These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!!

First post
Author
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#3741 - 2016-01-14 14:15:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Lucas Kell wrote:
King Aires wrote:
The only entitled way of thinking here is yours, in that you think it is your game and it should be played your way. You refuse to adapt or change therefore you ask others to leave so they can't influence development in a direction you don't improve.
This is incredibly true. There are a number of frequent posters that display this "my way or the highway" attitude while having absolutely nothing to do with the development of the game. They get so mad that other people dare to have opinions. Just stand your ground and they usually get bored.


Ah look, these birds of a feather are flocking together. I still wish they'd all Flock Off to something they actually enjoy rather than advocating the destruction of a good thing, but you know , birds will be birds, crapping all over everything.

Y'all should form a 'change for the sake of change, oh and Elite is wonderful why I'm not not playing it more" club. I wouldn't join, but you''d get quite a few members I'd bet. You can have whatever opinion you like. Pointing out that the opinion is wrong (and even somewhat evil) is also allowed.

BTW It can't be "my way or the highway" if you don't own the highway, and we don't. CCP does.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#3742 - 2016-01-14 14:15:48 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
I don't care if people leave or stay. I'm saying it's STUPID to stay in a game you don't like rather than playing one you do like.
What about staying in a game that you mostly like but wish had a series of improvements. Most of the people you put down repeatedly are in that category. Of the games in the style they want to play EVE fits them more than any other, but there are aspects of EVE they would change. You have this habit of seeing someone complain about a single thing then assuming that means they hate EVE.

Jenn aSide wrote:
Wanting a thing to remain at least somewhat what it is isn't selfish
It's as selfish as wanting change, or wanting no change. Why is it you think that if other people want something, that's selfish, but if you want something it's not?

Jenn aSide wrote:
there is no need to throw out all good things for the sake of reckless change.
What is "good" and "reckless" is subjective.

Jenn aSide wrote:
People should adapt themselves to the game, not expect the game to turn into something else just because they want it to.
The game should also adapt to the ever changing environment and market demands. Also, once again people suggesting some change aren't asking for the game to be something else, they just have a different opinion about what important parts of EVE need to be preserved and what parts they'd be happy to see change.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#3743 - 2016-01-14 14:19:06 UTC
King Aires wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
King Aires wrote:


You are displaying ...


Imma have to stop you there. If you're gonna turn this into an online psychoanalytical session, I'm pretty sure unsolicited services are against the forum rules. I think he's gonna wanna see your qualifications too before handing over any money. GG.


Funny, never seen Jenn banned for doing just that, in every thread ever he posted in. Roll


I'll call out anyone I see giving unqualified and unsolicited psychological evaluations, because at the end of the day, it's little more than you 'questioning' the mentality of the poster. You're basically saying, "if you disagree with me there must be something psychologically wrong with you". It's disgusting, and it says more about you than the person you're addressing.

If you're talking about Jenn calling you out for self-entitlement, that doesn't qualify as a psychological assessment, but a demonstrable display of behaviour. If I see unjustifiable entitlement, ie thinking you deserve something special just for you that no one else gets under the same circumstances, then I'll call it out too.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#3744 - 2016-01-14 14:21:20 UTC
Avvy wrote:
That's kind of normal really.

If someone likes something enough, they will have a tendency to try to protect it as it is.

Plus seeing what changes have done to some other MMOs, it just reinforces that reasoning.
True, but refusing to change is also pretty bad for MMOs.

The thing is, we all have different opinions about what we want to keep and what we want to see changed. It's CCPs job to decide what they want to do based on their opinions and their views on ours. Some people can't handle that and refuse to even allow other people to have their opinion, berating and attacking them, telling them to leave whenever they post.

Jenn aSide wrote:
Pointing out that the opinion is wrong
No such beast exists.

Jenn aSide wrote:
It can't be "my way or the highway" if you don't own the highway, and we don't.
No, but you like to pretend it does which is why you insult people and tell them they are stupid for playing EVE and how they should leave. That your demands for these people to leave are nothing more than flailing your arms and screeching is obvious to me but I'm ensuring other people are aware of the same.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#3745 - 2016-01-14 14:22:51 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
I'll call out anyone I see giving unqualified and unsolicited psychological evaluations, because at the end of the day, it's little more than you 'questioning' the mentality of the poster. You're basically saying, "if you disagree with me there must be something psychologically wrong with you". It's disgusting, and it says more about you than the person you're addressing.

