These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Jester Trek Latest Blog

First post First post
Author
embrel
BamBam Inc.
#2981 - 2014-03-26 16:12:43 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
There are real people going to sleep at night with empty bellies and no roof over their heads, but God forbid you white knight freaks of nature doing anything about that


So, you think that basically as long as somewhere somebody does have an empty belly all other perceived problems are irrelevant?

While there sure are huge differences in magnitude, your argument is plain silly. That there are bigger problems is no excuse not to solve the smaller ones that may actually even have a solution to them.

Otherwise you need to stop cancer research (1st world problem) as long as there is a war on this globe. Would be kinda silly, wouldn't it.
Salvos Rhoska
#2982 - 2014-03-26 16:13:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Crumplecorn wrote:
He says he consents to both.


At what timestamp are you hearing him saying he consents to both?
Batelle
Federal Navy Academy
#2983 - 2014-03-26 16:13:44 UTC
lollerwaffle wrote:
I'm confused about the term 'cyber bullying'


Cyberbullying is a thing for sure, but this isn't it. For one, it is extremely difficult to walk away from most cyberbullying, as its typically carried out by real-life acquaintances, and thus it is easy to pursue the victim across various media platforms. Unlike this situation, which was a single event between complete strangers with more than adequate tools to end any and all contact from the other party.

"**CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"**

Never forget.

Delicious Charen-Teng
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#2984 - 2014-03-26 16:15:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Delicious Charen-Teng
Malcanis wrote:
Tuscor wrote:
Just ban Erotica1. The community does not need poisonous twats like that - and I for one am happy for the sandbox and 'emergent gameplay' to take second seat to cleaning the community of such filth.


People talk about gays in very similar terms to the ones you have used in your post.

Come to that, so have insane monogonadal austrian dictators.



Batelle wrote:
Delicious Charen-Teng wrote:
I can't believe that this community is justifying a person treating another person like this. I've even heard CSM member likening people's anger against this to the behaviour of a homophobic dictator.

Is this the 'New' Eden.

Not at all sure I want to be a part of it anymore.


Better read those CSM posts more carefully then. He's merely stating that banning erotica1 is not justified in this situation. That's not the same as justifying any of erotica1's actions.


I'm no interpreter but that is pretty clear to me.
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#2985 - 2014-03-26 16:15:17 UTC
Perhaps we should take this conversation over to the TS user group forums, since this entire issue involves their software and what happened with/on it. It really has little, if anything, to do with EVE.

No? Because that would be silly? Because you'll be laughed at for claiming something illegal happened?

Good point. Blink

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Crumplecorn
Eve Cluster Explorations
#2986 - 2014-03-26 16:15:59 UTC
Lucretia DeWinter wrote:
Inviting same sap onto your TS and goading them for two hours about it until they snap? Yeah, I'll take issue with that.
Goading for two hours? Did you even listen to the recording? They ask him to read a total of three short web pages, and sing what amounted in the end to three songs (originally it was going to be twenty supposedly).

Long and drawn out? Sure. But they weren't promising to return a single ship, they were promising to quintuple the totality of the EVE assets. For that, I'd expect long and drawn out. And they were unfailingly polite and patient the entire time, even when Sohkar became abusive.

I find it interesting that you are ok with the linked ALOD but not with the Bonus Round, since in former case it involves lying point blank to a new player to get their stuff, while in the latter case the client gambled their assets away with full knowledge of what they were doing.

Witty Image - Stream

Not Liking this post hurts my RL feelings and will be considered harassment

LUMINOUS SPIRIT
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#2987 - 2014-03-26 16:16:19 UTC
Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Erotica 1 wrote:
...



Its OK buddy. We understand.

But do not worry, a properly worded crime tip to the FBI and other agencies does not go unnoticed.

It might take 6-8 months for them, but they will come.

And with words like ' online predators ' ' luring ' 'vulnerable victims ' 'possibly underage ' 'recorded ' 'tortured and abused ' ' published on the internet '

THEY WILL COME.


