These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Off Topic Discussions

Author
Arrendis
TK Corp
#381 - 2017-05-25 20:11:26 UTC
I dunno, I was angling for a 'gunfights in the streets around the hoi polloi.' kind of thriller piece, but there guys are just weird.
Ria Nieyli
Nieyli Enterprises
SL33PERS
#382 - 2017-05-25 20:19:15 UTC
Halcyon Ember wrote:
Laconic nation pilot meets hard bitten mercenary with a tendency for inappropriate humour on Crystal Boulevarde?
The pair find themselves sharing a pastry in an odd scene of camaraderie that leads to them finding comfort in one another's arms, if only for a night?


Oh my god...
Halcyon Ember
Repracor Industries
#383 - 2017-05-25 20:20:35 UTC
Ria Nieyli wrote:
Halcyon Ember wrote:
Laconic nation pilot meets hard bitten mercenary with a tendency for inappropriate humour on Crystal Boulevarde?
The pair find themselves sharing a pastry in an odd scene of camaraderie that leads to them finding comfort in one another's arms, if only for a night?


Oh my god...

You're excited, no?

Queen of Chocolate

Ria Nieyli
Nieyli Enterprises
SL33PERS
#384 - 2017-05-25 20:23:51 UTC
No.
Kasuko Merin
Anshar Incorporated
#385 - 2017-05-25 20:26:42 UTC
Down With This Sort Of Thing.

It was worth it. All of it. Every single second.

kul Shaishi
Yurai-Tenshin Zaibatsu
#386 - 2017-05-26 04:20:51 UTC
The battle of Caldari Prime ended up as Caldari political victory do the fact they control is sligh tmajority of the planet and The culturally important cities of Arcurio and Tovil.
Halcyon Ember
Repracor Industries
#387 - 2017-05-26 09:20:43 UTC
Mizhara Del'thul wrote:
Throwing money at a screw-up to make a problem go away is not 'being responsible'. That is being irresponsibly delinquent in their duty to expose the failure points in the system that allowed the event to occur in the first place, and ensuring that they are rectified in order to avoid such failure in the future.

Taking responsibility is being responsible. Refuting it and undoubtedly lying through their teeth is most certainly not.

If you can't see what the benefit is in acknowledging failure in order to rectify it, you're seriously short-sighted.


That burning feeling again...

Queen of Chocolate

Arrendis
TK Corp
#388 - 2017-05-26 17:00:13 UTC
Mizhara Del'thul wrote:
Along with that other new kid apparently having significant ties to both the Goons and Blooders


Mr. 'Are you at war with the cornfields'? Nah, he's got no ties to us that I can find. I suspect his connections lie more in the direction of NC. If he was attached to PL, he'd have more balls and get things wrong less often.
Mizhara Del'thul
Kyn'aldrnari
#389 - 2017-05-26 17:02:28 UTC
I don't think NancyDotte have fallen that low on quality control. They'd be a damn sight less effective if that was the case. I suspect a simple case of pretense and/or stupidity is the phenomenon dejour.
Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#390 - 2017-05-26 17:27:28 UTC
He does seem to be trying awfully hard to impress people.

AEther Galatia wrote:
Aria Jenneth wrote:
AEther Galatia wrote:
Arrendis wrote:
Graelyn wrote:
When your enemy falls and screams "Now I'm STRONGER", then you've hit brainstem.


Yup. Totally. Trust the platitudes, not the actual data, your Holiness.


Wonder who made you write this? (quoted in case you edit it.)


Ironic use of a title is still use of a title. But also still ironic.

Especially when it's the wrong title.






(A cardinal is properly addressed as, "your Eminence," I think.)


Thanks. That is very wise of you and was my point but I did not say it directly.


There's ... no way that makes sense. Like, at all.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#391 - 2017-05-26 17:30:46 UTC
Mizhara Del'thul wrote:
I don't think NancyDotte have fallen that low on quality control.


I dunno, Vince is still there.
Che Biko
Alexylva Paradox
#392 - 2017-05-27 11:11:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Che Biko
Lasairiona Raske wrote:
Makoto Priano wrote:
Funk alternated between wanting to bear Nauplius's lovechild, and wanting to flay him.

Perhaps both?

I really don't know what passes for romance in those circles.


This is kinda one of the best things I've read on here in a while.
Straight****, I need to step up my posting quality.
Edit: Or post more often?
Graelyn
Aeternus Command Academy
#393 - 2017-05-27 12:42:57 UTC
I don't think this thread will win anyone any medals.

Cardinal Graelyn

Amarr Loyalist of the Year - YC113

Halcyon Ember
Repracor Industries
#394 - 2017-05-27 13:07:54 UTC
Graelyn wrote:
I don't think this thread will win anyone any medals.

Such pessimism, aren't you old enough to have circled back to optimistic, yet?

Queen of Chocolate

Arrendis
TK Corp
#395 - 2017-05-27 18:52:42 UTC
Mizhara Del'thul wrote:
Their industrial and financial power is now significantly improved, and it's even possible - although unproven as that Sotiyo kill showed - that they can and will undock something other than interceptor fleets these days.


What did you think of our interceptors in Gehi last night? Noticed your Loki survived.
Mizhara Del'thul
Kyn'aldrnari
#396 - 2017-05-27 19:04:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Mizhara Del'thul
They were honestly kind of underwhelming given the numbers. Getting out of the fight with pretty much equal efficiency when outnumbered two to one (+ super blob, mixed as it may have been) honestly shouldn't happen. Especially when a good quarter of that 'one' are just there to third party independently.

Basically, how can so many with so much do so very little? Not impressive, Arrendis.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#397 - 2017-05-27 19:11:12 UTC
Mizhara Del'thul wrote:
They were honestly kind of underwhelming given the numbers. Getting out of the fight with pretty much equal efficiency when outnumbered two to one (+ super blob, mixed as it may have been) honestly shouldn't happen. Especially when a good quarter of that 'one' are just there to third party independently.

Basically, how can so many with so much do so very little? Not impressive, Arrendis.


Heh. Now you're back to ISK efficiency? C'mon, Miz, you know ISK efficiency is meaningless. The objectivie is all.
Mizhara Del'thul
Kyn'aldrnari
#398 - 2017-05-27 19:17:27 UTC
ISK efficiency is not the priority, but combat efficiency is. If it takes you twice the numbers plus a super blob to achieve equal combat efficiency and getting the objective, it speaks rather ill of the group in question. Numbers is a quality of its own, of course, but when it's the only saving grace of an encounter you have problems that need solving.

Smugposting is earned, Arrendis, and that means bringing more qualities to the table than just numbers.

Your objective was rather meaningless to us third parties, after all.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#399 - 2017-05-27 19:41:23 UTC
Mizhara Del'thul wrote:
Your objective was rather meaningless to us third parties, after all.


Third party. Riiiiight.
Mizhara Del'thul
Kyn'aldrnari
#400 - 2017-05-27 19:44:11 UTC
I dearly hope you're not calling me a liar. We had no objective nor contract in Gehi, only an opportunity to join in on a fight. Should I start saving documentation on op announcements for you, if you have decided to start questioning the veracity of my word?