These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dev Blog: Exploring The Character Bazaar & Skill Trading

First post First post First post
Author
Corraidhin Farsaidh
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#1521 - 2015-10-16 09:56:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Corraidhin Farsaidh
Surely this idea amounts to giving older players more ways to make isk that simply aren't available to younger players. For instance I have a character trained up for POS management. He doesn't really do much else than that and PI but I still train as I still have to PLEX him. Now I would simply throw in a pair of +5's and train all skills on that branch starting with the lowest multipliers first.

I would also use a remap to max out those attributes thus giving perfect training rate to throw those skills at another player or character. It would probably become necessary for me to do this as PLEX will jump in price if this idea is implemented. New players will benefit from this only if they enjoy being rapidly milked for cash early on in the game.

Ed: Also isn't this just effectiviley allowing SP laundering from an awox character? Won't sell on the bazaar due to reputation so just slice and dice the brain and feed it to other alts instead.
Uber Pie
#1522 - 2015-10-16 09:56:16 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
Uber Pie wrote:
Buying SP for ISK/PLEX/Cash is already taking place at the character bazaar, so let's not hide our heads in the sand and pretend it's not taking place already.

Two comments from my end to limit abuse:


  • A max limit of SP injections per year is a good idea I read in the thread. 2.5m SP is about a year's training @ 2610 SP per hr and there's a ton you can do with 2.5m SP reallocated. 5m is over the top in my book.

  • A timer between SP injections as we have for Neural remapping. 1 year per injection sounds reasonable.


2.5mil sp is not a years worth of training


You're absolutely right - my bad, missed a zero somewhere: It's 23m SP, so perhaps something between 10-20m would be more appropriate.

CorporationsUnlimited™ - Providing New Eden with High Faction Standing Corporations since 2010

Don ZOLA
Omniscient Order
#1523 - 2015-10-16 09:57:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Don ZOLA
Divine Entervention wrote:
Don ZOLA wrote:
Divine Entervention wrote:
So there isn't anything really wrong with the change, it's just "principle"?

Like, it's a great change that will most definitely result in alot more newer players trying the game and possibly sticking around long enough for us all to enjoy some new content via interaction with different people.

But because the idea is similar to pay to win, even though it's been established that it's not pay to win since skill points do not equal winning, we're revolting against it?

So the United States of America is blowing up Hospitals. All western countries are spying on and collecting data on all of their citizens for whatever nefarious purposes they can dream up. . .

But this is where we draw the line? This is the topic that gets the spergers blood boiling?

An idea that we correlate to pay to win, even though it's not, but we say it is because money is involved?

How silly. People like you are why I have such a superiority complex.


Stop being ignorant for a start and read arguments people write and stop repeating bs.


I can say this exact same thing to you and it will be just as true, and probably more so.


You can say, but the difference is that i have made numerous arguments against this and you did not manage to counter a single one. All you do is just repeat this is great idea and that it will be great benefit. I challenged that multiple times, yet it seems your superiority complex does not allow you to get in "fight' where you can lose so you stick to spamming same bs.

Edit: so just you saying it will not make it true at all, it will just make you look dumb ;)

There are 2 rules in a successful life: 1. Don't tell people everything you know

Crashys
State War Academy
Caldari State
#1524 - 2015-10-16 09:57:50 UTC
RIP EVE.

So this mean i can finally stop playing this game?
This is another way of EVE pretending to 'balance' things??

By having no respect for the fact i'm playing this crap since 2003 granting newbies easy ride to have same SPs as me as long as they are wealthy and buy toons of Plexs -> Convert to ISK -> Update char????

Does this mean finally "Chinese farming factories"???

Another invention from CCP that basically are trying to take as much as they can on a failscading game??

Well, that's why i started receiving messages from friends saying they will drop EVE Soon(tm). Now it makes sense. Nice one CCP.
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#1525 - 2015-10-16 10:00:40 UTC
Don ZOLA wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
Tex Raynor wrote:
Love it.
I suggest considering placing a cap, say around 150 or 200 mil sp, at which point sp cannot be injected. Otherwise one could technically purchase his way all up to maximum skillpoints - not sure if I am ok with that.


there was a post earlier explaining what the cost would be to have max level, that wont happen...


