Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center

Thank you for this. I know a lot of people are eagerly awaiting the Rorqual changes.

You are killing capital warfare for anyone that cannot field > 300-400 people with the EWAR changes and removing the skill factor.

Two questions more questions for this list:

1) Is there any chance of keeping the ability to fit remote capacitor transfers, but not the armour reps? While the need to power remote reps will be disappearing, the ability to quickly cap up after jumping while keeping a combat fit would potentially be compromised. Additionally, given the difference in effectiveness between armour and shield passive hardeners, removing the ability for fleet-wide anti-neut capacity to maintain capacitor levels on what the enemy is currently shooting at has potential to skew the meta between armour and shield by virtue of game design. Is the introduction of capital neuts really a good time to severely curtail their counter gameplay? Making neuting more effective while making capacitor 'repair' more difficult seems something which should receive considerable thought.

2. I saw your reply to my earlier question about the state of blap dreads (thanks for taking the time to reply to my plethora of questions btw) regarding more freedom to tweak their guns; is there any possibility of keeping the option for current blap dreads alive as a scripted siege module or something which would affect only the high angle guns? Putting such a script in lets you tweak statistics to your heart's content while not eliminating the option for a high-investment, high-dps platform which requires significant support. Such a role would be distinct from what we see with high angle guns, and could easily avoid stepping on the toes of whatever alterations seem necessary for anti-capital guns.

1. Will be there a skill split to Carriers and FAX?

2. Do you consider remapping base hull bonus on carriers ( when you exclude remote rep bonus).
If yes , do you consider the ability for players to change carrier skill? (for example, only to max out fighter DPS i skilled thanny to lvl 5, while keeping rest carriers on lvl 4) I know that this is a lot to ask.

3. The remap of capitals make many fits obsolete. We can change basic fitting , but all isk we spent to fit expensive rigs will be mostly lost. Can we get ability to recover rigs? We are talking about total remap of this ship class. Maybe it can be solved automatically by moving fitted rigs to cargo on all capitals during the patch. Old rigs need to be resized , as many capitals have still large rigs.

4. Have you considered creating pirate faction fighters?

5. Do you plan fixing wreck EHP? When i kill a (super)capital fleet i want the ability to take all things from the wrecks.

It would be a very interesting concept to link ewar resistance to sensor strength, giving eccm modules more dynamic function instead of just having it as a seperate entity that only benifits caps.

This was in reference to supercaps; currently they are both ewar immune and can't receive things like remote tracking or sensor boosts. Will remote assistance be possible for these ships with ewar resistance, and if so will it be reduced?

Given the changes being made to fighters, in order to introduce squadrons; Is this an idea you plan to carry over to sub-cap drones?


With the changes coming to ewar on capitals, do you also plan to change Marauders to ewar resistance, or will they remain ewar immune in bastion? (please say they're staying immune)

I would like to hear the reasoning behind removing siege/triage EWAR immunity. Currently, entering siege/truage requires you to make some big tradeoffs since you can't receive remote assistance of any kind, nor can you move. Since we already make these tradeoffs to gain EWAR immunity as well as big damage/remote/local rep bonuses, why do you feel it is necessary to remove the EWAR immunity too?

Well, manny got ejected from CSM for allegedly leaking something. I am not going to get into it.

I will tell you that I learned about Capital changes in their entirety a week before Vegas from a Goon on Slack, and there were no less than 4 CCP devs talking in the channel, so they knew.

I have no knowledge how that person found out, nor do I care

marader vs dreadnout, marader WINS
great CCP
you just kill self defence group of dreads, and carriers in w-space againts fleet.