These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Kronos] Pirate Faction Cruisers

First post First post First post
Author
Vulfen
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#1161 - 2014-05-08 13:56:39 UTC
DeadDuck wrote:
When can we expect to see those new Mordus legions hulls stats ?


This ^ Please let it be soon
Sarnia Aldurad
Stellar Winds Consortium
#1162 - 2014-05-10 18:51:20 UTC
The GILA as far as I understand it, has always, as a pirate ship, been a synthesis of the very best its two parent navies could offer. For the GILA this mean drone warfare was primary. I am great with the changes to Drones themselves, but you're talking about neutering the Gil into a bad imitator of a Gallente destroyer level hull. Why should I have burned so much time to get into the ultra rare Gila -- harnessing the best of a Missile and Drone tradition to suddenly be losing vast amounts of Drone capability.

Here :: have a new bonus structure -- lose 1/2 your weapon systems in a heartbeat w/the removal of all missile bonuses... then on top of it dump a flat 50% bonus that applies to just medium drones -- and utterly wreck its capability with its now "primary" weapon system by gutting the drone bay and its capacity so brutally. If I am to specialize in just medium drones, then you bloody well ought to at least leave us the drone bay size so we can have our different flghts of various drones... after all, this is out _primary_weapon_system and as such, being able to configure our "ammo", ie. drones in this case, is absolutely paramount.

This reall and truly needs a serious rethink. Lastly -- If I wantd to just fly a drone boat w/o my missiles, I'd never have reached beyond my gallente hulls.

Regards.

SA
Sheimi Madaveda
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1163 - 2014-05-10 19:05:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Sheimi Madaveda
Sarnia Aldurad wrote:
The GILA as far as I understand it, has always, as a pirate ship, been a synthesis of the very best its two parent navies could offer. For the GILA this mean drone warfare was primary. I am great with the changes to Drones themselves, but you're talking about neutering the Gil into a bad imitator of a Gallente destroyer level hull. Why should I have burned so much time to get into the ultra rare Gila -- harnessing the best of a Missile and Drone tradition to suddenly be losing vast amounts of Drone capability.

Here :: have a new bonus structure -- lose 1/2 your weapon systems in a heartbeat w/the removal of all missile bonuses... then on top of it dump a flat 50% bonus that applies to just medium drones -- and utterly wreck its capability with its now "primary" weapon system by gutting the drone bay and its capacity so brutally. If I am to specialize in just medium drones, then you bloody well ought to at least leave us the drone bay size so we can have our different flghts of various drones... after all, this is out _primary_weapon_system and as such, being able to configure our "ammo", ie. drones in this case, is absolutely paramount.

This reall and truly needs a serious rethink. Lastly -- If I wantd to just fly a drone boat w/o my missiles, I'd never have reached beyond my gallente hulls.

Regards.

SA


Role Bonus:
500% bonus to medium drone damage and hitpoints

It's ten times as powerful as you think, unless you made a typo in your post. The Gila is probably best defined as a synthesis of Gallente and Caldari navies - Roden Shipyards is Gallente and prefers missiles which is odd, but point being: It uses Caldari's favorite weapon (Missiles) and Gallente's (Drones).

Drones (bandwidth / bay): 20(-105) / 100(-300)

This bonus is offset here a little bit, but it still ends up being quite strong AND flexible as you could carry up to 5 flights in your cargo bay of super tanky drones, and Valkyrie should be able to track frigates just fine, plus the tight fitting will have you leaping for RLML launchers to begin with, covering the 'anti-frigate' capabilities that light drones provided for it in the past.

Considering it's also getting a missile damage bonus of 50%, I have a hard time understanding what you think is preventing its missiles from packing a punch.