There are people who spend thousands, even tents of thousands on this game, why do you think it is not going to happen? Rare cases of course, but it will happen.


if these people spend that amount already then whats the issue because they are already paying rl cash to gain an advantage

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Don ZOLA
Omniscient Order
#1526 - 2015-10-16 10:01:47 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
Don ZOLA wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
Tex Raynor wrote:
Love it.
I suggest considering placing a cap, say around 150 or 200 mil sp, at which point sp cannot be injected. Otherwise one could technically purchase his way all up to maximum skillpoints - not sure if I am ok with that.


there was a post earlier explaining what the cost would be to have max level, that wont happen...


There are people who spend thousands, even tents of thousands on this game, why do you think it is not going to happen? Rare cases of course, but it will happen.


if these people spend that amount already then whats the issue because they are already paying rl cash to gain an advantage


The issue is that this is supposed to help new players and it will not.

There are 2 rules in a successful life: 1. Don't tell people everything you know

Patrick Yaa
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#1527 - 2015-10-16 10:02:41 UTC
This is absolutely NOT targetted towards new players. Guybrush logs into the game, does the tutorial, sees the big spaceships, buys the skillpoints, and BAM he can fly an Abaddon/Raven/whatever, which he promptly buy withs a PLEX. yay. now what.
Chances are, the shiny new ship will end up killed soon enough, because the only guns that kind of work will be faction guns. But hey, you just got a billion, money to spend.
Even if Guybrush buys more skills, he still doesn't have the experience or ANYTHING required to fly a ship that size. He will be eaten by rats, because his tank isn't good enough, he will be hunted for the shinies.
and this is all just in the FIRST FREAKIING WEEK he plays. yay, money spent on a game and woops he's gone. congrats.

This might be good for intermediate players who are already in a corp and want to fly a doctrine, but this. is. not. for. new. players.

goddammit


Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#1528 - 2015-10-16 10:03:18 UTC
Don ZOLA wrote:

You can say, but the difference is that i have made numerous arguments against this and you did not manage to counter a single one.
Not to get in the middle of your little spat, but I just want to respond to that one thing.

Maybe your arguments aren't as grand as you think they are. Perhaps people feel they are not worth responding to as they are unrealistic at best and outright fabrications at worst.

Or something.

Mr Epeen Cool
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#1529 - 2015-10-16 10:04:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Lan Wang
Don ZOLA wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
Don ZOLA wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
Tex Raynor wrote:
Love it.
I suggest considering placing a cap, say around 150 or 200 mil sp, at which point sp cannot be injected. Otherwise one could technically purchase his way all up to maximum skillpoints - not sure if I am ok with that.


there was a post earlier explaining what the cost would be to have max level, that wont happen...


There are people who spend thousands, even tents of thousands on this game, why do you think it is not going to happen? Rare cases of course, but it will happen.


if these people spend that amount already then whats the issue because they are already paying rl cash to gain an advantage


The issue is that this is supposed to help new players and it will not.


Quoted cost from previous pages:

3. The cost of buying SP will become increasing expensive. To give some numbers to this. To get a 20 million SP character with the current method I'd have to buy 22,750,000 SP to inject. That is, I have to buy 13.75% more SP than I am attempting to end up at. If I want to jump to 50 million SP I have to actually buy 60,250,000 SP or about 21% SP over where I'll end up. One poster blathered on about how there'd be all these characters with 600 million SP. Just to get to 500 million SP one would have to buy 3.495 billion SP. Yes, with a fracking 'B'...billion. So STFU about that ****.

So its not really going to be very economical to max level characters, once you get to the certain sp its going to be more viable buying a character from the bazaar

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

darkchild's corpse
Rens Nursing Home
#1530 - 2015-10-16 10:05:06 UTC
Divine Entervention wrote:
Don ZOLA wrote:
Divine Entervention wrote:
So there isn't anything really wrong with the change, it's just "principle"?

Like, it's a great change that will most definitely result in alot more newer players trying the game and possibly sticking around long enough for us all to enjoy some new content via interaction with different people.

But because the idea is similar to pay to win, even though it's been established that it's not pay to win since skill points do not equal winning, we're revolting against it?

So the United States of America is blowing up Hospitals. All western countries are spying on and collecting data on all of their citizens for whatever nefarious purposes they can dream up. . .

But this is where we draw the line? This is the topic that gets the spergers blood boiling?

An idea that we correlate to pay to win, even though it's not, but we say it is because money is involved?

How silly. People like you are why I have such a superiority complex.


Stop being ignorant for a start and read arguments people write and stop repeating bs.


I can say this exact same thing to you and it will be just as true, and probably more so.


bullshit. he is making valid points spreaded all over the thread. he even explained why it would not lead to new players and this is were i agree with him.

this new mechanic is defnetly pay to win wich also was explained in this thread several times.
Divine Entervention
Doomheim
#1531 - 2015-10-16 10:06:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Divine Entervention
Don ZOLA wrote:
Divine Entervention wrote:
Don ZOLA wrote:
Divine Entervention wrote:
So there isn't anything really wrong with the change, it's just "principle"?

Like, it's a great change that will most definitely result in alot more newer players trying the game and possibly sticking around long enough for us all to enjoy some new content via interaction with different people.

But because the idea is similar to pay to win, even though it's been established that it's not pay to win since skill points do not equal winning, we're revolting against it?

So the United States of America is blowing up Hospitals. All western countries are spying on and collecting data on all of their citizens for whatever nefarious purposes they can dream up. . .

But this is where we draw the line? This is the topic that gets the spergers blood boiling?

An idea that we correlate to pay to win, even though it's not, but we say it is because money is involved?

How silly. People like you are why I have such a superiority complex.


Stop being ignorant for a start and read arguments people write and stop repeating bs.


I can say this exact same thing to you and it will be just as true, and probably more so.


You can say, but the difference is that i have made numerous arguments against this and you did not manage to counter a single one. All you do is just repeat this is great idea and that it will be great benefit. I challenged that multiple times, yet it seems your superiority complex does not allow you to get in "fight' where you can lose so you stick to spamming same bs.

Edit: so just you saying it will not make it true at all, it will just make you look dumb ;)


It's not pay to win. Skill points don't equal winning.

If anything, buying PLEX is MORE pay to win because with tons of ISK from selling PLEX, you can pay an entire alliance to kick another alliance out of their home.

I don't see you crying on the forums about my ability to spend $10000 on plex and paying mercenaries to hellcamp others out of the game.

This isn't pay to win, at all.

It's like spending money to buy a new dress to wear to the big dance. O that Raven show cases my attributes much better than this incurses does. I'll be sure to have all the boys looking at my killboard if I wear that!

This entire thread is just full of a bunch of non-sensical crying about how the sky is falling. . . . but we're in space! There's no sky. It's just more space followed by more space, except now we're going to see people who've been playing for only 3 months flying around in ships that use to take 8 months to fly.

It's not a big deal. It doesn't change anything and the thought that it does is plain and simple a testament to yours and everyone else who agrees with your sentiment that you're irrational and over reacting at the mere thought of change, even though it's a change for the better.


Your crying is the same as dudes in 1956 crying about how back in their day it use to take them 3 weeks to drive across country and sure, now with the new interstate system it only takes 1, but by-golly it just ain't right dammit! If it was only suppose to take a few days to drive across the country, it would've only took that long back when I use to do it when I was a wee lad!
Don ZOLA
Omniscient Order
#1532 - 2015-10-16 10:07:02 UTC
Mr Epeen wrote:
Don ZOLA wrote:

You can say, but the difference is that i have made numerous arguments against this and you did not manage to counter a single one.
Not to get in the middle of your little spat, but I just want to respond to that one thing.

Maybe your arguments aren't as grand as you think they are. Perhaps people feel they are not worth responding to as they are unrealistic at best and outright fabrications at worst.

