual may get ticked off by it, while the majority of the community will ignore such actions as trivial. You can call immunity to attacks all you want, and the people with power will continue to have successful attacks on others while ignoring you. They do not worry that your mentality will spread, as well they shouldn't. People immune to attacks like you and I are few and far between, and nothing will ever change that. The vast majority of the population even in this game are highly vulnerable to others by subconscious or instinctive choice and they refuse to address the basal nature which drives them to be that way, instead preferring to assume it cannot be understood or controlled. We are powerless to change their view on the subject because they don't understand it and they don't want to.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."
Cheese Crackers
Malfurion Mining
#94 - 2015-01-11 07:01:15 UTC
Xenuria wrote:
[
If you are unwilling to read the OP or any of the subsequent posts answering the questions your asking than I really have nothing to say to you. At best your lazy, at worst you are attempting to derail the conversation by asking questions I have already answered.


Any candidate in any election should answer every question asked to the fullest extent no matter how many times it has been repeated. This is because not everyone is the same as you and so may need the information in a different light to get the best understanding and as to maybe get a vote from a satisfied character. That is also how you are constructive even when faced with trolls as it can show that you can actually help someone and can be respectful, even if they are not. I have spent the time reading through this tread and it leads me to believe you have taken little time to look at other threads to understand how to approach those who ultimately vote in the election. Your right about possibly being the underdog but you don't win people over by calling them lazy for asking you to repeat your material for which you have based this campaign on as they may not understand it in way way you first wrote it. In my eyes you are the lazy one.

I have kept this post as constructive as my gritted teeth will allow it and will leave the post with one more idea that may or may not turn this train wreck of a campaign around. Go through all of the questions asked and answer them like it was the first time hearing of them and do it with respect and just maybe you will win more votes.

peace out, CC.
corbexx
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#95 - 2015-01-11 09:32:33 UTC
Can you give me some of your thoughts on exactly what you want to do to change the csm. I'd really like to hear some specific details on this.

I do worry about the way you reply to some peoples stuff, Lets say you get on the csm, lets say you do put forward your ideas. Now considering we post in several places, CCP's confluence and also in multiple places on these forums. Some times people don't see stuff (I've had to re link stuff to people a fair few times), and your reply to someone from ccp is.

Xenuria wrote:

If you are unwilling to read the OP or any of the subsequent posts answering the questions your asking than I really have nothing to say to you. At best your lazy, at worst you are attempting to derail the conversation by asking questions I have already answered.


Do you really think thats going to help you get stuff sorted? Knowing how to talk and communicate plays a huge part of what we do, and i'm sorry but you seem to really struggle on this.

Corbexx for CSM X - Wormholes still deserve better
Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#96 - 2015-01-11 15:11:47 UTC
corbexx wrote:
Xenuria wrote:

If you are unwilling to read the OP or any of the subsequent posts answering the questions your asking than I really have nothing to say to you. At best your lazy, at worst you are attempting to derail the conversation by asking questions I have already answered.


Do you really think thats going to help you get stuff sorted? Knowing how to talk and communicate plays a huge part of what we do, and i'm sorry but you seem to really struggle on this.

thats the same attititude that makes 'her' hated in EVE, not the "i cant be bought off" bit, but the "look at my opinions and worship them, if you disagree you arent worth my time to acknowledge because im superior!" schtick 'shes' been running for the last several years

fact is simple, Xenuria has ruined their reputation in EVE on thsi character to the point that A german has better chances of being eleceted to the head of Israeli government than Xenuria does getting onto the CSM
Azda Ja
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#97 - 2015-01-11 17:58:18 UTC
What do you stand for? Who do you represent?

You say the CSM needs to be remade or reorganized, but why exactly? I've yet to see a single other gaming company do something like this. It's unprecedented as far as I know and I would like to understand why on earth you think it's so bad as is. You've thrown around stats and made claims without anything to back them up. I, and I'd wager a majority of other players, will not vote for you based off of that alone.

Your answers to other people don't inspire confidence, if you can't answer a question you don't like, and instead attempt to dismiss the person asking, you have no business representing anyone.

Grrr.
Protovarious
The Neocom Network
#98 - 2015-01-11 20:27:22 UTC
Azda Ja wrote:
What do you stand for? Who do you represent?

You say the CSM needs to be remade or reorganized, but why exactly? I've yet to see a single other gaming company do something like this. It's unprecedented as far as I know and I would like to understand why on earth you think it's so bad as is. You've thrown around stats and made claims without anything to back them up. I, and I'd wager a majority of other players, will not vote for you based off of that alone.

Your answers to other people don't inspire confidence, if you can't answer a question you don't like, and instead attempt to dismiss the person asking, you have no business representing anyone.


I'm going to echo this until the mountains rattle. This kind of pie-in-the-sky approach to getting on the CSM was all the rage a few years ago. A CSM seat was looked upon as a arbitrary obligation that CCP had to fill and everyone with an axe to grind was simply led by that alone - a perceived chance to rage and if you didn't agree with the rage, you were somehow less "enlightened"

This is CSM number 10. The relationship between CCP and the Council has evolved and continues to improve. People see this and are conscious of the importance of having candidates who are communicative, focussed, and have the personal skills to wade through the unreasonable to reach the reasonable.

As Simon Cowell once said, "It's a no from me."

-1

Co-host of The Neocom Podcast - http://www.TheNeocom.com

Eve Community Blogger - The Eve Editorial - http://eveeditorial.wordpress.com

Twitter: @Proto_Eve
Xenuria
#99 - 2015-01-11 22:52:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Xenuria
At this point I am just going to outright ignore posts that are asking questions which I have already in this very thread answered specifically. These kinds of distraction tactics won't work here and the simple fact they are being attempted is indicative of my success as a candidate.

With that said, if anybody has a question I haven't already answered repeatedly please post it.

corbexx wrote:

Do you really think thats going to help you get stuff sorted? Knowing how to talk and communicate plays a huge part of what we do, and i'm sorry but you seem to really struggle on this.


That's amusing even without the irony dripping from it.
I communicate very effectively, It's not my fault if so many decide to post in this thread before even reading it. Perhaps you should take some of your own advice and read the OP (Original Post) of my thread.

Nariya Kentaya wrote:

thats the same attititude that makes 'her' hated in EVE, not the "i cant be bought off" bit, but the "look at my opinions and worship them, if you disagree you arent worth my time to acknowledge because im superior!" schtick 'shes' been running for the last several years

fact is simple, Xenuria has ruined their reputation in EVE on thsi character to the point that A german has better chances of being eleceted to the head of Israeli government than Xenuria does getting onto the CSM


I never said my opinions were worthy of worship nor did I even imply they were worthy of praise of any kind. I don't think ideas should be worshiped or praised. I also am not faulting anybody for disagreeing with me. I am making a point to ignore them because they are using a very petty tactic to derail the thread. My platform is by far one of the most granular out of all the csm 10 platforms, yet a small group of people have seen fit to post before even so much as glancing at the first page.

CSM 12 Candidate
Cheese Crackers
Malfurion Mining
#100 - 2015-01-11 23:15:06 UTC
Can I just throw it out there Xenuria should get some form of best troll award because day in and day out we get pulled in to posting here and day in and day out he just blatantly trolls us with answers even a 12 year old would know not to put if you wanted to get anywhere with this. I applaud you and its been great fun watching you keep up the act..... wait... it's not an act? oh god.