These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

i am disappointed in null sec people. (TL:DR talking about local chat.) read first post.

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#561 - 2012-11-03 15:15:19 UTC
lady labia wrote:
Sorry, I am leaving the thread now, did not mean to interrupt your "heated debate" Lol

"He used a bad word once, that's proof he's been ranting for 30 pages."

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat
Mirima Thurander
#562 - 2012-11-03 15:15:52 UTC
lady labia wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Sentamon wrote:
So we're come to the conclusion that Local channel, as is, pretty much removes PvP and any sort of danger from Nullsec.

these ****** PVPers

lady labia wrote:
ranting

That word. I don't think you know what it means.


Sorry, I am leaving the thread now, did not mean to interrupt your "heated debate" Lol


Make a thread called remove local post it in Russian in there section Zim will be along a few seconds after its posted posting the same null will be empty Reply.


Aka Zim uses a bot to find all the remove local threads and post in them.

All automated intel should be removed from the game including Instant local/jumps/kills/cynos for all systems/regions.Eve should report nothing like this to the client/3rd party software.Intel should not be force fed to players. Player skill and iniative should be the sources of intel.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#563 - 2012-11-03 15:19:31 UTC
Mirima Thurander wrote:
Aka Zim uses a bot to find all the remove local threads and post in them.

Interesting theory. Care to back up that allegation, or are you just rumormongering?

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat
Mirima Thurander
#564 - 2012-11-03 15:43:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Mirima Thurander
Lord Zim wrote:
Mirima Thurander wrote:
Aka Zim uses a bot to find all the remove local threads and post in them.

Interesting theory. Care to back up that allegation, or are you just rumormongering?



Clearly botter/has botter friends loves local.



Now on to more important matters.

Local breaks the stealth game play of eve.

All automated intel should be removed from the game including Instant local/jumps/kills/cynos for all systems/regions.Eve should report nothing like this to the client/3rd party software.Intel should not be force fed to players. Player skill and iniative should be the sources of intel.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#565 - 2012-11-03 15:45:01 UTC
Mirima Thurander wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Mirima Thurander wrote:
Aka Zim uses a bot to find all the remove local threads and post in them.

Interesting theory. Care to back up that allegation, or are you just rumormongering?

Clearly botter/has botter friends loves local.

Interesting theory. Care to back up that allegation, or are you just rumormongering?

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat
Mirima Thurander
#566 - 2012-11-03 15:49:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Mirima Thurander
Answer me this if ccp was to remove local and give u the tools to effectively scout your space in a timely manner would u go rage still?
Where you had to apply effort to get your intel and the game did not give it to you freely.


I'm going to say yes.

All automated intel should be removed from the game including Instant local/jumps/kills/cynos for all systems/regions.Eve should report nothing like this to the client/3rd party software.Intel should not be force fed to players. Player skill and iniative should be the sources of intel.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#567 - 2012-11-03 15:54:20 UTC
So what you're saying is, you've absolutely no proof for any of those two allegations, and you're just rumormongering.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat
Mirima Thurander
#568 - 2012-11-03 16:33:44 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
So what you're saying is, you've absolutely no proof for any of those two allegations, and you're just rumormongering.

Answer the question. Don't ignore it in favor of my trolls.

All automated intel should be removed from the game including Instant local/jumps/kills/cynos for all systems/regions.Eve should report nothing like this to the client/3rd party software.Intel should not be force fed to players. Player skill and iniative should be the sources of intel.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#569 - 2012-11-03 17:00:06 UTC
Mirima Thurander wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
So what you're saying is, you've absolutely no proof for any of those two allegations, and you're just rumormongering.

Answer the question. Don't ignore it in favor of my trolls.

Which question, the "go rage still" question? Doesn't that imply I'm raging to begin with?

If you'd asked a proper question, i.e. "will you move your isk-making alt to nullsec after local is changed", the answer would of course have been no, especially if they're not making any changes to make it actually worth moving out of hisec. This should be obvious to you, since I've stated multiple times I've moved my iskmaking alt to hisec because the effort/reward makes hisec worth it. Upping the effort without either upping the reward in nullsec or lowering the rewards in hisec is certainly not going to make me go "hmm, maybe I should move back after all".

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat
KrakizBad
Section 8.
#570 - 2012-11-03 17:02:26 UTC
I think he wants you to admit you have 58 bots running sanctums in a system or something.
Mirima Thurander
#571 - 2012-11-03 18:25:04 UTC
I want him to admit that he dont want local to go away even if it was to be replaced by a tool that worked just as well but required work.

All automated intel should be removed from the game including Instant local/jumps/kills/cynos for all systems/regions.Eve should report nothing like this to the client/3rd party software.Intel should not be force fed to players. Player skill and iniative should be the sources of intel.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#572 - 2012-11-03 18:35:11 UTC
Mirima Thurander wrote:
replaced by a tool that worked just as well but required work.

Like what?

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat
Shepard Wong Ogeko
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#573 - 2012-11-03 19:33:04 UTC
Mirima Thurander wrote:
I want him to admit that he dont want local to go away even if it was to be replaced by a tool that worked just as well but required work.


I think Lord Zim has already made it clear that he moved out of nullsec with local because even with local it is not really worth living there full time.

But you tearbears are either too illiterate or too consumed by your own rage to notice that little tidbit.

But don't let those pesky facts get in the way of your little tantrum
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#574 - 2012-11-03 19:35:49 UTC
lady labia wrote:
Almost 30 pages of ranting by Lord Zim, andski and Nicole, impressive.

Don't forget to eat and sleep P

What can I say, globetrotter-level posting like mine needs washington generals-level posting like you people's to really work
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#575 - 2012-11-03 19:37:57 UTC
Mirima Thurander wrote:
even if it was to be replaced by a tool that worked just as well but required work.

Oh hey, this thread is finally starting to get interesting. I don't recall you saying at any point that there should be a replacement tool. What did you have in mind?

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Mirima Thurander
#576 - 2012-11-03 19:51:01 UTC
Mirima Thurander wrote:
Answer me this if ccp was to remove local and give u the tools to effectively scout your space in a timely manner would u go complain still.
Where you had to apply effort to get your intel and the game did not give it to you freely.


I'm going to say yes.



Just Answer the question.

A tool is a tool if ccp made it your going to use it and so long as its less reliable than local is now I don't care how or what they Do so long as it dose away with local.

All automated intel should be removed from the game including Instant local/jumps/kills/cynos for all systems/regions.Eve should report nothing like this to the client/3rd party software.Intel should not be force fed to players. Player skill and iniative should be the sources of intel.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#577 - 2012-11-03 19:53:53 UTC
It's almost as if I haven't answered that question in excruciating detail already.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#578 - 2012-11-03 19:54:08 UTC
Sentamon wrote:
So we're come to the conclusion that Local channel, as is, pretty much removes PvP and any sort of danger from Nullsec.

It's no wonder all the Nullsecers are running to Highsec for fun.


if you're serious it's obvious that you have no idea what you're talking about, as usual

if you're trolling, this is weak

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Mirima Thurander
#579 - 2012-11-09 19:45:02 UTC
Death to local!

All automated intel should be removed from the game including Instant local/jumps/kills/cynos for all systems/regions.Eve should report nothing like this to the client/3rd party software.Intel should not be force fed to players. Player skill and iniative should be the sources of intel.
highonpop
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#580 - 2012-11-09 19:58:33 UTC
op is bad and should feel bad

FC, what do?