These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Rubicon] Command Ship Models

First post First post First post
Author
Shanticat
Space Research Corp
#241 - 2013-10-03 17:03:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Shanticat
wrong topic..
Hairpins Blueprint
The Northerners
Pandemic Horde
#242 - 2013-10-03 17:44:12 UTC
Models are nice : ) But DO NOT Change the names .... there is totaly no need for that Sad please stop that fozzie :" |

stop changing names in game, it makes me dizzy and sad (sobing)
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#243 - 2013-10-03 17:50:49 UTC
Takezo Kensei wrote:
No, just no!

Abso, sleip, nh have their _iconic_ models, which suit them _extremely_ well. Even the astarte looks cool in the brutix model. Abso and sleip especially look really badass and those models really deserve to stay!

On top of it who the hell wants to fly another drake!?! Or a cane for that matter?? Didn't you guys gave us navy BC's already? I'm really sorry but _none_ of the new hulls look as great as the old ones.

Wtf is team 5-0 thinking? You guys bored in office, no important stuff to work on so you're shitting on the command ships models??

Astarte / damnation / sleip - why on earth would anyone want them changed?? Just for the sake of standardization?

A definitive NO to these ridiculous changes!

Well, since the Astarte and Damnation aren't going to be changed at all, 2/3rds of your argument falls a bit short. Smile

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#244 - 2013-10-03 17:51:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
Hairpins Blueprint wrote:
Models are nice : ) But DO NOT Change the names .... there is totaly no need for that Sad please stop that fozzie :" |

stop changing names in game, it makes me dizzy and sad (sobing)

They aren't changing the names of the ships...

When they say something like
Quote:
Absolution becomes a Carthum Harbinger

they are simply telling you what corp/color scheme and hull will be used for the Absolution.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

John Ratcliffe
Tradors'R'us
IChooseYou Alliance
#245 - 2013-10-03 18:48:58 UTC  |  Edited by: John Ratcliffe
I think changing the Sleipnir is a stupid idea. I love my Sleipnir just the way it is. If I wanted it to look like a Hurricane, I would have bought a ******* Hurricane.

FFS.

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose

Siddicus
Nation of Sidd
#246 - 2013-10-03 19:10:52 UTC
John Ratcliffe wrote:
I think changing the Sleipnir is a stupid idea. I love my Sleipnir just the way it is. If I wanted it to look like a Hurricane, I would have bought a ******* Hurricane.

FFS.


Or a Hurricane Fleet Issue. which is just a camo hurricane, just like what they want the Sleipnir to be.
FlinchingNinja Kishunuba
Crunchy Crunchy
#247 - 2013-10-03 19:18:54 UTC
Also stay away from the nighthawk! Go do something important instead.
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#248 - 2013-10-03 19:28:39 UTC
Goti fase wrote:
Should the harbinger hull not be used for the Damnation instead of the Absolution?



NO! - as stated before, the Harbinger model is **** and should not be used. And in particular not for the Damnation!

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#249 - 2013-10-03 19:28:45 UTC
John Ratcliffe wrote:
I think changing the Sleipnir is a stupid idea. I love my Sleipnir just the way it is. If I wanted it to look like a Hurricane, I would have bought a ******* Hurricane.

FFS.

Except that still wouldn't make the sleip look like a hurricane, more it acknowledges the hurricane looks like a hurricane and, at the moment, isn't a sleip.
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#250 - 2013-10-03 19:32:04 UTC
Takezo Kensei wrote:
No, just no!

Abso, sleip, nh have their _iconic_ models, which suit them _extremely_ well. Even the astarte looks cool in the brutix model. Abso and sleip especially look really badass and those models really deserve to stay!

On top of it who the hell wants to fly another drake!?! Or a cane for that matter?? Didn't you guys gave us navy BC's already? I'm really sorry but _none_ of the new hulls look as great as the old ones.

Wtf is team 5-0 thinking? You guys bored in office, no important stuff to work on so you're shitting on the command ships models??

Astarte / damnation / sleip - why on earth would anyone want them changed?? Just for the sake of standardization?

A definitive NO to these ridiculous changes!


Because some people are ******** (no sorry for flame escalation with this degree of trash talk and likes for this idea). Either new models or forget about this model change right away, Fozzie! CCP has 1 month, you better start concept-arting and drawing good stuff if you want a model change.

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.

Ludakin DarkTribal
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#251 - 2013-10-03 19:42:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Ludakin DarkTribal
WTF ???

new skins for old hull...

that disapoint me, CCP dev need to work harder!!!
those ships look ugly!!!

there is a lot of bugs to resolve ingame, not doing useless cosmetic change on command ship !!!
hujciwdupe22
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#252 - 2013-10-03 20:00:31 UTC  |  Edited by: hujciwdupe22
Dear Fozzie

i think its just lazy,
Didnt you guys learn nothing?
First Vagabond and its ****** skin
then you remodelled it, so where was the point in giving it other skin in first place?
That what you guys doing is total lazyness, give them new models or leave them,

What does it give to the lore?

