These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Incoming titan adjustments

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Surge Roth
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1141 - 2012-03-14 02:26:13 UTC
Weaselior wrote:
Surge Roth wrote:
Andski wrote:
Surge Roth wrote:
Don't be mad that I'm stylin' all over you little bee no. 2,567. Besides, don't you have some autist with assburgers to listen to on vent shout your primaries while spamming f1? Now go serve your queen little bee.


look at the publord trying to talk down to his betters


More like watching you get butt flustered over being wrong.

dealing with people like you is always annoying because you're literally too dumb to realize when you've been humiliated

sort of takes the fun out of it


You need to stop projecting bro. If anyone is dealing with anything here is eve as a whole against you something awful guys. But I suppose having to pay to use a forum wtih up tight rules would make any of you have a high horse about anything and everything
Sir Marksalot
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1142 - 2012-03-14 02:26:28 UTC
Surge Roth wrote:
School Nickname Worldmonkey wrote:
Surge Roth wrote:
Andski wrote:
I'm so mad, I'm going to express my anger!


Don't be mad that I'm right. Face it bro, using carrier signature sized vessels will get hit by titans.


Of course they'll be hit by titans, we simply don't care. Our issue is that you can just throw down unsupported titans and devastate entire fleets with utter impunity. This has been covered enough over the course of this thread that you should be able to contain your rage when confronted with the truth.

You can continue to desperately assault our valiant forum warriors for all the good that it will do. It won't change the facts. :heh:


Keeping your mwds on all the time to increase your sig radius to near carrier levels with the hp of a battlecruiser deserves to get shot down by a lone titan without any fleet members, but let's be honest here. That don't happen. Freak accidents don't count either.


as does afterburning rifters, preach on brother badposter!
Ishen Villone
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1143 - 2012-03-14 02:26:57 UTC
I should be able to beat 1200 people with my 200 what the hell this is totally not fair
Sir Marksalot
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1144 - 2012-03-14 02:27:16 UTC
seriously what the hell is forums badposter Surge Roth even saying
Surge Roth
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1145 - 2012-03-14 02:28:19 UTC
Andski wrote:
Surge Roth wrote:
Keeping your mwds on all the time to increase your sig radius to near carrier levels with the hp of a battlecruiser deserves to get shot down by a lone titan without any fleet members, but let's be honest here. That don't happen. Freak accidents don't count either.


because every engagement has been against a lone titan lmao

look how clueless and disconnected you are from reality!


With the way you guys fight, may as well be
School Nickname Worldmonkey
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#1146 - 2012-03-14 02:29:33 UTC
Surge Roth wrote:

Keeping your mwds on all the time to increase your sig radius to near carrier levels with the hp of a battlecruiser deserves to get shot down by a lone titan without any fleet members, but let's be honest here. That don't happen. Freak accidents don't count either.


Maybe you need more XXbn officer sebos to feel good about yourselves and whine some more about you can't hit jack without them.
Surge Roth
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1147 - 2012-03-14 02:30:17 UTC
Sir Marksalot wrote:
Surge Roth wrote:
School Nickname Worldmonkey wrote:
Surge Roth wrote:
Andski wrote:
I'm so mad, I'm going to express my anger!


Don't be mad that I'm right. Face it bro, using carrier signature sized vessels will get hit by titans.


Of course they'll be hit by titans, we simply don't care. Our issue is that you can just throw down unsupported titans and devastate entire fleets with utter impunity. This has been covered enough over the course of this thread that you should be able to contain your rage when confronted with the truth.

You can continue to desperately assault our valiant forum warriors for all the good that it will do. It won't change the facts. :heh:


Keeping your mwds on all the time to increase your sig radius to near carrier levels with the hp of a battlecruiser deserves to get shot down by a lone titan without any fleet members, but let's be honest here. That don't happen. Freak accidents don't count either.


as does afterburning rifters, preach on brother badposter!


Maybe they should have maintained a transversal that was greater than those XL turrets.
Takashi Kaeda
Perkone
Caldari State
#1148 - 2012-03-14 02:30:58 UTC
Surge Roth wrote:
Takashi Kaeda wrote:
Boo hoo, why won't you believe I'm cool and edgy like naruto.


World of Warcraft online: where whining like a prepubescent boy gets you what you want. AKA: welfare epics



kill yourself.
Surge Roth
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1149 - 2012-03-14 02:31:27 UTC
Ishen Villone wrote:
I should be able to beat 1200 people with my 200 what the hell this is totally not fair

But nerfing other's play style to get a spoon fed win is fair, right. By the way, that sounds like hypocrisy to me.
Surge Roth
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1150 - 2012-03-14 02:32:00 UTC
Takashi Kaeda wrote:
Surge Roth wrote:
Takashi Kaeda wrote:
Boo hoo, why won't you believe I'm cool and edgy like naruto.


