These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Jester Trek Latest Blog

First post First post
Author
Jayem See
Perkone
Caldari State
#581 - 2014-03-25 18:22:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Jayem See
I might as well state that I find the recording in very poor taste. Whilst scamming is legal within Eve (and I would have it no other way) once this chap's assets have been removed, there isn't much justification for continuing to prolong his ordeal.

We've all heard clips of people singing for their ship. The difference is that it doesn't continue for several hours (whether the ransom is honoured or not.)

It does strike me that Erotica1 has taken it way, way too far.

Whilst Malcanis may sit there and say that no rules have been broken, which they haven't, it does strike me as odd that he can't see that CCP are within their right to review those rules and amend them as they see fit. A lot of people seem to find the recording objectionable - CCP's response is for them to make and not for Malcanis and a few others to decide.

I personally wouldn't ask them to ban Erotica1 but they are within their rights to ask him to tone it down. Whilst I understand they have no recourse outside of Eve, they can make a decision about whether they want a player associated with their product.

It's a thorny situation for sure. It does sadden me to see so many people justifying something like this. It just crosses the line for me.

Incidentally - Jester's blog might have been more effective if he had avoided the word torture. In this case it was probably inflammatory rather than constructive.

Aaaaaaand relax.

Toshiro Ozuwara
Perkone
#582 - 2014-03-25 18:22:54 UTC
Kadl wrote:
Erotica1 was clearly looking for services, actions to be performed by Sohkar (and others). Those actions were to be performed outside of the game on a Teamspeak server. Erotica1 may have used coercion to obtain those services. Thus a crime of extortion may have been committed.

If the activities were outside the game then Erotica1 was clearly offering in game items (or to make in game actions) in return for out of game services (or actions). It may be that Erotica1 had no intention of providing those in game items (or in making certain in game actions).

Whether it's criminal or not, it's probably abhorrent behavior based on even the White Knight's posting in this thread.

It didn't take long to locate the tracking beacon, deep inside the quarters for sleepin' They thought they could get away Not today, it's not the way that this kid plays

Capt Starfox
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#583 - 2014-03-25 18:23:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Capt Starfox
Toshiro Ozuwara wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
I'm not defending what erotica1 does


I'm afraid you are.

What you meant? Maybe not. But it's the logical consequence of what you said

see what I did there?

Malcanis wrote:
I'm defending his right to fair treatment and due process according to the rules.

You're the kind of guy who'd argue for a rapist to go free on a technicality then. Right? Because observation of arbitrary rules should trump justice?

Let's really get the heat off Erotica1. Let's talk about the CSM who defends harassment, mental abuse and torture because it's "not against the rules".

Malcanis wrote:
I sincerely hope that you never have the occasion to experience it in reality.

Great representative of the community. If my constituents hurt, it's ok as long as it doesn't happen to me.

Well played friend.


It's not torture.
It's not criminal activity.
Comparing real world crime/criminals to a video game screams for attention.
I would rather have him represent us, because he knows the rules of the video and the difference between IRL and virtual video games.

Abandon all hope ye who x up in fleet

TigerXtrm
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#584 - 2014-03-25 18:23:26 UTC
Wesley Otsdarva wrote:
http://massively.joystiq.com/2014/03/25/heres-some-of-the-cyberbullying-that-happens-in-eve-online/

So here goes for news coverage.


Oh ****. Shocked

My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!

My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#585 - 2014-03-25 18:23:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Ramona McCandless
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Actually, they are called Daily Mail readers and they are reactionary fools who voted in a mix of impotent pretend centralists and the Tories
TBH 99% of the UKs politicians are out of touch trust fund morons, regardless of their political affiliations. The Daily Mail itself is pretty much Fox News printed on paper.

We're pretty screwed when Boris is the only politician who is worth giving a damn about.


This is true, and the more Boris speaks, the less sense he talks.

