These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dev Blog: Exploring The Character Bazaar & Skill Trading

First post First post First post
Author
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#5761 - 2015-11-17 23:00:24 UTC
Vahligmarr wrote:
No matter how often you twist it, its linked to RMT by design, so its an additional RMT to bypass a game mechanic = Advantage. It's turning an already expensive game, into a subscription / free to play hybrid...


(I bet it will lead to stuff like purchasable starter and premium packs, like frigate, cruiser, battleship packs with all the skills you need in them. Starter pack, 12.99 $ cheap, premium pack, only 20.99 $... "the power of three", buy three starter packs, you get one premium pack for free.... awesome game)
The RMT-free boat has sailed. It's not coming back. It said long before the dual training certs, before NES/NEX, before AUR. PLEX effectively and completely killed this notion for the isk market long ago.

Meanwhile the SP market has been purely pay to advance since ghost training was killed off years ago. Yet here we are pretending we vets didn't front that cash all this time and only now is the trap of pay to advance springing, despite several of us choosing to remain subbed even when inactive to keep that precious SP flowing.

Funny thing is that the supply of sellable SP will still be constrained by that same mechanic, but selling the ability to trade it makes it suddenly a "bypass."

Also nice slippery slope, if any of that ever comes to pass (basically CCP actually selling SP as a prerequisite, since that isn't what's happening here) you may have a point.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#5762 - 2015-11-17 23:08:00 UTC
Levi Belvar wrote:
If they were available now to buy and you were the only person selling them. I wanted 10 off you but you say to me the skill points are fine but i can't buy anything out of game i dont have the resources for that .Can you complete my contract of 10 between you and me.
1st, why would you care about what means I'm expending?

2nd, There are already in game means to obtain AUR (granted through someone else' purchase)

3rd, Since making SP requires extractors, even if the were in game items I'd have to engage in some other transaction or gameplay to get them, so the whole thing is a moot point.

4th, Even if the above reasoning didn't hold, would you be giving me anything other than isk? If you did give me cash, would that be an EULA violation?
Levi Belvar
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#5763 - 2015-11-17 23:13:28 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Levi Belvar wrote:
If they were available now to buy and you were the only person selling them. I wanted 10 off you but you say to me the skill points are fine but i can't buy anything out of game i dont have the resources for that .Can you complete my contract of 10 between you and me.
1st, why would you care about what means I'm expending?

2nd, There are already in game means to obtain AUR (granted through someone else' purchase)

3rd, Since making SP requires extractors, even if the were in game items I'd have to engage in some other transaction or gameplay to get them, so the whole thing is a moot point.

4th, Even if the above reasoning didn't hold, would you be giving me anything other than isk? If you did give me cash, would that be an EULA violation?

You didnt answer the question, The contract was between you and me and i was not offering you cash, nothing available from anyone else you dont have the resources to buy out of game items. can you provide me the 10 TSP's All it requires is a simple yes or no.

“Stupidity and wisdom meet in the same centre of sentiment and resolution, in the suffering of human accidents.”

Vahligmarr
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#5764 - 2015-11-17 23:16:05 UTC
Maybe its time to get the boat back to where it started... I would appreciate it if Plex, Bazaar, AUR and SPT would sail far far away...
General Lootit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#5765 - 2015-11-17 23:17:11 UTC  |  Edited by: General Lootit
Levi Belvar wrote:

You didnt answer the question, The contract was between you and me

There is nothing between you and me! Please go out.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#5766 - 2015-11-17 23:19:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Tyberius Franklin
Levi Belvar wrote:
You didnt answer the question, The contract was between you and me and i was not offering you cash, nothing available from anyone else you dont have the resources to buy out of game items. can you provide me the 10 TSP's All it requires is a simple yes or no.
I demonstrated why it's not relevant to anything I've said or refuting the claim that this is "cash for SP". I don't have to go along with situational misdirection from you. It's actually best I don't as it dilutes the point:

And the point is that as stated you, the end user aren't paying anything but isk. You, the end user cannot give me cash for SP, you cannot give CCP cash for SP (via this proposal), and you cannot give me AUR for SP.

If you want to set up impossible hypotheticals which don't actually disprove much less address what I'm actually saying I'm not interested playing along.
Rat Scout
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#5767 - 2015-11-17 23:20:28 UTC
Levi Belvar wrote:
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Levi Belvar wrote:
If they were available now to buy and you were the only person selling them. I wanted 10 off you but you say to me the skill points are fine but i can't buy anything out of game i dont have the resources for that .Can you complete my contract of 10 between you and me.
1st, why would you care about what means I'm expending?

