These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Jester Trek Latest Blog

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Alec Freeman
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#2061 - 2014-03-26 05:41:36 UTC
Winchester Steele wrote:
La Nariz wrote:
This thread is proof highsec needs to be nerfed.



Isn't there some way for you to incorporate this thread into your spreadsheet? I think that would be the final evidence needed for CCP to begin Operation Dinsdale in earnest.


Sorry no spreadsheet. But I do have this rather snazzy graph.

http://i.imgur.com/9Yqrqiv.png
LUMINOUS SPIRIT
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#2062 - 2014-03-26 05:41:47 UTC
Dagar Bly wrote:


Snitches get stitches


No. This isnt a prison parody or a gang. This is the grown up world, where some of us take a stand.

Welcome.
KnowUsByTheDead
Sunlight...Through The Blight.
#2063 - 2014-03-26 05:41:47 UTC
Mario Putzo wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
103 pages in 6.5 hours.
I'm kind of upset I'm this late to the party but holy ****.


Its been a wild ride.


Indeed it has. Indeed it has.

Shocked

Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense.
Dagar Bly
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#2064 - 2014-03-26 05:43:47 UTC
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Dagar Bly wrote:


Snitches get stitches


No. This isnt a prison parody or a gang. This is the grown up world, where some of us take a stand.

Welcome.


For what? Just to be a douche? Isn't that what YOU'RE mad at? Well.. Congrats, you win.

http://eveportraitcontest.webs.com
Anslo
Scope Works
#2065 - 2014-03-26 05:44:30 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
Anslo wrote:
You try too hard to be a goon.



I'm sorry pubbie massa, I just can't stop a-trollin'...


Fix'd.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]
Xuixien
Solar Winds Security Solutions
#2066 - 2014-03-26 05:44:38 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Xuixien wrote:


Felonies, lol.

You realize this thread is gonna be locked in buried within 48 hours and nothing will come of any of this?

And even if you tried... you don't have a case, simply put.

:)


You really dont get how deep in real criminal **** these people potentially are, do you?


lol.

I'm on BU comms if you want to chat about how we're all going to jail for making someone sing about Gummy Bears, though.

Epic Space Cat, Horsegirl, Philanthropist
Salvos Rhoska
#2067 - 2014-03-26 05:45:32 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
They are back somewhere in this 100 page monstrosity.

I've been through every page and must have missed them because I didn't see any.
Sorry to ask, but any chance you can link them again, or link to the post you are referring to?


Among them are blackmail, extortion, fraud, intentional infliction of emotional distress, psychological harassment, cyber-bullying and violations related to the recording and distribution of the recordings without consent (and no, there was no consent, no matter how much some morons claim it. its not there.) Thats just on the victims side. CCP is itself, to my mind, also in a position to sue for various breaches of contract on points of the EULA as relating to Erotica1 making use of their services in actions which constitute any of the above.

PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#2068 - 2014-03-26 05:45:37 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
La Nariz wrote:
We can quantify the amount of shitposts done by highsec pubbies versus the amount of goodposts done by non-highsec pubbies then compare the two and see if there is a significant difference between the two.

I thought that comparison had been done. The post about it whizzed by a couple of pages ago.

I think the conclusion was, all of the posts in this thread bar a couple of people are so similar that we are all the alts of the same person.


It was a non-peer reviewed post from a non-scientist so you might want to take that one with a grain of salt and let the real scientist work.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133
Mario Putzo
#2069 - 2014-03-26 05:45:56 UTC
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Dagar Bly wrote:


Snitches get stitches


No. This isnt a prison parody or a gang. This is the grown up world, where some of us take a stand.

Welcome.


Grown up world is pretty sissy now a days. Back in the day if you didn't like what someone said you challenged them to a duel, and someone had to die. Now you just type up a blog and let the parrots scream your opinion of injustice on whatever media outlet the prefer.
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#2070 - 2014-03-26 05:46:29 UTC
Anslo wrote:
La Nariz wrote:
Anslo wrote:
You try too hard to be a goon.



I'm sorry pubbie massa, I just can't stop a-trollin'...


Fix'd.


Wow racism much dude, highsec pubbies are truly terrible.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133
Winchester Steele
#2071 - 2014-03-26 05:46:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Winchester Steele
Mara Rinn wrote:
Mikey Aivo wrote:
i blow up spaceships so i must go on to blow up buildings?


I would suggest that Erotica 1's behaviour is more in line with people torturing kittens being likely to go on to commit violence against humans. Except Erotica 1 is already well down that path: the whole point of the Bonus Room is to wheedle a person into an emotional outburst so they can be mocked.

Why is Erotica 1's fan group so keen to point out that they've been through all the legal points very carefully to make sure that what they're doing is legal? Could it possibly be that they are aware that they are pushing the boundaries of acceptable behaviour? Have they confused "legal" for "ethical" and "moral" acceptability? Perhaps they have no morals or ethics and only perceive that things are "legal" or "illegal." Do they comfort themselves by knowing that what they're doing is legal, therefore it's okay?