Still at least you guys in Engerland have that to content with and not what I have in the part I live in where your voting block is determined by what kind of Christian you supposedly are

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Praise the Yeti
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#586 - 2014-03-25 18:24:54 UTC
The people calling for Erotica 1 to be banned based on that recording........why are you not calling for Shadoo and Grath Telkin to be banned also based on the very public recordings of them (by defacto) engaging in what could be perceived to be exactly the same activity?



I Riven I
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#587 - 2014-03-25 18:25:19 UTC
TigerXtrm wrote:
I Riven I wrote:
Guys can you all please calm down here??

ITS JUST MONEY!!

IF ITS $100 OR $1000 .. IT STILL JUST POCKET MONEY AND NOT A BANK ROBBERY OF MILLIONS.


So much drama out of a couple hundreds..


This stopped being about the money like 26 pages ago...



from what I can tell, the guy is the one that deserves to be banned, as he life threatened another player.

Kadl
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#588 - 2014-03-25 18:25:37 UTC
Batelle wrote:
True, but unless erotica1 et al dox the guy and start calling him, emailing him, contacting his friends & family, or otherwise defame him, its still not harassment. Getting **** on via a consensual phone call that you've consented to have recorded is not harassment.


But if you are coerced then the phone call may not be consensual in all jurisdictions, and if you are coerced to agree to the recording then the consent is not really consent.

Honestly the police, and lawyers can take up the legal issue as they desire.

Whether this happened in game or out of game it seems clear that CCP could ban Erotic1, the question is do they want to.
Toshiro Ozuwara
Perkone
#589 - 2014-03-25 18:25:37 UTC
Ramona McCandless wrote:
What does due process mean to you then?

I am not talking about court. I am not talking about law. "Due process" is a fiction of fairness, provided when it is convenient to do so, and denied when it is not.

We don't need 12 jurors to hear this case. Let the wider world listen to the recording as Ripard suggested, and let them judge Eve and CCP for it.

I am sure CCP can get Malcanis to volunteer to head up PR on this, where he can explain to people disgusted by this behavior that it's within the rules, and that Erotica1 deserves his day in court. That will be compelling for sure.

It didn't take long to locate the tracking beacon, deep inside the quarters for sleepin' They thought they could get away Not today, it's not the way that this kid plays

Ravcharas
Infinite Point
Pandemic Horde
#590 - 2014-03-25 18:25:41 UTC
ITT "don't dangle restitution in front of your marks and have them join your comms to humiliate themselves for two hours while you make fun of their speech impediment" is apparently an unreasonable request on the community.
Kara Vix
Perkone
Caldari State
#591 - 2014-03-25 18:25:57 UTC
Toshiro Ozuwara wrote:
Kadl wrote:
Erotica1 was clearly looking for services, actions to be performed by Sohkar (and others). Those actions were to be performed outside of the game on a Teamspeak server. Erotica1 may have used coercion to obtain those services. Thus a crime of extortion may have been committed.

If the activities were outside the game then Erotica1 was clearly offering in game items (or to make in game actions) in return for out of game services (or actions). It may be that Erotica1 had no intention of providing those in game items (or in making certain in game actions).

Whether it's criminal or not, it's probably abhorrent behavior based on even the White Knight's posting in this thread.


Even as a police officer (retired) with a masters degree I cannot say if this was legal or not, but I can say it was abusive enough that a court would probably look at it if a complaint were made, so I think CCP should take it seriously.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#592 - 2014-03-25 18:26:12 UTC
Wesley Otsdarva wrote:
http://massively.joystiq.com/2014/03/25/heres-some-of-the-cyberbullying-that-happens-in-eve-online/

So here goes for news coverage.


Good, perhaps people will learn that EVE online is grown folks business and stay in their thempark MMOs all swaddled in cotton safe from the 'griefers'..
Lady Areola Fappington
#593 - 2014-03-25 18:26:31 UTC
Praise the Yeti wrote:
The people calling for Erotica 1 to be banned based on that recording........why are you not calling for Shadoo and Grath Telkin to be banned also based on the very public recordings of them (by defacto) engaging in what could be perceived to be exactly the same activity?






