Jita Park Speakers Corner

Fully supported!

Well, that didn't take long to get 100 likes. Good luck to you!

Nice work. Was hoping that you will apply for CSM7 again. +1 vote

Btw. How do you envision the use of warfare linked t3 cruisers in future?

The benefit of having someone on the CSM who genuinely understands the fine detail of small numbers combat is hard to overstate.

Coming from a renowned idiot and somebody who supports Darius III, another world-class chucklefuck, I'd say that's a compliment.

I've read these proposals that Prom has put forwards to CCP and I have to say I'm stunned with the thorough level of detail that he puts into them, never mind the extensive testing; to hear him talk about the changes and goings on on Sisi you can tell he is putting the hours in.

Making a dumbass remark about absence, when he has already addressed this concern honestly and openly is pretty pathetic and just highlights how cretinous you are.

To be perfectly honest, when you told me T1 frigs would be getting looked at I assumed you were simply trying to get me to leave your AF thread alone. I was very happy to hear CCP seeks to keep us competitive.


I very much like hearing this. I've felt for a long time that rebalancing the T1 frigates and cruisers without looking at the Problem With Non-T2 Modules is a waste of effort. One has only to look at the Armor Plate modules to see how completely out of whack things are (i.e., why do we even have anything besides rolled-tungsten?).


Now I'm close to ******* cheering. If you cannot get them out of their little safe hidey-places, would you be willing to propose to CCP a simple 'Pilot was in Gang" yes/no on the killmail? If you're into the solo fighting scene, it really sucks not knowing if you fought well but lost to a boosted opponent, or fought badly. The effects of booster alts is considerable when two ships of the same type face off, and in a semi-crowded system it becomes impossible to tell if someone's boosted.


Same question I asked Seleene: I d-scanned a Rifter in a belt in lowsec, and warped to that belt at range. I aligned for the planet, and after allowing time for the pilot to see where I was going, I warped there. The other Rifter followed and we fought.

Given the circumstances, we both wanted to fight. One of us took a GCC and lost security status. Eventually that pilot will have to start shooting little red crosses or suffer the consequences of 'going pirate'. On this occasion, it was me. Perhaps tomorrow it will be him.

Why are we punished for seeking combat? Is this working as intended or something you feel needs fixing?

I wan't to say this is working as intended, but I get the feeling that isn't what you want to hear
I don't think it's means of punishment as much as it could be a restriction to the crimewatch system.

There are ways to get a fight in low-sec without getting GCC, but they aren't always convenient.
Dropping cans and/or looting/salvaging wrecks gives aggro now, and that's still a fairly popular mechanic.

I think FW is something CCP is trying to push onto the low-sec population for this very reason.
If you're living in low-sec you'd probably be doing one of four things:
- pirating (don't care about GCC)
- hunting pirates (not affected by GCC)
- pve (not related to GCC)
- fw (not affected by GCC)

If you're looking to shoot someone without going through those avenues, you still have the looting mechanic.
Point is, the above list will be the big ideas, and will probably work alright.

At the end of the day though, you can always goto NPC 00

On the other hand.. it could be neat to have mutual aggression mechanic, similar to trading but results in a private timer.
HEY BRO, WANT TO FIGHT? ACCEPT AGGRO INVITE!

It'll be nice to vote for someone who wants to buff underused ships into relevance rather than nerf popular ships into irrelevance.

PROM4CSM4LYFE