These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Plex Prices

First post
Author
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#801 - 2015-09-27 11:46:20 UTC
motie one wrote:
Just how many of your friends have put alts into hibernation because it is too time consuming to grind for the cost of plex? and are unhappy with the loss of funtionality and fun that results in, even though they are still holding on to their main for now?

Zero, as far as I can tell.

My friends have left the game because it is bad, or because other games are better, or because they are getting older and now have wives and kids that take up the time that they used to devote to EVE, or because after playing the game for X years they've just had enough of it.

That said, none of my friends are poor, because they are either independently wealthy in EVE or because they have me as a friend and I **** out money like the proverbial golden goose.
motie one
Secret Passage
#802 - 2015-09-27 11:46:28 UTC  |  Edited by: motie one
Bad Bobby wrote:
Elizabeth Norn wrote:
You are seeing an effect (lower PCU) and attributing it to higher PLEX prices

Whereas I attribute it to the game being terrible for a prolonged period of time, while still asking a very high price for admission.

Predictably a lot of people have decided:

  • "Screw this, I'm going to play a better and/or cheaper game!"
  • "I'll carry on playing, but I'm damned if I'm going to keep sinking RL cash into buying PLEX to sustain myself."
  • "I'll carry on playing, but I'm damned if I'm actually going to pay for a sub."

So PCU drops, PLEX supply reduces and PLEX demand increases.

In case you are interested, #3 is me.


Lots of truth there, the only proviso I would add, is that people are reasonably willing to pay for their main as long as there is some fun, alts however, are still fun to shoot at. But without being able to redeem plex to pay for them, at a reasonable time cost, then they go. Eventually the main follows, if he has not already.

It is not reasonable for anyone to request that you voluntarily, give up a highly profitable, and well played technique, for the good of the game, as others would simply step in and all that that would result in in you losing out.

But in one form or another the unique nature of pilots services, will be clarified, and enforced if needed.
The alternative is really something that cannot persist and expand if we wish EVE to have a healthy future.
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#803 - 2015-09-27 11:49:29 UTC
I can't imagine the hell of playing this game with only one account.

I don't think that's a curse any of my friends are interested in either, except for the few that have been strictly one account only forever. The game just doesn't function very well with only one account, it's almost as if that was intentional.
motie one
Secret Passage
#804 - 2015-09-27 11:54:59 UTC  |  Edited by: motie one
Bad Bobby wrote:
I can't imagine the hell of playing this game with only one account.

I don't think that's a curse any of my friends are interested in either, except for the few that have been strictly one account only forever. The game just doesn't function very well with only one account, it's almost as if that was intentional.

Absolutely true, Plex WAS a mechanism to allow growth into that possibility, and path for players, where one had alts soaking Up commodities from the economy.

Eve is almost impossible, at the least actively unpleasant, without either you or your friends having alts, I for one am seeing fewer and fewer friends with multiple alts. Followed, by fewer and fewer friends.

I am pretty sure we agree with the pattern, if not the route a solution should take.

There really is no argument to be made, that the reduction in the availability of redemptions at a realistically attainable and achievable rate, is seriously affecting the game. There are many other causes, but this is a significant one.

Plex was a shining example of what was special and good with EVE, widely copied, now it is a poor shadow of it's former glory.
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#805 - 2015-09-27 12:09:59 UTC
Bad Bobby wrote:
motie one wrote:
Just how many of your friends have put alts into hibernation because it is too time consuming to grind for the cost of plex? and are unhappy with the loss of funtionality and fun that results in, even though they are still holding on to their main for now?

Zero, as far as I can tell.

My friends have left the game because it is bad, or because other games are better, or because they are getting older and now have wives and kids that take up the time that they used to devote to EVE, or because after playing the game for X years they've just had enough of it.

That said, none of my friends are poor, because they are either independently wealthy in EVE or because they have me as a friend and I **** out money like the proverbial golden goose.

Actually, maybe half of one.

I personally cut down from around 25 subbed accounts to my current 8-9 about a year ago. I didn't do that because the PLEX prices rose, although that certainly gave me an additional incentive to do so.

I did that because CCP banned my main for something I didn't do, made me go through customer service hell to get myself re-instated, dealing with the most unhelpful and rude people I've ever had to deal with in customer service roles, gave me the most weak apology I have ever seen when they finally figured out they had banned me in error and gave me an insult for reimbursement.

However, I've chosen not to re-sub those accounts, even a year after the event, because (1) CCP still haven't made good on their past behaviour and (2) High PLEX prices make the cold hard business maths of re-subbing those accounts somewhat unattractive.
motie one
Secret Passage
#806 - 2015-09-27 13:28:16 UTC
That must be a miserable experience, my sympathies.
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#807 - 2015-09-27 13:46:51 UTC
motie one wrote:
That must be a miserable experience, my sympathies.

At the time it was a pain, but EVE is full of such pains and the life of a successful EVE player is shaped by how they adapt and overcome such obstacles.

