These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Technology Lab

Forum Index

EVE Forums » EVE Technology and Research Center » EVE Technology Lab » EVE API and Public CREST discussion

Topic is locked indefinitely.

First pagePrevious page2526272829Next pageLast page

EVE API and Public CREST discussion First post First post First post
Author

Previous Topic Next Topic

Calvin

Tritanium Forge Industries

Likes received: 18

#521 - 2014-08-02 14:59:55 UTC

CCP FoxFour wrote:

Would it help if I also allowed factory managers access? It would mean they would get ALL the corp blueprints though, not just the ones in hangers they have access to.

That'd help with the first problem I mentioned, though then the problem would be limiting what BP info people in the factory manager role can pull. I can see how that's a tricky problem to resolve and I think that's a decision that needs more crowdsourcing than just me (-:

Is there a particular reason that industry jobs can't pass through the ME/TE levels of the BP's they're using in the API?

Qoi

Exert Force

Likes received: 109

#522 - 2014-08-02 15:24:52 UTC

Calvin wrote:

There's no way I'm sharing my API key with a subordinate

That is exactly what corp api keys are designed for though.

Quote:

Is there a particular reason that industry jobs can't pass through the ME/TE levels of the BP's they're using in the API?

Because we want a list of all blueprints and not just those in active jobs. That was a horrible hack that has to die.

I think the bigger problem here is putting the Blueprints on the asset list CAK bit, did you run out of bits? Give it an extra permission under Science & Industry, that allows directors that know what they are doing to create a corporation key with access only to the blueprint list and give it out to the people doing industry.

There are of course obvious scaling issues with this approach as your corporation becomes bigger - but then if you are big enough you will have a programmer on staff anyway who can solve this problem for you.

http://eve-industry.org

Calvin

Tritanium Forge Industries

Likes received: 18

#523 - 2014-08-02 15:33:51 UTC | Edited by: Calvin

Qoi wrote:

Calvin wrote:

There's no way I'm sharing my API key with a subordinate

That is exactly what corp api keys are designed for though.

If there's an API mask specifically for revealing blueprints in the corp, sure. I'm cool with that.

Qoi wrote:

Calvin wrote:

Is there a particular reason that industry jobs can't pass through the ME/TE levels of the BP's they're using in the API?

Because we want a list of all blueprints and not just those in active jobs. That was a horrible hack that has to die.

Why not both?

CCP FoxFour

C C P

C C P Alliance

Likes received: 4,484

#524 - 2014-08-02 16:02:04 UTC

Calvin wrote:

CCP FoxFour wrote:

Would it help if I also allowed factory managers access? It would mean they would get ALL the corp blueprints though, not just the ones in hangers they have access to.

The blueprints thing is a pretty rough thing for us to lookup so if possible we would like to avoid that, hence the 24 hour cache timer. Once we get this on Sisi though we can monitor performance a bit closer and consider some solutions.

@CCP_FoxFour // Technical Designer // Team Tech Co

Third-party developer? Check out the official developers site for dev blogs, resources, and more.

Maarssi

Maarssi Corp

Likes received: 0

#525 - 2014-08-04 10:26:44 UTC

CCP FoxFour wrote:

Calvin wrote:

CCP FoxFour wrote:

Would it help if I also allowed factory managers access? It would mean they would get ALL the corp blueprints though, not just the ones in hangers they have access to.

fingers crossed.
I'm doing the groundwork for a new industry tool and bp ME/TE is very important to me. If we have to use one specific API key (high-level corp access role) for all corp members, then that would be a bit of a hassle. BUT still better than not getting the levels at all.

Keep up the good work.

Roberta Chikita

Doomheim

Likes received: 0

#526 - 2014-08-04 15:41:36 UTC

Hi !

I probably find a "bug" or "misstake" on xml api

In PlanetaryPins, It seem the latitude and longitude are the same value
I want to represent planets with canvas or other thing but I'm not able to do this with this "bug".

example:
[row pinID="1009824070429" typeID="2551" typeName="Plasma Command Center" schematicID="0" lastLaunchTime="0001-01-01 00:00:00" cycleTime="0" quantityPerCycle="0" installTime="0001-01-01 00:00:00" expiryTime="0001-01-01 00:00:00" contentTypeID="0" contentTypeName="" contentQuantity="0" longitude="-3.87589615676289" latitude="-3.87589615676289" ][/row]

[row pinID="1009824077992" typeID="2556" typeName="Plasma Launchpad" schematicID="0" lastLaunchTime="0001-01-01 00:00:00" cycleTime="0" quantityPerCycle="0" installTime="0001-01-01 00:00:00" expiryTime="0001-01-01 00:00:00" contentTypeID="2400" contentTypeName="Toxic Metals" contentQuantity="760" longitude="-3.89758862802" latitude="-3.89758862802" ][/row]

any idea why?

