These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Hide your ISK, Team Security is out of control. (Allegedly)

First post First post
Author
Darirol
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#621 - 2013-02-12 23:17:42 UTC
Finde learth wrote:
Liang Nuren wrote:
Aren Madigan wrote:

Honestly? I can see some of the difficulty, yeah, which is why I'm not angry at CCP... yet. But I would say it'd do a lot of damage to CCP's position if someone made a video on how this was done. If "John" was legit, wish he would have stuck around to do that at least. If not? Good riddance.


John was botting. Really. I mean it. This is a provable thing, and CCP only bans on 150% proof.

-Liang


Did CCP ban Psyco Groupie on 150% proof? You should know you are lying like CCP.


and he escalated and got unbanned and got reimbursed with some plex for every account if i remember right. **** happens and the escalation thing seems to work.

Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#622 - 2013-02-12 23:18:07 UTC
Callie Cross wrote:
Everyone keeps jumping on this EUNI CEO SUPPORTS BOTTING bandwagon, but no one can provide a single word of source backing it up.


Have a good, long read through the E-UNI thread that started all of this.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Nikolai Lachance
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#623 - 2013-02-12 23:23:47 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
He was told multiple times why it was removed and as with every case the details of the case will not be shared with anyone other than the offender.

The problem is that being told it was removed because it was illegally obtained is insufficient, given the circumstances. If they had additionally explained why there was a delay in removing it, perhaps indicating that there was an ongoing investigation that had only just been completed, an assurance that the ISK would have been removed eventually, apologies for the inconvenience, and some kind of expression of gratitude for Kelduum's decision to bring it up with them before making use of the ISK (which would have complicated everything), then there wouldn't really be an issue.

Instead, the process made it look like the ISK was confiscated only because Kelduum brought it up and that they really hadn't substantiated the fact that the ISK was illegally obtained and were only saying so to stonewall Kelduum's incredulity.

EVE University lives almost entirely off of donations from others. With the way this was handled, it felt like E-Uni was being punished for Kelduum's due diligence by a security team with carte blanche authority and no oversight. It could have been handled significantly better, for example starting with the response that Sreegs posted in this thread initially.
Josef Djugashvilis
#624 - 2013-02-12 23:27:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Josef Djugashvilis
At the risk if going slightly off-topic if I may.

By sheer coincidence, I was looking at the Eve-Uni website earlier today with a view to applying so that I could improve my terrible pvp skills.

Think I shall look for a different corp.

Eve-Uni and the game in general would suffer no great loss if their CEO was to biomass his character.

This is not a signature.

Nikolai Lachance
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#625 - 2013-02-12 23:28:41 UTC
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Callie Cross wrote:
Everyone keeps jumping on this EUNI CEO SUPPORTS BOTTING bandwagon, but no one can provide a single word of source backing it up.


Have a good, long read through the E-UNI thread that started all of this.

And if, upon doing so, you come away with the impression that Kelduum supports botting, you have reading comprehension issues (or a significant personal bias against Kelduum).
Grimpak
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#626 - 2013-02-12 23:30:02 UTC
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
At the risk if going slightly off-topic if I may.

By sheer coincidence, I was looking at the Eve-Uni website earlier today with a view to applying so that I could improve my terrible pvp skills.

Think I shall look for a different corp.

Eve-Uni and the game in general would suffer no great loss if their CEO if he was to biomass his character.

thing is, 3 years ago I would recomend eve-u to any noob that wanted to learn stuff.

nowadays and specially with this crap? hell better get your teaching somewhere.

[img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]

[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right

Sassums
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#627 - 2013-02-12 23:30:25 UTC
Where do we go to submit feedback regarding the GM's, I have some feedback on issues and rather than throwing them under the bus, I'd prefer not to.
Aren Madigan
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#628 - 2013-02-12 23:31:57 UTC
Grimpak wrote:
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
At the risk if going slightly off-topic if I may.