I'm more concerned about the fact that CCP lost over £3000 in income from me as a result of a minor act of incompetence and I'm certain that I wasn't the only person impacted. Despite the fact that each cancelled sub had that as the reason for cancellation there hasn't been even so much as a mail to smooth things over with me. If I treated my RL clients like that, I wouldn't have any clients.
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#808 - 2015-09-27 14:09:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Bad Bobby
So back on topic.

The PLEX price is now 1184 Buy / 1206 Sell. I don't think any suggested crash is happening.

We're going to see 1.3B again, but more slowly.

We may well see 1.5B by December.

There will be the traditional slump during the holiday season.

Then in the new year PLEX prices will reach for the stars.

This is assuming that CCP don't make any fundamental changes. I'm not talking about central bank intervention, because those will happen when needed to prevent insane spikes as we have seen in the past.

I personally don't care too much if CCP does or doesn't make any fundamental changes because I'm happy with PLEX price being the price people are prepared to pay for PLEX. But you, motie one, have a desire to see some change to deal with your perceived issue. The idea of a NPC order is ridiculous and entirely the opposite of the way EVE is headed. so you should give up any hope of that or anything like it. You could however get behind more viable changes to bring about your desired lowering of the PLEX price, which would have to be something to do with account structure and subscription changes.

Personally, I'd like to see myself only have one account with all my characters on it, not 9 active accounts and 16 inactive accounts. I'd like to see the ability to pay monthly for the particular services I require from CCP. Be that the ability to train X characters on my account, the ability to log on X concurrent characters on my account or the ability to do any other thing CCP can dream up. I'd also love to see this because it would herald the end of having to pay 2 PLEX whenever I need to move a character from one of my own accounts to another of my own accounts for organisational purposes. It would also mean I'd only need one username and password rather than the dictionary of username/password pairs I currently have to manage.

If PLEX become simply the units of payment for the services you use on your account, then PLEX will be a lot better than they are now and accounts will be a lot better than they are now.

If CCP also reduce the RL currency price of Subs/PLEX, we'll probably see some, but not all, of the change you desire.
Ria Nieyli
Nieyli Enterprises
SL33PERS
#809 - 2015-09-27 14:40:35 UTC
Bad Bobby wrote:
I can't imagine the hell of playing this game with only one account.

I don't think that's a curse any of my friends are interested in either, except for the few that have been strictly one account only forever. The game just doesn't function very well with only one account, it's almost as if that was intentional.


As a tangent, something something bad design.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#810 - 2015-09-27 15:41:36 UTC
Bad Bobby wrote:

The only solution, if indeed there is one, is to encourage more people to buy PLEX with RL currency and make them available on the market. This will occur naturally once more people are playing the game, enjoying it and are willing to invest more RL currency in it.

My personal feeling is that CCP should lower the monthy subscription cost and the PLEX cost, because in today's gaming marketplace the product they are providing isn't worth the price they are charging for it. But that's very much my personal opinion and CCP's numbers may not agree with me or their financial situation may not be able to endure that change.


My thoughts precisely. Not least because an EVE with 1.5x players paying $10/month is substantially more resilient, attractive and entertaining than one with 1.0x players paying $15/month.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#811 - 2015-09-27 15:57:31 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Bad Bobby wrote:

The only solution, if indeed there is one, is to encourage more people to buy PLEX with RL currency and make them available on the market. This will occur naturally once more people are playing the game, enjoying it and are willing to invest more RL currency in it.

My personal feeling is that CCP should lower the monthy subscription cost and the PLEX cost, because in today's gaming marketplace the product they are providing isn't worth the price they are charging for it. But that's very much my personal opinion and CCP's numbers may not agree with me or their financial situation may not be able to endure that change.


My thoughts precisely. Not least because an EVE with 1.5x players paying $10/month is substantially more resilient, attractive and entertaining than one with 1.0x players paying $15/month.

Assuming the hamsters don't die under the strain, I can't see any reason why we wouldn't want that.

When you were on the CSM, was the subject of pricing ever discussed?
motie one
Secret Passage
#812 - 2015-09-27 16:19:11 UTC  |  Edited by: motie one
Bad Bobby wrote:
So back on topic.

The PLEX price is now 1184 Buy / 1206 Sell. I don't think any suggested crash is happening.

We're going to see 1.3B again, but more slowly.

We may well see 1.5B by December.

There will be the traditional slump during the holiday season.

Then in the new year PLEX prices will reach for the stars.

This is assuming that CCP don't make any fundamental changes. I'm not talking about central bank intervention, because those will happen when needed to prevent insane spikes as we have seen in the past.

I personally don't care too much if CCP does or doesn't make any fundamental changes because I'm happy with PLEX price being the price people are prepared to pay for PLEX. But you, motie one, have a desire to see some change to deal with your perceived issue. The idea of a NPC order is ridiculous and entirely the opposite of the way EVE is headed. so you should give up any hope of that or anything like it. You could however get behind more viable changes to bring about your desired lowering of the PLEX price, which would have to be something to do with account structure and subscription changes.