Don't confuse legality with morality.

It's perfectly legal to invest in tobacco companies, but it's morally reprehensible to do so.



Or. Or. Just go with me here and put the tinfoil away for a sec. Maybe they were covering their asses because this game is filled to the brim with space lawyer carebears, who just want to be left alone "to play in peace". (The New Order has some experience in the field of space lawyering you know)


Btw, pushing boundaries is the very definition of emergent gameplay. Welcome to the sandbox.

...

Dagar Bly
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#2072 - 2014-03-26 05:47:28 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
They are back somewhere in this 100 page monstrosity.

I've been through every page and must have missed them because I didn't see any.
Sorry to ask, but any chance you can link them again, or link to the post you are referring to?


Among them are blackmail, extortion, fraud, intentional infliction of emotional distress, psychological harassment, cyber-bullying and violations related to the recording and distribution of the recordings without consent (and no, there was no consent, no matter how much some morons claim it. its not there.) Thats just on the victims side. CCP is itself, to my mind, also in a position to sue for various breaches of contract on points of the EULA as relating to Erotica1 making use of their services in actions which constitute any of the above.


No.

http://eveportraitcontest.webs.com
Anslo
Scope Works
#2073 - 2014-03-26 05:47:37 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
Anslo wrote:
La Nariz wrote:
Anslo wrote:
You try too hard to be a goon.



I'm sorry pubbie massa, I just can't stop a-trollin'...


Fix'd.


Wow racism much dude, highsec pubbies are truly terrible.


Highsec.

Me.

Lel.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]
Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations
#2074 - 2014-03-26 05:47:38 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:


Invite me to a Bonus Room and hear for yourself.


Hmm...

See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did.
Salvos Rhoska
#2075 - 2014-03-26 05:47:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Mario Putzo wrote:
Why if Erotica 1 gets assaulted then he can get some real world isk out of the exchange as well. Its funny how ACTUAL breaking of laws works.

Yes. Presuming he survives the encounter.

I wouldnt want a strung out violent ex-marine that I've psychologically tormented for 2hrs to the result of him smashing his desk, having a cause or intent to harm me...

PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#2076 - 2014-03-26 05:50:13 UTC
Anslo wrote:
La Nariz wrote:
Anslo wrote:
La Nariz wrote:
Anslo wrote:
You try too hard to be a goon.



I'm sorry pubbie massa, I just can't stop a-trollin'...


Fix'd.


Wow racism much dude, highsec pubbies are truly terrible.


Highsec.

Me.

Lel.


Yeah you, look at that sig you should change it to: A horrible racist highsec pubbie.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#2077 - 2014-03-26 05:50:21 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Mario Putzo wrote:
Why if Erotica 1 gets assaulted then he can get some real world isk out of the exchange as well. Its funny how ACTUAL breaking of laws works.

Yes. Presuming he survives the encounter.


Remember guys, this is supposedly NOT going too far.

But making fun of someone on the internet, oh, we can't have that. Get the torches and pitchforks.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.
Mario Putzo
#2078 - 2014-03-26 05:50:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Mario Putzo
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Mario Putzo wrote:
Why if Erotica 1 gets assaulted then he can get some real world isk out of the exchange as well. Its funny how ACTUAL breaking of laws works.

Yes. Presuming he survives the encounter.


So you are saying that this man will commit murder?

My what an odd line you have drawn in the sand to harbor murder as moral.
Winchester Steele
#2079 - 2014-03-26 05:51:01 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Mario Putzo wrote:
Why if Erotica 1 gets assaulted then he can get some real world isk out of the exchange as well. Its funny how ACTUAL breaking of laws works.

Yes. Presuming he survives the encounter.



Lol. You are so close to that edge.... Keep up the threats. Just like your hubby. Birds of a feather and all that I suppose.

...

Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#2080 - 2014-03-26 05:51:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
They are back somewhere in this 100 page monstrosity.

I've been through every page and must have missed them because I didn't see any.
Sorry to ask, but any chance you can link them again, or link to the post you are referring to?


Among them are blackmail, extortion, fraud, intentional infliction of emotional distress, psychological harassment, cyber-bullying and violations related to the recording and distribution of the recordings without consent (and no, there was no consent, no matter how much some morons claim it. its not there.) Thats just on the victims side. CCP is itself, to my mind, also in a position to sue for various breaches of contract on points of the EULA as relating to Erotica1 making use of their services in actions which constitute any of the above.

Listing means nothing.

Can you link a single actual criminal code that has been so obviously breached here (or even your earlier post where you linked them - I've looked, but can't find it, but that is probably because I took a man look. My wife is always complaining about that)?

Sorry to have to ask, but I'm just trying to get my head around that aspect of the argument, because clearly that would be a serious issue.