These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Jester Trek Latest Blog

First post First post
Author
Icylce
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#4541 - 2014-03-27 07:26:42 UTC
PotatoOverdose wrote:

Cite the precise rule E1 broke and reread my last, bolded paragraph regarding coercion and manipulation. Please. I didn't ignore it, I attacked it head on. You chose not to read it.

Naive. Sometimes human beeings are turned into puppets. Your seeing things too idealistically.
PotatoOverdose
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#4542 - 2014-03-27 07:28:17 UTC
Space Juden wrote:

Do juries decide sentencing based on the pathology of the victim?

Depending on you municipality, it can be a contributing factor, actually.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#4543 - 2014-03-27 07:28:56 UTC
PotatoOverdose wrote:
Space Juden wrote:

Do juries decide sentencing based on the pathology of the victim?

Depending on you municipality, it can be a contributing factor, actually.


Except that juries don't decide sentencing, the judge does that.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Space Juden
Supermassive Potato Pancake
#4544 - 2014-03-27 07:29:57 UTC
PotatoOverdose wrote:
Space Juden wrote:

Do juries decide sentencing based on the pathology of the victim?

Depending on you municipality, it can be a contributing factor, actually.


That's news to me, I know it happens but it shouldn't in a law system where people are judged on their crimes alone.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#4545 - 2014-03-27 07:30:38 UTC
Icylce wrote:
PotatoOverdose wrote:

Cite the precise rule E1 broke and reread my last, bolded paragraph regarding coercion and manipulation. Please. I didn't ignore it, I attacked it head on. You chose not to read it.

Naive. Sometimes human beeings are turned into puppets. Your seeing things too idealistically.


Shrugs off request for citation of relevant reference material, insults the person requesting in instead.

I'm noticing a pattern here. Particularly amongst the people on the witchhunt.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Space Juden
Supermassive Potato Pancake
#4546 - 2014-03-27 07:31:04 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
PotatoOverdose wrote:
Space Juden wrote:

Do juries decide sentencing based on the pathology of the victim?

Depending on you municipality, it can be a contributing factor, actually.


Except that juries don't decide sentencing, the judge does that.


Some places they do yeah but it's not really the point.
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#4547 - 2014-03-27 07:31:39 UTC  |  Edited by: BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
Hello Monument Visitor wrote:
I just want to summarize a bit for my own sake and maybe others. There really are a lot of posts about this now! Please indicate where I may have gone wrong...


  1. E1 baits gullible and / or vulnerable people in EvE with a scam.
  2. Once a potential victim is found and has shown sufficient vulnerability, they are invited to continue out of game on TS (the bonus room).
  3. The scam continues for a few minutes on TS until the victim has been scammed out of all in-game assets.
  4. E1 then ransoms the victim's assets through a series of humiliating & escalating non-game related actions & tasks, picking up on any possible weaknesses the victim may have (speech impediment for example).
  5. E1 continues this process for as long as it takes for the victim to display alarming levels of psychological torment & distress and snap into outrage.
  6. The whole process is recorded and sometimes made public.


What I gather from reading many (but not all) comments is that the player base in general are OK with 1 & 2 as it's all a part of the game we play. Most are still OK with 3 but some don't like taking it out of game (mainly due to subsequent steps I think, might be wrong here though).

4 is beginning to push certain limits that people have, mainly based around extending an EvE scam into real world actions. 5 is seen as thoroughly reprehensible. 6 isn't mentioned too much - some see it as pawn for E1's pleasure, some as further psychological torment of the victim.

That's my rough summary of the most common views from the players.

A minority try to validate E1's actions with things like "the victim should be banned for making threats", "HTFU, it's EvE", "he deserved it", "It's not illegal or in contravention of the EULA" (that's possibly the most common one) and possibly the most outstandingly appalling one is "E1 only did it to this extent once, other times weren't as bad so it's an outlier and is therefore OK".

For what it's worth, I'd say the majority of the EvE player base are morally sound people. The poor reputation that EvE's player base has is undeserved and is based on a very small minority. Reading this thread is evidence of this.

1. Undisputed. This is part of normal gameplay.
2. Not quite sure what you mean by sufficient vulnerability, but yes, the mark has their money doubled once or twice and then on their second or third play is told that to receive a reward they have win the bonus round.
3. The victim sends their isk to erotica and assets to escrow agents. This can take a very short or very long time depending on the mark's character and account, and if they have other accounts.
4. I have had mixed feelings for awhile on this. With some marks this is fun. They have fun the agents have fun. It can be pretty silly. With others they can be very upset.
5. This is how it has sometimes turns out, but is never the primary goal from what I can tell. The primary goal is to find a reason that the mark is not suitable to win the bonus round. Often this involves not being code compliant, but can also be any level of hostility or dishonesty towards Ero or escrow agents. This is the only part of the whole subject that disturbs people.
6. The mark is asked at the beginning of the bonus round if they consent to be recorded.

Icylce wrote:
6. IS illegal if u dont have consent of person u record.

WHICH IS WHY CONSENT IS ASKED FOR!

Founder of Violet Squadron, a small gang NPSI community! Mail me for more information.

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie's Space Mediation Service!

Silvara Nocturn
Nocturn Industries
#4548 - 2014-03-27 07:32:13 UTC
CCP has to take action because this game is rated pegi 12 and allows minors to play. If this happens to a child they are royally screwed and rightfully so. The only way for them to allow this behaviour is to raise the age limit up to 18 or 21 depending on country. Which they I doubt they will do.

You can claim that no one would subject a child to this but that would be a baseless claim. You can claim that this can happen anyway, while this is true CCP will still be held accountable for the fact that they allow this sort of behaviour in a game that allows minors to play.Online Interactions are not rated, but you can't ignore them either. Especially since EO gameplay is mostly online interactions.

As for choice, yes Sohkar had a choice he could have stopped it. Erotica 1 also had a choice, he could have stopped it too. Neither choices are consequential to the question at hand. Does the Eve Online community think what Erotica 1 has done is acceptable?
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#4549 - 2014-03-27 07:33:09 UTC
lollerwaffle wrote:
Erica Dusette wrote:
The thing is though that in RL (at least here) Casinos are now bound by law to stop problem gamblers and addicts from gaming when they're spotted. Same with pubs and alcohol - the establishment is ultimately responsible for how drunk they allow someone to become.

We're seeing the same thing creep in online, where the sites are ultimately being asked to take responsibility for people who cannot meter their own interactions within the game.

This is the part of RL that I don't agree with. People are beginning to lose all sense of personal responsibility and demanding that other people take responsibility for their actions. Which is wrong. Everyone is responsible for their own actions and choices. This shirking of responsibility and accountability for one's own action is a plague on this world.

The laws are there to protect stupid people and their families. Video games don't need these kinds of laws because there is no meaningful consequence where in-game interactions are involved (however we are seeing laws introduced to protect people from real life interactions through digital media). In video games, players are encouraged to screw up and learn from their mistakes and that's exactly what is happening here. The punishment might be harsher than many expect in a video game, but that's what makes the lesson so valuable. It should also teach players to avoid this kind of situation in future, especially in real life. Isn't it a wonderful thing when people can learn important life skills and better themselves through video games?
lollerwaffle
Perkone
Caldari State
#4550 - 2014-03-27 07:33:09 UTC
Space Juden wrote:
Roggle wrote:
A racist, homophobic, who threatens to commit murder is scammed. Ya he is a real innocent victim here...


Even if what you said is true, if homo"phobia" was a real fear and "racism" wasn't innate in everyone in at least the pretense of social outgrouping. What does it matter?

Do juries decide sentencing based on the pathology of the victim?

LOLwat, victim of an video game scam of imaginary money makes RL death threats, displaying racist and homophobic tendencies. Yes, i believe I do know which way the jury will swing in this case. It's a no brainer really, unless said jury has trouble differentiating between RL and virtual worlds.. What's more when the supposed 'victim' can walk away with just the click of a mousebutton, and maybe 2 more to ensure he never has to come into contact with people he thinks aren't nice to him.
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#4551 - 2014-03-27 07:33:55 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Icylce wrote:
PotatoOverdose wrote:

Cite the precise rule E1 broke and reread my last, bolded paragraph regarding coercion and manipulation. Please. I didn't ignore it, I attacked it head on. You chose not to read it.

Naive. Sometimes human beeings are turned into puppets. Your seeing things too idealistically.


Shrugs off request for citation of relevant reference material, insults the person requesting in instead.

I'm noticing a pattern here. Particularly amongst the people on the witchhunt.

Already been cited multiple times. You may not harass other players. You may not cause damage to CCP's reputation.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)

Space Juden
Supermassive Potato Pancake
#4552 - 2014-03-27 07:34:57 UTC
lollerwaffle wrote:
Space Juden wrote:
Roggle wrote:
A racist, homophobic, who threatens to commit murder is scammed. Ya he is a real innocent victim here...


Even if what you said is true, if homo"phobia" was a real fear and "racism" wasn't innate in everyone in at least the pretense of social outgrouping. What does it matter?

Do juries decide sentencing based on the pathology of the victim?

LOLwat, victim of an video game scam of imaginary money makes RL death threats, displaying racist and homophobic tendencies. Yes, i believe I do know which way the jury will swing in this case. It's a no brainer really, unless said jury has trouble differentiating between RL and virtual worlds.. What's more when the supposed 'victim' can walk away with just the click of a mousebutton, and maybe 2 more to ensure he never has to come into contact with people he thinks aren't nice to him.


"So, I know my client burned his victims alive, but after all they said a naughty word in the past so... it was ok"
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#4553 - 2014-03-27 07:35:18 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
You may not harass other players. You may not cause damage to CCP's reputation.

Erotica 1 has done neither of those things.
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#4554 - 2014-03-27 07:35:50 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:
lollerwaffle wrote:
Erica Dusette wrote:
The thing is though that in RL (at least here) Casinos are now bound by law to stop problem gamblers and addicts from gaming when they're spotted. Same with pubs and alcohol - the establishment is ultimately responsible for how drunk they allow someone to become.

We're seeing the same thing creep in online, where the sites are ultimately being asked to take responsibility for people who cannot meter their own interactions within the game.

This is the part of RL that I don't agree with. People are beginning to lose all sense of personal responsibility and demanding that other people take responsibility for their actions. Which is wrong. Everyone is responsible for their own actions and choices. This shirking of responsibility and accountability for one's own action is a plague on this world.

The laws are there to protect stupid people and their families. Video games don't need these kinds of laws because there is no meaningful consequence where in-game interactions are involved (however we are seeing laws introduced to protect people from real life interactions through digital media). In video games, players are encouraged to screw up and learn from their mistakes and that's exactly what is happening here. The punishment might be harsher than many expect in a video game, but that's what makes the lesson so valuable. It should also teach players to avoid this kind of situation in future, especially in real life. Isn't it a wonderful thing when people can learn important life skills and better themselves through video games?

Except we're not talking about in game. This entire sad episode involved a group of EvE players harassing and humiliating another EvE player. It had nothing to do with spaceships at all. It was outright predatory behavior designed and intended to cause harm to another person.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#4555 - 2014-03-27 07:37:11 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Already been cited multiple times. You may not harass other players. You may not cause damage to CCP's reputation.

I really think you need to look at the precedent set on that harassment clause. CCP is VERY loose on it. This is by design. One of their game trailers focuses on taking revenge for actions that happened a year before for god's sake.

Founder of Violet Squadron, a small gang NPSI community! Mail me for more information.

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie's Space Mediation Service!

Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#4556 - 2014-03-27 07:37:18 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
You may not harass other players. You may not cause damage to CCP's reputation.

Erotica 1 has done neither of those things.

Perhaps not in your fantasy world but in the real world she has. Would you like me to link to the forums of the various games forums which are painting EVE players and CCP's premier game as aweful?

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#4557 - 2014-03-27 07:37:27 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Icylce wrote:
PotatoOverdose wrote:

Cite the precise rule E1 broke and reread my last, bolded paragraph regarding coercion and manipulation. Please. I didn't ignore it, I attacked it head on. You chose not to read it.

