These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Plex Prices

First post
Author
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#781 - 2015-09-26 20:27:57 UTC
motie one wrote:
I do expect speculators to try to shore up their support, before Monday.

As a speculator, I cashed out during the obvious peak. Every pundit I know of called it as being overblown and likely to fall back to ~1.1B, as it did.

So the only speculators left with stocks were either asleep at the wheel or holding regardless with the intention of cashing out during the inevitable year end spike.

Why anyone would worry about propping up today's PLEX price, if it were to fall further, rather than letting it drop so that they could buy in heavily at the new floor, is beyond me.

PLEX is headed up to 1.3B-1.5B, regardless of this recent drop, it just outran itself with the recent spike.
Elizabeth Norn
Nornir Research
Nornir Empire
#782 - 2015-09-26 20:52:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Elizabeth Norn
voetius
Grundrisse
#783 - 2015-09-26 21:00:21 UTC
Gadolf Agalder wrote:


I further predicted


I'm usually a bit sceptical of people that 'predict' things using secret sauce recipes that are too secret to divulge to the masses. After all, if you throw enough darts at the board you are bound to get 180 every now and again.
Zhaceera Armerarram
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#784 - 2015-09-26 22:29:33 UTC
Self fullfilling Prophecies and self fueling arguments really bear no foresight.

Foresight is seeing something going up when it is going down. Something crashing during a long stable period.

"If justice is not for everyone, it is for no one."

motie one
Secret Passage
#785 - 2015-09-26 22:58:15 UTC  |  Edited by: motie one
Bad Bobby wrote:
motie one wrote:
I do expect speculators to try to shore up their support, before Monday.

As a speculator, I cashed out during the obvious peak. Every pundit I know of called it as being overblown and likely to fall back to ~1.1B, as it did.

So the only speculators left with stocks were either asleep at the wheel or holding regardless with the intention of cashing out during the inevitable year end spike.

Why anyone would worry about propping up today's PLEX price, if it were to fall further, rather than letting it drop so that they could buy in heavily at the new floor, is beyond me.

PLEX is headed up to 1.3B-1.5B, regardless of this recent drop, it just outran itself with the recent spike.


Quite logical, your behaviour seems more of a market strategy rather than speculation. Whilst some who wish to see it rise, manipulative speculators, if you will, are clearly putting in stop orders, in an attempt to prevent a visible sell off occuring, and thereby creating a panic.

The greater longer term pressure acting out, is the behaviour of those more major entities, who wish to preserve their much larger investment, that is probably too large to crash out without in turn damaging their investment returns as a result.

I do disagree with your projections as to long term values, I have previously explained why. We are in my opinion going to see one of two scenarios.

A hard reduction, either created by the action of EvE's economists, or a panic reaction, or both in combination, which may already be primed to occur, or the large Holders using market peaks, to divest over the longer term. As always leaving the less aware or less than competent speculators. and those who are blinded by the promise of historic safety, to carry the loss.

I fully understand the logic, where past performance and events extrapolated forward do support your projections, the graph wizardry is persuasive. However past performance, does not guarantee future performance, as we are very well aware of in the real world too. It is a mistake to place too much faith in them. After all I personally know experienced traders on major trading floors, who were convinced the only way sub prime derivatives would go was up. We all know the result of that.

Such peaks, have the habit of deflating in an untidy and extreme manner. The trigger may seem insignificant at the time it occurs.


It will be interesting to witness either way, and I am sure there will still be plenty of money to be made by an intelligent, and aware market player such as yourself, whichever way the market moves.
Gadolf Agalder
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#786 - 2015-09-27 03:15:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Gadolf Agalder
voetius wrote:
Gadolf Agalder wrote:


I further predicted


I'm usually a bit sceptical of people that 'predict' things using secret sauce recipes that are too secret to divulge to the masses. After all, if you throw enough darts at the board you are bound to get 180 every now and again.

...
I further predicted in the publicly announced forecast that ...

...
Edit:
2. The source of the data and forecast info was from the "back to school" time period.

There are factors related to ...
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#787 - 2015-09-27 03:42:16 UTC
voetius wrote:
Gadolf Agalder wrote:
I further predicted

I'm usually a bit sceptical of people that 'predict' things using secret sauce recipes that are too secret to divulge to the masses. After all, if you throw enough darts at the board you are bound to get 180 every now and again.