Replaced < > by [ ] for respect the no html rules

CCP FoxFour

C C P

C C P Alliance

Likes received: 4,484

#527 - 2014-08-04 15:44:27 UTC

Roberta Chikita wrote:

Hahahaha that sounds like something stupid I would do. Will try and check it out on Tuesday.

@CCP_FoxFour // Technical Designer // Team Tech Co

Third-party developer? Check out the official developers site for dev blogs, resources, and more.

University of Caille Gallente Federation 9
miner Fonulique University of Caille Gallente Federation Likes received: 9	#528 - 2014-08-04 15:54:45 UTC Sorry, I must have missed it, ware do I login to change API Key for SISI?

Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM 6,759
Steve Ronuken Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM Likes received: 6,759	#529 - 2014-08-04 17:40:53 UTC miner Fonulique wrote: Sorry, I must have missed it, ware do I login to change API Key for SISI? https://community.testeveonline.com/support/api-key/ Woo! CSM XI! Fuzzwork Enterprises Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter


miner Fonulique University of Caille Gallente Federation Likes received: 9	#530 - 2014-08-04 19:07:28 UTC Thx!

stoxxine

OLVI industries

Likes received: 31

#531 - 2014-08-05 05:44:01 UTC

CCP FoxFour wrote:

I hope to have it on Sisi next week and TQ the week after, no promises though.

The cache time on it will be 24 hours.

I hope you will then include all blueprints consumed in the past 24 hours. The problem is timing the api calls, currently (ok i did not test this _today_) if i run s a short industry job, it can disappear from IndustryJobs between calls, meaning, it is only seen in 6 hours when jobhistory is pulled again.

Would this 24 hour timer practically mean that if i do short copy job, immediately feed the output (bpc) it to a short industry job, which consumes it, the blueprintID i see in IndustryJobHistory (or IndustryJobs, if i'm lucky) is possibly never seen in blueprints api? That can be inconvenient.

+1 for IndustryJobs including union with anything started within the hour or so. Or after History was last cached..

Disclaimer: The above was probably written drunk or by a friend on my pc or a hacker. No warranty for any misinformation provided.

Ema Bane

MAAK Industries

Likes received: 1

#532 - 2014-08-05 15:57:49 UTC

With the API endpoint /IndustryJobs, there use to be the attribute "installedItemLicensedProductionRunsRemaining" = "-1" for BPO and >=0 for BPC but it has disappeared in Crius.

There is a "licensedRuns" attribute, but it doesn't reflect the type of blueprint as "installedItemLicensedProductionRunsRemaining" use to do...

Any plan to bring back the possibility to distinguish from what type of blueprint a job has been issued?

CCP FoxFour

C C P

C C P Alliance

Likes received: 4,484

#533 - 2014-08-05 16:58:29 UTC

Ema Bane wrote:

Confused, how would you change it?

@CCP_FoxFour // Technical Designer // Team Tech Co

Third-party developer? Check out the official developers site for dev blogs, resources, and more.

CCP FoxFour

C C P

C C P Alliance

Likes received: 4,484

#534 - 2014-08-05 17:41:21 UTC

CCP FoxFour wrote:

Roberta Chikita wrote:

Hahahaha that sounds like something stupid I would do. Will try and check it out on Tuesday.

Yup, this was pretty much me just being incredibly incompetent. Fix is deployed to Sisi right now. Will go to TQ... at some point. Probably with Fay, maybe tomorrow if I am feeling awesome about it.

@CCP_FoxFour // Technical Designer // Team Tech Co

Third-party developer? Check out the official developers site for dev blogs, resources, and more.