And you...you just visualize a cage in a zoo with a monkey in it. Puts things in perspective doesnt it.


You really are scary.


Yes I am. E1 likes to abuse victims and hide behind the rules. I like to bring the real world on top of him using those same rules.
Iso Anneto
Doomheim
#2988 - 2014-03-26 16:16:47 UTC
olan2005 wrote:


If that recording is not going to far, then what is . From your perspective , where is the line between SCAM and outright bullying , humiliation of individuals .

How far should the scammer go after receiving all his victims assets , to reap personal enjoyment out of his victims stupidity

At what point does something go beyond a scam

WERE DO YOU DRAW THE LINE


I don't draw a line until it becomes an illegal activity.
He should go as far as he likes. But as I said earlier, this was NOT pure stupidity, he snapped once early in the recording, which means that at least from that point on, all that kept him there was greed.

Anyway, I'm logging, it's 3 am here.
Upde
Upde Harris Industries
#2989 - 2014-03-26 16:17:38 UTC
lollerwaffle wrote:
I'm confused about the term 'cyber bullying'

To me, bullying is REAL LIFE harassment/abuse (either through physical or non-physical means), where the victim does not have the option of walking away.

What does that have to do with being harassed on the internet where all you have to do to 'walk away' is to hit the power button on your computer?

Especially seeing as how the supposed victim chose to continue to subject himself repeatedly to such behaviour, over digital pixels which have no bearing on real life? I could possibly understand it if this happened on social media like Facebook etc., where real identities mean the border between real and virtual worlds becomes slightly blurred. But over a video game, which has absolutely NO bearing on real life?

I don't like something, I turn the TV/Monitor/PC/console off and do something else. Easy.

Some people seem to go to great lengths to find something to be offended about. Weird.


not that simple mate. Its the same for people who get harassed on social media, they can chose to walk away any time they like, but people still get into hotwater. Look up cases of facebook trolling etc for reference. Its not really the same thing as what happened here as we can differentiate between a troll laying it on thick on facebook to someone whose friend just killed themselves and an EVE manipulator. In this case though lots of grey zones have been entered which make it really difficult for both CCP and outside observers to clearlyt differentiate between the game and IRL.

There are 2 camps on this case.

Camp 1 - the it was a game scam and the bonus room is levelled against the in game character
Camp 2 - it was a "cyber" assault on someone emotionally and was levelled against the person driving the character and not the in game character

It will be interesting to see the official CCP position on all of this.

lollerwaffle
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#2990 - 2014-03-26 16:17:42 UTC
Batelle wrote:
lollerwaffle wrote:
I'm confused about the term 'cyber bullying'


Cyberbullying is a thing for sure, but this isn't it. For one, it is extremely difficult to walk away from most cyberbullying, as its typically carried out by real-life acquaintances, and thus it is easy to pursue the victim across various media platforms. Unlike this situation, which was a single event between complete strangers with more than adequate tools to end any and all contact from the other party.


Hence my bit about the blurred lines on social media where it's carried out by real life acquaintances. Still, why would anyone subject themselves to voluntary humiliation over some internet video games if they can't take it is really beyond me, but maybe that's because I'm simple What?
Mario Putzo
#2991 - 2014-03-26 16:18:12 UTC
lollerwaffle wrote:
Batelle wrote:
lollerwaffle wrote:
I'm confused about the term 'cyber bullying'


Cyberbullying is a thing for sure, but this isn't it. For one, it is extremely difficult to walk away from most cyberbullying, as its typically carried out by real-life acquaintances, and thus it is easy to pursue the victim across various media platforms. Unlike this situation, which was a single event between complete strangers with more than adequate tools to end any and all contact from the other party.


Hence my bit about the blurred lines on social media where it's carried out by real life acquaintances. Still, why would anyone subject themselves to voluntary humiliation over some internet video games if they can't take it is really beyond me, but maybe that's because I'm simple What?


