These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP employees must be removed from the game.

First post
Author
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#421 - 2012-05-10 11:50:57 UTC
Tanya Powers wrote:


Do your homework first (me too, I guess I forgot something on purpose)



Not much to do.

Soundwave was a Goon before being hired.

I finished my homework early. Can I have a cookie ?

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Doctor Ungabungas
Doomheim
#422 - 2012-05-10 12:17:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Doctor Ungabungas
Malphilos wrote:
Doctor Ungabungas wrote:
Malphilos wrote:

Proves nothing except that the shoe, once placed on the other foot, seems a bit uncomfortable.


You seem to think that you are attacking GSF here, but you're attacking CCP.


Actually, it's you who seems to think I'm "attacking" GSF. I'm sure you have your reasons.

On the other hand I'm sure you don't actually think this is about CCP, as they haven't shown any discomfort. Their appropriate and professional response came quite early in the discussion, essentially:

"We have a procedure for dealing with this. If you have evidence here's the contact info."

Simple, professional, and done.

All of the discomfort (or "butthurt" if you prefer the vernacular) seems to be coming from other quarters.



So if you're not attacking GSF and you're not attacking CCP, what are you attacking? Because your posts that imply CCP corruption are certainly attacking something.

CCP refuted what you said (I'm not even going to call it allegations because it's more just 'stuff you said') but you continue posting it in the hope that someone might come and believe it. The reality is though, regardless of how you try to rationalise it, it is CCP who gets hurt if players leave because they believe your unfounded garbage.


As for your other point, I might seem discomforted at your continued attacks against CCP but only because you're desperately trying to damage a game that I enjoy playing. I'd be equally discomforted at baseless attacks on my gardener or the department I work for, because unlike you I understand that what people say can have consequences in the real world.

PS: If you really do have some evidence of corruption, bring it. Get that **** sent into Internal Affairs. Get it on the front page of PC Gamer and the BBC. I personally have nothing to hide, and if by some miracle of fate you aren't completely full of **** like we all think you are and there are members of GSF that do: **** em, burn it all down - both GSF and the eveo will be stronger for it.
The rest of us will be stronger for it.
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#423 - 2012-05-10 12:29:32 UTC
Doctor Ungabungas wrote:
The reality is though, regardless of how you try to rationalise it, it is CCP who gets hurt if players leave because they believe your unfounded garbage.





That's right, the crazy tinfoil hat-ism before T20 sure stayed that way huh ?

How quickly we forget.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Doctor Ungabungas
Doomheim
#424 - 2012-05-10 12:32:39 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Doctor Ungabungas wrote:
The reality is though, regardless of how you try to rationalise it, it is CCP who gets hurt if players leave because they believe your unfounded garbage.





That's right, the crazy tinfoil hat-ism before T20 sure stayed that way huh ?

How quickly we forget.


And how many people left because of T20 and never came back? Or only came back because of the security controls that were put in place?
Josef Djugashvilis
#425 - 2012-05-10 12:34:32 UTC
Fabulousli Obvious wrote:
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:


Actually, as low down as I am in the Eve food chain, if any Dev were to offer or enable me to gain an unfair adavantage ingame, I would report it as fast as I can type.


How un-Goon-like of you.



+1 for the mention of Oscar Wilde.Smile

This is not a signature.

Fabulousli Obvious
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#426 - 2012-05-10 12:37:27 UTC
Doctor Ungabungas wrote:


And how many people left because of T20 and never came back? Or only came back because of the security controls that were put in place?


I don't know, you tell us.

Stop hitting yourself in the face with those questions. Stop it. Stop.

I am NOT YOUNG ENOUGH to know EVERYTHING.  ~~ Oscar Wilde, writer, d. November 30, 1900

Fabulousli Obvious
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#427 - 2012-05-10 12:38:13 UTC
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:



+1 for the mention of Oscar Wilde.Smile



It would be great to actually know what the pattern was.

I am NOT YOUNG ENOUGH to know EVERYTHING.  ~~ Oscar Wilde, writer, d. November 30, 1900

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#428 - 2012-05-10 12:39:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Mr Kidd
CCP Sreegs wrote:

:edit: And by basis we presume actual real activity or such to point at not the findings of your local tarot card reader or your own psychic gifts.