Arma Purgatorium - Once for the State, Now for the King Low Sec, PvP, Industrial - Open for Recruiting http://armapurgatorium.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/arpur_recruit1.png 

Sarnia Aldurad
Stellar Winds Consortium
#1164 - 2014-05-10 19:28:29 UTC
Sure let me clarify now that I've calmed down :)

GILA Impact analysis ------------------------------------


BOUNUS CHANGES::

Gallente Cruiser Bonus:

10% bonus to kinetic and thermal missile damage

versus a 10% drone damage and hitpoints for all drone types


Role Bonus:

500% bonus to medium drone damage and hitpoints

versus 50% bonus to Light Missile and Rocket max velocity giving us extended range

SLOT Changes:

Drones (bandwidth / bay): 20(-105) / 100(-300)

so -- we lose 105m3 of bandwidth and now have the ability to launch only an un-bonused flight of lights, or a super beefy flight of mediums. No more heavies or sentries, and no more geckos

we also lose 300m3 of logistics space for our drones overall. we now have room for just (2) flights of medium drones on our bays.... versus the massed wings I have available to me now.

We are going from a robust, hugely versatile Drone Sniper, to something that is, indeed more focused, but a mere shadow of what it was. Hope that helps clarify.

SA
Viribus
Wilderness
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
#1165 - 2014-05-10 19:38:10 UTC
Sarnia Aldurad wrote:
Sure let me clarify now that I've calmed down :)

GILA Impact analysis ------------------------------------


BOUNUS CHANGES::

Gallente Cruiser Bonus:

10% bonus to kinetic and thermal missile damage

versus a 10% drone damage and hitpoints for all drone types


Role Bonus:

500% bonus to medium drone damage and hitpoints

versus 50% bonus to Light Missile and Rocket max velocity giving us extended range

SLOT Changes:

Drones (bandwidth / bay): 20(-105) / 100(-300)

so -- we lose 105m3 of bandwidth and now have the ability to launch only an un-bonused flight of lights, or a super beefy flight of mediums. No more heavies or sentries, and no more geckos

we also lose 300m3 of logistics space for our drones overall. we now have room for just (2) flights of medium drones on our bays.... versus the massed wings I have available to me now.

We are going from a robust, hugely versatile Drone Sniper, to something that is, indeed more focused, but a mere shadow of what it was. Hope that helps clarify.

SA


It actually has room for 5 flights of medium drones

Math really isn't your thing, is it
Sarnia Aldurad
Stellar Winds Consortium
#1166 - 2014-05-10 20:23:10 UTC
Viribus wrote:


It actually has room for 5 flights of medium drones

Math really isn't your thing, is it


Math isnt the issue. I'm not sure how you use your Drones and Drone bays,but I maintain flights of each type of medium drones,a salvage flight, a heavy contingent for tougher foes, and EWAR flights as well/. I worked my ass off for my Gila and Rattler. They are my favorite types of ships rugged Missile + Drone boats -- this set of changes limits my options in Drones and even with regards to missiles (see above). DPS balancing is all dandy, but if it sacrifices the flexibilty and to me the key nature of my favorite vessels IMO its not really a good set of changes.

Just think about it... With this change I'll get (5) flights of condensed extra-powered medium drones which will equal the DPS of my old medium flights on a flight per flight basis, but I will become severely ilmited in my application of drones across various environments and sitations.

Simple as that.

SA
Sheimi Madaveda
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1167 - 2014-05-10 20:56:16 UTC
Sarnia Aldurad wrote:
Math isnt the issue. I'm not sure how you use your Drones and Drone bays,but I maintain flights of each type of medium drones,a salvage flight, a heavy contingent for tougher foes, and EWAR flights as well/. I worked my ass off for my Gila and Rattler. They are my favorite types of ships rugged Missile + Drone boats -- this set of changes limits my options in Drones and even with regards to missiles (see above). DPS balancing is all dandy, but if it sacrifices the flexibilty and to me the key nature of my favorite vessels IMO its not really a good set of changes.

Just think about it... With this change I'll get (5) flights of condensed extra-powered medium drones which will equal the DPS of my old medium flights on a flight per flight basis, but I will become severely ilmited in my application of drones across various environments and sitations.