2nd, There are already in game means to obtain AUR (granted through someone else' purchase)

3rd, Since making SP requires extractors, even if the were in game items I'd have to engage in some other transaction or gameplay to get them, so the whole thing is a moot point.

4th, Even if the above reasoning didn't hold, would you be giving me anything other than isk? If you did give me cash, would that be an EULA violation?

You didnt answer the question, The contract was between you and me and i was not offering you cash, nothing available from anyone else you dont have the resources to buy out of game items. can you provide me the 10 TSP's All it requires is a simple yes or no.


Oh I see, so it's Pay-to-Loose (your skil-lpoints)
Rat Scout
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#5768 - 2015-11-17 23:21:17 UTC
CCP you are a genius, you just invented pay to loose
Levi Belvar
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#5769 - 2015-11-17 23:21:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Levi Belvar
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Levi Belvar wrote:
You didnt answer the question, The contract was between you and me and i was not offering you cash, nothing available from anyone else you dont have the resources to buy out of game items. can you provide me the 10 TSP's All it requires is a simple yes or no.
I demonstrated why it's not relevant to anything I've said or refuting the claim that this is "cash for SP". I don't have to go along with situational misdirection from you. It's actually best I don't as it dilutes the point:

And the point is that as stated you, the end user aren't paying anything but isk. You, the end user cannot give me cash for SP, you cannot give CCP cash for SP (via this proposal), and you cannot give me AUR for SP.

facetiousness aside, I was trying to make the point that with the bazaar you can earn the isk to plex the transfer of the toon, The TSP you have to spend cash for every single packet that's moved. You will never be able to fund its sale internally.

“Stupidity and wisdom meet in the same centre of sentiment and resolution, in the suffering of human accidents.”

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#5770 - 2015-11-17 23:22:34 UTC
Rat Scout wrote:
CCP you are a genius, you just invented pay to loose
This is probably the most accurate description presented thus far, oddly enough.
General Lootit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#5771 - 2015-11-17 23:24:49 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Rat Scout wrote:
CCP you are a genius, you just invented pay to loose
This is probably the most accurate description presented thus far, oddly enough.

Some lessons must be paid.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#5772 - 2015-11-17 23:43:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Tyberius Franklin
Levi Belvar wrote:
facetiousness aside, I was trying to make the point that with the bazaar you can earn the isk to plex the transfer of the toon, The TSP you have to spend cash for every single packet that's moved. You will never be able to fund its sale internally.
If we're excluding the initial sale of PLEX as a cash venture, which I was not since that still originates from real money, then we can take the route of isk > PLEX > AUR > Extractor.

If I can buy PLEX in game and have in not be "cash for SP" when I pay the character transfer fee on the Bazaar , why can't I convert it to AUR and have it play by the same rules?
Veraca Darmazaf
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#5773 - 2015-11-17 23:44:32 UTC
If you look at SP as a currency then this is both an SP sink due to diminishing returns, and a way to redistribute wealth from the SP 'rich'.

Hmm, probably not the first time this idea has been mentioned in this monster thread.
Levi Belvar
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#5774 - 2015-11-17 23:54:10 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Levi Belvar wrote:
facetiousness aside, I was trying to make the point that with the bazaar you can earn the isk to plex the transfer of the toon, The TSP you have to spend cash for every single packet that's moved. You will never be able to fund its sale internally.
If we're excluding the initial sale of PLEX as a cash venture, which I was not since that still originates from real money, then we can take the route of isk > PLEX > AUR > Extractor.

If I can buy PLEX in game and have in not be "cash for SP" when I pay the character transfer fee on the Bazaar , why can't I convert it to AUR and have it play by the same rules?

I wasnt saying you can't but that is the $64000 question How much are they going to be seeing as you can transfer 200 plus mill with 2 plex . If theyre not going to be some piddly ass amount like 50 aurum per unit then its all about cashing in on the player base again

“Stupidity and wisdom meet in the same centre of sentiment and resolution, in the suffering of human accidents.”

General Lootit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#5775 - 2015-11-18 00:23:24 UTC
Another example "How to invent unsolvable problem and prove that new thing is bad "
Tau Phoenix wrote:

What happens if a player tried to sell SP for a skill that they no longer use but th eskill is a pre-requestite for a skill they do use? Would CCP like to comment here? Would that char still be able to fly a T2 cruiser is the prerequisit SP werr sold/removed from th e char?

