These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

secrret nurf to people with more then 1 monitor

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
saltrock0000
State War Academy
Caldari State
#1 - 2012-02-16 15:50:24 UTC
So this freezing overview not only freezes when the mouse is over it, but when the mouse is over on another monitor!

Duel boxing people beware. sorting by range multiboxing pvp miiiiiight get ya killed!

\'''\<(o_O)>/'''/
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
#2 - 2012-02-16 15:53:12 UTC
assumes that this guy here ^ found out the hard way.

Dust 514's CPM 1 Iron Wolf Saber Eve mail me about Dust 514 issues.
saltrock0000
State War Academy
Caldari State
#3 - 2012-02-16 15:55:33 UTC
fortunatly not, but if i had there would of defiantly been petitions lol

\'''\<(o_O)>/'''/
IceAero
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#4 - 2012-02-16 16:28:36 UTC
This has got to be fixed...
Smokin Cheeba
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#5 - 2012-02-16 16:33:45 UTC
Does the overview still update on the client that doesn't have mouse focus? ie new targets moved to bottom?
Liu Ellens
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#6 - 2012-02-16 16:34:57 UTC
Thinking about it, people with systems such as this one might want to have it the way as it is now. P

Well, they oughta know what to do with them hogs out there for shure.
saltrock0000
State War Academy
Caldari State
#7 - 2012-02-16 16:37:42 UTC
Smokin Cheeba wrote:
Does the overview still update on the client that doesn't have mouse focus? ie new targets moved to bottom?



Nope it completely freezes the overview on the monitor/client which doesnt have mouse focus

\'''\<(o_O)>/'''/
Smokin Cheeba
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#8 - 2012-02-16 16:39:39 UTC
saltrock0000 wrote:
Smokin Cheeba wrote:
Does the overview still update on the client that doesn't have mouse focus? ie new targets moved to bottom?



Nope it completely freezes the overview on the monitor/client which doesnt have mouse focus




Wow. Huge fail on this one. Fix needed asap.
Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
#9 - 2012-02-16 17:57:11 UTC
Not exactly

If you leave you left screen with the pointer in the area of the overview, the client will consider you mouse pointer to be stuck on the right side of the left screen while in reality it is somewhere on the right screen.

If you take care to move your mouse from the left screen to the right screen but make sure you avoid the overview on the left screen when you pass over to the right the left overview will not be frozen.

For example my overview is 2/3 the height of my screen so i can go from one screen to the other in the top 1/3 and the overview on the left is not frozen.

This is tedious and not acceptable. An immediate fix is required to introduce a toggle to freeze overview or to remove overview freezing until a toggle can be coded.

Leaving it as it is for a week or two is completely unacceptable.
Lin Fatale
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2012-02-16 21:09:33 UTC
really annoying, fix it plz
Paragon Renegade
Sebiestor Tribe
#11 - 2012-02-16 21:13:45 UTC
No skin off my ass.

I can't believe CCP actually allows multiboxing

The pie is a tautology
Xolve
State War Academy
Caldari State
#12 - 2012-02-16 21:20:41 UTC
Paragon Renegade wrote:
No skin off my ass.

I can't believe CCP actually allows multiboxing


Couldn't you have just drank the kool-aide with the rest of the cultists.

Your presence here and your posting habits arn't beneficial to anyone.




Also- for dual screens, Overview on the left on the left screen, Overview on the Right on the right screen.. at least this works for me.
Paragon Renegade
Sebiestor Tribe
#13 - 2012-02-16 21:23:14 UTC
Xolve wrote:
[quote=Paragon Renegade]

Couldn't you have just drank the kool-aide with the rest of the cultists.

Your presence here and your posting habits arn't beneficial to anyone.


I'm blunt, if you dislike that, too bad.

As far as I'm concerned, multi-boxing is cheating

The pie is a tautology
Orcirk
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2012-02-16 21:33:28 UTC
Paragon Renegade wrote:
Xolve wrote:
[quote=Paragon Renegade]

Couldn't you have just drank the kool-aide with the rest of the cultists.

Your presence here and your posting habits arn't beneficial to anyone.


I'm blunt, if you dislike that, too bad.

As far as I'm concerned, multi-boxing is cheating

As far as CCP is concerned, it's not.
Given that they actively encourage multiboxing through various offers aimed specifically at getting people second/third accounts, I'd have thought this to be fairly obvious.
Paragon Renegade
Sebiestor Tribe
#15 - 2012-02-16 21:37:39 UTC
Orcirk wrote:

As far as CCP is concerned, it's not.
Given that they actively encourage multiboxing through various offers aimed specifically at getting people second/third accounts, I'd have thought this to be fairly obvious.


All you've done is confirm that I disagree with CCP.

Paying for multiple accounts and monitors is essntially paying more for a larger advantage, or pay to win. Remember that? It's stupid and goes against both the premise of an MMO (Why play with others when you can do it yourself?) and the spirit of the game.

The pie is a tautology
Hauling Hal
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#16 - 2012-02-16 21:40:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Hauling Hal
Paragon Renegade wrote:
Orcirk wrote:

As far as CCP is concerned, it's not.
Given that they actively encourage multiboxing through various offers aimed specifically at getting people second/third accounts, I'd have thought this to be fairly obvious.


All you've done is confirm that I disagree with CCP.

Paying for multiple accounts and monitors is essntially paying more for a larger advantage, or pay to win. Remember that? It's stupid and goes against both the premise of an MMO (Why play with others when you can do it yourself?) and the spirit of the game.


When it costs less to play 2 accounts owned by one person versus two accounts that are played by two people, I'll believe you.

There are 2 accounts, who owns them is irrelevant.
Paragon Renegade
Sebiestor Tribe
#17 - 2012-02-16 21:44:26 UTC
Hauling Hal wrote:


When it costs less to play 2 accounts owned by one person versus two accounts that are played by two people, I'll believe you.

There are 2 accounts, who owns them is irrelevant.


Following that logic, Aurum should be used to buy Faction mods :D

The pie is a tautology
thatboydc
State War Academy
Caldari State
#18 - 2012-02-16 21:48:31 UTC
Paragon Renegade wrote:
Hauling Hal wrote:


When it costs less to play 2 accounts owned by one person versus two accounts that are played by two people, I'll believe you.

There are 2 accounts, who owns them is irrelevant.


Following that logic, Aurum should be used to buy Faction mods :D


Your statement has literally nothing to do with his statement.
Hauling Hal
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2012-02-16 21:48:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Hauling Hal
Paragon Renegade wrote:
Hauling Hal wrote:


When it costs less to play 2 accounts owned by one person versus two accounts that are played by two people, I'll believe you.

There are 2 accounts, who owns them is irrelevant.


Following that logic, Aurum should be used to buy Faction mods :D


No, it's accounts, not in-game items. You have a chip on your shoulder, because you think the game should be fair to solo players. It isn't, it's Eve. Get over it. Whether its one player with 2 accounts or 2 players on 2 accounts is utterly irrelevant, it's 2 accounts. Live with it and make friends. Do you cry over war decs as well?
Paragon Renegade
Sebiestor Tribe
#20 - 2012-02-16 21:49:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Paragon Renegade
thatboydc wrote:

Your statement has literally nothing to do with his statement.


Paying for something you wouldn't otherwise have.

It has everything to do with it.

Multiboxing is ******** and should be against the rules

The pie is a tautology
123Next pageLast page