If you're talking about Jenn calling you out for self-entitlement, that doesn't qualify as a psychological assessment, but a demonstrable display of behaviour. If I see unjustifiable entitlement, ie thinking you deserve something special just for you that no one else gets under the same circumstances, then I'll call it out too.
I think he was pointing out the huge number of times Jenn has gone off about how mentally and psychologically challenged people are on the forums for having different opinions. Seriously, I'm pretty sure there's a fair few example in this very thread if you look on eve-search.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#3746 - 2016-01-14 14:32:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Lucas Kell wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
I don't care if people leave or stay. I'm saying it's STUPID to stay in a game you don't like rather than playing one you do like.
What about staying in a game that you mostly like but wish had a series of improvements. Most of the people you put down repeatedly are in that category. Of the games in the style they want to play EVE fits them more than any other, but there are aspects of EVE they would change. You have this habit of seeing someone complain about a single thing then assuming that means they hate EVE.


That's not what you do. Radical types always try to seem moderate, but you are transparent.

No one (in their right minds that is) posts thousands upon thousands of negative posts about things they LIKE lol.

Quote:

What is "good" and "reckless" is subjective.


Moral relativism is like a religion for people like you.

Quote:
The game should also adapt to the ever changing environment and market demands. Also, once again people suggesting some change aren't asking for the game to be something else, they just have a different opinion about what important parts of EVE need to be preserved and what parts they'd be happy to see change.


When that opinion is based on desire (I want X from this game experience) rather than reason (evidence, history, logic), it's a bad opinion. People who want things to change for selfish reasons without regard to consequences seldom ever admit that what they think is wrong. But it's still wrong.

Many a company has died trying to "adapt to the ever changing environment and market demands" when they might have survived if they stayed on course and let the evolution be natural and gradual and respectful of their past accomplishments. For the very most part CCP has survived with a game that doesn't cater to modern (read 'weak') player's tender sensibilities (safeties and stupid pop ups not withstanding). And they did that while legions of other companies folded trying to emulate the newest trends.

CCP is like a still successful newspaper publisher in the era of the internet where most other media companies folded after embracing the digital age... If CCP were smart they'd keep doing that and continue to ignore what others are doing like they always have.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#3747 - 2016-01-14 14:40:51 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
No, but you like to pretend it does which is why you insult people and tell them they are stupid for playing EVE and how they should leave. That your demands for these people to leave are nothing more than flailing your arms and screeching is obvious to me but I'm ensuring other people are aware of the same.


Who is making demands? I don't own the game, I can't demand anything.

I'm pointing out that you are free to do as you choose. What you choose is stupid, and I'm truly sorry if you find this expression of truth 'insulting', but it's nonetheless true. I don't care about your feelings, and despite what people like you believe, you have no right to not be offended.

Some people like to torture themselves I guess. I work with a few people like that ,who don't like the job, don't like the bosses, think 'things would be so much better if only they'd do {x} etc etc. But somehow they don't seem able to not take the money on payday, nor do they seem willing to go work for a better organization. If I hated something so much that I had to comment on how bad it is (and how something else is better) every single day, I wouldn't live my life in misery, I'd go get that other job and enjoy life.

To each his own I guess, but still some things are just achingly stupid.
Avvy
Doomheim
#3748 - 2016-01-14 14:44:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Avvy
Lucas Kell wrote:
Avvy wrote:
That's kind of normal really.

If someone likes something enough, they will have a tendency to try to protect it as it is.

Plus seeing what changes have done to some other MMOs, it just reinforces that reasoning.
True, but refusing to change is also pretty bad for MMOs.

The thing is, we all have different opinions about what we want to keep and what we want to see changed. It's CCPs job to decide what they want to do based on their opinions and their views on ours. Some people can't handle that and refuse to even allow other people to have their opinion, berating and attacking them, telling them to leave whenever they post.


We all have different views and views will be challenged as a way of trying to give balance to the argument.

Some people are more rigid in their views and some more flexible, doesn't mean the rigid ones are being unreasonable, it just means they know what they want and what they don't. It's not even being selfish as it is their views they are expressing.

It is CCPs job to decide what changes are necessary, based on what they think and the feedback they get from their customers.