By sheer coincidence, I was looking at the Eve-Uni website earlier today with a view to applying so that I could improve my terrible pvp skills.

Think I shall look for a different corp.

Eve-Uni and the game in general would suffer no great loss if their CEO if he was to biomass his character.

thing is, 3 years ago I would recomend eve-u to any noob that wanted to learn stuff.

nowadays and specially with this crap? hell better get your teaching somewhere.


I still would even if Kelduum is completely in the wrong in every way. Completely condemning someone for one thing you don't like is grade school behavior far as I'm concerned.
Nikolai Lachance
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#629 - 2013-02-12 23:32:11 UTC
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
At the risk if going slightly off-topic if I may.

By sheer coincidence, I was looking at the Eve-Uni website earlier today with a view to applying so that I could improve my terrible pvp skills.

Think I shall look for a different corp.

Eve-Uni and the game in general would suffer no great loss if their CEO if he was to biomass his character.

That's a very bold assessment from someone with no experience in the corporation or in dealing with Kelduum himself.

If improving your PvP skills is your goal, then you have many options available to you. E-Uni deals in educating in all aspects of EVE gameplay, including PvP but PvP is not a focus of the organization.
Zombie132
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#630 - 2013-02-12 23:33:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Zombie132
Kick Kelduum from the CSM!

He has publicly defamed CCP, acted irresponsibly and behaved in a way which is counter to the interests of the player base he was elected to represent.

[K]ick [K]elduum [F]rom the [C]SM!


K-KFC!


Just thought this rabble needed a catchcry~


In all honesty Kelduum, you'd probably be well served just to mea culpa, admit some mistakes you've made so you can go back to teaching newbies, which I have immense respect for
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#631 - 2013-02-12 23:33:58 UTC
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
At the risk if going slightly off-topic if I may.

By sheer coincidence, I was looking at the Eve-Uni website earlier today with a view to applying so that I could improve my terrible pvp skills.

Think I shall look for a different corp.

Eve-Uni and the game in general would suffer no great loss if their CEO if he was to biomass his character.

Make sure he sends all his isk to some space-important group ...

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Alicia Fermi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#632 - 2013-02-12 23:34:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Alicia Fermi
That is unfair. EVE University less run by Kelduum than the volunteer army of recruiters, mentors, teachers, and so on. (Hell, Kelduum even handed the day-to-day CEO-type activities to another director as he was moving countries.)

I still think that E-UNI is a good place to direct newbies who cannot get into one of the other newbie-friendly corporations (e.g. Dreddit, GoonWaffe, etc.). However, I would suggest that said newbies move to a corp dedicated toward their chosen game style once they have the basics down and an idea of what they want to do.

(Edit: Kelduum seems frequently wrong these days. His CSM position has really got to his head.)
Grimpak
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#633 - 2013-02-12 23:34:31 UTC
Aren Madigan wrote:
Grimpak wrote:
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
At the risk if going slightly off-topic if I may.

By sheer coincidence, I was looking at the Eve-Uni website earlier today with a view to applying so that I could improve my terrible pvp skills.

Think I shall look for a different corp.

Eve-Uni and the game in general would suffer no great loss if their CEO if he was to biomass his character.

thing is, 3 years ago I would recomend eve-u to any noob that wanted to learn stuff.

nowadays and specially with this crap? hell better get your teaching somewhere.


I still would even if Kelduum is completely in the wrong in every way. Completely condemning someone for one thing you don't like is grade school behavior far as I'm concerned.

dunno, eve-U definitely wasn't like this in the past, and stuff changed with Keldrum, so, personal opinion is that the issue is Keldrum, not eve-u.

[img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]

[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right

Moneta Curran
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#634 - 2013-02-12 23:36:31 UTC

This Kelduum character should resign. No politician should get away with embezzlement.

If one infamous CSM member can show the good grace to step down after an impulsive drunken sneer at the expense of some random clown, Kelduum should certainly give up his seat after this attempt to hide botted isk in plain sight.