Ema Bane

MAAK Industries

Likes received: 1

#535 - 2014-08-05 17:42:52 UTC | Edited by: Ema Bane

I have tried to start 2 jobs on SISI. 1 from a Stabber BPO and 1 from a Stabber BPC:

[row jobID="229140815" installerID="909770118" installerName="Ema Bane" facilityID="60011929" solarSystemID="30002641" solarSystemName="Aufay" stationID="60011929" activityID="1" blueprintID="1166462377" blueprintTypeID="692" blueprintTypeName="Stabber Blueprint" blueprintLocationID="60011929" outputLocationID="60011929" runs="1" cost="289326.00" teamID="0" licensedRuns="10" probability="0" productTypeID="0" productTypeName="" status="1" timeInSeconds="6424" startDate="2014-08-04 23:27:53" endDate="2014-08-05 01:14:57" pauseDate="0001-01-01 00:00:00" completedDate="0001-01-01 00:00:00" completedCharacterID="0"/]

[row jobID="229140814" installerID="909770118" installerName="Ema Bane" facilityID="60011929" solarSystemID="30002641" solarSystemName="Aufay" stationID="60011929" activityID="1" blueprintID="1015338198637" blueprintTypeID="692" blueprintTypeName="Stabber Blueprint" blueprintLocationID="60011929" outputLocationID="60011929" runs="1" cost="289326.00" teamID="0" licensedRuns="10" probability="0" productTypeID="0" productTypeName="" status="1" timeInSeconds="6424" startDate="2014-08-04 23:27:43" endDate="2014-08-05 01:14:47" pauseDate="0001-01-01 00:00:00" completedDate="0001-01-01 00:00:00" completedCharacterID="0"/]

The /IndustryJobs returns me almost exactly the same things for the 2 jobs except the start date obviously.
There is no way I can know which job is with the BPO and which job is with the BPC. I really miss that feature that I was using to manage my blueprints pool on my big spreadsheet.

Previous Crius it was possible to do it with the attribute "installedItemLicensedProductionRunsRemaining" = "-1" for BPO and >=0.

I think it is the purpose of the new attribute "licensedRuns" in Crius but for both jobs I have licensedRuns="10". Maybe this attribute is not working as intended?
I have no idea why it is equal to "10" as the BPC is a single run and the BPO is by nature, infinite. There is something wrong here.

Steve Ronuken

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM

Likes received: 6,759

#536 - 2014-08-05 18:12:10 UTC

Ema Bane wrote:

Once the blueprint API is out, you'll be able to use the blueprintID. (Short term copies won't show up on it. But BPOs will show up, as you'll have them for more than the cache time.)

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter


CCP FoxFour C C P C C P Alliance Likes received: 4,484	#537 - 2014-08-05 21:02:52 UTC Along with the PI fix CORS headers are now in the XML API on Sisi. @CCP_FoxFour // Technical Designer // Team Tech Co Third-party developer? Check out the official developers site for dev blogs, resources, and more.


Steve Ronuken Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM Likes received: 6,759	#538 - 2014-08-05 21:34:11 UTC CCP FoxFour wrote: Along with the PI fix CORS headers are now in the XML API on Sisi. \o/ Woo! CSM XI! Fuzzwork Enterprises Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Steve Ronuken

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM

Likes received: 6,759

#539 - 2014-08-06 00:27:42 UTC

To expand on that \o/, I now have a page which can retrieve character sheet details, without sending your api details to me.

It doesn't work in firefox, for some reason, but works fine in Chrome.

I don't want to have people's APIs. I don't want to do occasional lookups to check. I want to treat it in the same way as pyfa and EFT (though with more 'fill in the details again')

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

stoxxine

OLVI industries

Likes received: 31

#540 - 2014-08-06 06:43:00 UTC

CCP FoxFour wrote:

Ema Bane wrote:

Confused, how would you change it?

when activityid=5 then outputLicensedRuns
when activityid=1 and type=bpc then inputLicensedRuns-jobRuns
when activityid=1 and type=bpo then -1
when activityid=8 then outputMaxRuns+decryptorRunsModifier

the last one might need a quirk for ships vs modules.

Disclaimer: The above was probably written drunk or by a friend on my pc or a hacker. No warranty for any misinformation provided.

First pagePrevious page2526272829Next pageLast page

EVE Technology Lab

Tritanium Forge Industries

Exert Force

C C P

C C P Alliance

Maarssi Corp

Doomheim

University of Caille

Gallente Federation

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM

OLVI industries

MAAK Industries