These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Latest patching (Mining)
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
alittlebirdy
All Hail The Liopleurodon
#41 - 2012-08-08 18:26:16 UTC
Miner tears best tears... cry more and show CCP that you want hello kitty in space... they will either kill eve or nut up and tell you to HTFU.
Implying Implications
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#42 - 2012-08-08 18:28:09 UTC
Razorzee Taranogas wrote:
well i dont think thats a point. Using a hulk for mining and this ship is obselete now for me and not usable cause i mine alone not in gang besides skill points wasted for this ship. Had a cargo bay of 27k m3 in my fit now im utterly screwed because it cannot fulfill any roll as intended through ccp's changes. Petitioned a reimbursement because of capital loss and non usabilityt

They overhauled the whole role of mining ships i dont care about that but i do care to have to adjust to this crap buyin a mackinaw for cargo bay summa 200milj + and rising and prolly never usin the hulk anymore. I thought ccp was so proud of being so flexible with regards to fittings and roles well this one Mining ships they srewed up in my opinion.

regards

Hope you drown in your tears.

hello
Anslo
Scope Works
#43 - 2012-08-08 18:32:51 UTC
alittlebirdy wrote:
Miner tears best tears... cry more and show CCP that you want hello kitty in space... they will either kill eve or nut up and tell you to HTFU.


>implying CCP won't continue to cater to care bears because we are the larger percentage of total customers.

Deal with it.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]
Virgil Travis
Non Constructive Self Management
#44 - 2012-08-08 18:43:32 UTC
Anslo wrote:
alittlebirdy wrote:
Miner tears best tears... cry more and show CCP that you want hello kitty in space... they will either kill eve or nut up and tell you to HTFU.


>implying CCP won't continue to cater to care bears because we are the larger percentage of total customers.

Deal with it.


Quantity != Quality.

Deal with it.

Unified Church of the Unobligated - madness in the method Mamma didn't raise no victims.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#45 - 2012-08-08 18:46:19 UTC
Anslo wrote:
alittlebirdy wrote:
Miner tears best tears... cry more and show CCP that you want hello kitty in space... they will either kill eve or nut up and tell you to HTFU.


>implying CCP won't continue to cater to care bears because we are the larger percentage of total customers.

Deal with it.

We can still kill your barges. Just sayin
Anslo
Scope Works
#46 - 2012-08-08 18:46:36 UTC
Virgil Travis wrote:
Anslo wrote:
alittlebirdy wrote:
Miner tears best tears... cry more and show CCP that you want hello kitty in space... they will either kill eve or nut up and tell you to HTFU.


>implying CCP won't continue to cater to care bears because we are the larger percentage of total customers.

Deal with it.


Quantity != Quality.

Deal with it.


Quality doesn't matter when it comes to subscriptions. Everyone is the same, whether pvp-tard or care bear. More care bears= more money, less pvpers make less care bears afraid from trying eve, then subscribing, then tossing their money at CCP. At the end of the day, it's all about that beautiful profit. Deal with it.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]
Anslo
Scope Works
#47 - 2012-08-08 18:47:17 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Anslo wrote:
alittlebirdy wrote:
Miner tears best tears... cry more and show CCP that you want hello kitty in space... they will either kill eve or nut up and tell you to HTFU.


>implying CCP won't continue to cater to care bears because we are the larger percentage of total customers.

Deal with it.

We can still kill your barges. Just sayin


Then we care bears vote with our wallet until CCP makes it safe for us :)

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#48 - 2012-08-08 18:49:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Anslo wrote:
implying CCP won't continue to cater to care bears because we are the larger percentage of total customers.
You know what the largest percentage of customers are? PvPers. 75% like PvPing — more than for any other activity in the game.

Do you know how important, say, PvE is to bringing people into EVE? Less than the OSX client.

Quote:
Then we care bears vote with our wallet until CCP makes it safe for us :)
…and nothing of any importance will be lost. They tried catering to the care bears once. It resulted in a sharp decline in player numbers and income and forced them to quickly and completely abandon that idea.
GallowsCalibrator
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#49 - 2012-08-08 18:49:50 UTC
Razorzee Taranogas wrote:
well i dont think thats a point. Using a hulk for mining and this ship is obselete now for me and not usable cause i mine alone not in gang besides skill points wasted for this ship. Had a cargo bay of 27k m3 in my fit now im utterly screwed because it cannot fulfill any roll as intended through ccp's changes. Petitioned a reimbursement because of capital loss and non usabilityt

They overhauled the whole role of mining ships i dont care about that but i do care to have to adjust to this crap buyin a mackinaw for cargo bay summa 200milj + and rising and prolly never usin the hulk anymore. I thought ccp was so proud of being so flexible with regards to fittings and roles well this one Mining ships they srewed up in my opinion.

regards


http://i.imgur.com/613sB.gif
Anslo
Scope Works
#50 - 2012-08-08 18:56:19 UTC
Tippia wrote:
You know what the largest percentage of customers are? PvPers. 75% like PvPing — more than for any other activity in the game.