World of Warcraft online: where whining like a prepubescent boy gets you what you want. AKA: welfare epics



kill yourself.


Is that a threat? I take threats very seriously.
Takashi Kaeda
Perkone
Caldari State
#1151 - 2012-03-14 02:32:42 UTC
Yes I threatened you to kill yourself.

Good one.

But please, kill yourself.
Krutoj
State War Academy
Caldari State
#1152 - 2012-03-14 02:33:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Krutoj
Lets summirise this patch with nerfing of the biggest End game item, most expenssive and now most useless. Well done at rolling this game back by 7 years.
I will address some of the things that Greyscale thinks are true or were "discussed"

Quote:
We have talked to the CSM about this, and we're comfortable going forward with these changes in light of that discussion. I'm not going to put words in their mouths, though.


While this is true and we did discuss this, the major consensus was that nerfing titans is just trying to use a quick fix on a problem that is larger than a titan. Its the problem of 0.0 warfare, ship balance and how the end game currently built around those. Fixing titans as opposed to trying to come up with a better sov mechanics and better ship balance (between tech3 ships and titans), seemed to CCP like an easier way out that would buy them some more affection from the majority of players who cant comprehend this.


Quote:

XL turret tracking halved, siege module tracking penalty removed
Titans reduced to 3 maximum locked targets, and base scan resolution reduced to 5


So now titans cant lock fast enough or track. Whats the point of locking anything at all other than structures and supercaps if it cant be tracked in the first place? Why nerf scan resolution, which together with cloak is non existent? I will tell you why, because CCP thinks that if some wanker managed to buy the most rarest fucken items in the game and killed with that titan 10 people, its a cause for concern for entire player base. That said, taking a look at statistics, were a titan normaly an alliance asset, not many can afford to outfit their titan like a christmas tree of officer modules and yet, this became the major factor for this nerf. Funny that, tech 3 officer/deadspace ships (yes with deadspace/officer 100mn afterburners) dont get treated as such and yet there are more of them and they pose more balancing issues.

Btw mr "our assumption"Greyscale, assumptions are the mother of all fukups. I hope you will remember this saying next time you draft a patch.
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#1153 - 2012-03-14 02:33:32 UTC
Surge Roth wrote:
Keeping your mwds on all the time to increase your sig radius to near carrier levels with the hp of a battlecruiser deserves to get shot down by a lone titan without any fleet members


And this is where you show your ignorance. Lone titans are not the problem.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.
Surge Roth
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1154 - 2012-03-14 02:33:58 UTC
Takashi Kaeda wrote:
Yes I threatened you to kill yourself.

Good one.

But please, kill yourself.


Threatening someone over the forums is a bannable offense. I sincerely hope you're joking.
Takashi Kaeda
Perkone
Caldari State
#1155 - 2012-03-14 02:36:00 UTC
Surge Roth wrote:
Takashi Kaeda wrote:
Yes I threatened you to kill yourself.

Good one.

But please, kill yourself.


Threatening someone over the forums is a bannable offense. I sincerely hope you're joking.



Good thing I 'threatened' you then.
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#1156 - 2012-03-14 02:37:22 UTC
Krutoj wrote:
So now titans cant lock fast enough or track. Whats the point of locking anything at all other than structures and supercaps if it cant be tracked in the first place?


Every Titan nerf that CCP has done has been to lessen the impact Titans have on subcaps. Obviously, CCP doesn't want people using unsupported Titans to fight subcaps. Take their hint, adapt your strategies and be happy in life.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.
Aryndel Vyst
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#1157 - 2012-03-14 02:39:17 UTC
I demand Grath Telkin change his eve portrait
Surge Roth
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1158 - 2012-03-14 02:39:26 UTC
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Krutoj wrote:
So now titans cant lock fast enough or track. Whats the point of locking anything at all other than structures and supercaps if it cant be tracked in the first place?


Every Titan nerf that CCP has done has been to lessen the impact Titans have on subcaps. Obviously, CCP doesn't want people using unsupported Titans to fight subcaps. Take their hint, adapt your strategies and be happy in life.


You guys could of done the same without crying for nerfs. But here we are.
Takashi Kaeda
Perkone
Caldari State
#1159 - 2012-03-14 02:41:15 UTC
I too like posting out of my ass about things I can barely comprehend.
Surge Roth
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1160 - 2012-03-14 02:43:00 UTC
Takashi Kaeda wrote:
I too like posting out of my ass about things I can barely comprehend.


good for you. Maybe the rest of goonswarm will admit to this