Because he was greedy.
Destitute Tehol Beddict
Binary Trading
#2992 - 2014-03-26 16:18:19 UTC
Iso Anneto wrote:
Destitute Tehol wrote:


I don't agree with what E1 did. I have not decided my opinion on what should be done on the matter yet. I am waiting for a CCP response.

EDIT: I would also appreciate it if words aren't put in my mouth. I say what I say there's nothing more behind what I say.


I was just saying because what you said means that there would be no recording, which means the argument of "he didn't consent/ there's no proof he consented at the beginning" would be invalidated.


Textual consent done IN GAME would be adequate imo in terms of "consent"

(This is NOT A agreement with anything to do with E1, and really just one "technical" argument about this whole situation)

Something along the lines of

E1: Can I record and Broadcast the teams-speak bonus round
Victim: yes/no

What happened after is another debate completely.

Loot Buying service: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4529397#post4529397

Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#2993 - 2014-03-26 16:18:45 UTC
Capt Starfox wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
Can somebody please remind me how many times Sohkar left the Bonus Room....only to return?




And this question would be directed to those who actually listened to the recording in its entirety...not the sheeple who just read the blog and are therefore experts in this situation....

Relevance?


You serious?

Absolutely. Its irrelevant. But its a nice attempt to shift the blame from the people who did do the wrong thing onto the victim. Actually, not its pretty transparent and a bad attempt.

Somebody took his stuff, granted it was just pixels, however that's irrelevant. Whats relevant is a number of people deliberately set out to humiliate and embarrass another person without any regard for them at all. They also made fun of him because he had a speech impediment which is vilification based on disability. There are a lot of things wrong with what they did and your pathetic attempts to try to justify the behavior is, well, pathetic.

Also relevant is if it happened again and a more imbalanced person was deliberately targeted and treated the same way causing that person to harm themselves then CCP would likely be liable in part since they are now fully aware of whats occurring and doing nothing would be pretty stupid from a legal point of view.

CCP has nothing to gain by allowing this behavior to continue and potentially a lot to lose.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#2994 - 2014-03-26 16:20:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Yes I am. E1 likes to abuse victims and hide behind the rules. I like to bring the real world on top of him using those same rules.
Meanwhile you like to advocate the inflicting of real world violence in a dispute over some internet spaceships, while hiding behind an anonymous avatar. I take it you don't think those self same rules apply to you, because you're obviously of a higher moral fibre than Erotica. Roll

Yes you're scary, but not for the reasons you think you are.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

LUMINOUS SPIRIT
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#2995 - 2014-03-26 16:20:59 UTC
Upde wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Erotica 1 wrote:
...



Its OK buddy. We understand.

But do not worry, a properly worded crime tip to the FBI and other agencies does not go unnoticed.

It might take 6-8 months for them, but they will come.

And with words like ' online predators ' ' luring ' 'vulnerable victims ' 'possibly underage ' 'recorded ' 'tortured and abused ' ' published on the internet '

THEY WILL COME.


And you...you just visualize a cage in a zoo with a monkey in it. Puts things in perspective doesnt it.


I think you lost credibility with this one. I seriously doubt the FBI are going to get out of bed for this. The likely outcome here is that CCP take a public hosing, E1 et al. take an EVE ass reaming i.e permaban / account loss etc, the "contestant" takes a 30 day for inciting racial hatred.................


Oh buddy, buddy. Its not MY credibility. Thats not how it works my friend.

They follow up EVERY tip. EVERY. SINGLE. ONE. Its their job. They have a list, they go through every single line.

They will come. Americans dont mess around with pedophelia, online luring, **** and abuse of victims. E1 is smack down in the middle of this. And I would not associate with him. Not when FBI starts digging.
Crumplecorn
Eve Cluster Explorations
#2996 - 2014-03-26 16:21:05 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Also relevant is if it happened again and a more imbalanced person was deliberately targeted and treated the same way causing that person to harm themselves then CCP would likely be liable in part since they are now fully aware of whats occurring and doing nothing would be pretty stupid from a legal point of view.
Literally exactly this could be said about blowing up ships in EVE.

