These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

CSM VOTEING - EVE DEVS AND ISD READ THIS

Author
Lady Hofstedar
Doomheim
#1 - 2012-02-13 10:29:12 UTC
Hello

For along time the CSM has been branded useless because most players haven't a friggin clue where they vote or how they read up on the candidates. The CSM IS RUN BY PVPERS by pvpers for the pvpers. Whislt i personally do not object to this i fear the actualy point of the CSM has become ABJECT to the point where we may aswell hand Mittani the keys to CCP's head office and let him run things.

Goons are what they are but then they are the class of player this game attracts.

Voteing needs to change, each candidate should be able to post on a Eve blog site and have it linked ingame to a new *Neocom* button which players can read at there leasure and decide who they want to vote for by a SIMPLE poll accessable ingame.

So the ENTIRE population of EvE Online gets to read about there CSM candidates and decided for themselfs who to vote for. No have ten thousand goons vote for one player and he wins by default.

Having a blog site for potential candidates and having a simple say 10/10 candidtaes with a *vote for the most favoured three you like*. Then when that vote is done, put the most favoured three up on the poll again and give people a month to REVOTE on who they want but when this is done SEND A MESSAGE ingame to ALL PLAYERS asking for there votes with web links and directions to the neocom button.

This system would be incredibly easy to setup. There is no excuse. Sort the CSM out.

/flame on
ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2012-02-13 10:31:11 UTC
voting*

Dodixie > Hek

Valei Khurelem
#3 - 2012-02-13 10:31:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Valei Khurelem
CSM should never have existed and was a mistake particularly as this is a games company encouraging selfish assholes to come out of the woodwork, I leave you this video that will explain everything.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIraCchPDhk

"don't get us wrong, we don't want to screw new players, on the contrary. The core problem here is that tech 1 frigates and cruisers should be appealing enough to be viable platforms in both PvE and PvP."   - CCP Ytterbium

Ciar Meara
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#4 - 2012-02-13 10:32:56 UTC
Lady Hofstedar wrote:

This system would be incredibly easy to setup. There is no excuse. Sort the CSM out.
/flame on


I can't seem to find the "easy" part.

- [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow]

baltec1
Bat Country
The Initiative.
#5 - 2012-02-13 10:33:09 UTC  |  Edited by: baltec1
CSM is advertised here on the forums, on the log in screen, in the news you seen upon log in, on eve radio, and is chatted about in all large alliances and in the local chat of every single high population system. It is near impossible to not know about this.
Xorv
Questionable Acquisitions
#6 - 2012-02-13 10:35:03 UTC
What exactly are you saying? That players that don't PvP are too lazy or stupid to inform themselves about the CSM and therefore require some sort of in game tutorial?
2bhammered
Cyberpunk 2077
#7 - 2012-02-13 10:40:54 UTC
I wrote down my vote on a piece of paper, who do I send it to?
Scorsigaar
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#8 - 2012-02-13 10:55:38 UTC
I guess most bots just don't vote.
Skippermonkey
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#9 - 2012-02-13 11:16:22 UTC
THE BEST OPTION WOULD BE TO VOTE FOR SKIPPERMONKEY

COME AT ME BRO

I'LL JUST BE DOCKED IN THIS STATION

ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2012-02-13 11:34:16 UTC
Skippermonkey wrote:
THE BEST OPTION WOULD BE TO VOTE FOR SKIPPERMONKEY


Skippermonkey has actually lost his vote from me due to forum spam :S

Dodixie > Hek

Skippermonkey
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#11 - 2012-02-13 11:43:02 UTC
ElQuirko wrote:
Skippermonkey wrote:
THE BEST OPTION WOULD BE TO VOTE FOR SKIPPERMONKEY


Skippermonkey has actually lost his vote from me due to forum spam :S


Game Over :'(

COME AT ME BRO

I'LL JUST BE DOCKED IN THIS STATION

Elistea
BLUE Regiment.
#12 - 2012-02-13 12:13:41 UTC
CAPS LOCK FRENZY!!!
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#13 - 2012-02-13 12:16:30 UTC
Lady Hofstedar wrote:
Hello

For along time the CSM has been branded useless because most players haven't a friggin clue where they vote or how they read up on the candidates. The CSM IS RUN BY PVPERS by pvpers for the pvpers.


In a PvP based game this is a good thing.


















(And yes, industry is PvP, trading is PvP, fooking T1 battleship people in incursions with better shiny ships is PvP).
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#14 - 2012-02-13 12:52:43 UTC
Lady Hofstedar wrote:
we may aswell hand Mittani the keys to CCP's head office and let him run things.


Chairman For Life Mittani would approve of this message.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

Keno Skir
#15 - 2012-02-13 13:32:54 UTC
Aside from any side taking regarding the CSM, i think voting should be as OP stated. A "political" screen on the neocom that flashes when a player is required to vote on something. No more excuses for not taking part, and maybe even a few less "the mattini is bad and shouldnt be on the CSM cus he is -" threads. Win Win.

+1
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
#16 - 2012-02-13 13:36:24 UTC
Lady Hofstedar wrote:

[STUFF]

/flame on


I decided to give your post a like instead of flaming you for poor spelling and silly ideas. It seemed like you needed someone to like you.

Happy Monday!

I don't judge people by their race, religion, color, size, age, gender, or ethnicity. I judge them by their grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, clarity of expression, and logical consistency.

Akrasjel Lanate
Immemorial Coalescence Administration
Immemorial Coalescence
#17 - 2012-02-13 13:37:02 UTC
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Lady Hofstedar wrote:
we may aswell hand Mittani the keys to CCP's head office and let him run things.


Chairman For Life Mittani would approve of this message.

umadbroWhat?

CEO of Lanate Industries

Citizen of Solitude

ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#18 - 2012-02-13 13:42:09 UTC
Akrasjel Lanate wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Lady Hofstedar wrote:
we may aswell hand Mittani the keys to CCP's head office and let him run things.


Chairman For Life Mittani would approve of this message.

umadbroWhat?


Oh, he maaaaad...

Dodixie > Hek

Serene Repose
#19 - 2012-02-14 06:33:46 UTC
I'm not a big fan of the OP. However, I'm less of a fan of the Goonwaffle Committee For The Betterment of EVE (The CSM).

We must accommodate the idiocracy.

Ziranda Hakuli
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#20 - 2012-02-14 06:46:31 UTC
CSM...getting on the board has become what i have seen now.....kinda like a power block in 0.0

CCP its time to take back control and be a **** to your employees that pull stupid **** in game
12Next page