Ships & Modules

Given this alt's choice of name, I find this quote amusing, but sure, I'll do my best to simplify this elegant statement:

'I do not get along with CCP Greyscale. I cannot bond with this man over alcohol in a casual place.'

'I am sad that you choose to use an alternate character that does not reveal who you are when you complain about this nerf which was entirely demanded by your own behavior.'

'This has come because you have done things which are bad for EVE and make it a worse game, and which are obviously your fault. You hide behind bad arguments against false figures, and try to change the subject from your own guilt.'

'You killed everyone, and now you are being killed. If you had not used Titans to kill everything, this would not be a necessary nerd to their use.'

I believe this should be clear.

Work for your wealth, kid. Or get your Dev friends to change the scan mechanics for moons. Whats the problem?

Not out of context when the nurf = monopoly for one of the involved partys

Pretty much the entire CFC is calling for nerfs to tech and income generated by actually having people use systems. I believe this is something mittens mentioned in his current CSM campaign.

Same approach till you get the balance you want.
Don't tell me you can't do it, and this titan nurf is also a stated hot fix.

Beyond the simple fact that the T2 production system guarantees there will be a bottleneck and the trick to wealth is figuring out what that is, this would not necessarily drive conflict in EVE in 0.0. Moons are still not tied to Sov as a source of wealth beyond that, in low sec, super caps are even more hilariously unkillable, as only scripted hictors are able to hold points on single super caps . Highsec moons need to deal with the idiotic warded system. The imbalance in Moon Distribution throughout 0.0, and the fact that alliance level wealth is tied to moons and not sovereignty driver of this problem, not the lack of tech moons in low sec and high sec.

Any fix to this that doesn't create another, potentially worse problem is going to be complex. I can't wait for it to come, but again, this is a separate issue, which you're using to drive the topic off from the central fact: Titans being able to quickly murder all ships in EVE was detrimental to EVE as a game, and their use this way created this change.

Why are you arguing on the same side as me about tech in the titan thread? I'll use smaller words and try to put this to bed:

Both need nerf.

You were dumb.

You get nerf first.

Good game.

Yeah. Guess now we can spend our tech money on more drakes, blackbirds and rifters until then.

lol same old Mittani, the more he says 'stuff' the more CCP and newbs believe it :(
Let me break your paragraphs down a little...

1. You give no hard facts, just loose collections of your own opinions.

2. Ships are in game. People buy ships. People like ships. People use ships. **Gasp**.

3. There is no broken mechanic, no abuse, no illegal activity, and nothing is obvious bar your sh**posting.

4. It's not about old guard, elite players, justification blah blah, it's simply about pew. You shoot, you kill, you enjoy.

5. I don't see any mega threads about abuse of fleets by having 3-4 of them (250 in each).

6. I don't see any mega threads about abuse of Apha Maels, and how having 400-700 of them in one mega fleet is somehow 'ok', but fielding 20 titans is not..

No I take it back. Mittens must be right, after all, the goon way is the best way. I see it now.

Sorry, nothing to see here.

Then push it at the same time, king Mittani.

Show some ******* impartiality.