Oh hush you no better than that. Gankers and scammers and such are total scum. You can tell because the database numbers attached to that character say so!

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

Toshiro Ozuwara
Perkone
#594 - 2014-03-25 18:27:09 UTC
Capt Starfox wrote:
[It's not torture.
It's not criminal activity.
Comparing real world crime/criminals to a video game screams for attention.
I would rather have him represent us, because he knows the rules of the video and the difference between IRL and virtual video games.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbole

Just giving Malcanis a taste of his own medicine.

It didn't take long to locate the tracking beacon, deep inside the quarters for sleepin' They thought they could get away Not today, it's not the way that this kid plays

Winchester Steele
#595 - 2014-03-25 18:27:27 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Winchester Steele wrote:
Xander Delacroix wrote:
On one side we have those who want Erotica1 and his cronies buried in a digital shallow grave.

On the other side, we have those wishing to hoist Erotic1 up on their shoulders as a hero to freedom.

Perhaps, just perhaps, there's a middle ground? Where we can discuss the underlying issue, rather than this single incident? We're all adults, and dealing with the issue of 'potential' cyber bullying is very much an adult issue. So how about we all get off our respective soapboxes, myself included, and start discussing, as adults, this issue and the ramifications that any potential decisions and actions taken regarding the "emergent gameplay" vs "cyber-bullying" debate?



Ok. I think cyber bullying is a bullshit term made up by soccer moms to explain their own failings to teach their children how to properly defend themselves in this dog eat dog world. I think it's utter garbage spewed by socialists and busybodies who are terrified because the internet represents something they can't control.

At it's most base it is a form of thought control from people like you who think they are on the moral highground.

Turn your ******* computer off. Delete your facebook. In this case, just DON'T GO INTO THE BONUS ROUND WITH A KNOWN SCAMMER.

Why is it that folks like you ALWAYS need the authorities (CCP) to fight your battles for you? Man the **** up son.


And watch your advioce be ignored lol.

RIGHT NOW I've got some distant family members (cousins) involved in a facebook shouting match with some other cousins about something stupid. This weekend I saw 1 cousin each from both opposing sides and both vented at me how dumb the other side was. And both kept asking me when i was gonna get on facebook lol.

I'm still in WTF mode over that, they're playing virtual Hatfields and McCoys with each other and then looking at me as If I'm the crazy one for not fooling with facebook.....





I have an empty facebook page, with my wife as my only friend. Just so I can see on all the pictures of my beautiful children that she posts. I don't use my real name and my profile is blank. It's noones business what my status is right now, and frankly, I couldn't give two ***** about anyone else's "status". Facebook is ****.

...

Drone 16
Holy Horde
#596 - 2014-03-25 18:27:31 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Drone 16 wrote:
Malcanis wrote:

As I said before, it's not when the popular handsome hero is on trial that our dedication to justice is tested. It's when the unpopular, ugly, awful unpleasant defendant needs a fair hearing.

That's when we really see who cares about doing what's right.


That's a good point. The guy who got griefed is obviously not popular in-game, no one has heard of him. He has a speech impediment and is from the sound of things gullible. All things that make him ripe for ridicule, apparently.

Meanwhile, Erotica1 has many friends on the forums who don't want to see him punished, they are out in droves trying to justify that recording. They don't want their "fun" or their popular guy threatened.

So Malcanis, you "white knght" Erotica1 because he is "somebody" in the community and the other guy is a "nobody"

So you are backing the "in crowd" over the "outcast". That's justice for you...


Look at the hoops people go through to twist things around. I think it's childish.

It's not about popularity, it's about what is expected of adults. The 'victim' went willingly into a bad situation and got owned and blew up about it (while at the very same time exposing himself as a potentially violent racist).

