Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center

Sig tank is better than buffer face tank in fleets, as fellow logi pilots just have much less raw armor/shield damage to rep, wich magnify tanking power of signature bonussed logi wing vs facetanking logi wing.
(same rep power to rep less raw damage -> better general tank)

Amarr and caldari ships it seems designed to be more durable but suffer form EWAR
Matar and Gal ships designed to have better utility but be less durable.

With current desigh sigtanking ships have better actual tanks than facetanking buffer-bonussed ships and have better utility by initial design, wich means that Amarr and Cal ships are inferior.

Suggestion:

Change buffer bonus for appropriate resists bonus to make design tanking bonuses equal between races.

OR change signature bonus for scan res bonus

high scan res allows logi to apply reps faster, that is crutial aspect that current t1 ships lack.
Curent t1 line ships melt in few seconds under foccused fire, often unable to catch reps from t1 logi (especially armor, due to combination of low scan res+application of HP at the end of the long cycle).
That change will make Gal/Min logi more desirable for fast t1 FW frigate-dessie fights where reaction time is valued more than raw tanking power, and make Amarr/Cald ships more desirable in small T2 / T3D / T1 cruiser gangs where reaction time valued less than raw tanking power of individial logi ship.

The sig radius bonus seems pretty strong as pointed by Big Miker, even if i like the idea of this kind of bonus, maybe move it as a role bonus or a fix number (like -1 sig per level of logi freg), to avoid ridiculous number. I think the red line about sig radius is around 20 (as a linked claw can go to 19~) and any ship shouldn't go under 20.

Gallente Navy Navitas with RR hull "coming soon"? For Real Men.

So shoot them with lights?


The emphasis on sig tanking increases the importance of pilot skill necessary in minimising the risk of such pot shots. With the introduction of falloff, there's incentive to be changing position and getting closer at times to deliver higher reps, and maintaining speed and position to take advantage of such sig radius will be an interesting challenge. The emphasis on sig tanking also means that, just as these will be the most powerful in frig/dessie compositions, so too will small weapons be the most effective against them.

Please add utility hull!

Remote cap for Amarr

Remote sensor booster for Gallente

Remote tracking links for Minmatar

Remote ECCM for Caldari.

Edi: Again SECOND SHIP, separate from OP.

Regarding INVENTION of these - the Amarr Inquisitor BPO is dedicated to the bomber Purifier.
So this will be properly addressed by release date?

The other three should work readily towards T2 invention by simply adding the invention path as their BPO's are clear.

I hope there is an excellent reason as to why the kirin is a good 40m/s below the other three...

So I asked about cap transfers in the twitch chat, the main reason for that was for small ship content where neuts are an issue. I don't have a super compelling reason for it, but overall think it would be nice. it is also possible someone else can point out that it is a terrible idea. if it just means bringing cap boosters than so be it. although with that I have to wonder if it is worth it to bring a t1 logi cruiser cap chain?

can't wait to look at these in more detail.

Will the current Logistics skill get splitted into Logistics cruisers and Logistics frigates (like when the scout drones were splitted into light and medium drones) or will it be an entirely new train?

When T3 battlships come around, I demand that the Caldari one be the "Senpai".

EDIT: Also, confirming that the "Penguin" is more badass than the "Stork".