Ahh, I think I understand now. There is much less room in your ship's drone bay for the OTHER random goodies that you've been used to having, which I agree make the ship more desirable. At first it just sounded like you were mad about losing DPS and different damage type coverages - at least it did to me :P

HAMs are okay (HML are pretty bad), and you didn't really need a range bonus on HAMs anyways - so I think that the missile part should be fine, especially considering how even though RLML are worse right now it is great that the bonus is to DAMAGE and not RATE OF FIRE so that RLML are at least remotely revelant.

At least the Mobile Depot helps alleviate some of these problems. ECM/Salvage drones? It probably won't help you much on that note 'cause you still have 20mb bandwidth lol.

Arma Purgatorium - Once for the State, Now for the King Low Sec, PvP, Industrial - Open for Recruiting http://armapurgatorium.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/arpur_recruit1.png 

Aglais
Ice-Storm
#1168 - 2014-05-10 21:17:30 UTC
Sarnia Aldurad wrote:
The GILA as far as I understand it, has always, as a pirate ship, been a synthesis of the very best its two parent navies could offer. For the GILA this mean drone warfare was primary. I am great with the changes to Drones themselves, but you're talking about neutering the Gil into a bad imitator of a Gallente destroyer level hull. Why should I have burned so much time to get into the ultra rare Gila -- harnessing the best of a Missile and Drone tradition to suddenly be losing vast amounts of Drone capability.

Here :: have a new bonus structure -- lose 1/2 your weapon systems in a heartbeat w/the removal of all missile bonuses... then on top of it dump a flat 50% bonus that applies to just medium drones -- and utterly wreck its capability with its now "primary" weapon system by gutting the drone bay and its capacity so brutally. If I am to specialize in just medium drones, then you bloody well ought to at least leave us the drone bay size so we can have our different flghts of various drones... after all, this is out _primary_weapon_system and as such, being able to configure our "ammo", ie. drones in this case, is absolutely paramount.

This reall and truly needs a serious rethink. Lastly -- If I wantd to just fly a drone boat w/o my missiles, I'd never have reached beyond my gallente hulls.

Regards.

SA


This argument again.

Refuting paragraph 1: The Gila was primarily a drone carrier that ignored it's onboard missiles because it's missiles were practically unbonused, and almost did not meaningfully contribute to it's DPS output. Calling the new Gila a "bad imitator of a Gallente destroyer level hull" shows that you do not fully understand what the changes actually imply. Furthermore, if it was the "best of a Missile and Drone tradition", why did so many people tell me to just forgo using missiles entirely and slap on a bunch of energy neutralizers/NOS? Hm? Sounds like the missile part wasn't worth using. Whereas now, a significant chunk of your very reasonable DPS comes out of missiles, making it truly the "best of a Missile and Drone tradition". (Addendum: the 500% damage bonus to mediums as far as I can tell is to make sure that DPS is on par with what you can get out of the Gila now. With heavy drones. Which are slow. Mediums are not. They will be getting even faster, and I think also better tracking.)

You also claim (wrongfully) that Guristas ships have drones as their "primary" weapon system. Ever notice in ISIS how it says that Gurista ships "combine missiles and drones"? Hm. It's almost like they don't favour one over the other, and instead use both in a fashion that, after launch, may actually be quite valid- as it's precisely what a variety of other acceptable ships do, only Guristas utilize extremely powerful drones.

Refuting paragraph 2: ...Wait, what even are you arguing here? What's this about "the removal of all missile bonuses"? They get a 50% damage bonus, can you read? Yes, that's right- a 50% bonus to thermal and kinetic missile damage. With four launchers. This is actually kind of okay. Keep in mind you still have two drones (with a 500% bonus to damage and durability- yes, FIVE, HUNDRED, PERCENT) on top of that. It's going to be a dangerous brawler. Do you know yet just how the new drones are going to perform? I keep recalling hearing that tracking valkyries are going to make Frigates cry, so there's really no need to worry about losing any sort of capability against things smaller than you if you prepare for it (which is exactly how other cruisers work tbh). Furthermore. A flight of Gila drones is two. They'll take up 20m3 of space. Your drone bay has 100m3 of space. That's four sets of medium drones, and then four lights of whatever you want- salvage, ECM, whatever. You're essentially moaning about issues that don't exist in terms of "lack of drone bay space". And again you claim that Guristas are supposed to be "pure drone ships with support missiles". No, you're describing how they were flown before, and refuse to change for some reason despite the new setup being objectively better in terms of DPS and usability (Again- superdrones. They're going to be really, really tough to kill. You will have shipboard DPS as well instead of relying solely on drones.) It's clear that for once, CCP has an actual role in mind for these ships- adapt, and get an Ishtar or something if you want to cling to "the old ways".

