Jita Park Speakers Corner

Incursions have been a tremendously well received addition to the game, so it is natural they should be built upon and improved. The first thing in my mind is to rebalance the highsec incursions to make sure the least-done sites get used and that sites stay longer to allow more casual people to participate. Another one is to get the content team to add more types of incursions, preferably with other races than sansha and with as strong an emphasis on backstory integration/addition as possible. CCP had been neglecting the roleplaying and events aspect for a while, this oft-requested change in direction was a very good thing and should be repeated. The lowsec/0.0 sites work fine as far as I'm concerned, so no change required there (other than diversity to keep the challenge fresh).
Should CCP determine that new incursion types require too much resources at this stage, I'd still try and get them to create more collaborative PvE, if only because one of the major challenges to overcome for a highsec dweller to go into low/null is the lack of a social group and group experience.

Spies are an inevitable fact of life. It affects larger groups more than smaller ones though. Most of the heists in eve history didn't come from people who had been in a corp for a short period of time, but rather from people who had managed to sneak their way in for a long period of time, and I don't see how any game mechanics can prevent that from happening. So while I see where you're coming from, there's not much that I see can be done with relatively low effort to help foster security. What I'm saying in essence is that the return is too chancy for the large investment in development resources it would require. So, no... However some of the ideas in there are worth pursuing, if the cost is low enough.

CSM 6, as every CSM I've been a member of (all of them since CSM 2) has been pushing continuously against botting and RMT. The truth of the matter is that CCP actively goes against them. At our request they publicized their unholy rage initiative, but most of the work is done in the background. We have had continuous evidence that fight against RMT and botting is happening. Less than we'd like, but more than you know... It's essentially a game of whack-a-mole. You kill one, another springs up, and I understand and agree with CCP that providing information as to how they are fighting them could make that fight less effective. We are however constantly debating with CCP for them to provide figures/reports of their activity to show that the fight is going on. I hope CCP Sreegs will present some information to that effect at fanfest.
To answer your question though: Yes indeed, I will be pushing for more fighting against botting/RMT in CSM 7, just know that it is already happening (and be sure to use the channels available to report their activity: petition and security@ccpgames.com )

You have my vote.

Don't lose out guys, support Meissa!!

I like

Getting my vote for the 3rd year in a row.

(Best dude for the gig, even when he was red to me)

Agreed, if you reduce the value, then no one cares about the moons anymore and a decision point is eliminated.
Do you have a specific proposal for how to deal with this problem?

I've never met a person with such a broad knowledge of all things eve like Meissa. All my votes belong to you :)

you hawe my vote

Meissa, congrats on your success in EvE politics. it's difficult to please damn nearly everyone in a dog eat dog universe, but you have done just that. it's largely due to your performance as CSM.

i look forward to CSM7 and their recommendations for improving nullsec industry opportunities, decreasing botting/rmt while creating more incentives for conflict in nullsec to highsec.

this can only be good for business after all. someone must sell the bullets.

+1 from me!!!!

I will Vote for you!!!!!!