Or something.

Mr Epeen Cool


If they were not good they would be quite easy to be challenged. And I am sure people would enjoy to do it. Considering how much "support" they are pushing into this and answering anything they can I am sure they would spend 1 min to make my arguments void and get me out of the discussion. You do not seem to be familiar with how forums work? :P

There are 2 rules in a successful life: 1. Don't tell people everything you know

Dave stark
#1533 - 2015-10-16 10:07:05 UTC
Don ZOLA wrote:
The issue is that this is supposed to help new players and it will not.


think i missed the line in the devblog that said that.

could you quote it for me, my eyesight seems to be failing me in my old age

Devblog wrote:
For those reasons, we’ve been wanting to take a look at improving the Bazaar for some time now. Recently, we’ve seen new threads emerging where EVE players discuss options to help new players with progression. The combination of your threads and our Character Bazaar evaluation together were that extra kick in the pants to get us into gear.


they said that us discussing helping new players has kicked them in to gear, not that this idea is for new players.
Hashtag Rare Pepe
Doomheim
#1534 - 2015-10-16 10:08:05 UTC
Reiisha wrote:
Can we just all agree on this being a really bad idea and nip it in the bud?

CCP already is on a slippery slope with everything that's going on. They don't need to give themselves the push to go down all the way.


No?
Lim Hiaret
Hiaret Family
#1535 - 2015-10-16 10:08:26 UTC
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_gap

Eve is dying, eve is dying, yeah yeah yeah, eve is dying...
Now I'm against it
But
Eve is dying, eve is dying, yeah yeah yeah, eve is dying...

Also free gold plated dominix for vets only, rainbow coloured text in local for vets only, name a planet for vets only, name a system for vets only...

No? Ah never mind...
Its friday...
Don ZOLA
Omniscient Order
#1536 - 2015-10-16 10:09:38 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:

Quoted cost from previous pages:

3. The cost of buying SP will become increasing expensive. To give some numbers to this. To get a 20 million SP character with the current method I'd have to buy 22,750,000 SP to inject. That is, I have to buy 13.75% more SP than I am attempting to end up at. If I want to jump to 50 million SP I have to actually buy 60,250,000 SP or about 21% SP over where I'll end up. One poster blathered on about how there'd be all these characters with 600 million SP. Just to get to 500 million SP one would have to buy 3.495 billion SP. Yes, with a fracking 'B'...billion. So STFU about that ****.

So its not really going to be very economical to max level characters, once you get to the certain sp its going to be more viable buying a character from the bazaar


I agree with that. But I never mentioned it as a key issue. How about you read this and then comment : https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6101499#post6101499

There are 2 rules in a successful life: 1. Don't tell people everything you know

Sunstar Jonni
Leviathan Rising
Fortis Et Certus
#1537 - 2015-10-16 10:09:39 UTC
Seriouly is Rise running around smacking people with the wabbajack again!
NO NO NO

I can see spending plex to change appearance\name would like some accounting in corp history for that however.

Even notification that a Char has changed hands.

But this SP buying and selling No I do not think this could ever work and not be completly abused.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#1538 - 2015-10-16 10:10:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Patrick Yaa wrote:
This is absolutely NOT targetted towards new players. Guybrush logs into the game, does the tutorial, sees the big spaceships, buys the skillpoints, and BAM he can fly an Abaddon/Raven/whatever, which he promptly buy withs a PLEX. yay. now what.
Chances are, the shiny new ship will end up killed soon enough, because the only guns that kind of work will be faction guns. But hey, you just got a billion, money to spend.
Even if Guybrush buys more skills, he still doesn't have the experience or ANYTHING required to fly a ship that size. He will be eaten by rats, because his tank isn't good enough, he will be hunted for the shinies.
and this is all just in the FIRST FREAKIING WEEK he plays. yay, money spent on a game and woops he's gone. congrats.

This might be good for intermediate players who are already in a corp and want to fly a doctrine, but this. is. not. for. new. players.

goddammit


Would that be Mr Threepwood?