All in all, I think your approach to the Guristas lineup really needs a serious rethink. Perhaps you should stick with Gallente ships for now, as they're not due for a radical overhaul (and improvement) in how they function on a fundamental level any time soon.
CraftyCroc
Fraternity Alliance Please Ignore
#1169 - 2014-05-12 23:14:32 UTC
Have read too much

Cyna ( angel ships)

Warp speed buff - nice
Don't nerf pg/cpu
Overheat bonus
Sig decrease bonus per level

Thanks
Cage Man
Fusion Enterprises Ltd
Pandemic Horde
#1170 - 2014-05-13 00:25:32 UTC
The point to the gila is can currently be used for missioning and exploration as you could use sentry drones and do some decent damage. The SOE ships while they can warp cloaked, do not do what the gila can (could).
The changes are not enough to make it useful as a missile boat, and I would really like to know who uses medium drones for missions or even pvp.
Before you all come raging at this, go and take it out on the test server and see how long you medium drones survive in any anom/mission.
When last did you see a PVPer, launch medium drones ?? its lights, heavy or sentry.. CCP is making this awesome ship in to a relic.
Sheimi Madaveda
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1171 - 2014-05-13 00:42:03 UTC
Cage Man wrote:
The point to the gila is can currently be used for missioning and exploration as you could use sentry drones and do some decent damage. The SOE ships while they can warp cloaked, do not do what the gila can (could).
The changes are not enough to make it useful as a missile boat, and I would really like to know who uses medium drones for missions or even pvp.
Before you all come raging at this, go and take it out on the test server and see how long you medium drones survive in any anom/mission.
When last did you see a PVPer, launch medium drones ?? its lights, heavy or sentry.. CCP is making this awesome ship in to a relic.


Arbitrator, Pilgrim, Curse, the occasional Algos wanting to use all 35mb, some battlecruisers that think they should field Hammerheads instead of Warriors, and Battleships with 50mb/75m3 drone powers. Oh, and sometimes Rapier/Bellicose/Huginn will do it to use up the 40mb power, it is hard to avoid mediums when you are webbed (though Bellicose can't web as reliably as its t2 variants)

I'll go test it out this weekend, but my eye is on the Blood Raider line... especially the Cruor.

Arma Purgatorium - Once for the State, Now for the King Low Sec, PvP, Industrial - Open for Recruiting http://armapurgatorium.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/arpur_recruit1.png 

Jediael
TunDraGon
Goonswarm Federation
#1172 - 2014-05-13 18:06:38 UTC
welp...gila + gecko's was fun while it lasted. Is there a box to check so I can "grandfather" in my current setup? The new ship design is nice though!
Ci'Fera
State War Academy
Caldari State
#1173 - 2014-05-14 06:10:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Ci'Fera
Congratulations, The changes to the guristas ships in my personal opinion are terrible, I may be one of the few people who despize gallente, But the Gila is the drone ship I go to. The changes would not allow it to use heavy, sentry or even the awesome new geckos. Its nice to have something like a fighter for once sence you guys removed carriers from highsec.

I dont see why they removed carriers on that note from empire. Its not like they dont die to things like bombers these days.


Edit: The reason I use the gila is because its not gallente, and its nice to see it get a makeover in Kronos. No I dont want to fly a rattlesnake, Got tired of battleships 6 years ago.
Rab See
Stellar Dynamics
#1174 - 2014-05-14 21:59:02 UTC
So what do you see now CCP?

Cynabal price just sliding away, another lost opportunity, nerfed into the ground.

