These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP Dev Acquires New Order Permit

First post
Author
Avvy
Doomheim
#21 - 2015-09-27 03:53:55 UTC
Syeed Ameer Ali wrote:
ISD Atomic Dove wrote:

Also while this will most certainly be a galvanizing thread, as is the norm with anything C.O.D.E. on our forums it seems, we would find it great if we could all avoid antagonizing other players style of play.


Antagonizing other player's style of play is the whole purpose of these forums isn't it? Is this your first day? You're kind of cute.


Antagonizing other players on the forums just for the sake of it, is what trolls do and trolling is prohibited.
Amyclas Amatin
SUNDERING
Goonswarm Federation
#22 - 2015-09-27 04:13:00 UTC
What we need next is a human face to put on James 315...

For more information on the New Order of High-Sec, please visit: http://www.minerbumping.com/

Remember that whenever you have a bad day in EVE, the correct reponse is "Thank you CCP, may I please have another?"

Zahara Cody
Imperial Corrections Service.
#23 - 2015-09-27 04:16:56 UTC
I'd buy a permit if it came with a physical copy like that. Great idea. Thumbs up.

Hating is free, that's why poor people do it the best.

TackyTachy1
Doomheim
#24 - 2015-09-27 04:18:27 UTC
I Like the code guys; I got a couple characters that enjoy blowing them up. GankerBumping is cool!

Forum Rep for a bunch of characters, couple corps and one seriously Lost In Space multiboxer.

Ima GoodGirl
Aria Shi's Wasted ISK
#25 - 2015-09-27 04:30:57 UTC
Khergit Deserters wrote:
The way I read it, a Code agent just unilaterally presented the permit card thing to Shadowcat. It's not like she bought it, or is endorsing Code. She did let Code photograph her with the permit, but what kind of normal sociable person wouldn't do that?

Actually, if you read her tweet accompanying the photo, she acknowledges that she can "now officially go mining".

The implication of course being that she knows that without a permit, she can't go officially mining.

Seems like at least some form on endorsement.
Ima GoodGirl
Aria Shi's Wasted ISK
#26 - 2015-09-27 04:34:22 UTC
Syeed Ameer Ali wrote:
ISD Atomic Dove wrote:

Also while this will most certainly be a galvanizing thread, as is the norm with anything C.O.D.E. on our forums it seems, we would find it great if we could all avoid antagonizing other players style of play.


Antagonizing other player's style of play is the whole purpose of these forums isn't it? Is this your first day? You're kind of cute.

It's the whole purpose of the game, not just the forums.

It would be pretty boring if we didn't antagonise others styles of play.
Vortexo VonBrenner
Doomheim
#27 - 2015-09-27 04:49:31 UTC
Well...whatever one thinks of code, I think one would have to admit that was a fairly good bit of meta. Guy made / saw an opportunity. Definitely a propaganda coup for lord jimmy and his merry muck of misbegotten minions.


Oinola Akachi
State War Academy
Caldari State
#28 - 2015-09-27 05:29:29 UTC
It's miner ransom before the destruction opportunity.

It will not protect you from other gankers, but just so you know, the receiver can afford not to attack.


Other than that, other diplomacy follows with agreements.


Some reason I don't pay is that I do miner ganking too.
Bellatrix Invicta
Doomheim
#29 - 2015-09-27 07:09:39 UTC
Ima GoodGirl wrote:
Khergit Deserters wrote:
The way I read it, a Code agent just unilaterally presented the permit card thing to Shadowcat. It's not like she bought it, or is endorsing Code. She did let Code photograph her with the permit, but what kind of normal sociable person wouldn't do that?

Actually, if you read her tweet accompanying the photo, she acknowledges that she can "now officially go mining".

The implication of course being that she knows that without a permit, she can't go officially mining.

Seems like at least some form on endorsement.


Endorsement or just a smart miner? My ISK is on the latter.

If you think you've won, think again.

The CODE always wins.

Salvos Rhoska
#30 - 2015-09-27 08:25:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Ima GoodGirl wrote:
Khergit Deserters wrote:
The way I read it, a Code agent just unilaterally presented the permit card thing to Shadowcat. It's not like she bought it, or is endorsing Code. She did let Code photograph her with the permit, but what kind of normal sociable person wouldn't do that?

Actually, if you read her tweet accompanying the photo, she acknowledges that she can "now officially go mining".

