These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Goons "legalising" botting!!

First post First post
Author
John Caesse
Just Post Inc.
#261 - 2011-09-29 23:58:50 UTC
Apparently an alliance not wanting its members to try and get each other banned is a big deal
Stella SGP
#262 - 2011-09-30 00:00:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Stella SGP
Jita Alt666 wrote:
Seerg was pretty clear: Give them proof of organised eula flouting and they will take action.

This is exactly why this thread is a waste of time and nothing will be done. He is asking for something that can never be proven. Even if any alliance were to openly admit to anything in forum post, its still just a forum post, unless of course you want to start using forum post as indisputable evidence for anything..... which is kind a.....

WELCOME TO THE INTERWEBZ
Brooson
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#263 - 2011-09-30 00:00:57 UTC
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:
Brooson wrote:
The Apostle wrote:
Way to go Goons. Forum bots as well now?


We are a joke, even by nullsec alliance "standards."


Fixed that for ya, mateBlink



You, sir, are both a scholar and a gentleman. I envy your astute observations and sharp wit.
Digital Messiah
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#264 - 2011-09-30 00:03:32 UTC
Botting goes on in all big alliances. The secret here, is that it isn't usually the alliance. Most of the time it is small to large corporations that bot up a storm in owned / rented space. This was a huge issue with one of my other characters while I was in test alliance. There was a big kick of a few corporations. Really though, if you want to help. Report the bots whether they are blue to you or not. If you get kicked out oh well. It is EVE what is the worst that can happen? Also if you are afraid of your old allies hunting you down for eternity. Just remember that GM's allow forms of griefing to an extent, but not an all out storm of fire and brimstone forever. Plus I think they might help you out if it was because you had reported bots. Or maybe not...

Something clever

CATPAIN KIRK
State War Academy
Caldari State
#265 - 2011-09-30 00:06:27 UTC
Woo Glin wrote:
I, for one, am ashamed to learn that there are people not only taking part in but also members of our leadership conding this behavior.



It's 'condoming', not 'conding'. jesus christ l2spell
Woo Glin
State War Academy
Caldari State
#266 - 2011-09-30 00:08:22 UTC
I hope you're kidding.
Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
#267 - 2011-09-30 00:10:31 UTC
Woo Glin wrote:
I, for one, am ashamed to learn that there are people not only taking part in but also members of our leadership condoning this behavior.

edit: spelling, and hounour


That's "behaviour" in English, actually. Bear

(E-honour = SRS BZNS, after all.)

Star Wars: the Old Republic may not be EVE. But I'll take the sound of dual blaster-pistols over "NURVV CLAOKING NAOW!!!11oneone!!" any day of the week.

Scatim Helicon
State War Academy
Caldari State
#268 - 2011-09-30 00:11:30 UTC
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
Cydori wrote:

So allow me the conceit of speaking for all non Goons in EVE Online: We don't believe you. You and your CSM chairman, like all Goons, are practiced liars and proud of that fact. Short of outright insanity, what possible motivation would any of us have to believe a word you say now?

The end.


Nope, not the end. Your conceit is just that - conceit. I am a non goon, never been a goon, but you sir do NOT speak for all of us. And for the record, making blanket statements like "all goons" is like saying "black people". It stereotypes and shows a lack of respect for pilots as individuals when you treat an entire group as if they've all committed a crime. Anti-goon bigotry in-game isn't much different than anti-whoever bigotry out of game. Your bias couldn't be more clear, and it calls into question YOUR statements as well.

As to the believability of Goonswarm or its entities, you just have to take everything with a grain of salt. I've listened to Mittani's interviews, blogs, and statements from various Goon authorities - and while I'd never say, attempt to buy a supercarrier from them without using Chribba escrow, or believe them if they said I had to pay 100 million isk to join their alliance, there is a whole lot that goons, especially the CSM, say that is quite verifiable from plenty of other sources. I just think its shortsighted and disrespectful to say that everything that comes out of every goon mouth is a lie. That kind of rhetoric doesnt help anyone.

Many of the goons are good sports about realizing that this is a just a game, and while they may play the game ruthlessly on the server, many make an effort to separate in-character deceit and treachery (which is normal gameplay), and their statement made objectively about the game in general when discussing mechanics on the forums and such. A lot of us are smart enough and willing to take the time and listen to know the difference, i'm sorry that you need to categorize, simplify, and treat them all the same.

Quote:
P.S. CCP's willful ignorance of what goes on in its own game is, sadly, of no great surprise. So I take CCP Screegs at his word when he says CCP has no intent of taking any meaningful action unless presented with irrefutable evidence of a coordinated RMT scheme at the corp/alliance level. Which is exactly what all of us expected of CCP prior to this dreary and depressing "debate" about a problem which is manifestly evident to everyone with a functioning brain stem, but which somehow continually seems to elude CCP.


I have a functioning brain stem, and I use it to observe and make judgements about the state of the game as well. I've been playing the game for two years, lived and operated in just about every slice of space from Jita to the the fringes of 0.0. Faction Warfare is my home and my primary activity, but I travel extensively, in pursuit of pew pew and some of the lootable resources that can only be found in 0.0. To this day, I have yet to observe ANY evidence of players using bots, and certainly not on any kind of scale. I still don't see what the big deal is, honestly there are enough players that rat, mine, and pew for 16 out of 24 hours (the others being devoted to sleep), so economically I could care less if someone uses a bot to automate income for the other 8. Its cheesy, and I hope they die in a fire and lose any implants they're stupid enough to bot in, but I fail to seem them or their hobbies as being a game-destroying factor on any kind of massive scale.

