Player Features and Ideas Discussion

prejudice doesnt contribute to a discussion. obviously.

Another one might say otherwise.
---
moving on:
Guys, explain to me, why someone posts something in a thread for some time about a topic that he does not even care about?.

Iain's said and reiterated pretty much all I have left to say, but I'll just add this;







You're quite wrong there. We obviously do care about the game (spending hanging about the F&I forum and reading threads here) , but, the nature of time and causality being what it is, we literally couldn't care until we had read your thread. You have received direct responses to your OP, and you persist in dismissing them as they are not necessarily complementary to your idea. To that end, I might suggest that you direct the quoted question to yourself and seek the answers within.

You know Ben Ishikela this has been interesting but at the same time infuriating. All I see here is the old adage of the pot calling the kettle black. In case you have never heard that one here is a link that may help. Pot calling the kettle black

So getting beyond that I will go back to my originally posted questions.

You state this idea will offer interesting game play options what are they?
And before you jump on me for being brain dead I will remind you this is YOUR idea and YOU bear the burden of defending it and to answer questions about it.

Contrary to your belief I have given this a lot of thought, and to be brutally honest I simply cannot see how or where all of these interesting game play ideas are going to come from.

Looking at the use of a structure as you suggest does this really give any new and interesting game play options considering that you would still need to have a reinforcement timer to balance time zone issues?

Staying with the structure idea how do you envision these interacting with the new Citadels?

If there is not a structure involved then how is pointing a lazor at the sun anymore fun or more interesting than pointing a lazor at an asteroid?

From the PvP side what new options for content does this idea offer?
Is another structure bash really going to be any more interesting than the structures we already have, you know the ones people are always complaining about how boring they are.

Will your idea put more players in space and therefore more players at risk that what we currently have?

I stated it in my last post but want to restate it to close this one.
What I see with this idea is complexity added simply to make things more complex.
If you see some way that this will add interesting game play then please fill us in.

Okay now I have to bite.

You seem to be confusing arrogance with experience. That is fine, folks older than you are may seem that way to a younger one. This comes not only from the wisdom you get with age but also the experience that goes with it.

When we say an idea is bad we will have done the following with the blink of an eye:

- We will have the experience of either first hand or second hand experience to see where this idea of your would be heading far in advance.

- We will have first hand knowledge of something very similar and know how it turned out = bad.

- We are bright enough to see where people can and will abuse it for the worse (of prior intent)

Now take your pick, it doesn't matter which. When we see a bad idea we will say so. But let the record show that we also are very open to good or not terrible ideas.

updated first-post.