CCP Terminus secretly told me
CCP Terminus wrote:

The current plan is to not allow skillpoints to be extracted from skills that are requirements of other skills. So in your example you would have to remove the Command Ships skill before you could remove any prerequisite skills like Armored Warfare.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#5776 - 2015-11-18 00:24:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Tyberius Franklin
Levi Belvar wrote:
I wasnt saying you can't but that is the $64000 question How much are they going to be seeing as you can transfer 200 plus mill with 2 plex . If theyre not going to be some piddly ass amount like 50 aurum per unit then its all about cashing in on the player base again
Ok so this is where things get conceptually complicated:

I said that since the buyer doesn't spend cash/aur it's not "cash for SP." You countered with someone has to spend cash at some point. Then we get to this:
Levi Belvar wrote:
with the bazaar you can earn the isk to plex the transfer of the toon, The TSP you have to spend cash for every single packet that's moved.
So it's a strange issue now. With AUR you for some reason said it's explicitly cash, but PLEX isn't, despite PLEX being a source of AUR. Further when this is pointed out, we now divert to the issue being the specific pricepoint.

That feels like moving goalposts on top of possibly either ignoring or not knowing PLEX > AUR was a thing. I'm not sure the contention you have or objection to what I'm saying at this point either.

And extremes of character transfers aside most transferred characters are under 50mill SP as stated earlier in this thread by CCP. 50 AUR/Extractor is 70 TSPs/PLEX, 140 TSPs/Bazaar transfer fee, or 70,000,000 transferable for the same amount. Edit: Honestly, that's an amount that I can also agree with, meant to say so in the initial post.

If I did the math right anyways. Also I'm not sure it needs argued that every case of Bazaar transfers need to be cheaper in TSP form. Especially with the diminishing returns.
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#5777 - 2015-11-18 01:27:08 UTC
Removed some off topic posts. Please keep it civil and on topic. Thank you.

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode

Senior Lead

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department

Raffael Ramirez
Alcohol Fuelled
#5778 - 2015-11-18 01:51:38 UTC
I am worried about this game, I believe there is a lot to do for CCP without doing what they try to do here.

A lot of areas of the current game need work, if you spend some time online and maybe read some sections of the forums every now and then you realize that a lot of things are broken (again).

Null sec,
Cap ships,
Battleships
Incursions
Roleplaying
Risk vs Reward
being AFK is a play style
etc.

I am sure everybody can agree with at least one thing that is broken/need fixing and the list goes on.
But what is proposed is a fundamental change of game mechanics, that to be perfectly honest don't need fixing.
If you want a char with more SK/P you can buy it - nothing wrong with it so there is a way it is even legal - why do it?

I remember when buying characters was illegal and got you permabanned - now it is a legal thing because CCP couldn't stop it in a meaningful way - same with PLEX and RMTs. Instead of punishing and enforcing the rules they make them legal - it's easier I suppose. But it sets an example on how illegal things will be dealt with - they will become a feature.

I see a deterioration of the game and the community that is sad to see, I know 'my eve' vanished long ago with the introduction of AUR and PLEX and I will never get it back. I feel like all these mechanics cheapen the game experience. EVE was unique in more ways than I can list but it becomes just another item collection, pay to compete kind of game. I ask the question here for anyone who cares to answer: What happened to you vision of EVE?

Cold, dark, harsh, competitive, long term investment, hobby, science fiction, real living breathing world, actions have consequences - these are the words that described the gaming experience - I cannot see any relation to the direction this company/game is going.

Maybe gamers left because of changes/mistakes made in the past which set EVE on the course it is now, maybe the vision of EVE changed, maybe CCP needs to do this to survive as a company. I have no idea, but I want to express my disappointment and worry about what EVE might become in the future.




General Lootit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#5779 - 2015-11-18 16:14:04 UTC  |  Edited by: General Lootit
Raffael Ramirez wrote:

But what is proposed is a fundamental change of game mechanics, that to be perfectly honest don't need fixing.

Maybe you think that way because you already have SP as much as you want?
Quote:
Date of Birth: 2003-10-13

Raffael Ramirez wrote:
If you want a char with more SK/P you can buy it - nothing wrong with it so there is a way it is even legal - why do it?

Yea, but SP trading will allow me to keep indentity and spend isk in more gradual way.
Raffael Ramirez wrote:
Maybe gamers left because of changes/mistakes made in the past which set EVE on the course it is now, maybe the vision of EVE changed, maybe CCP needs to do this to survive as a company.

Or maybe old players will quit no matter what because of insurmountable circumstances of life and current flow of new players is not enough to cover the loss. Changes like this required to increase the flow.
Josef Djugashvilis
#5780 - 2015-11-18 16:21:17 UTC
This is a pointless thread.

CCP need the money, end of discussion.

All that remains is to see how CCP will implement it.

This is not a signature.