These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

New dev blog: Next Unified Inventory Update

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Maul555
Xen Investments
#921 - 2012-06-28 06:36:18 UTC
ZaBob wrote:
CCP RubberBAND has a most excellent post acknowledging the most pressing issues and how they're going to address them. It's available here:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1541165#post1541165

I hope it's turned into a Dev Blog.



This bears repeating...
Angst IronShard
#922 - 2012-06-28 11:16:06 UTC
Unified Inventory : a way too laggy , and it's worse when shift + click for another window
Vanessa Steelbloom
Renegade Pleasure Androids
#923 - 2012-06-30 22:02:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Vanessa Steelbloom
Just make the new UI 100% identical in function to the old UI. Tabbed corp hangars, no trees, no ridiculously FAT UI borders wasting space, no confusion which window is which. None of this garbage.

100% identical with an option for the new junk.
Cookie Bradshaw
Koala Bootcamp
#924 - 2012-07-04 16:20:40 UTC
Vanessa Steelbloom wrote:
Just make the new UI 100% identical in function to the old UI. Tabbed corp hangars, no trees, no ridiculously FAT UI borders wasting space, no confusion which window is which. None of this garbage.

100% identical with an option for the new junk.




Totally agree....this new inventory system is just frustrating and comfusing and takes much longer to mangae and open. I do alot of ore hauling in my corp an to open my cargohold + 10 secure cans and then sort the ore in to station containers is just about imposible now. To keep track of what goes where and so on...with the old system i could just dubble klick in the background and all cans opened in one stack and i could sort it in 30 secs. Now i dont know what is what and where, and sometimes if I hover over a station can to long the stationcan opends instead and i have to put the ore back and start over...

Have actually not heard one member that likes this new system...


PLEASE!!!!!!! go back to ther old system before I go insane
Ann Kuvakei
HomeZone
#925 - 2012-07-04 20:08:21 UTC
CCP RubberBAND wrote:


[...]
I would appreciate if people dropped this point, we will not go back to the old system.
[...]
Hulasikali Walla
Brave Nubs
#926 - 2012-07-06 08:51:25 UTC
Ann Kuvakei wrote:
CCP RubberBAND wrote:


[...]
I would appreciate if people dropped this point, we will not go back to the old system.
[...]




Well, he don't care or give a F___, to what the players writes on the forum......
So why should the players care about his point of view Attention

This UI is a real mess, it's was deployed at a stage where it did not even meet the grade of an "Apha version"...
Even with all the feedback given on numerous treads, there seems to be no end to this mess.
They are putting pach after pach, on a system that most of the players don't want , with no real effect on the usability of the UI, but with side effect on other part of the game.

Keep your head in the sand CCP.
Knalldari Testpilot
#927 - 2012-07-06 13:59:08 UTC
CCP Explorer wrote:
Panhead4411 wrote:
So is this the real reason the new Inventory was initially PUSHED onto TQ?

I understand and appreciate that you have in house dealines, but you seem to not be understanding that your customers would prefer a fully functional system before you try to work on something new.

Unless i've misread most of the feedback given in all the major threadnaughts thus far.
This is not the reason. We honestly thought we were ready.

lol?

are you trolling us? Shocked
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
#928 - 2012-07-12 11:54:19 UTC
**** it CCP, you are done if the old inventory behavior is restored.
Dragonzchilde
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#929 - 2012-07-12 17:14:53 UTC
Knalldari Testpilot wrote:
CCP Explorer wrote:
Panhead4411 wrote:
So is this the real reason the new Inventory was initially PUSHED onto TQ?

I understand and appreciate that you have in house dealines, but you seem to not be understanding that your customers would prefer a fully functional system before you try to work on something new.

Unless i've misread most of the feedback given in all the major threadnaughts thus far.
This is not the reason. We honestly thought we were ready.

lol?

are you trolling us? Shocked



must say i loved his reply too. wonderful game designers i would call that even better quality assurance still.

I'm down from 9 accounts to 1. The way ccp is doing in the last 4 - 5 patches I wont be resubbing any. GTC with tech moon money it is.

Great Job CCP.... I hope dust will go the same way cause you don't deserve your customers.
Kusum Fawn
Perkone
Caldari State
#930 - 2012-09-13 05:13:38 UTC
Because. just because. maybe one day it will be good again.

Its not possible to please all the people all the time, but it sure as hell is possible to Displease all the people, most of the time.
ZaBob
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#931 - 2012-09-18 20:23:55 UTC
Kusum Fawn wrote:
Because. just because. maybe one day it will be good again.


I get the impression -- from the lack of any further progress -- that they think it's good again.
Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#932 - 2012-09-18 22:13:28 UTC
ZaBob wrote:
Kusum Fawn wrote:
Because. just because. maybe one day it will be good again.