I think he actually provided support for his claims, it's just I can't make head nor tail of his posting.

For clearer predictions, complete with extensive graph porn of a type far beyond the limits of the in-game market browser, I'd refer you to something I included in my previous posts, in advance of the events predicted therein:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIJVf9qMO5k PLEX analysis starts @ 4:15

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULyk4IryZ6k PLEX analysis starts @ 6:52

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOJIS5McFcQ PLEX analysis starts @ 6:54

I've given the times for the start of the PLEX analysis, but there is plenty of other good content in those videos.

Tbh, I don't think you needed to apply Lockefox's level of market voodoo and entrail scrying in order to predict what was going to happen. I had already made up my mind when I watched his videos on release and he just confirmed what I was already thinking and gave me some nice graphs, trends and justification for what I was already doing in the PLEX market.

I can't remember and am not going to go back and check, but I think delonewolf made similar, if less detailed predictions in his weekly market run down (EVE Talk).

I'd like to hear VV's view on all this.

Gadolf Agalder
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#788 - 2015-09-27 05:14:32 UTC
Thanks for the videos Bad Bobby.

I will review what I advanced in more details and review the source of my finding as was already predicted by others this occurence last year for now.
I first heard of it 2 years ago, and the first time it occured, I didn't understand.
The second time, I didn't understand but I saw it happened.

This time around I took the time to add calculations and marked references so I could get more precisions in my approximations and factors to a list of factors influencing this.


My forecast was from approximation of 10% to 20% change and value change going upward in this time frame.
Do I use graphs?
hell yes.
Do I make graphs?
Yes, that too, I also do drafting.

I use graph & drafts to simplify my analytical mind processes since they require overcoming challenges greater than my simple resources allow.

I create & use those graphs & tools simply to overcome those challenges & to simplify my procedures whether it is reasoning grounds on which to do analysis...

Given, one would have to learn how to read those design to interpret them properly without misinterpretation, but , I create
alternate method to convey the subject without the need to assimilate the design learning process.



When the time period started to occur, I compared my approximative market values with those which occured and the time frames in question.
One reason they were approximative is because I didn't link it.
I didn't even bother to verify the exactitude of my advances since I was confident enough of myself to mention it without verifying by eye witness.
In other words, the original post may still be there with the exact data, I just didn't verify it myself either, although I wrote it myself indeed, which makes a big difference from other posters.

I read nothing of the other post from other posters yet and I am sure that it is loaded with better data than I could provide.
Oinola Akachi
State War Academy
Caldari State
#789 - 2015-09-27 05:37:31 UTC
[v] Remember me ?



I made videos of the PLEx trading Prices which I will edit before publishing to others.

Most of my videos are private on YouTube awaiting editing.

Many parts will be integrated into edited versions.
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#790 - 2015-09-27 05:47:07 UTC
I'm going against my better instincts in engaging you in conversation motie one, because I think you are fundamentally wrong in almost every respect in your philosophy, predictions and understanding of the EVE/PLEX economy.

I suspect that wrongness comes from some underlying bitterness or angst, which is clouding your judgement, because I see that you do have a grip on economic theories, so you clearly have the mental capacity to understand these things, and yet your view seems to have a Gevlon-esque skew away from reality and down your own private rabbit hole.

Please don't take this as a plot to insult or inflame you, I'm just making a single attempt to break through your delusions and bring you back to reality. If that is unsuccessful or unwelcome, then I apologize wholeheartedly.

motie one wrote:
The greater longer term pressure acting out, is the behaviour of those more major entities, who wish to preserve their much larger investment, that is probably too large to crash out without in turn damaging their investment returns as a result.

So, these major entities:

Who are they?

Why do they have both a "much larger investment" in something and yet have to exert massive pressure on propping up the value of this thing in the face of strong fundamental market forces that you think work against them?

I question how such a person amasses a large fortune with which to wield such power in the marketplace if they spend their time investing in things that are going against them and have a strong tendency to throw good money after bad in order to hold up their ill-planned schemes.

I don't find this greatly plausible, even if I were to accept your analysis of the PLEX market. I don't feel your analysis is internally consistent. Feel free to explain this to me.

motie one wrote:
I do disagree with your projections as to long term values

Those were not long term projections. That is how I see things going up until the December holiday sale induced slump. Longer term, moving in to the new year, I expect PLEX to progress much higher.

motie one wrote:
We are in my opinion going to see one of two scenarios.