Which is exactly what everyone else, save the people who could directly benefit, are left with to determine if some odd occurrence happened might be due to a dev being present. Like the day I was sitting cloaked in a system observing a fleet hundreds of km away with nothing around me being bounced off at +1000km like I ran into a static object. Petition filed, "Our tarot cards show nothing". But whatever, man.

Don't ban me, bro!

Malphilos
State War Academy
Caldari State
#429 - 2012-05-10 12:49:56 UTC
Doctor Ungabungas wrote:

So if you're not attacking GSF and you're not attacking CCP, what are you attacking? Because your posts that imply CCP corruption are certainly attacking something.


Where did I imply current, as opposed to the irrefutable past, corruption?

I've pointed out that there have always been "baseless" whines, that sometimes they turn out to be true, that anyone who expects differently is setting themselves up for disappointment, and that some people seem (somewhat ironically) uncomfortable with the mention of any of that.

Oh, and that evidence is all that counts.

CCP hasn't refuted anything I've said. And your raging attempts to spin that while quoting my praise for their official response is hilarious.

But, Proverbs 28:1 and all that, eh? Blink
Kodiak Commando
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#430 - 2012-05-10 13:10:50 UTC
I feel the bigger corps are getting people in so they can tax them and keep the corp going. I dont like see new people being taxed until they know the game better.
Nevigrofnu Mrots
Goonswarm Federation
#431 - 2012-05-10 13:14:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Nevigrofnu Mrots
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Tanya Powers wrote:


Do your homework first (me too, I guess I forgot something on purpose)



Not much to do.

Soundwave was a Goon before being hired.

I finished my homework early. Can I have a cookie ?



yes, he was

by the way, I found video proof, soundwave is that you at 2:05? Shocked

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYAXKjz0Llo


edit: and then we have the obvious...: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1sdTzj9iac&feature=related
Geil Ding
Perkone
Caldari State
#432 - 2012-05-10 13:29:31 UTC
It is a difficult discussion, but it is important for CCP employees to play their own game for obvious reasons. But there will always be players who benefit from CCP players, either aware or unaware. This is often subtle like an advice to stock up certain items or sell other items. But this is ok, and unavoidable. The problem is when a group of players get a great advantage over other players, like the knowledge of valuable moons gained by a CCP player who has access to this type of information.

An option would be for CCP to create special corps and/or alliances where only CCP members can join. These names would never be made public for obvious reasons. But this option is far from ideal.

We must give our trust to CCP and their employees to do the right thing but also to be vigilant and report anything suspicious.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#433 - 2012-05-10 13:32:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
CCP Screegs and CCP Soundwave were goons, so bloody what? There's no massive conspiracy here, GSF are not Band of Devs, they aren't receiving Dev help with their campaign to terrorise pretty much everybody but especially those they see as shiptoasters.

They are able to do all this because they're organised, they have a planning & logistics chain that could put small governments to shame, they have the industrial backbone and control of natural resources to effectively have a bottomless wallet. The null sec alliances and their constant struggles for galactic domination are what makes Eve completely different from any other MMO out there.

No other MMO allows this sort of thing, in that CCP, Eve and especially us the players set the gold standard for sandbox games. I'm proud to be part of a small gaming community that creates mainstream media coverage rivaling real-world events and makes other MMO's look like padded rooms.

TL;DR Goons don't need Dev help to achieve what they want to, personally I think, and hope, that they're looking to shake up the game on a massive scale and possibly start the biggest war an MMO has ever seen.

TOPIC : I'd rather have Devs that play the game, because they love the game and/or were playing the game before it became their job, than Devs who play the game 2 hours a week because CCP says they must.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Fabulousli Obvious
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#434 - 2012-05-10 13:37:10 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:


TL;DR Goons don't need Dev help to achieve what they want to, personally I think, and hope, that they're looking to shake up the game on a massive scale and possibly start the biggest war an MMO has ever seen.