The problem I see is I don't think this game is good enough to break from its niche market and go more main stream. One of the things that keeps dragging players back to it is its tough reputation, so if that changes too much it might not be too good for this game. Something they need to be mindful of with changes.

Changes can be both good or bad, usually you find out after the change which they actually are.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#3749 - 2016-01-14 14:55:53 UTC
Avvy wrote:


The problem I see is I don't think this game is good enough to break from its niche market and go more main stream. One of the things that keeps dragging players back to it is its tough reputation, so if that changes too much it might not be too good for this game. Something they need to be mindful of with changes.


This is well said. I disagree about it "not being good enough" for something. Many bad things have mass appeal (McDonalds for example) while many good things will never EVER make the kind of income McDonalds makes. Le Bernardin in New York (for example) will NEVER earn it's owners the same billions MCD corp has.

But otherwise your comment is great. What happens when CCP tries to get all "modern and relevant"? They end up making a game that still doesn't draw in new people while also ticking off it's loyal customers.

Quote:

Changes can be both good or bad, usually you find out after the change which they actually are.


The "it's all relative" crowd does not understand this. In fact I think relativism is a way to avoid confronting the idea that they could be wrong (by denying right and wrong, good or bad exist in the 1st place lol).
sero Hita
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#3750 - 2016-01-14 15:32:19 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:


The "it's all relative" crowd does not understand this. In fact I think relativism is a way to avoid confronting the idea that they could be wrong (by denying right and wrong, good or bad exist in the 1st place lol).


Or the other way around, relativism is a way of acknowledging you might not know all the details, and instead of standing your ground, you accept that most things are relative and has a different meaning for different people. Leading to the obvious conclucion, that people on the internet should be wary using all these absolute non-validated statements that are flying around.

"I'm all for pvp, don't get me wrong. I've ganked in Empire, blobed in low sec. Got T-shirts from every which-where.. But to be forced into a pvp confrontation that I didn't want is wrong ccp." RealFlisker

King Aires
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#3751 - 2016-01-14 16:22:09 UTC
sero Hita wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:


The "it's all relative" crowd does not understand this. In fact I think relativism is a way to avoid confronting the idea that they could be wrong (by denying right and wrong, good or bad exist in the 1st place lol).


Or the other way around, relativism is a way of acknowledging you might not know all the details, and instead of standing your ground, you accept that most things are relative and has a different meaning for different people. Leading to the obvious conclucion, that people on the internet should be wary using all these absolute non-validated statements that are flying around.



You can't explain relativism to a person who is used to getting positive reinforcement that their ideas and opinions are always correct. Jenn thinks there is 0% chance that he may be wrong, and all differing opinions are met with complete dismissal.

Jenn, as a former law enforcement officer myself, to a current member of the LEO community, I implore you to change your viewpoint on life. After you leave your chosen profession you will be filled with regret on how you treated fellow human beings with the staunch black and white approach and ever closed-minded view that you display so regularly here.

TL:DR You can't make concrete minds think abstractly.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#3752 - 2016-01-14 16:33:26 UTC
King Aires wrote:
sero Hita wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:


The "it's all relative" crowd does not understand this. In fact I think relativism is a way to avoid confronting the idea that they could be wrong (by denying right and wrong, good or bad exist in the 1st place lol).


Or the other way around, relativism is a way of acknowledging you might not know all the details, and instead of standing your ground, you accept that most things are relative and has a different meaning for different people. Leading to the obvious conclucion, that people on the internet should be wary using all these absolute non-validated statements that are flying around.



You can't explain relativism to a person who is used to getting positive reinforcement that their ideas and opinions are always correct. Jenn thinks there is 0% chance that he may be wrong, and all differing opinions are met with complete dismissal.

Jenn, as a former law enforcement officer myself, to a current member of the LEO community, I implore you to change your viewpoint on life. After you leave your chosen profession you will be filled with regret on how you treated fellow human beings with the staunch black and white approach and ever closed-minded view that you display so regularly here.

TL:DR You can't make concrete minds think abstractly.


The day I believe anyone who thinks like you has ever been in my profession is the day I eat my hat, and it ain't edible. Again, do we still need to pretend like we all don't know who you really are?

And wtf do you think you know about how I treat people while I'm on the job? Explaining to dumb people on the internet that the world doesn't exist to cater to any of us (and if they don't like a video game, it would be smarter to chose another or stop gaming altogether) has nothing to do with how I work.


Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#3753 - 2016-01-14 16:40:02 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
That's not what you do. Radical types always try to seem moderate, but you are transparent.

No one (in their right minds that is) posts thousands upon thousands of negative posts about things they LIKE lol.
Except you're wrong, both in the representation of my posts and the way I feel about EVE. The thing is, you are trying to tell me how you think I feel about EVE. How do you still not able to understand that out of you and me I understand my own preferences better?

Jenn aSide wrote:
When that opinion is based on desire (I want X from this game experience) rather than reason (evidence, history, logic), it's a bad opinion.
For starters, it's not, but even if it was, your opinions are also based on your own wants. Your problem is that you believe your opinion to be the correct one and feel that your own anecdotes are enough evidence of that and thus every opinion that differs is bad. I on the other hand believe that opinions are just that, opinions, and they differ. There's no such thing as a wrong opinion, simply opinions that each of us agree of disagree with and it's up to CCP to decide how they feel about them when making design decisions.

Jenn aSide wrote:
Many a company has died trying to "adapt to the ever changing environment and market demands" when they might have survived if they stayed on course and let the evolution be natural and gradual and respectful of their past accomplishments.
And many a company has died by refusing to adapt and being left behind by the market. The funny thing is that we know already that CCP aren't exactly keen on just staying on course, hence their recent branch out in VR.

Jenn aSide wrote:
For the very most part CCP has survived with a game that doesn't cater to modern (read 'weak') player's tender sensibilities (safeties and stupid pop ups not withstanding).
Here's the "EVE Players are better than other gamers" bull that we're used to. It's simply not true. If anything many EVE players (like yourself) are weak as they can't even handle the proposal of change let alone actual change itself. Learn to be flexible, to adapt, and perhaps you can keep up with modern players. Let's face it, you like EVE as it is and want it to stay as it is because you know it, if makes you feel safe because you know more than all the newer guys. I'm much more for being kept on my toes and challenged continuously and helping new blood get up to the standard that they are competitive is a big part of that.

Jenn aSide wrote:
CCP is like a still successful newspaper publisher in the era of the internet where most other media companies folded after embracing the digital age... If CCP were smart they'd keep doing that and continue to ignore what others are doing like they always have.
You mean crammed full of additional revenue streams to stay afloat? As a general rule, ignoring your competitors and the wants of people in and around your market segment is a bad idea. If they were smart they'd roll out microtransactions for something simple, like skins, they'd start up new projects to look for new, fresh markets and they'd gradually decrease focus on EVE-O. Oh wait...

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#3754 - 2016-01-14 16:46:59 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
I'm pointing out that you are free to do as you choose. What you choose is stupid, and I'm truly sorry if you find this expression of truth 'insulting', but it's nonetheless true. I don't care about your feelings, and despite what people like you believe, you have no right to not be offended.
But I'm not offended. A random on the internet is telling me I hate a game - which I know I don't hate - then they are calling me stupid for still playing said game. The only thing I feel about that is pity. You seem absolutely sure that you know how I feel about EVE and you seem to be trying your absolute hardest to offend me because of it and you are failing.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

sero Hita
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#3755 - 2016-01-14 16:55:30 UTC
King Aires wrote:

You can't explain relativism to a person who is used to getting positive reinforcement that their ideas and opinions are always correct. Jenn thinks there is 0% chance that he may be wrong, and all differing opinions are met with complete dismissal.

Jenn, as a former law enforcement officer myself, to a current member of the LEO community, I implore you to change your viewpoint on life. After you leave your chosen profession you will be filled with regret on how you treated fellow human beings with the staunch black and white approach and ever closed-minded view that you display so regularly here.

TL:DR You can't make concrete minds think abstractly.


This seems to be quite an assumption made on how someone replies on the internet, and tbh. getting personal like that over an internet discussion is exaggerated and seems out of line IMO.

"I'm all for pvp, don't get me wrong. I've ganked in Empire, blobed in low sec. Got T-shirts from every which-where.. But to be forced into a pvp confrontation that I didn't want is wrong ccp." RealFlisker

DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#3756 - 2016-01-14 17:36:39 UTC
Seems this thread is still being proven wrong. interesting. the Rapid fall stopped a while ago and stableized, now its rebounding. so yea the op is wrong

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

Toramaline
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#3757 - 2016-01-14 20:51:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Toramaline
Numbers dropping? old farts quitting? EvE declining? possibly, who knows?