A hard reduction, either created by the action of EvE's economists, or a panic reaction, or both in combination, which may already be primed to occur, or the large Holders using market peaks, to divest over the longer term. As always leaving the less aware or less than competent speculators. and those who are blinded by the promise of historic safety, to carry the loss.

We've just gone through those scenarios this weekend.

The hard reduction created by the action of EvE's economists has happened, it's over, we've done it. They pulled the price back into sanity at around 1.15B and are now letting it continue on it's usual upward trend at a more sober pace.

The panic/exit reaction, such that it was, was just people exiting their position at an obvious peak. There wasn't much panic. Just speculators completing their transactions and other people going along with it.

CCP's action obviously made the need to sell somewhat immediate, for those that aren't playing for the future higher prices or who are planning to exit and re-enter in order to cash in on that future price.
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#791 - 2015-09-27 05:55:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Bad Bobby
motie one wrote:
I fully understand the logic, where past performance and events extrapolated forward do support your projections, the graph wizardry is persuasive. However past performance, does not guarantee future performance, as we are very well aware of in the real world too.

While past performance may be a strong factor in many people's thinking and it certainly helps to maintain the upward PLEX trend. This is not the only, or even the most significant factor in my PLEX investments or those of informed investors.

The simple fact is that PLEX is massively underpriced:

It's functional value and utility, is much higher than the price you pay for it. If you are a capable player, you will get more out of your 30 days sub than the isk you put in to paying for it. That's a fundamentally good investment for those that can afford to make it.

That functional value and utility is rising and has been rising for a long time. CCP keep adding new ways to make use of that PLEX and have short-medium term plans to keep increasing that utility. It's certainly consistent with their own financial needs to keep the utility of PLEX rising and thereby maintaining demand for it.

Aside from basic sales incentive for CCP to keep PLEX going strong, there is the fact that one of the main fundamental functions of PLEX is to combat RMT. In that respect it is performing well, in that the rate of exchange from RL currency to isk is extremely attractive and there is minimal incentive to take greater risks in the illicit RMT market instead of simply buying PLEX.

The recent past of EVE has been pretty poor:

We've gone through a period where 0.0 stagnated and bored PvP pilots were required (and were able to) tour the length and breadth of EVE in search of what content they could find. The totally solved problem that was Dominion sov was so long in the tooth that it held no surprises for anyone and a steady state had been established and cemented to a degree that had horrendous impacts on the game.

The fleet meta moved towards drone-centric setups that were quite frankly dull as ditchwater to fly in. I lost interest in fleet PvP and ended up leaving the loving arms of Pandemic Legion for the deeply questionable but relatively varied world of FW (seriously) which then lead me to become almost completely inactive in the game. CCP took to dancing around the issue rather than fixing it.

The evolved meta and the results of a succession of nerfs that had rendered capitals somewhat dull and pointless has led to much unsubbing or alts.

The cure to that problem was (and had to be) somewhat extreme and took a lot of us up to the edge. Nerfing capitals in to the ground. Removing the force projection that was needed to extract what little content remained. Leaving us with more or less nothing to do.

Aside from that, there were some pretty disasterous, or just plain painfull, changes in all other aspects of EVE.

They adopted the rapid release cycle and basically kissed goodbye to marketing, coherent complete changes and any project with grand scope to rival the most successful expansions that brought us things like wormholes. They also appeared to do a poor job of taking advantage of the benefits of that rapid release cycle and failed to hold back changes until they were fit for release and failed to iterate on disasterous changes quickly (or even at all in some cases).

All of this while their outward persona became a disjointed mess of random devs speaking about small parts of the game that they were fixing without the indication of their being a firm hand on the tiller with a solid achievable vision of the future. Several statements made by Seagull, who is certainly very capable but I fear isn't as good a spokesperson as the job requires, often pointed in one direction only to see the reality head off in a completely different direction.

It shouldn't come as any surprise that EVE activity and player counts had dropped massively.

But now we're through that dark time and everything before us looks pretty good:

They are replacing the structures they ruined in Crius with new structures that have far greater potential and appear to have far more work being put in to them.