Witty Image - Stream

Not Liking this post hurts my RL feelings and will be considered harassment

lollerwaffle
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#2997 - 2014-03-26 16:21:08 UTC
Upde wrote:
lollerwaffle wrote:
I'm confused about the term 'cyber bullying'

To me, bullying is REAL LIFE harassment/abuse (either through physical or non-physical means), where the victim does not have the option of walking away.

What does that have to do with being harassed on the internet where all you have to do to 'walk away' is to hit the power button on your computer?

Especially seeing as how the supposed victim chose to continue to subject himself repeatedly to such behaviour, over digital pixels which have no bearing on real life? I could possibly understand it if this happened on social media like Facebook etc., where real identities mean the border between real and virtual worlds becomes slightly blurred. But over a video game, which has absolutely NO bearing on real life?

I don't like something, I turn the TV/Monitor/PC/console off and do something else. Easy.

Some people seem to go to great lengths to find something to be offended about. Weird.


not that simple mate. Its the same for people who get harassed on social media, they can chose to walk away any time they like, but people still get into hotwater. Look up cases of facebook trolling etc for reference. Its not really the same thing as what happened here as we can differentiate between a troll laying it on thick on facebook to someone whose friend just killed themselves and an EVE manipulator. In this case though lots of grey zones have been entered which make it really difficult for both CCP and outside observers to clearlyt differentiate between the game and IRL.

There are 2 camps on this case.

Camp 1 - the it was a game scam and the bonus room is levelled against the in game character
Camp 2 - it was a "cyber" assault on someone emotionally and was levelled against the person driving the character and not the in game character

It will be interesting to see the official CCP position on all of this.


Oh yes, I fully agree that facebook stuff is really blurred, as the perpetrator and victim's (in most cases just the victims though) REAL NAME/IDENTITY etc. are involved. However, in a video game, where you can play any character as anonymously as you wish, where the things you fight/scam/mine/kill rats over are just imaginary pixels, I can't see how people still subject themselves to humiliation Question
Batelle
Federal Navy Academy
#2998 - 2014-03-26 16:21:23 UTC
Lucretia DeWinter wrote:
For me, this is about how CCP need to codify that there is a standard of conduct (there is one in the EULA/TOS) and that, should external factors beyond their control be used to breach that conduct, then sanctions within their control (bans, reversals etc) can and will be administered.


Except for that whole glaring issue of how CCP can be expected to fairly and accurately investigate conduct that occurs outside their sphere of control.

"**CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"**

Never forget.

Upde
Upde Harris Industries
#2999 - 2014-03-26 16:21:41 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
Perhaps we should take this conversation over to the TS user group forums, since this entire issue involves their software and what happened with/on it. It really has little, if anything, to do with EVE.

No? Because that would be silly? Because you'll be laughed at for claiming something illegal happened?

Good point. Blink


or maybe its because it is related to EVE as it is the leveraging of CCP IP that gets people into the Bonus Room and the subsequent publication of said bonus room encounters is directly linked to EVE as a game. If this was just a random conversation that wasn't instigated on the back of in game activity no one would give a damn least of all CCP. But because is puts CCP, their game and their reputation into a potential meat grinder its safe to say this is very EVE related.
Jack Lennox
Grove Street Families
#3000 - 2014-03-26 16:21:53 UTC
Congrats kids, you've created a 150 page thread on something that is basically a non-issue when things like this are happening in real life, not in our little game world.

"Guardian" newspaper threatened to be closed http://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/uk/guardian-threatened-with-closure-over-snowden-leaks-conference-told-1.1738203


Russian military holds exercises in breakaway Moldova region http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/25/us-russia-military-exercises-idUSBREA2O1KB20140325


I love EVE but for christsake, 150 pages later

Been ganked? Robbed? Space feelings hurt?  Now there's something you can do! Fill out a Customer Service Comment Card!  EIther that or contact everyone's favorite Space Detective for an instant ban!