Malcanis is supporting reason and due process over emotion and mob justice and mysticism and and giant persian elephants....Damn, i should never post while watching '300' reruns.




The only hoops you that are being jumped through are the ones that you are your friends are frantically skipping through to rationalize outright cruelty. Sure the victim walked into it, sure he should be fleeced, this is Eve not "Hello Kitty" but that recording goes far beyond that.

You defend it because you identify more strongly with what Erotica1 did and you support that type of behavior in the game. Just be honest and say it.

It puts the peanutbutter on itself or it leaves the bonus round... - E1's greatest Hits

LUMINOUS SPIRIT
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#597 - 2014-03-25 18:27:32 UTC  |  Edited by: LUMINOUS SPIRIT
Cyber-bullying crosses a line.

Ban Erotica 1, his alts, and everyone else that ever participated in this.

EDIT: The victim should do this:

File an action in USA court over cyber-bullying, with CCP as party to the case. CCP office in USA would fold and release IP of Erotica 1, they dont need this kind of publicity - thats guaranteed. CCP arent stupid, they will not defend a user like that EULA or not.

Then file action vs Erotica directly, and watch him dance. Cyber-bullying in USA has serious repercussions, - jail-time.

It would not even cost that much, no more then 10 grand, most of it recoverable as damages later. I do this sort of thing in my real life work every now and again against trade mark infringements.
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#598 - 2014-03-25 18:27:33 UTC
Toshiro Ozuwara wrote:
Ramona McCandless wrote:
What does due process mean to you then?

I am not talking about court. I am not talking about law. "Due process" is a fiction of fairness, provided when it is convenient to do so, and denied when it is not.

We don't need 12 jurors to hear this case. Let the wider world listen to the recording as Ripard suggested, and let them judge Eve and CCP for it.

I am sure CCP can get Malcanis to volunteer to head up PR on this, where he can explain to people disgusted by this behavior that it's within the rules, and that Erotica1 deserves his day in court. That will be compelling for sure.


Ok so you do see what he meant, and wasnt as you suggested, advocating for a rapist to be let off on a technicality.

Good good

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#599 - 2014-03-25 18:27:34 UTC  |  Edited by: rodyas
Malcanis wrote:
Anslo wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:

Erotica1, fighter for freedom and against Tyranny. Who in hell would have thought that LOL.


As I said before, it's not when the popular handsome hero is on trial that our dedication to justice is tested. It's when the unpopular, ugly, awful unpleasant defendant needs a fair hearing.

That's when we really see who cares about doing what's right.

It should speak volumes about the community's state when a CSM candidate is defending these kind of actions.


I'm not defending what erotica1 does

I'm defending his right to fair treatment and due process according to the rules.

I'm sorry you're unable to see the difference, but the difference is there nonetheless. I sincerely hope that you never have the occasion to experience it in reality.


Well what are the rules regarding loopholes? Does CCP admit they were outsmarted by erotica1 by him having conversations through non game program with another EVE player?

Maybe CCP should clarify those loopholes then see what should happen to erotica1 or so.

Besides if erotica1 did outsmart CCP through that, what is wrong about setting up character purchases and ISK selling on programs outside the EVE client.

I should be able to exit EVE, go to ebay, which isn't owned by CCP and sell my character and that is all legal, since it is outside CCP's hands.

Also since character trading is illegal, I should be able to reclaim my character through CCP giving me control to it again.

That would be a scam and CCP couldn't punish me for it, since all the TOS breaking happened outside the game as well.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#600 - 2014-03-25 18:27:59 UTC
Ravcharas wrote:
ITT "don't dangle restitution in front of your marks and have them join your comms to humiliate themselves for two hours while you make fun of their speech impediment" is apparently an unreasonable request on the community.


It actually is unreasonable, unless someone was int he dudes house holding a gun to his head preventing him fro disconnecting.