They are re-working capitals and super capitals and the word on the street from CSMs who live and breathe capital combat is that we're in for moist underwear and dirty grins.

They are a long way through the process of making the majority of ships and modules in the game non-terrible, but are still clearly committed to this as an eternal struggle.

They are working their way through the issues with their new problem child sov system and the hope and expectation of many is they'll eventually get it to a nice state where we can enjoy a new shiny sov system that actually works for as long as it takes for us to bring it to the same totally solved state as we did with Dominion.

They have finally had the good sense to re-introduce expansions. So we can now have proper marketing, coherent complete changes and hopefully some new features with grand scope. We've also seen Seagull state that she's going to be more front and center in this and will give us the impression that somebody somewhere has a clue where everything is headed.

The future outlook for the next six months is one of increasing player numbers, increasing player activity and increasing demand for PLEX.

So please, tell me, why do you feel PLEX price should be dropping in the face of all this positive news and upward forces?

Why do you think that such a fundamentally daft and counter productive idea as an NPC order is needed?

Once again, my apologies for going hard against your ideas, but I'm hoping a little tough love from someone who hasn't yet put your back up may bring you back on to the reservation with the rest of us happy Indians.
Alexi Stokov
State War Academy
Caldari State
#792 - 2015-09-27 06:08:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Alexi Stokov
Isn't the price of a PLEX on the Chinese server over 3 billion? Why cry over a measly 1.2 billion?
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#793 - 2015-09-27 07:13:03 UTC
Tbh, if they were to un-break industry by sorting out the terrible ranks system and the overly fast speed of production as well as doing some work on actually improving the overall EVE UI rather than degrading it, I'd be entirely happy with where EVE is and where it's headed.

Given that I'm pretty fussy and have zero tolerance for shoddy work, the fact that I can say that is a pretty impressive complement to CCP.

Oh and they could replace this terrible forum with something good, preferably restoring the features they threw out when they moved to it from the old forums.

I'm not going to bother asking for them to improve EVE PvE, because it's so hateful at the moment that there isn't really much worth saving. I've always advocated they just delete all the missions and non-sandbox PvE from the game and be done with it, but I know that focusing the game on the hard core sandbox player and away from the casual player isn't really a good idea. But seriously, missions are so embarrassingly bad for game content in 2015.

When I can say that CCP are doing a good job, that means pretty much everyone else that is less bitter and demanding than me must be dancing in the streets. When these promises turn into actual implemented, stable and iterated features then we're going to see a lot of re-subbing.
motie one
Secret Passage
#794 - 2015-09-27 09:53:29 UTC  |  Edited by: motie one
Bobby, so much of what you say is absolutely on the ball, some well discussed and clear thinking.
In the end, when all is taken into account, only what the market dictates, will come to pass.

I really do expect a reset of the price of Plex, as much as you expect to see it rise.
Do not take this as an uninformed, naive, "crazy" belief. It just differs from yours. I cannot assume your in life financial experience, I base my views on mine, and frankly those are no one's business but my own. I have no intention of waving them around like a flag and claiming victory due to experience and position.

I know that from the point of view of a market trader, that both a volatile market, with wide swings, and of course a 10% profit on two bil is so much better than ten percent on two hundred (I do not expect it to drop that low other than a massive overshoot).
Naturally one has an emotional attachment for such conditions to exist and prosper.

This has been the driver of plex price increase, not demand for pilot services skyrocketing.

The opposite of what you believe is regretfully true, market sentiment is wholly driving price, not structural issues, which is why we see our colleagues, hybernating alts amongst other actions. The pressures you eloquently describe and hope will lessen, results in mains unsubscribing, and later returning.
The plex pressure, unsubscribes alts, and later, when players realise they have an experience where they feel incomplete, let their mains follow. Slower, but just as sure, and more final.

There is a structural disparity, that is deeply destructive.
And that will one way or other end in a black swan moment.

If you step outside your zone of comfort and familiarity, and look at the wider picture, It really is quite clear. We as humans naturally look for the markers that confirm our bias, It is understandably hard to overcome this.

As to which one of us is right, remains to be seen.

I naturally do hope I am right as otherwise a major pillar supporting eve, the ability to get some real world benefit, for average players, from their in game efforts will remain effectively unavailable, to the less dedicated, isk producer, With all the consequences of that.
Most harmful will be a playerbase consisting of rich players with trading alts, and a few isk and plex rich, bored, highly focused players in profitable space only, and casual and less dedicated players are gone, or just come and go.