The implication of course being that she knows that without a permit, she can't go officially mining.

Seems like at least some form on endorsement.

This.

And my hate of twit(ter) deepens.

Gj CODE on OP success.
Crumplecorn
Eve Cluster Explorations
#31 - 2015-09-27 08:37:41 UTC
Avvy wrote:
Syeed Ameer Ali wrote:
ISD Atomic Dove wrote:

Also while this will most certainly be a galvanizing thread, as is the norm with anything C.O.D.E. on our forums it seems, we would find it great if we could all avoid antagonizing other players style of play.


Antagonizing other player's style of play is the whole purpose of these forums isn't it? Is this your first day? You're kind of cute.


Antagonizing other players on the forums just for the sake of it, is what trolls do and trolling is prohibited.
In my day...

Witty Image - Stream

Not Liking this post hurts my RL feelings and will be considered harassment

Otso Bakarti
Doomheim
#32 - 2015-09-27 08:54:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Otso Bakarti
Disgusting. Cool
Have a nice day!

There just isn't anything that can be said!

Snagletooth Johnson
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#33 - 2015-09-27 11:32:57 UTC
So...all CODE mining permits are proven to be useless counterfeit, as none of them are laminated, and thus are void.


You all just got ripped off, nice job.
Deletus
Doomheim
#34 - 2015-09-27 13:45:16 UTC
Hello,

as the creator of those permits, all i can say is that it was merely a gift for the CCP staff meant to show some gratitude towards them for making an awesome game that i enjoy a lot.

I went to the player gathering as a Code Agent, naturally i had to bring permits. Blink

If someone takes offense i can't help it. When i made them i did not expect to see a forum post about it.


Salvos Rhoska
#35 - 2015-09-27 14:19:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Well done on OP success to AWOX CCP staff.

As Dev states in Twit(ter) you now need a CODE license to officially mine.

Furthermore, you dont need an ingame license, you need a printed/laminated IRL version.

Apparently you also dont need to pay for them with isk, you just need to make a CODE agent "thankful".
Buoytender Bob
Ronin Exploration Mission and Mining
#36 - 2015-09-27 14:57:29 UTC
I find it kind of ironic that the official papers/permits needed to function in hi-sec and touted by an official of the ruling group originated from Berlin. Guess that is because of my age compared to the rest of the gaming group; brings up some RL memories/issues, but that's on me...I understand it for what it was meant to be: a gift to some CCP people who helped make a game so many people love. Well played, CODE. Well played indeed.

To buck the popular trend, I began to Rage Start instead of Rage Quit.

...and every time I get another piece of Carbon, I know exactly what CCP is getting this Christmas.

Deletus
Doomheim
#37 - 2015-09-27 15:38:43 UTC
Buoytender Bob wrote:
I find it kind of ironic that the official papers/permits needed to function in hi-sec and touted by an official of the ruling group originated from Berlin.


It clearly says "Uedama" on the backside.
Salvos Rhoska
#38 - 2015-09-27 15:41:59 UTC
Deletus wrote:
Buoytender Bob wrote:
I find it kind of ironic that the official papers/permits needed to function in hi-sec and touted by an official of the ruling group originated from Berlin.


It clearly says "Uedama" on the backside.


You gave a Dev a license, to perform their natural ingame activities, so that you do not intervene upon them.

Does this not constitute bribery?
Deletus
Doomheim
#39 - 2015-09-27 16:08:59 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Does this not constitute bribery?


Are you for real?
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
#40 - 2015-09-27 16:33:46 UTC
ISD Atomic Dove wrote:
Just chipping in here before anything horrible starts to flare up.

Quote:

18. Impersonation of another party is prohibited.

Forum users are strictly prohibited from impersonating any other party on the EVE Online forums. This includes but is not limited to ISD volunteers, CCP employees, CCP partners and other forum users. This also includes suggesting that an employee of CCP or an ISD volunteer will perform a task for you


While there are being various lines being toed here I would ask you please err on the side of caution and remain posting well within rules of the forums here.


Also while this will most certainly be a galvanizing thread, as is the norm with anything C.O.D.E. on our forums it seems, we would find it great if we could all avoid antagonizing other players style of play.



Just who is impersonating who here, exactly? Is this a reference to the permit-holding Dev's player account?

Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .

Bumble's Space Log