Sadly for myself and after playing EvE for just a few years I now find it has become very childish and pandering to the new player.
I used to love exploration, the risk of tanking your ship to the extreme and not knowing just what might hit you, having the skills to hack cans and hopefully get a reward, finding rare rewards worth many millions that you'd sell to pay for plex all of this was one of a great many elements of a game I totally adored.

I liked it so much that after a year of play in 2004 I managed to get my entire family of 2 brothers and my father playing, each of us having at least three accounts and one having six (he did like to mine).

Now however EvE has become dare I say it stale, like luke warm two day old beer, it looks good and may be a suddenly great idea but one taste and you realise it's nowhere near as good as it was.

Call me a bitter old vet if you will, all I will say is that I'm now the last of my family playing and as of last week all of my accounts apart from this toon have now been unsubbed as we have all said the same and that is EvE is slowly becoming nothing more than a shade of it's past.

Gameplay is important as well as content and steadily the game has become simplified to a state of ruin, silly tic tac toe/ minesweeper games with every can having that rare item you once had to take hours to find and be skilled enough to get, titans for everyone swamping fields of battle, fozziesov (blergh), jump fatigue (really really annoying), skill resets and removals (some took months to learn), scambots not being silenced, scam contracts not being fixed etc etc

I could go on and will probably get flamed for all this yet I feel if something isn't done soon the game I love and adore will slowly lose the bright light it has and become nothing more than that old flashlight hidden under the sofa with the half charged batteries you use when you've lost something under the table.

Just my thoughts, burn away.................
sero Hita
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#3758 - 2016-01-14 21:04:07 UTC
Toramaline wrote:
Numbers dropping? old farts quitting? EvE declining? possibly, who knows?

Sadly for myself and after playing EvE for just a few years I now find it has become very childish and pandering to the new player.
I used to love exploration, the risk of tanking your ship to the extreme and not knowing just what might hit you, having the skills to hack cans and hopefully get a reward, finding rare rewards worth many millions that you'd sell to pay for plex all of this was one of a great many elements of a game I totally adored.

I liked it so much that after a year of play in 2004 I managed to get my entire family of 2 brothers and my father playing, each of us having at least three accounts and one having six (he did like to mine).

Now however EvE has become dare I say it stale, like luke warm two day old beer, it looks good and may be a suddenly great idea but one taste and you realise it's nowhere near as good as it was.

Call me a bitter old vet if you will, all I will say is that I'm now the last of my family playing and as of last week all of my accounts apart from this toon have now been unsubbed as we have all said the same and that is EvE is slowly becoming nothing more than a shade of it's past.

Gameplay is important as well as content and steadily the game has become simplified to a state of ruin, silly tic tac toe/ minesweeper games with every can having that rare item you once had to take hours to find and be skilled enough to get, titans for everyone swamping fields of battle, fozziesov (blergh), jump fatigue (really really annoying), skill resets and removals (some took months to learn), scambots not being silenced, scam contracts not being fixed etc etc

I could go on and will probably get flamed for all this yet I feel if something isn't done soon the game I love and adore will slowly lose the bright light it has and become nothing more than that old flashlight hidden under the sofa with the half charged batteries you use when you've lost something under the table.

Just my thoughts, burn away.................


well If you have been playing since 2004, you have had quite a long run. What other game have you played for that many years? None I am pretty sure. My grandmother always says (pardon my bad translation skills). Time spend nicely, does not come back in a bad way. You had your long run, it is over, you are not interested anymore. No amount of changes or status quo would change that. Have a nice passing to a game, that will fit you better o7

"I'm all for pvp, don't get me wrong. I've ganked in Empire, blobed in low sec. Got T-shirts from every which-where.. But to be forced into a pvp confrontation that I didn't want is wrong ccp." RealFlisker

Vektrio
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#3759 - 2016-01-14 21:19:43 UTC
I am a complete newb to EVE, sub'd a few weeks ago, and I just found this thread.

188 thread pages to discuss whether or not the game is dying, I don't know how to feel about that.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#3760 - 2016-01-14 21:54:36 UTC
Vektrio wrote:
I am a complete newb to EVE, sub'd a few weeks ago, and I just found this thread.

188 thread pages to discuss whether or not the game is dying, I don't know how to feel about that.



These forums have always exemplified that kind of irony.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016