As you were so quick to point out to me before, where is your evidence? You're making up numbers :)

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]
Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#51 - 2012-08-08 19:00:56 UTC
Anslo wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Anslo wrote:
alittlebirdy wrote:
Miner tears best tears... cry more and show CCP that you want hello kitty in space... they will either kill eve or nut up and tell you to HTFU.


>implying CCP won't continue to cater to care bears because we are the larger percentage of total customers.

Deal with it.

We can still kill your barges. Just sayin


Then we care bears vote with our wallet until CCP makes it safe for us :)


What happened to this Anslo?

All the carebears ran away
Hiding from the guns ablaze
Made their base out in the night
Far far from the pirate's might
Carebears think they all are safe
Protected by the station's grace
Silly lemmings, don't you know?
You will reap just what you sow.
Bloody Anslo's coming back
Ganking from the endless black
Walking through the station's halls
Anslo's come to kick your balls
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#52 - 2012-08-08 19:01:30 UTC
Anslo wrote:

Then we care bears vote with our wallet until CCP makes it safe for us :)


I won't stop you, more profits for me.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#53 - 2012-08-08 19:01:47 UTC
Anslo wrote:
As you were so quick to point out to me before, where is your evidence?
Here (source).

You see, unlike you, I deal in fact, not fabrication.
Anslo
Scope Works
#54 - 2012-08-08 19:01:50 UTC
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
Anslo wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Anslo wrote:
alittlebirdy wrote:
Miner tears best tears... cry more and show CCP that you want hello kitty in space... they will either kill eve or nut up and tell you to HTFU.


>implying CCP won't continue to cater to care bears because we are the larger percentage of total customers.

Deal with it.

We can still kill your barges. Just sayin


Then we care bears vote with our wallet until CCP makes it safe for us :)


What happened to this Anslo?

All the carebears ran away
Hiding from the guns ablaze
Made their base out in the night
Far far from the pirate's might
Carebears think they all are safe
Protected by the station's grace
Silly lemmings, don't you know?
You will reap just what you sow.
Bloody Anslo's coming back
Ganking from the endless black
Walking through the station's halls
Anslo's come to kick your balls


That's me being too lazy and apathetic to even bother changing my bio after about 2 years.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]
Abon
Pandorum Research Incorporated
#55 - 2012-08-08 19:01:52 UTC
How does the OP even stand upright with those bazookas fitted to her chest? Shocked
Anslo
Scope Works
#56 - 2012-08-08 19:05:42 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Anslo wrote:
As you were so quick to point out to me before, where is your evidence?
Here (source).

You see, unlike you, I deal in fact, not fabrication.


I see, then this confirms it. You bend the facts to fit your argument. Any data analyst will immediately look at that chart and realize it represents, not compartmentalized interests, but mixed. The way YOU phrased your statement indicated that 75% of the population as a whole liked PvP, without acknowledging multiple interests being among those polled. The fault then lies with you and your inability to accurately frame your findings, you bare the burden of proof, not the individual reading and criticizing your claim.

Along your lines of thinking, I could say 190% of the population prefers doing things NOT related to PvP.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]
Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#57 - 2012-08-08 19:07:02 UTC
Anslo wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Anslo wrote:
As you were so quick to point out to me before, where is your evidence?
Here (source).

You see, unlike you, I deal in fact, not fabrication.


I see, then this confirms it. You bend the facts to fit your argument. Any data analyst will immediately look at that chart and realize it represents, not compartmentalized interests, but mixed. The way YOU phrased your statement indicated that 75% of the population as a whole liked PvP, without acknowledging multiple interests being among those polled. The fault then lies with you and your inability to accurately frame your findings, you bare the burden of proof, not the individual reading and criticizing your claim.

Along your lines of thinking, I could say 190% of the population prefers doing things NOT related to PvP.


What?

No, it means 75% of the population likes PvPing as well as other things.
Anslo
Scope Works
#58 - 2012-08-08 19:08:38 UTC
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
Anslo wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Anslo wrote:
As you were so quick to point out to me before, where is your evidence?
Here (source).

You see, unlike you, I deal in fact, not fabrication.


I see, then this confirms it. You bend the facts to fit your argument. Any data analyst will immediately look at that chart and realize it represents, not compartmentalized interests, but mixed. The way YOU phrased your statement indicated that 75% of the population as a whole liked PvP, without acknowledging multiple interests being among those polled. The fault then lies with you and your inability to accurately frame your findings, you bare the burden of proof, not the individual reading and criticizing your claim.

Along your lines of thinking, I could say 190% of the population prefers doing things NOT related to PvP.


What?

No, it means 75% of the population likes PvPing as well as other things.


Nope, not from her original statement.

Tippia wrote:
You know what the largest percentage of customers are? PvPers. 75% like PvPing — more than for any other activity in the game.


That statement says that the largest percentage of customers are PvPers.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#59 - 2012-08-08 19:10:19 UTC
Anslo wrote:

That statement says that the largest percentage of customers are PvPers.


75% of them do pvp... That kinda makes them pvpers.
Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#60 - 2012-08-08 19:10:45 UTC
Yes, because they are. PvPer is not a binary choice. If you make the choice to PvP it does not mean that you are prevented from stepping foot into a mining vessel or playing the market or running missions.