Naive. Sometimes human beeings are turned into puppets. Your seeing things too idealistically.


Shrugs off request for citation of relevant reference material, insults the person requesting in instead.

I'm noticing a pattern here. Particularly amongst the people on the witchhunt.

Already been cited multiple times. You may not harass other players. You may not cause damage to CCP's reputation.


Indicate the harassment and damage to CCP's reputation then. Because if there's damage to CCP's reputation based on false reports of harassment, which is what this is, then CCP's best avenue is to actually sue for libel. If this is reported as cyber bullying, and if that damages their reputation, then CCP can easily demonstrate Sokhar's consent to the whole thing, negating the charge of cyber bullying entirely and getting compensation out of people who claim that CCP are at fault and that they 'condone' cyber bullying by virtue of not caving to the demands of an emotionally charged public and the subsequent irrational witch hunt.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

lollerwaffle
Perkone
Caldari State
#4558 - 2014-03-27 07:37:53 UTC
Silvara Nocturn wrote:
CCP has to take action because this game is rated pegi 12 and allows minors to play. If this happens to a child they are royally screwed and rightfully so. The only way for them to allow this behaviour is to raise the age limit up to 18 or 21 depending on country. Which they I doubt they will do.

You can claim that no one would subject a child to this but that would be a baseless claim. You can claim that this can happen anyway, while this is true CCP will still be held accountable for the fact that they allow this sort of behaviour in a game that allows minors to play.Online Interactions are not rated, but you can't ignore them either. Especially since EO gameplay is mostly online interactions.

As for choice, yes Sohkar had a choice he could have stopped it. Erotica 1 also had a choice, he could have stopped it too. Neither choices are consequential to the question at hand. Does the Eve Online community think what Erotica 1 has done is acceptable?

CCP should do the parents' jobs for them?

Game is rated 12+, doesn't mean parents can throw away all sense of responsibility in educating their children and expose them to this behaviour, for which the game is fairly well known. Parents who don't know anything about this game should make it their responsibility to at least google it instead of throwing away all common sense and responsibilities because of the '12+' label.
Big Lynx
#4559 - 2014-03-27 07:38:10 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Riot Girl wrote:
lollerwaffle wrote:
Erica Dusette wrote:
The thing is though that in RL (at least here) Casinos are now bound by law to stop problem gamblers and addicts from gaming when they're spotted. Same with pubs and alcohol - the establishment is ultimately responsible for how drunk they allow someone to become.

We're seeing the same thing creep in online, where the sites are ultimately being asked to take responsibility for people who cannot meter their own interactions within the game.

This is the part of RL that I don't agree with. People are beginning to lose all sense of personal responsibility and demanding that other people take responsibility for their actions. Which is wrong. Everyone is responsible for their own actions and choices. This shirking of responsibility and accountability for one's own action is a plague on this world.

The laws are there to protect stupid people and their families. Video games don't need these kinds of laws because there is no meaningful consequence where in-game interactions are involved (however we are seeing laws introduced to protect people from real life interactions through digital media). In video games, players are encouraged to screw up and learn from their mistakes and that's exactly what is happening here. The punishment might be harsher than many expect in a video game, but that's what makes the lesson so valuable. It should also teach players to avoid this kind of situation in future, especially in real life. Isn't it a wonderful thing when people can learn important life skills and better themselves through video games?

Except we're not talking about in game. This entire sad episode involved a group of EvE players harassing and humiliating another EvE player. It had nothing to do with spaceships at all. It was outright predatory behavior designed and intended to cause harm to another person.


And this handful of Erotica1's defenders and narrow minded will never understand. i think that statement is posted a trillion times already. it's only trolling now. CCP needs to give at least a Statement about this.
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#4560 - 2014-03-27 07:39:23 UTC
Too many people learn to internet lawyer from prime time television.

Makes my day reading your professional analysis of the situation at hand and the legal ramifications for all involved. Anyone with even a first year law school education would be laughing their asses off reading this thread.

Mr Epeen Cool