The fact that an incursioneer or null ratter deep in the blue doughnut can earn 200m an hour (sic) does not mean 95% of others see the world from his viewpoint.

That will have very toxic results long term, short term is bad enough.

However, Plex returning to be within the reach of average players, or "bad casual" players even, will help reinvigorate the game, far more than cosmetic changes, no matter how nice they are.

Preserving nice profits in a single class of asset, pilots services, must be a secondary consideration.

A question? Do people wish to come to or leave the following economies?

One where the beneficial services of a country are available to an elite few, and not available to the average citizen, or one where the average citizen can enjoy a reasonable modicum of them as the result of a normal life?

Quote, see if you can find it. "when acceptable ideas have failed, any idea that may succeed, will clearly seem unacceptable, and offering that, will draw ridicule, thus, we fail to solve our deepest problems."
motie one
Secret Passage
#795 - 2015-09-27 10:02:11 UTC  |  Edited by: motie one
Alexi Stokov wrote:
Isn't the price of a PLEX on the Chinese server over 3 billion? Why cry over a measly 1.2 billion?


There is a desire there by the independent company that runs it to encourage numbers of subscriptions with little concern for the long term health of the game and a greater focus on revenue. (Possibly untrue but this seems to be the opinion of the playerbase)

Bots are technically still forbidden, but form a large majority of player action, the market is monstrously distorted and dysfunctional and is allowed to spiral into chaos.

Cost of plex in real currency is very different.

In fact it is a pretty good example, of what happens when you let an experiment run, when CCP do not give a guiding hand to the market.

Hardly a model of a long term profitable business.

And not something we should use to compare EvE as we know it to.
Truly apples to oranges.
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#796 - 2015-09-27 10:59:08 UTC
motie one wrote:
The fact that an incursioneer or null ratter deep in the blue doughnut can earn 200m an hour (sic) does not mean 95% of others see the world from his viewpoint.

The thing is that there are only a finite number of PLEXes being created by players handing over their RL currency to CCP and due to the free market sandbox economy of EVE, those PLEXes are always destined to go to the people willing to pay the most for them. The poor player will always have a hard time, unless there are so many PLEXes being created that the richer player's needs are entirely satisfied.

By way of an example with small numbers to make it easy for my arithmetic challenged brain:

A total of 10 PLEX are created this month.

2 get bought by wealthy 0.0 alliances to hand out to their leaders, FCs and logisticians.
2 get bought by wealthy individual players as an investment against future price rises.
2 get bought by wealthy market traders and industrialists.
1 gets bought by wealthy Incursion runners.
1 gets bought by wealthy WH farmers.
2 get bought by middle income no-life grinders that run LV4s, rat or mine constantly to sustain themselves.

There is nothing left for a poor player who despite the desire to do so, cannot afford to pay the price that all those people listed above are prepared to pay. Either because they lack the knowledge, time, determination or enthusiasm to do what it takes to make the isk they need.

The only solution, if indeed there is one, is to encourage more people to buy PLEX with RL currency and make them available on the market. This will occur naturally once more people are playing the game, enjoying it and are willing to invest more RL currency in it.

My personal feeling is that CCP should lower the monthy subscription cost and the PLEX cost, because in today's gaming marketplace the product they are providing isn't worth the price they are charging for it. But that's very much my personal opinion and CCP's numbers may not agree with me or their financial situation may not be able to endure that change.
motie one
Secret Passage
#797 - 2015-09-27 11:13:07 UTC  |  Edited by: motie one
Bad Bobby wrote:
motie one wrote:
The fact that an incursioneer or null ratter deep in the blue doughnut can earn 200m an hour (sic) does not mean 95% of others see the world from his viewpoint.

The thing is that there are only a finite number of PLEXes being created by players handing over their RL currency to CCP and due to the free market sandbox economy of EVE, those PLEXes are always destined to go to the people willing to pay the most for them. The poor player will always have a hard time, unless there are so many PLEXes being created that the richer player's needs are entirely satisfied.

By way of an example with small numbers to make it easy for my arithmetic challenged brain:

A total of 10 PLEX are created this month.

