Player Features and Ideas Discussion

The Naga still looks useless...

Hybrid turrets are just as much the Caldari signature weapon as missiles are.

It is my opinion that Caldari missile purists give everyone who started Caldari a bad name. You keep wanting the Naga to be a gucking horrible cruise/torp platform. EVE doesn't need another strictly POS bashing ship because you all are too lazy to train hybrid goddamn turrets. If Minmatar have to train both shield and armor tanking in order to be effective at all, why is it such a catalcysm that you have to train two weapon systems? (Further, large railguns are good. So are small ones, IIRC. It's just the medium ones that are literally the worst weapons in the game, next to... Oh, heavy missiles. At least for the cruiser/battlecruiser scale. The normal ones.)

The tier 3's are working as intended. They don't need another nerf. The other ship classes need a buff and that's the direction CCP's been heading in.

You don't buff everything to meet the outlyer, you nerf the outlyer. Power creep is not a good thing. They're also a complete laugh in the face of any attempts to buff active tanking, especially after off grid boosts are nerfed.

The problem here is that while we're getting the 'phoon v2.0, we still don,t have a mobile missile sniping platform. I wanna use my cruise missiles on something that can be taken into WH-space without cllapsing half the WHs that aren't brand new. Also, the gallente already fill the hybrid sniper role.

The changes to these ships make little difference to me as I'm rarely in position to get buttraped by them, however the talos having a dronebay does change its application in PvE to one where it becomes much more usable in an area it wasn't intended to be, either remove the dronebay or give a dronebay to all of them.

These changes are not enough.

Attack battlecruisers need to be nerfed much harder, mainly their fitting ability.

These things simply have more firepower than battleships and more. wya more mobility. Tank is hardly as relevant , specailly when they have RANGE and flaloff bonuses. They can avoid almost all damage,


These thigns need ALL to loose 1 turret at LEAST!!!! They could very well loose 2 turrets adn still be overpowered.

I find your opinion to be quite ridiculous considering you have to spend more time training missiles than turrets.
Frig missiles, you need to learn light and rocket.
Cruiser and BC - heavy and Ham.
Battleship - Torps and cruise.

While turret users just learn the main skill to 5 and can simply buy the skill for the long or short range. Caldari is mostly missile boats and the fact we have to learn 2 weapon skills as compared in order to have access to the other half of the caldari line.

All the while only a a few ships on each other race requires missile skills.

Caldari pilots have every right to have viable missile platforms in every flavor of ship class and currently large missiles are poor weapons. Heavy missiles are garbage now because turret cry babies couldnt handle a challenge.

I find turret people to be lazy in telling missile users to just learn guns because their missile systems suck.

I am gallente turret user and you should be ashamed for your comment.

*FacePalm*

you're an idiot

of course autos and arties do the opposite just like all the different weapons systems for each race.
blaster = short range dps rails = long range no dps, pulse and beams are similar as are torps and cruise missiles are you seeing a trend here?

i like the idea of slowing the Tier 3s down but there is still nothing you can do about that pre-alligned nado 90-100km off gate with a throw away remote sensor boosting alt next to it.

still i look forward to seeing the changes in action