I get the impression -- from the lack of any further progress -- that they think it's good again.
Could be. Or that they have prioritized their coder and designer resources on other ventures.

I still have several UI-related bugs open and unfiltered at this point in time -- this can't be a unique situation...

I remember Hilmar's humble communication from about 11 months ago where he announced a renewed focus on customers as he was laying off a couple hundred of his own people.

Once he got his books in order, it was back to the usual 'ignore our customers until something else blows up in our face' business methodology. So much potential with EVE and CCP. And they always blow it.

+++++++ I have never shed a tear for a fellow EVE player until now. Mark “Seleene” Heard's Blog Honoring Sean "Vile Rat" Smith.
poppeteer
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#933 - 2012-09-19 04:35:13 UTC  |  Edited by: poppeteer
CCP Arrows latest UI thread;

Improving the Inventory UI - What matters the most?
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=155053

Get on board and provide feedback.
Bubanni
Corus Aerospace
#934 - 2012-09-19 16:00:21 UTC
Robert Caldera wrote:
**** it CCP, you are done if the old inventory behavior is restored.


This iteration would do exactly that if you ask me, (in terms of the areas I use it for, not pos's and such?)
I am looking forward to adding shortcuts directly to the neocom, that will make me able to use the unifiec inventory as if it was just like the old one. (wont have to use the tree view at all)

Supercap nerf - change ewar immunity https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=194759 Module activation delay! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1180934
Panhead4411
Rothschild's Sewage and Septic Sucking Services
The Possum Lodge
#935 - 2012-09-20 01:26:56 UTC
Bubanni wrote:

This iteration would do exactly that if you ask me, (in terms of the areas I use it for, not pos's and such?)
I am looking forward to adding shortcuts directly to the neocom, that will make me able to use the unifiec inventory as if it was just like the old one. (wont have to use the tree view at all)


From the sound of it, you'll have to add a shortcut for each division of the corp hanger in order to not use the tree...funny how he's not saying anything specific about that part...

http://blog.beyondreality.se/shift-click-does-nothing    < Unified Inventory is NOT ready...
Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#936 - 2012-09-20 15:45:59 UTC
poppeteer wrote:
CCP Arrows latest UI thread;

Improving the Inventory UI - What matters the most?
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=155053

Get on board and provide feedback.
Quoting for emphasis. Re-link posts, copy-n-paste post content, etc. Whatever you have to do to put player requirements back in front of the developers' eyes.

@ CCP: was it that hard to lock this thread and put a link to Arrow's new and hopefully constructive thread?

+++++++ I have never shed a tear for a fellow EVE player until now. Mark “Seleene” Heard's Blog Honoring Sean "Vile Rat" Smith.
Mr Bimble
Lost Ark Enterprises
#937 - 2012-10-16 15:56:09 UTC
Still a pain in the arse.UI is still a piece of ****. Takes a back seat to "improvements" to the avatars.Spaceships guns missiles lasers.Not even a spacesuit.Get your heads out of your arses and fix broken **** before playing with useless frillies
Amaldor Themodius
TUR3O
#938 - 2012-10-30 21:53:12 UTC
The unified inventory UI is literally worse than the previous UI in pretty much all ways. I don't understand why ccp persist in investing developer resources and cash into the ongoing serries of band aids to fix the unified UI when they could roll back to the old UI which was fine tbh.

The key pain points for me with the unified inventory UI are:

1 - it's counter intuitive. Even after months of using this new UI its always a task to remember to do what is needed to ensure the action I want to undertake.

2 - its clunky and poorly designed. There are just too many flaws especially when dealing with multiple large pools of inventory in a station. Activity such as putting drones into ships or ships into carriers are needlessly complex and tome consuming.

3 - Literally nobody I know likes or wants this ui in preference to the old one

Please chamge back.
shado20
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#939 - 2012-11-16 17:25:44 UTC
Amaldor Themodius wrote:
The unified inventory UI is literally worse than the previous UI in pretty much all ways. I don't understand why ccp persist in investing developer resources and cash into the ongoing serries of band aids to fix the unified UI when they could roll back to the old UI which was fine tbh.

The key pain points for me with the unified inventory UI are:

1 - it's counter intuitive. Even after months of using this new UI its always a task to remember to do what is needed to ensure the action I want to undertake.

2 - its clunky and poorly designed. There are just too many flaws especially when dealing with multiple large pools of inventory in a station. Activity such as putting drones into ships or ships into carriers are needlessly complex and tome consuming.

3 - Literally nobody I know likes or wants this ui in preference to the old one

Please chamge back.

i 2ed this


ok like the summer has been over for some time now! and CCP is still stuck in the mud on this failed UI.
I mite make a youtube video showing where you fail because its obvious CCP cant read!