War or conquering ?

Conquering has the following synonyms:

to beat, bring to knees, checkmate, circumvent, clobber, control, cream*, crush, discomfit, drub, foil, frustrate, get the better of, humble, lick, master, outwit, overmaster, overpower, override, overthrow, prevail, quell, reduce, rout, shut down, subdue, subjugate, succeed, surmount, throw, thwart, total*, trample underfoot, trash, triumph, vanquish, whip, wipe off map, worst, zap

They sound a lot more appropos than 'war'.

I am NOT YOUNG ENOUGH to know EVERYTHING.  ~~ Oscar Wilde, writer, d. November 30, 1900

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#435 - 2012-05-10 13:39:31 UTC
Fabulousli Obvious wrote:


War or conquering ?

Conquering has the following synonyms:

to beat, bring to knees, checkmate, circumvent, clobber, control, cream*, crush, discomfit, drub, foil, frustrate, get the better of, humble, lick, master, outwit, overmaster, overpower, override, overthrow, prevail, quell, reduce, rout, shut down, subdue, subjugate, succeed, surmount, throw, thwart, total*, trample underfoot, trash, triumph, vanquish, whip, wipe off map, worst, zap

They sound a lot more appropos than 'war'.


True enough, to conquer does generally involve some warfare though, even if it was poorly executed by the conquered.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#436 - 2012-05-10 13:43:55 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:


True enough, to conquer does generally involve some warfare though, even if it was poorly executed by the conquered.


Many conquered had great technique.

But, there isn't really any strategy though for sheer overwhelming numbers.

Just ask Austrailians about rabbits.............

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#437 - 2012-05-10 13:54:35 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:


Just ask Austrailians about rabbits.............


Could be worse, could be Dropbears, a rabbit is one of the very few animals in Australia with more than 2 legs that isn't trying to kill you.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#438 - 2012-05-10 14:19:28 UTC
I seem to recall BOB denying it with equal fervor.
History repeats I guess.

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Cutout Man
Doomheim
#439 - 2012-05-10 15:04:28 UTC
I don't know about CCP being in bed with goons, but it should concern people that ccp employees are part of ingame alliances. The issue is presented by CCP as simple: Internal Affairs somehow solves all problems. It should be obvious that Internal Affairs is powerless to stop anyone who is using even the slightest modicum of caution. It is impossible for IA to say with any certainty that devs, GMs, ISD, or other staff aren't creating accounts and paying with paypal or plex or some other anonymous method (for the same reason that alliance counterintelligence can't).

It isn't bad that devs play, after all they need to experience the game from the player perspective. What's bad is that even the tiniest bits of knowledge about the game mechanics, reward schedules, exact math, upcoming changes, etc. can convey a huge advantage to an alliance. It also has a more insidious effect. They have a stake in certain outcomes. Not an ingame financial stake, but a mental stake. It is a natural inclination to want to protect the playstyle that affects you and your friends. That mentality warps their view of game design and administration when they get to the office. It is easy to fall into the trap of seeing the game from one perspective and, because you have a stake in it, resisting change, innovation, and improvement. That's true for all of us, but we're the ones who are paying to play.

Unfortunately, its a problem that can't really be solved. Even if the employees didn't play, its easy enough to send someone an email, tell a friend some secrets, etc. Before some CCP employee makes a snarky reply (and there were some good ones in this thread lol), over the years I've been on comms with two different players who were developers. They were old friends/acquaintances of older members of the alliances I was in. They weren't currently working at CCP at the time they were on comms, so technically no harm, no foul. But the idea that they're completely hidden and anonymous is laughable.

Maybe its just a matter of focusing that mental energy and time into something else. I would love to see the CCP alliance ingame setup shop in a new NPC null sec system and battle royale forever.
Bayushi Tamago
Sect of the Crimson Eisa
#440 - 2012-05-10 15:46:09 UTC
Stop being so damn butthurt.

Players who become employees get their characters banned from the game, especially when they are coming from nullsec alliances to prevent things like BoB getting t2 BPOs from happening again. This policy was pushed really hard by goons. So suck it up and l2play