NPC corporations seems to hire the junior brand manager ***** from the memes.

New models or gtfo (no offence but i have to say it)
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#253 - 2013-10-03 20:07:04 UTC
Ludakin DarkTribal wrote:
there is a lot of bugs to resolve ingame, not doing useless cosmetic change on command ship !!!
So lets have the artists redirected to bug fixes. That will go splendidly.
Rhea Rankin Nolen
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#254 - 2013-10-03 20:07:32 UTC
The whole idea is meh at best IMO.


Most of these ship models got faction variant textures, and now you want to recycle the SAME models again by retexturing them again and assigning them as CS. That is hardly adding to variety.

CS already have distinctive textures, and just giving them different models of 2 existing ship variants seems pointless and a change for the sake of change.

i.e. 3 versions of Hurricane. We really need that? Roll

I'd personally rather have things as they are and wait another 1-2 years for completely new models, than have this half-baked compromise solution.

Clendestined
Perkone
Caldari State
#255 - 2013-10-03 20:18:33 UTC
Rhea Rankin Nolen wrote:
The whole idea is meh at best IMO.


Most of these ship models got faction variant textures, and now you want to recycle the SAME models again by retexturing them again and assigning them as CS. That is hardly adding to variety.

CS already have distinctive textures, and just giving them different models of 2 existing ship variants seems pointless and a change for the sake of change.

i.e. 3 versions of Hurricane. We really need that? Roll

I'd personally rather have things as they are and wait another 1-2 years for completely new models, than have this half-baked compromise solution.




There are 3 model drakes too, or how about the brutix? hmm, or how about...well you get what I'm saying. Roll

Love this idea for the model changes as it needed it but it's still bland to say the least. The split weapon platforms for the wrong ship chassis had me steer clear but i'm pretty happy they are at least doing this. Gives me a reason to train up for Gallente now... (btw, i think the brutix is ugly as....yeah..meh..)

LOVE YOU ALL!
Maya Sazas
Doomheim
#256 - 2013-10-03 20:51:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Maya Sazas
I can´t get behind this at all. These ships reputations and their places in the lore are connected to their current models.

They might not be everyones taste, but that´s just what makes them unique even more so. There are 3 main points why i don´t think this a good idea:

1) Why would you go for even more models of shiptypes that are already omnipresent in the game? Do we really need another Drake or another Hurricane?

2) The models you want to replace at least the Sleipnir and the Nighthawk with are much more streamlined and tailored to "please the eye". They are also much more boring and uncreative. Models with edges are fine, as long as the overall concept is sound.

3) As far as i get this you are planing to rework the t2 models anyway. So why not just wait until you got those new models ready? Why forcefully change models to completely unrelated ships? To establish continuity for people who did not know the old models? And the continuity argument falls pretty flat, considering that A LOT of t2/faction versions use different weapons compared to their t1 counterparts (Hawk, Vengeance, Rapier, Raptor, etc).

The only reason i can think of is that you actually already worked on the new models for the Harbi, the Myrm, the Hurri and the Drake....Wait, didn´t you just revamp the Drake? Might it be that you can use some of the designs done at that point for the upcoming t2 models? Of course i am just speculating here, but if that was the case it would be a pretty cheap reason to break the lore and leave a sour taste with many of your customers.

Please rethink this. I really can´t see how this could be considered "obvious positive". And no, i am not even a fan of how the Ferox/Cyclone/Prophecy looks. But these ships earned their place in Eve history. It´s a shame to see ships many people grew accustomed to and have font memories of, be treated like totally exchangeable stuff. Do proper reworks of the models, even if it takes time.
Soldarius
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#257 - 2013-10-03 21:04:47 UTC
Dat Absolution... damn...

Also, my T2 Drake cometh!

http://youtu.be/YVkUvmDQ3HY

Centurax
CSR Engineering Solutions
Citizen's Star Republic
#258 - 2013-10-03 21:26:48 UTC
Nighthawk = Kaalakiota Drake yay!!

Shame I cant really say anything about the 2 turrets, please not on the drake, needs 7 launchers otherwise the aesthetics will be lost P
Dersen Lowery
The Scope
#259 - 2013-10-03 21:33:39 UTC
Yes, please. Eos, come to daddy.

Dersen will be a decent command ship pilot just about in time for this yummy goodness.

Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.

I voted in CSM X!

Mara Pahrdi
The Order of Anoyia
#260 - 2013-10-03 21:36:15 UTC
Not too fond of the Eos change, I don't really like the Myrm. But since I like the Harbinger and also the Claymore, Vulture and, most important, the Damnation are not affected, I will get over it. Eventually Lol.

Remove standings and insurance.