I agree this isn't going to benefit new players, despite some people thinking otherwise. I normally laugh at the Eve is dying threads, unfortunately with this change CCP seem determined to grab all the cash they can while hammering nails into the coffin and taking it in that direction with ill conceived crap like this, all the while saying "think of the children"

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Gully Alex Foyle
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1539 - 2015-10-16 10:11:16 UTC
Divine Entervention wrote:
So there isn't anything really wrong with the change, it's just "principle"?
Obviously you don't care about the principle. And you know what? From a personal perspective, in this case I don't care either.

When I'm out shooting people, I never think about how many SP they have and if those + or -5% will make any difference, because usually they simply don't.


Problem is, many people care about principles. I'm worried that because of principles and underlying game culture/style/philosophy there will be many more people leaving the game or simply enjoying it less than people joining or enjoying it more.


Also, I expect that the f*ing company making the game care about principles. I expect them to create and maintain meaningful and fun game mechanics, not offer players ways to skip them altogether if, and only if, they fork out $.

Make space glamorous! Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter!

Don ZOLA
Omniscient Order
#1540 - 2015-10-16 10:11:55 UTC
Divine Entervention wrote:
Don ZOLA wrote:
Divine Entervention wrote:
Don ZOLA wrote:
Divine Entervention wrote:
So there isn't anything really wrong with the change, it's just "principle"?

Like, it's a great change that will most definitely result in alot more newer players trying the game and possibly sticking around long enough for us all to enjoy some new content via interaction with different people.

But because the idea is similar to pay to win, even though it's been established that it's not pay to win since skill points do not equal winning, we're revolting against it?

So the United States of America is blowing up Hospitals. All western countries are spying on and collecting data on all of their citizens for whatever nefarious purposes they can dream up. . .

But this is where we draw the line? This is the topic that gets the spergers blood boiling?

An idea that we correlate to pay to win, even though it's not, but we say it is because money is involved?

How silly. People like you are why I have such a superiority complex.


Stop being ignorant for a start and read arguments people write and stop repeating bs.


I can say this exact same thing to you and it will be just as true, and probably more so.


You can say, but the difference is that i have made numerous arguments against this and you did not manage to counter a single one. All you do is just repeat this is great idea and that it will be great benefit. I challenged that multiple times, yet it seems your superiority complex does not allow you to get in "fight' where you can lose so you stick to spamming same bs.

Edit: so just you saying it will not make it true at all, it will just make you look dumb ;)


It's not pay to win. Skill points don't equal winning.

If anything, buying PLEX is MORE pay to win because with tons of ISK from selling PLEX, you can pay an entire alliance to kick another alliance out of their home.

I don't see you crying on the forums about my ability to spend $10000 on plex and paying mercenaries to hellcamp others out of the game.

This isn't pay to win, at all.

It's like spending money to buy a new dress to wear to the big dance. O that Raven show cases my attributes much better than this incurses does. I'll be sure to have all the boys looking at my killboard if I wear that!

This entire thread is just full of a bunch of non-sensical crying about how the sky is falling. . . . but we're in space! There's no sky. It's just more space followed by more space, except now we're going to see people who've been playing for only 3 months flying around in ships that use to take 8 months to fly.

It's not a big deal. It doesn't change anything and the thought that it does is plain and simple a testament to yours and everyone else who agrees with your sentiment that you're irrational and over reacting at the mere thought of change, even though it's a change for the better.


Your crying is the same as dudes in 1956 crying about how back in their day it use to take them 3 weeks to drive across country and sure, now with the new interstate system it only takes 1, but by-golly it just ain't right dammit! If it was only suppose to take a few days to drive across the country, it would've only took that long back when I use to do it when I was a wee lad!


Nice post. Really. I just do not see how is it related to my arguments on the issue. So can you please first read some of my posts, for example https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6101499#post6101499 and then counter argument so we avoid your unnecessary spam and making you look like having no clue about what you are trying to counter argument?
Thanks in advance.

There are 2 rules in a successful life: 1. Don't tell people everything you know