2 get bought by wealthy 0.0 alliances to hand out to their leaders, FCs and logisticians.
2 get bought by wealthy individual players as an investment against future price rises.
2 get bought by wealthy market traders and industrialists.
1 gets bought by wealthy Incursion runners.
1 gets bought by wealthy WH farmers.
2 get bought by middle income no-life grinders that run LV4s, rat or mine constantly to sustain themselves.

There is nothing left for a poor player who despite the desire to do so, cannot afford to pay the price that all those people listed above are prepared to pay. Either because they lack the knowledge, time, determination or enthusiasm to do what it takes to make the isk they need.

The only solution, if indeed there is one, is to encourage more people to buy PLEX with RL currency and make them available on the market. This will occur naturally once more people are playing the game, enjoying it and are willing to invest more RL currency in it.

My personal feeling is that CCP should lower the monthy subscription cost and the PLEX cost, because in today's gaming marketplace the product they are providing isn't worth the price they are charging for it. But that's very much my personal opinion and CCP's numbers may not agree with me or their financial situation may not be able to endure that change.


This is where it is so hard, you are absolutely correct as to what is happening, but your conclusions assume that Plex is treated as a commodity, no different from Player produced items such as Ships or minerals.

Whilst this is what is currently happening, I argue this is NOT the real case even though the current trading sentiment is that it is no different.

CCP cannot allow this to persist in the long term, as it is having horrific results with retention.
A key and vital tool has been taken out of the hands of average players, and even more focused players are finding the grind required an unacceptable price in time expended to pay. It would be similar to gold being boosted to $10000 an ounce, whilst appearing great as a source of wealth storage, or investment, as the price component in industry, and jewellery becomes untenable, killing those markets for the product, alternatives are found. And the market purely existing detached from underlying consumption.
Unfortunately, however, there is no alternative to plex in the EVE economy, to encourage correction. So the only remaining options are economic warfare, however unlikely, or intervention to preserve the wider economy.
This can be short term management, or a clear seperation of the asset as a class.

Now Imagine the product is salt, rather than gold, and we see the real effects, without salt, members of the family sicken, and then eventually die.

Short term gain cannot be allowed to harm the long term viability of the game, and CCP always eventually come back to that conclusion.
Elizabeth Norn
Nornir Research
Nornir Empire
#798 - 2015-09-27 11:34:17 UTC
You are seeing an effect (lower PCU) and attributing it to higher PLEX prices, why do you think it's that way round rather than lower subscriptions leading to less PLEX bought from CCP, thus less sold on the market and higher PLEX prices. The list of reasons people might've unsubscribed is endless. If PLEX consumers were leaving due to high prices at a similar rate to how much the PCU has gone down, wouldn't we have seen a larger drop in the volume of PLEX?
motie one
Secret Passage
#799 - 2015-09-27 11:37:29 UTC  |  Edited by: motie one
Elizabeth Norn wrote:
You are seeing an effect (lower PCU) and attributing it to higher PLEX prices, why do you think it's that way round rather than lower subscriptions leading to less PLEX bought from CCP, thus less sold on the market and higher PLEX prices. The list of reasons people might've unsubscribed is endless. If PLEX consumers were leaving due to high prices at a similar rate to how much the PCU has gone down, wouldn't we have seen a larger drop in the volume of PLEX?


We have discussed this at length, so just to pick up one point, regarding volumes, they are only indicative, that they are being bought and sold, the real metric is redemptions into pilots services.
Just how many of your friends have put alts into hibernation because it is too time consuming to grind for the cost of plex? and are unhappy with the loss of funtionality and fun that results in, even though they are still holding on to their main for now?
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#800 - 2015-09-27 11:41:39 UTC
Elizabeth Norn wrote:
You are seeing an effect (lower PCU) and attributing it to higher PLEX prices

Whereas I attribute it to the game being terrible for a prolonged period of time, while still asking a very high price for admission.

Predictably a lot of people have decided:

  • "Screw this, I'm going to play a better and/or cheaper game!"
  • "I'll carry on playing, but I'm damned if I'm going to keep sinking RL cash into buying PLEX to sustain myself."
  • "I'll carry on playing, but I'm damned if I'm actually going to pay for a sub."

So PCU drops, PLEX supply reduces and PLEX demand increases.

In case you are interested, #3 is me.