EVE Information Portal

Obviously.
If a developer introduce for us the masterful example of the incompetence, that is
apparently the minnie's fault.

Compare Talos to Tornado is simple -actually sisi is good to figure how insufficient chances are for gallente while either by range or ammo changes other races like amarr or minmatar are getting boosted.

Before:
There's no reason to fly something that can't catch prey apply decent dmg in falloff with crap tracking

After:
There's no reason to fly something that still can't catch prey, still can't apply decent dmg in falloff without tracking issues. Now has more cap free to keep running AB or MWD but still useless since can't catch prey, but gives you the illusion you can do something while you're being melted has before. Nice for gank at gates station undocks and mackinaws.
For the same price Tornado just does better in all fields, why fly the green crap?

Has for those "don't give range I don't want hybrids looking like autos".

First things first, I don't want your Autos or lasers to be better at blaster roles any more since they're not and were not supposed to be in the first place, so if they can't fix hybrids it's lasers and autos who are in need of the nerf hammer.

All I can assume is that most devs toons are either Amarr or Minmater and that subconciously they dont want to make Galle be on an equal footing.
I found the youtube clip of a blaster fleet getting on top of and owning a Beam fleet so hilarious. it was like them rubbing the difference in and saying if you cant win with blasters you're just crap pilots.
Hybrids suck now and they will after the changes. CCP dont seem to have the will, inclanation, insparation or ability to fix them.

I know I've gotten pretty exited last night when I replied to the "drone attaching idea" (post #896), but the more I think about it, the less I like it unfortunately :(

One of the reasons is the one you just mentioned: ACs will even on those hulls still outperform blasters by a long shot, and that will open just another can of worms.
Then there is the probably significant effort required to implement this, even if they don't physically attach to hulls but pull on the ship with tractor beams or something. It's still an entirely new game mechanic.
Also in fact this is basically just a conditional speed buff to hulls, essentially giving speed based on drone bandwidth (and removing the drone damage while it's active). While this does give the greatest boost to Gallente, it's also pretty random as to which ship gets how much boost otherwise.
It would be an option to create something like "drone attachment hard points" to more directly control this, but in the end this feels like a rather cumbersome approach. The effect would be quite similar if the speed of the hulls was just simply increased where needed by the exact amount that is deemed necessary or appropriate.

To bad, it seemed like a really cool idea at first. One more example of how something cool isn't necessarily a good idea...

Yeah because everyone in null sec does just like that: "fly under 200clicks" and every single blaster in the constellation just magically pops and rip apart everything looking like rust or sex toys....we all know it so well.

That video made me smile the first time I saw it "wtf is this troll from CCP"

I'd like them to do some real videos of what's going on in high sec low sec and null sec, not sure they'd be able too admit how disproportional is the number of matar/amarr/caldari/gallente ships flown.
Sad CCP Tallest is the once that can do something about but will probably not be able to: see the 180° direction about web bonus for Talos with stuff about fleets and hit bigger stuff.

Everyone knows the only sub cap gallente ships useful in fleets are arazus/lachesis for the long point, at any other task gallente hulls/weapons are just pitiful.

Gangs? -yes they can succeed, when they're being rep by GUARDIANS, shooting stuff pinned by RAPIERS, Ecm by FALCONS, but even then if you fly gallente it's just the poor man's choice. Every single ship type in amarr or minmatar set up WILL be better for the same job.

This is the worst idea what i heard.

Make gallentean ship the fastest race in game ? Oh i see, do you want to catch some paper hull matar ships.
Those matar ships have the worst hull in game. Thier advantages just their speeds when a blaster hit them from short distance they burning out instantly. Minnie hit and run tactics when a faster blaster ship using on their ships a web and scrambler ?
Do you just want a "I WIN" button and creating a ship which faster than matarian ship, which have better firepower and better hull. LOL
This would be the fine solution ? No thx no.
Need smarter gallente ship and weapon system buff.

Just check your idea. Do you want flying with all race, but what would be happen if you create a faster ship with better damage and hull against matar ships ? No one will fly with minie ships, because a deimos will be faster and kill easily a vagabond or anything else.
The zealot ahac fleet will be change to uber damage deimos fleet or proteus fleet which have over 700 DPS with lol 250k EHP (wich has just 40k armor without slave sett and other bonuses) and faster than other one.
Thx no.

Need to use other fine solution like scrambler range bonus/lvl for gallentean ships and they would be turning off their enemies mwd from farther range. (and this is logic for eve history too because their recon ships use racial scram bonus)

Other thing. Do you want to nerf AC, when after speed nerf no one flight with matar ships, because those ships was crap and they could to shot 15-20km with crap falloff damage, they couldn't fight from short distance (paper hull), they couldn't fight from far distance (crap damage and distance without falloff bonus), but at least they could flight slow after speed nerf. :D
No one used them. Everyone flight with amarrian ships and drakes. LOL
Now when CCP "finaly" rebalanced the matar weapons, and minie ships finaly useable as amarrian ship, do you want to nerf them.

A smart and wise hybrid buff need to put gallente ships to top level again as they did with matar and amarr ships without any nerf.

Maybe its good idea not to makes gallente the fastest but switch stats between Blasters and Autocannons ? So matar will be 4,5 km range and gallente 10km - sounds good ? same with ammo. Matar is the fastest right ? So blaster range will be fine for them True ?

If you don't want to make Gallente the fastest, make them the most agile by a good margin, allowing them to close range quickly and making maneuvers like the Crazy Ivan more practical. As mentioned above, it's silly for one race to be both fast and agile, both from a physics perspective and a gameplay perspective.

Gallente have **** tanks also ALL of there tanking bonuses are for active tanking so i have no clue what tiger is talking bout.