I say if you really want to police activity in-game, go do it!! Form a bot posse and spend all your time hunting bots. Take notes, post evidence to people like me that doubt this is a major scourge on New Eden, and report them to the authorities. But if you're too lazy to do that, than you can't than whine because another group in the game isn't doing that. The Goon leadership's statements seem pretty reasonable to me, just as CCP's security policy seems also reasonable. (Go ahead, say it, its not the first time I've been called a goon alt or CCP alt. )

We have this issue in militia too - whether or not to shoot purples that are causing trouble. Or that are engaging in questionable behavior. Going crazy and shooting purples or blues because of SUSPECTED, unverifiable, actions, cause far more diplomatic headaches than it does solve problems. It's a knee-jerk reaction solution to problem pilots that has implications that end up affecting a lot of innocent people in the process.

If you see botting, report it. If you're not around to see it, don't whine that others arent spending all their time policing it. Or better yet, provide some concrete evidence that "it" actually exists on a massive scale.

There are soooooo many issues that are in plain sight that need fixing right now, going on a witchhunt ghostbuster campaign against a phantom threat just seems like a major waste of time when there is a system in place to deal with these matters. Even more of a waste of time is a campaign against others who aren't out also campaigning to hunt ghosts.

Careful now, everyone knows that if you don't wave your pitchfork on the goonbot witch hunt with the requisite enthusiasm it means that you must be one of the goonbot witches.

Every time you post a WiS thread, Hilmar strangles a kitten.

John Caesse
Just Post Inc.
#269 - 2011-09-30 00:13:08 UTC
CATPAIN KIRK wrote:
Woo Glin wrote:
I, for one, am ashamed to learn that there are people not only taking part in but also members of our leadership conding this behavior.



It's 'condoming', not 'conding'. jesus christ l2spell


not sure if serious...
Brooson
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#270 - 2011-09-30 00:13:23 UTC
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:
Woo Glin wrote:
I, for one, am ashamed to learn that there are people not only taking part in but also members of our leadership condoning this behavior.

edit: spelling, and hounour


That's "behaviour" in English, actually. Bear

(E-honour = SRS BZNS, after all.)



Hounour is not a word. But neither is Fubicaltimak.
EVE Stig
Doomheim
#271 - 2011-09-30 00:13:40 UTC
Cypermethren wrote:


I've never known a CSM, someone which the eve community looks up too


Who the hell looks up to the CSM... youre playing this wrong

"Some say that he is actually dead, but the Grim Reaper is too afraid to tell him." "Some say he is the 3rd member of Daft Punk and he did the vocals of "Technologic" song. All we know is,he's called EVE Stig"!

Homo Erectus
Evolution
Northern Coalition.
#272 - 2011-09-30 00:14:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Homo Erectus
Woo Glin wrote:
I hope you're kidding.


I think the right goon/b/fukung meme to use for that is the one with the joker and the "not sure if serious" on it

edit- John Caesse beat me to it so he gets a facebook thumbs up
Woo Glin
State War Academy
Caldari State
#273 - 2011-09-30 00:14:33 UTC
how are you not in amok. yet
The Apostle
Doomheim
#274 - 2011-09-30 00:14:55 UTC  |  Edited by: The Apostle
Quote:
Hey OP, you're asking for an unenforceable rule. It's like the "no running" rule in elementary school.

Actually I don't think it is unenforceable at all.

Here's the logic.

Disregarding what can currently occur under the EULA add this one simple line...

>>> Alliance/corp is fined for EVERY bot detected, escalating on subsequent offenses.

The justification for this is where an alliance/corp has ASSUMED RESPONSIBILITY or PROVIDED A HAVEN for bots then they must also be HELD ACCOUNTABLE for bots.

Either the alliance gets VERY proactive against bots or it's going to hurt.

..oo00oo..

btw: You Goon guys have been very active in this thread and I really do appreciate you dropping by. If you're doing anything, your're proving Mittani's sheep theory. Keep up the good work. Post stays high on the list too. Win/Win

[i]Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo![/i]

Brooson
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#275 - 2011-09-30 00:17:36 UTC
I vote The Apostle for EVEonline forum Inquisitor.
Woo Glin
State War Academy
Caldari State
#276 - 2011-09-30 00:20:19 UTC
The Apostle wrote:
Quote:
Hey OP, you're asking for an unenforceable rule. It's like the "no running" rule in elementary school.


btw: You Goon guys have been very active in this thread and I really do appreciate you dropping by. If you're doing anything, your're proving Mittani's sheep theory. Keep up the good work. Post stays high on the list too. Win/Win



oh **** my game just got owned
EVE Stig
Doomheim
#277 - 2011-09-30 00:20:36 UTC
Stella SGP wrote:
Jita Alt666 wrote:
Seerg was pretty clear: Give them proof of organised eula flouting and they will take action.

This is exactly why this thread is a waste of time and nothing will be done. He is asking for something that can never be proven. Even if any alliance were to openly admit to anything in forum post, its still just a forum post, unless of course you want to start using forum post as indisputable evidence for anything..... which is kind a.....

WELCOME TO THE INTERWEBZ


Ah, like how Helicity was banned for telling a dev to DIAF cause that was apparently a real life threat?

Yeah... CCP set the standard first lol

"Some say that he is actually dead, but the Grim Reaper is too afraid to tell him." "Some say he is the 3rd member of Daft Punk and he did the vocals of "Technologic" song. All we know is,he's called EVE Stig"!

CATPAIN KIRK
State War Academy
Caldari State
#278 - 2011-09-30 00:24:43 UTC
Woo Glin wrote:
how are you not in amok. yet



who - me?
EI Digin
irc.zulusquad.org
#279 - 2011-09-30 00:27:04 UTC
**** goons
BiggerDangDude
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#280 - 2011-09-30 00:27:24 UTC
Hey guys check out my googles. I bet Goons couldn't "legalise" looking this good.