Why do CCP do this? One ship is better to some degree, so lets nerf it to crap and make the others way better. Its just plain stupid.
ChromeStriker
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1175 - 2014-05-16 08:00:16 UTC
CCP Rise wrote:

We've also adjusted powergrid on the Ashimmu to make some more room for those PG heavy energy war mods.


... According to the OP you've actually REDUCED the PG by 120... Hope this is a typo because its a damn tight fit anyway lol...

No Worries

Sheimi Madaveda
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1176 - 2014-05-16 13:58:42 UTC
ChromeStriker wrote:
CCP Rise wrote:

We've also adjusted powergrid on the Ashimmu to make some more room for those PG heavy energy war mods.


... According to the OP you've actually REDUCED the PG by 120... Hope this is a typo because its a damn tight fit anyway lol...


You will be fitting 1 less neut and for general use, there is little need for a cap booster, so I guess it kinda evens out. If you want all neuts 0 nos then you will be completely dependent on Logi for capacitor unless you forgo dual web.

Arma Purgatorium - Once for the State, Now for the King Low Sec, PvP, Industrial - Open for Recruiting http://armapurgatorium.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/arpur_recruit1.png 

Aralieus
Shadowbane Syndicate
#1177 - 2014-05-16 16:19:38 UTC
I just want to say that new Ashimmu is AWESOME! Don't nerf it Evil

Oderint Dum Metuant

Antonio Steele
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#1178 - 2014-05-16 20:54:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Antonio Steele
I was crunching some numbers and found that a medium drone is typically worth half the DPS of it's race's heavy drone. If you have 2 drones at 5 times power you essentially have the power equivalent of 5 unbonused heavy drones but in a much faster package that applies damage better. The old damage bonus used with heavy drones essentially gave you 7.5 heavy drones worth of DPS.

So basically you lose 2.5 heavy drones worth of DPS by using heavily bonused medium drones.

They added 1 launcher to the Gila, and if you use the proper damage type you essentially gain 2 more launchers. So you basically gain 3 launchers worth of DPS total.



TL/DR The gila loses 2.5 heavy drones worth of drone DPS and gains 3 launchers worth of DPS when using Kin or Thermal missiles.

All in all this is a net loss of DPS on paper as adding 3 heavy launchers doesn't quite make up for the loss of 2.5 heavy drones worth of DPS.

One could argue that actual DPS could go up as medium drones apply damage better and if you factor travel time into the DPS equation you might gain DPS by spending less time to get in range.
(Ex, 5 seconds travel and 5 seconds attacking versus 2 seconds travel and 8 seconds attacking in the same 10 second window of time)
Ravasta Helugo
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#1179 - 2014-05-16 21:32:30 UTC
Antonio Steele wrote:
I was crunching some numbers and found that a medium drone is typically worth half the DPS of it's race's heavy drone. If you have 2 drones at 5 times power you essentially have the power equivalent of 5 unbonused heavy drones but in a much faster package that applies damage better. The old damage bonus used with heavy drones essentially gave you 7.5 heavy drones worth of DPS.

So basically you lose 2.5 heavy drones worth of DPS by using heavily bonused medium drones.

They added 1 launcher to the Gila, and if you use the proper damage type you essentially gain 2 more launchers. So you basically gain 3 launchers worth of DPS total.



TL/DR The gila loses 2.5 heavy drones worth of drone DPS and gains 3 launchers worth of DPS when using Kin or Thermal missiles.

All in all this is a net loss of DPS on paper as adding 3 heavy launchers doesn't quite make up for the loss of 2.5 heavy drones worth of DPS.

One could argue that actual DPS could go up as medium drones apply damage better and if you factor travel time into the DPS equation you might gain DPS by spending less time to get in range.
(Ex, 5 seconds travel and 5 seconds attacking versus 2 seconds travel and 8 seconds attacking in the same 10 second window of time)

You did the math wrong. It still does the equivalent of 7.5 Heavies in damage. And now it applies said damage much better up close, although not at range.
PotatoOverdose
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#1180 - 2014-05-16 22:43:18 UTC
Launching a Gecko from a Gila would've been cool. Just sayin'.