Personally, I'd like to see myself only have one account with all my characters on it, not 9 active accounts and 16 inactive accounts. I'd like to see the ability to pay monthly for the particular services I require from CCP. Be that the ability to train X characters on my account, the ability to log on X concurrent characters on my account or the ability to do any other thing CCP can dream up. I'd also love to see this because it would herald the end of having to pay 2 PLEX whenever I need to move a character from one of my own accounts to another of my own accounts for organisational purposes. It would also mean I'd only need one username and password rather than the dictionary of username/password pairs I currently have to manage.

If PLEX become simply the units of payment for the services you use on your account, then PLEX will be a lot better than they are now and accounts will be a lot better than they are now.

If CCP also reduce the RL currency price of Subs/PLEX, we'll probably see some, but not all, of the change you desire.


Do not be too distracted, by attributing my comments to personal desire.
I simply desire working tools.

What changes occur to restore Plex into a means of Average players gaining some benefit from it's existance, are really a matter for CCP to design, they can take the long term, if they have time and manipulate and wrangle it down to a level they deem viable, or if time is short, implement a design that MAY be similar to my suggestions or something quite different , but either way, drawing a line in the sand stating that players speculate with this commodity at their peril.

It can be argued that such behaviour is not like EVE, but in reality, it is very much so, one does not exploit clearly defined in game tools without a reaction in return. The fact that this has not been visible up to now, does not mean they will close their eyes and mouths indefinately.

All that is really needed is for CCP to state how importantly they see Plex as a tool.
Elizabeth Norn
Nornir Research
Nornir Empire
#813 - 2015-09-27 18:49:23 UTC
Why must the average player be able to afford in-game PLEX with ISK? I would imagine the average player is already paying for the subscription with IRL $ anyway.
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#814 - 2015-09-27 19:02:53 UTC
Elizabeth Norn wrote:
Why must the average player be able to afford in-game PLEX with ISK? I would imagine the average player is already paying for the subscription with IRL $ anyway.


I don't know, but it seems to be an assumption held by most people who think PLEX prices are too high. Personally I think it is a dumb assumption. It is dumb because it means half the Eve population is paying via PLEX with ISK, while the other half is paying via subs and also buying PLEX.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Lieu Thiesant
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#815 - 2015-09-27 19:37:42 UTC
It seems the high prices yearly stable increase percentages affect the player base or logged accounts decline ...


Less players could afford to pay their pilot extension license for extra time at 1.5b ISK.
Less players at 2b ISK.

Unless...
Unless the cash flow increases and is directly related to the PLEx values.
motie one
Secret Passage
#816 - 2015-09-27 20:24:01 UTC  |  Edited by: motie one
Elizabeth Norn wrote:
Why must the average player be able to afford in-game PLEX with ISK? I would imagine the average player is already paying for the subscription with IRL $ anyway.


Most players will pay for their primary character with real world subs, and alts with Plex. Except many are not any more, hence the issue.

Eve without alts is very limited once you get past a certain point, and after hibernating alts the game is less fun.

Think about what happens next when the game is less fun.

Hopefully CCP have begun to ignore plex volume and taken a Long hard look at the ratio of redemptions, and are acting accordingly.

The only time a Plex has a true value to CCP, and the game, is when it is originally sold and when it is redeemed.
Lieu Thiesant
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#817 - 2015-09-27 20:25:07 UTC
motie one wrote:
Elizabeth Norn wrote:
Why must the average player be able to afford in-game PLEX with ISK? I would imagine the average player is already paying for the subscription with IRL $ anyway.


Most players will pay for their primary character with real world subs, and alts with Plex. Except many are not any more, hence the issue.

That makes sense, still a lot of people.
Elizabeth Norn
Nornir Research
Nornir Empire
#818 - 2015-09-27 23:52:47 UTC
Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#819 - 2015-09-28 00:42:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Sabriz Adoudel
Elizabeth Norn wrote:
Perhaps CCP doesn't want alts, perhaps they want players Blink.


What CCP want is people with RL money that are willing to spend it on EVE, either to pay for a subscription, or to engage in the sanctioned RMT that is purchasing a PLEX pack from an authorized distributor.

Either works.

All that end users of PLEX do for CCP is change how desireable sanctioned RMT is to people by altering how much ISK they get for their PLEX pack. Which, ironically, is exactly the same thing that a speculator with a trillion liquid ISK buying up 900 PLEX from the in-game market with intent to resell them 'when the time is right' does.


Edit: Worth saying that the changed PLEX:ISK exchange ratio has one more big effect that's actually a bit of a negative. If a player desires 8b ISK and wishes to get there via sanctioned RMT, two years ago they'd have needed to buy a much larger PLEX pack than they do today. Yet the ISK price of many of the goods they might consider buying haven't changed that much.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#820 - 2015-09-28 03:11:37 UTC
Lieu Thiesant wrote:
It seems the high prices yearly stable increase percentages affect the player base or logged accounts decline ...


Less players could afford to pay their pilot extension license for extra time at 1.5b ISK.
Less players at 2b ISK.

Unless...
Unless the cash flow increases and is directly related to the PLEx values.


Dude you get an F in time series analysis.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online