The fact that he feels entitled to the botted isk is hilarious, the way he tried to create public outrage over this appalling.
It merely demonstrates that he is completely unfit to be on the council.
Josef Djugashvilis
#635 - 2013-02-12 23:38:04 UTC
I mean no disrespect to Eve-Uni.

They just need a new CEO.

This is not a signature.

Aren Madigan
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#636 - 2013-02-12 23:38:47 UTC
Grimpak wrote:

dunno, eve-U definitely wasn't like this in the past, and stuff changed with Keldrum, so, personal opinion is that the issue is Keldrum, not eve-u.


Honestly I don't even know anything about the guy. Plus situations change. I'd say though there isn't one person in the world who you can't **** off and make essentially throw a tantrum. Except maybe people like Ghandi...
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#637 - 2013-02-12 23:42:00 UTC
Nikolai Lachance wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Callie Cross wrote:
Everyone keeps jumping on this EUNI CEO SUPPORTS BOTTING bandwagon, but no one can provide a single word of source backing it up.


Have a good, long read through the E-UNI thread that started all of this.

And if, upon doing so, you come away with the impression that Kelduum supports botting, you have reading comprehension issues (or a significant personal bias against Kelduum).


Kelduum Revaan wrote:
he was a station trader, and a very good one at that, playing trade markets in EVE like a professional, using the common tools available, as well as custom built tools, but never automating anything to do with the EVE client himself - the closest he ever got was probably to create custom in-game-browser pages to streamline his workflow, meaning he would log into an alt, and update around 30 orders a minute for 10-20 minutes at a time.


Says he did nothing wrong, then immediately proceeds to tell us how he did it. Kelduum supported a botter & tried to justify his actions, therefore condoning it. And that's only in the first post, there's a whole 11 pages of E-UNI people supporting this.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Shamon Hussad
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#638 - 2013-02-12 23:42:05 UTC
Can someone explain to me, without using any derogatory language, or calling others names, why we are all hating on Keldrum?
Nikolai Lachance
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#639 - 2013-02-12 23:43:21 UTC
Moneta Curran wrote:

This Kelduum character should resign. No politician should get away with embezzlement.

If one infamous CSM member can show the good grace to step down after an impulsive drunken sneer at the expense of some random clown, Kelduum should certainly give up his seat after this attempt to hide botted isk in plain sight.

The fact that he feels entitled to the botted isk is hilarious, the way he tried to create public outrage over this appalling.
It merely demonstrates that he is completely unfit to be on the council.

Are you daft?

E-Uni receives an unsolicited donation of all of a player's ISK as he decides to quit the game. Kelduum, knowing this player was involved in disciplinary action for potential botting to obtain ISK, isolates this donation away from E-Uni assets to prevent it from being used for corp activities, and then contacts CCP to determine the legality of this ISK.

How do you get from that to an accusation of "embezzlement" or an attempt to "hide" botted ISK? Kelduum could have simply allowed the money to be used in the corporation. The question is, would it have been confiscated if Kelduum hadn't said anything to CCP? Or, was Kelduum (and by extension in this case, E-Uni) essentially punished for his due dilligence?
Khanh'rhh
Sparkle Motion.
#640 - 2013-02-12 23:44:07 UTC
Wowza.

Just when you think Kelduum can't get any more whiney and entitled he posts something like this

Kelduum on E-Uni forums wrote:
Actually, E-UNI has historically been treated pretty badly by CCP, although probably not on purpose.

From expansions that break things, them 'stealing' our public channel by making it official (which totally broke it for some time) to broken API things and bugs with titles, not to mention the changes to wardec mechanics which were supposed to fix loopholes but in fact made things worse.

In fact, Retribution was the first expansion in years (as long back as I can recall) that didn't break something important to E-UNI


It's "probably not on purpose" that expansions didn't personally consider his alliance.

Jesus wept.

"Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual,