These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Incoming titan adjustments

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
bamason
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#1161 - 2012-03-14 02:45:18 UTC
how about give the titan a tracking nerf and leave xl turrets alone, some of us like tracking dreads.
Takashi Kaeda
Perkone
Caldari State
#1162 - 2012-03-14 02:46:44 UTC
The fact that you unironically think Titans are balanced and good for the game in their current iteration is kind of funny though.

Tell me, when the CFC have more Titans than you what would you cry about then?
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#1163 - 2012-03-14 02:52:43 UTC
Surge Roth wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Krutoj wrote:
So now titans cant lock fast enough or track. Whats the point of locking anything at all other than structures and supercaps if it cant be tracked in the first place?


Every Titan nerf that CCP has done has been to lessen the impact Titans have on subcaps. Obviously, CCP doesn't want people using unsupported Titans to fight subcaps. Take their hint, adapt your strategies and be happy in life.


You guys could of done the same without crying for nerfs. But here we are.


It's impossible to kill a blob of titans once it reaches a critical mass. There's no way to adapt to it.

Nothing in Eve should be unkillable.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#1164 - 2012-03-14 02:53:09 UTC
pubbies whining about ships they will never afford :shobon:

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Sir Marksalot
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1165 - 2012-03-14 02:53:13 UTC
Surge Roth wrote:
Takashi Kaeda wrote:
Yes I threatened you to kill yourself.

Good one.

But please, kill yourself.


Threatening someone over the forums is a bannable offense. I sincerely hope you're joking.


im literallt threatening you with your own suicide

if you do not stop trolling terribly you will end up looking at your posting and decide to end it all by hitting a tree at 130mph
Tobruk
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#1166 - 2012-03-14 02:53:23 UTC
Glad to see the spirit of T20 is alive and well at CCP.


Sir Marksalot
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1167 - 2012-03-14 02:54:08 UTC
Surge Roth wrote:
Takashi Kaeda wrote:
I too like posting out of my ass about things I can barely comprehend.


good for you. Maybe the rest of goonswarm will admit to this


welcome to goonwaffeswarmfleet
Krutoj
State War Academy
Caldari State
#1168 - 2012-03-14 02:54:42 UTC
Surge Roth wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Krutoj wrote:
So now titans cant lock fast enough or track. Whats the point of locking anything at all other than structures and supercaps if it cant be tracked in the first place?


Every Titan nerf that CCP has done has been to lessen the impact Titans have on subcaps. Obviously, CCP doesn't want people using unsupported Titans to fight subcaps. Take their hint, adapt your strategies and be happy in life.


You guys could of done the same without crying for nerfs. But here we are.


Apperently 100 titans in game are ungodly more strong than any alliance or CCP in this game. Since the previous nerf, titans have no impact on the large scale fights and very rarely on small gangs, so I dont even know where the above statement about "impact" is coming from. And yes, lets nerf minority more, because majority has no brains to fight them.
Surge Roth
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1169 - 2012-03-14 02:55:25 UTC
Takashi Kaeda wrote:
The fact that you unironically think Titans are balanced and good for the game in their current iteration is kind of funny though.

Tell me, when the CFC have more Titans than you what would you cry about then?


I wouldn't cry. In fact, I'd say it would be working as intended. What isn't good for the game is changing things mindlessly for the sake of changing it or for a group of people.
Tobruk
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#1170 - 2012-03-14 02:56:30 UTC
When your done with the titan nerfing can you pass me a SABER BPO

thanks CCP D A R I U S J O H N S O N
Sir Marksalot
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1171 - 2012-03-14 02:57:44 UTC
Krutoj wrote:
Surge Roth wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Krutoj wrote:
So now titans cant lock fast enough or track. Whats the point of locking anything at all other than structures and supercaps if it cant be tracked in the first place?


Every Titan nerf that CCP has done has been to lessen the impact Titans have on subcaps. Obviously, CCP doesn't want people using unsupported Titans to fight subcaps. Take their hint, adapt your strategies and be happy in life.


You guys could of done the same without crying for nerfs. But here we are.


Apperently 100 titans in game are ungodly more strong than any alliance or CCP in this game. Since the previous nerf, titans have no impact on the large scale fights and very rarely on small gangs, so I dont even know where the above statement about "impact" is coming from. And yes, lets nerf minority more, because majority has no brains to fight them.

who is this and why does this person have a csmflag
Sir Marksalot
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1172 - 2012-03-14 02:58:44 UTC
Tobruk wrote:
When your done with the titan nerfing can you pass me a SABER BPO

thanks CCP D A R I U S J O H N S O N

CCP D A R I U S J O H N S O N literally gave me a golem, cnr, and tornado bpo as well as the isk to start production on them
Takashi Kaeda
Perkone
Caldari State
#1173 - 2012-03-14 02:59:02 UTC
Surge Roth wrote:
Takashi Kaeda wrote:
The fact that you unironically think Titans are balanced and good for the game in their current iteration is kind of funny though.

