These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

So why is CCP supporting the Burn Jita event?

First post First post
Author
MotherMoon
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#121 - 2012-04-30 07:09:21 UTC
its a sandbox

http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1206/scimi.jpg

Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#122 - 2012-04-30 07:17:44 UTC
Jake Warbird wrote:
I can still go to jita. Working as intended.


This, fundamentally, is 100% spot on. So I am not empty quoting, this man was in Jita.

I seen him with my own EYES!

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#123 - 2012-04-30 07:22:23 UTC
Quote:
I want to know why CCP feels that even thought I pay my $15/mo just like the members of the GF they can do whatever they want, and I cannot. (Example: Going to Jita when GF feels I shouldn't.)


Pointing out where, almost immediately, you made your error.

You can do anything in this game that you want to, and are able to, just like anyone else.

If you feel you can't do something because of the actions of other players, that's YOUR issue... not anyone else.

We all have the same tool set at our disposal, including you.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Amanda Holland
Doomheim
#124 - 2012-04-30 07:26:16 UTC
Tallian Saotome wrote:
Amanda Holland wrote:
Tallian Saotome wrote:
Amanda Holland wrote:
I was under the idea that theres no such thing as harassment in this game

You REALLY have to work at it before CCP will actually consider it harassment, but there is. If you camp someone into a station for a month, thats harassment. .


eh thats called war not harassment, I assumed thats WHY the war system is set up to BE able to do that

If you camp a corp in, its war, if you camp an individual in, its harassment....

Everything is fair if you can give a reason for doing it other than the lulz tho.


If you cant one person in a oe person corp its called war lol there really isnt harassment in this game or lets say Ive never SEEN anyone get a ban for it

ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) vroom vroom motorcycle CCP to the sandbox: "This "adapt or die" attitude is nothing new to EVE, but we want to give it a constant rhythm that is a bit more under our control than in the past"

Amanda Holland
Doomheim
#125 - 2012-04-30 07:27:05 UTC
MotherMoon wrote:
its a sandbox


hey i said that

ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) vroom vroom motorcycle CCP to the sandbox: "This "adapt or die" attitude is nothing new to EVE, but we want to give it a constant rhythm that is a bit more under our control than in the past"

EVE Stig
Doomheim
#126 - 2012-04-30 07:27:40 UTC
Thread answer: to **** YOU off

"Some say that he is actually dead, but the Grim Reaper is too afraid to tell him." "Some say he is the 3rd member of Daft Punk and he did the vocals of "Technologic" song. All we know is,he's called EVE Stig"!

Corbin Blair
Doomheim
#127 - 2012-04-30 07:31:52 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD LoneLynx
Kurai Kihaku wrote:

I want to know why CCP feels that even thought I pay my $15/mo just like the members of the GF they can do whatever they want, and I cannot. (Example: Going to Jita when GF feels I shouldn't.)

Everyone is free to do whatever they want whenever they want as long as it isn't cheating. *snip* - ISD LoneLynx You're also free to use one of the other three market hubs. You're even free to go invade goon space and get them back for burn jita. You're also free to kiss my hairy ass if you don't like your options. There are no PvP disabled safe zones in Eve. There never have been and there never will be. It's not like this is some big surprise. There's nothing new here. Jita has tons of ships killed every day. It's one of the most violent systems in Eve. If you wanted zones where PvP is impossible you should have signed up for a game that has them. I hear WoW is popular with your kind.
Proletariat Tingtango
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#128 - 2012-04-30 07:33:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Proletariat Tingtango
"I understand it's a sandbox, buttt when I get killed we should pause for a moment and pretend this is WoW."

I quit other MMOs to get away from people like you, OP.

It's really a shame that Earth & Beyond got sunset. It's been almost a decade now, and I enjoyed the hell out of that game... but it was really perfect for all these hi-sec carebears because you could mine and explore and kill pirates/aliens to your little heart's content... and the only pvp was really terrible strictly consentual, arena-style combat!

I miss that game. It had potential and it would mean that EveO would have that many less carebare children and terrible pubbies
Corbin Blair
Doomheim
#129 - 2012-04-30 07:39:30 UTC
Kurai Kihaku wrote:

I can directly compare what is happening in EVE to a cable company. Let's say thousands of people are watching TV and their favorite channel gets blocked.

Suddenly a malignant individual decides to hack into the cable network, and blocks this channel. Off course at this point the cable company would try to do whatever they can to track down and deal with this individual.

That's not even close to what's happening. What's happening here is like if we were playing chess and I killed your queen, then you threw a massive fit and demanded the rules of chess be changed to save your queen. This is not a case of someone blocking my access to what I paid for. Player driven content and drama is exactly what I'm paying for. YOU'RE the one trying to block my cable.
Jake Warbird
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#130 - 2012-04-30 07:45:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Jake Warbird
Kurai Kihaku wrote:

I can directly compare what is happening in EVE to a cable company. Let's say thousands of people are watching TV and their favorite channel gets blocked.

Suddenly a malignant individual decides to hack into the cable network, and blocks this channel. Off course at this point the cable company would try to do whatever they can to track down and deal with this individual.

This is exactly what happened. Goons and their meta games need to be stopped! THINK OF MY ******* CHILDREN!!

If you can't find the sarcasm,you need to skill yourself... at BC5.
Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#131 - 2012-04-30 07:46:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Tallian Saotome
Amanda Holland wrote:
If you cant one person in a oe person corp its called war lol there really isnt harassment in this game or lets say Ive never SEEN anyone get a ban for it

I've never seen anyone do it, have only heard about it once.

About the only way to manage it in a way that would get you any kind of GM attention would be if it was a NPC corp toon, since anything else can be classified as a tactical attack on someone ;)

Like I said, you have to REALLY work at it to get any kind of GM attention for harassment.

Or, actually, you can just call people hate filled racial epithets, which is punishable with an instant permaban. Never seen that one actually enforced tho, even tho its clearly stated in the EULA, only seen people get muted in local for it. If it was actually enforced, TEST alliance would not exist.

Edit: Convenient link to the relevant excerpt from the EULA

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

Seleia O'Sinnor
Drop of Honey
#132 - 2012-04-30 07:55:08 UTC
And when the subs go down and they knoweth why a Deus Ex Machina will descend from the sky and protect the wounded and sore immortals from further capital flight to other MMOs.

Sandbox? Sure.

Odyssey: Repacking in POS hangars for modules +1,  but please for other stuff too, especially containers. Make containers openable in POS hangars.

Mars Theran
Foreign Interloper
#133 - 2012-04-30 07:55:40 UTC
Kurai Kihaku wrote:
Just want to understand the logic behind the game company taking such a stance.

Piracy, scamming, and griefing, all that I understand. But what is happenign with the "Burn Jita" event is completely different.

...

I think that EVE's biggest strength is also it's biggest weakness. It has become a little too much like RL. In ALL mmos, there is nothing a powerful corp, or a guild can do to prevent other people from playing the game any way they like. They may have the best items/gear... the most friends... the most influence.... but there is absolutely nothing allowing the more powerful players to interfere with, or hinder in anyway the game-play of others.

...

Really, I think CCP is giving GF a little too much credit, allowing them to be the force of nature in EVE. The Yang that comes with the Yin, the spoon of tar in the barrel of honey, the black stripe in a pattern of white and black stripes... Well you get the point.

...

Honestly I think those who chose the carebear gameplay style are already punished enough. They are essentially blocked out of all the fun gameplay elements. They cannot have access to best loot, they cannot mine the best ore, they cannot roam the world of eve without getting blown up as soon as they step out of their little fenced pen. But they are not choked enough... Lets tighten the noose some more, right?! Wrong.... Press this group of people too hard, and you got no one to grief anymore. No one to block. No one to make cry...

...

Carebears fill an essential role in EVE. Without them, EVE would be missing a lot of what makes it great.

I believe that the best game, is one where people can choose to play any way they like. If you want to be a boring carebear, be a boring carebear. If you want to be a vicious pirate, be one. But the two should not be mixed forcefully because that ruins the gameplay experience for those that do not want to PvP. (there's lowsec and 0.0 for that!) Don't these people also pay the $15/mo fee? And if they do, why is it that they don't deserve to play EVE any way they like without being interrupted?

...

Quote:
"The people they're going to hurt now are people who have quite a lot of security," he said. "There's not a lot of turnaround on ships and goods in Empire. I think it might be healthy if we lose a lot of this industrial power, if they have to go back and save up for their ships again and be a part of the cycle of life everyone else is a part of."


You "think".... I "think" it would be "healthy" for EVE if the Goons lost a lot of their power, but they are losing nothing aside from their ships an a small part of their wealth, while the Carebears are losing everything.



This is a long post, but I don't entirely disagree with it. I draw the line where most others do, though I am in disagreement with the majority of responses as they are framed.

Basically, what I have to say is this:

GSF is doing what they want and it is completely acceptable from a game design standpoint. If you disagree with it as a player, it is as a player you should deal with it. There are plenty of options and you don't have to let them gank your freighter or prevent you from enjoying your game.

Foreknowledge is the best knowledge. Something we rarely have in real life, yet in this game, players like those behind Burn Jita and Hulkageddon are perfectly willing to provide that for all players. This isn't some event that spontaneously combusted, but one that took some careful planning and preparation.

The players were warned it was coming, and the Devs knew about it early on, either from GSF making there intentions known publicly or GSF informing the Devs that the node needed to be reinforced by other means. Same as is required for Alliance fights to prepare that node for battle when it occurs. I don't know whether this official notification was required in this case or not with all the prior warning that was given on the forums well in advance. Probably still regardless.

There is a purpose for Burn Jita. Not everyone may be aware of it, but it provides the players an opportunity to profit, mixes things up, and may well eventually break a stalemate in the market with the conclusion of Hulkageddon. It isn't something that is done for no reason, and it may well be that the Devs see an opportunity to make use of it for other purposes never intended by the playerbase. I would, were I them.

I don't mean advertising either, though it obviously is doing that with or without their assistance. It has to do with ISK, and encompasses both economic analysis in events like these and can include other things I'll not mention here.

This isn't like the cable company laughing at people for missing their favorite TV show. That is a rather poor analogy and unfounded. You are perfectly within your rights and ability to play EVE the way you want, if not within the standard method you would normally follow. Things have changed and you must adapt. This is dynamic gameplay made possible by a portion of the playerbase for both your and there entertainment.

What entertainment you derive from it is entirely up to you, and you can make the best or worst of it as you see fit. I'm sure you would be quite happy if you had found a way to profit from it, as I would be. I haven't because I was unwilling to risk my limited means on such an endeavour, but it doesn't mean I have not enjoyed it or at least been interested by the ongoing events.

tl;dr: You don't have to be negatively affected by events such as these; it is your choice to allow them to affect you this way, and to continue to do so is counterproductive to your enjoyment of the game.



*Disclaimer: Certain sections of your post have been randomly eliminated to make room for me to type this. Smile
zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub
Zora'e
#134 - 2012-04-30 07:58:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Zora'e
You make the statement that people who pay their $15.00 a month should be allowed to play the game the way they want... except this game is a game that is centered around PVP, and it's CCP's game. They make the rules. They choose the gameplay style. They decide what is right and wrong in their universe. Not you.

There ARE aspects of the game I don't like. However, I am bright enough Idea to know that I pay to PLAY in a universe created by CCP, which means I play by CCP's rules. Not mine.

So, the long and short of it is. If you don't like how CCP runs their game. Unsub.

Seriously not trying to be nasty about it. I've unsubbed a number of times when CCP has done something that tweaked my nads. But the fact is, it's their game. Not yours. And this is the kind of stuff they like to see in their game. Player driven content.

It might suck for someone that gets their hulk or whatever blown up... but that's the game you signed on to play, when you payed your sub and clicked accept and entered the game.

So, either accept that is the nature of the game, or refuse to accept it, and quit.

~Z

I won't say you are stupid, but you're not exactly on the Zombie menu either.

Amanda Holland
Doomheim
#135 - 2012-04-30 07:59:20 UTC
Corbin Blair wrote:
Kurai Kihaku wrote:

I can directly compare what is happening in EVE to a cable company. Let's say thousands of people are watching TV and their favorite channel gets blocked.

Suddenly a malignant individual decides to hack into the cable network, and blocks this channel. Off course at this point the cable company would try to do whatever they can to track down and deal with this individual.

That's not even close to what's happening. What's happening here is like if we were playing chess and I killed your queen, then you threw a massive fit and demanded the rules of chess be changed to save your queen. This is not a case of someone blocking my access to what I paid for. Player driven content and drama is exactly what I'm paying for. YOU'RE the one trying to block my cable.


the above is right. You should get banned from the forums if you throw a hissy fit or QQ
itd make the game more managable

ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) vroom vroom motorcycle CCP to the sandbox: "This "adapt or die" attitude is nothing new to EVE, but we want to give it a constant rhythm that is a bit more under our control than in the past"

Lictor Yeva
WoonGaffe
#136 - 2012-04-30 08:02:56 UTC
Zora'e wrote:
So, either accept that is the nature of the game, or refuse to accept it, and quit.

~Z


We do have what amounts to a democratically elected 'government' in EVE. We have channels of communication with the devs. If there's something you don't like, unsubbing is not your only option ...
Kariva
Doomheim
#137 - 2012-04-30 08:08:36 UTC
You don't see the bigger picture .. It's all about money.

Someone sold those tornadoes. Someone is playing with the market speculating moon go, mineral prices, ice prices ....
It's all fan but some people at the top made a loot of isk speculating the markets....

What do you think is hulkagedon? It's a perfect way to earn money (isk )
Think who is sponsoring prizes in hulkagdon ???? those who control the market ...... look at the hulk prices rising

Why i should sell hulk for 200kk when i can organize hulk... and sell it for 350kk it's just profit ....

It's all about the fun But it's rely all about the MONEY.......
Ice field to low sec. It's all about controlling the market .
Lower ice supply = bigger profits for power blocks ...
Why are people crying to move lvl 4 to low sec. They say it's to much reward to low risk...

So what do you call ganking in high sec .....??? That's fair it's "sandbox"

76kkktitan dd logistics no to powerful nerfed... (not a sandbox)
76kkk titan killing a 200kk dictor /bs nerfed ... (not a sandbox)
4kk ship's killing a 300kk hulk it's sandbox stop crying.......
CCP is stupid i many cases they see the same things differently ....
High sec corp are not a powerful bloc that has any voice in CSM so nothing will eve be done in that matter.
CCP at some poin will have to decide when the want to give all power to 0.0 power block or to ballance it equaly to all sec space (high safe mining industry)(low pvp/faction warfare) (null power blocks play). No one should have the control over all (high/low/null) what is happenng right now...






Nirnias Stirrum
UberWTFBBQ and Battle Technologies
#138 - 2012-04-30 08:08:53 UTC
Please go back to WoW this game is obviously not for you...

But i will leave these words of wisdom for you:

"The term sandbox refers more to the mechanics of a game and how, as in a physical sandbox, the user is entertained by his ability to play creatively, boundless of artificial structural constraints, and with there being "no right way" of playing the game."
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#139 - 2012-04-30 08:10:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
<< Carebear
<< Lives in sandbox
<< Accepts GSF as the fly in the ointment
<< Loves GSF for being the fly in the ointment

Mittens & Company are the archetypal villains that every good story needs, without stuff like Burn Jita and Hulkageddon Eve would be just another MMO I wouldn't play, with them it's the only MMO I play.


Edit
Nirnias Stirrum wrote:
But i will leave these words of wisdom for you:

"The term sandbox refers more to the mechanics of a game and how, as in a physical sandbox, the user is entertained by his ability to play creatively, boundless of artificial structural constraints, and with there being "no right way" of playing the game."


I'm so quoting this at the next person that tells me I'm playing the game wrong because I'm a carebear.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Zora'e
#140 - 2012-04-30 08:16:57 UTC
Lictor Yeva wrote:
Zora'e wrote:
So, either accept that is the nature of the game, or refuse to accept it, and quit.

~Z


We do have what amounts to a democratically elected 'government' in EVE. We have channels of communication with the devs. If there's something you don't like, unsubbing is not your only option ...


Technically true. Lol

I won't say you are stupid, but you're not exactly on the Zombie menu either.