Tell me, when the CFC have more Titans than you what would you cry about then?


I wouldn't cry. In fact, I'd say it would be working as intended. What isn't good for the game is changing things mindlessly for the sake of changing it or for a group of people.


Because reducing a sandbox to who can bring more of single ship type would be a really fun game.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#1174 - 2012-03-14 03:00:12 UTC
Krutoj wrote:
Surge Roth wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Krutoj wrote:
So now titans cant lock fast enough or track. Whats the point of locking anything at all other than structures and supercaps if it cant be tracked in the first place?


Every Titan nerf that CCP has done has been to lessen the impact Titans have on subcaps. Obviously, CCP doesn't want people using unsupported Titans to fight subcaps. Take their hint, adapt your strategies and be happy in life.


You guys could of done the same without crying for nerfs. But here we are.


Apperently 100 titans in game are ungodly more strong than any alliance or CCP in this game. Since the previous nerf, titans have no impact on the large scale fights and very rarely on small gangs, so I dont even know where the above statement about "impact" is coming from. And yes, lets nerf minority more, because majority has no brains to fight them.


specnaz aren't supposed to give a ****

specnaz are supposed to snap necks and slit throats

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Surge Roth
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1175 - 2012-03-14 03:01:03 UTC
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Surge Roth wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Krutoj wrote:
So now titans cant lock fast enough or track. Whats the point of locking anything at all other than structures and supercaps if it cant be tracked in the first place?


Every Titan nerf that CCP has done has been to lessen the impact Titans have on subcaps. Obviously, CCP doesn't want people using unsupported Titans to fight subcaps. Take their hint, adapt your strategies and be happy in life.


You guys could of done the same without crying for nerfs. But here we are.


It's impossible to kill a blob of titans once it reaches a critical mass. There's no way to adapt to it.

Nothing in Eve should be unkillable.


You could take the easy road and just bring more caps. Oh wait, you guys refuse to actually do that lol. Instead, you guys continue to deploy the same doctrines that lose to these things expecting a different result.
Ruthless Erection
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#1176 - 2012-03-14 03:02:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Ruthless Erection
Andski wrote:
Loving this.


You would because you're a ****** Goon. Your sole purpose in EVE is to destroy it


CCP, this is a terrible idea. There are so many other ways you could balance titans


But if you insist upon this ******** "balancing", bring AoE Doomsday back then

We have TiDi, AoE doomsday won't be nearly as bad as it used to be


But I'm beginning to think that CCP no longer runs this game, and that Goons dictate what they want to happen, and it does. -A- cried about Doomsdaying of sub-capitals, BAM. No more doomsdaying sub-caps. Goons are crying about titans, and their "OPness", BAM. Titans get "nerfed"

First observation, Goons have more titans/supers than all of Raiden, PL, NCdot, and other alliances, put together. They CHOOSE to not use them, so why must you punish those who do use them

You've removed drone bays, you've removed sub-cap doomsday'ing, and now you're removing their ONLY line of defense. Think hard before you reply CCP, we're beginning to think you're incompetent in developing & balancing this game further.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#1177 - 2012-03-14 03:02:27 UTC
Surge Roth wrote:
You could take the easy road and just bring more caps. Oh wait, you guys refuse to actually do that lol. Instead, you guys continue to deploy the same doctrines that lose to these things expecting a different result.


look at the clueless pubbie act like he's not ))

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#1178 - 2012-03-14 03:02:45 UTC
Ruthless Erection wrote:
[quote=Andski]Loving this.[/quote

You would because you're a ****** Goon. Your sole purpose in EVE is to destroy it


CCP, this is a terrible idea. There are so many other ways you could balance titans


But if you insist upon this ******** "balancing", bring AoE Doomsday back then

We have TiDi, AoE doomsday won't be nearly as bad as it used to be


But I'm beginning to think that CCP no longer runs this game, and that Goons dictate what they want to happen, and it does. -A- cried about Doomsdaying of sub-capitals, BAM. No more doomsdaying sub-caps. Goons are crying about titans, and their "OPness", BAM. Titans get "nerfed"

First observation, Goons have more titans/supers than all of Raiden, PL, NCdot, and other alliances, put together. They CHOOSE to not use them, so why must you punish those who do use them

You've removed drone bays, you've removed sub-cap doomsday'ing, a

deal wiz it

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#1179 - 2012-03-14 03:03:38 UTC
please keep suggesting AoE doomsdays as a good idea, we'll immediately cynojam every system we own and multiple doomsday every cynojammer sieging fleet

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#1180 - 2012-03-14 03:06:50 UTC
unless you're saying that they should bring back AoE doomsdays and restrict them to doing damage to capitals ahahahahaha

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar