These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Plex Prices

First post
Author
Leetmcfeet
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#701 - 2015-09-21 20:58:41 UTC
motie one wrote:
Well, I personally cannot imagine CCP not taking an "Central Bank" action of some form.


Again CCP infered plex should cost more than 1 Billion isk last time they intervened when plex jumped to 1 Billion from 800. If it hits 1.5B they just might intervene if it happens quickly; if it takes months (as it should) they likely would not - because if the past is any indicator - if it slowly increases to an amount (1.5B in this example) - it will drop when next years summer begins. At which point it would be in the 1.2-.1.3 range and be a good price for that year; until september/october happens again and the base price for the next year is set at 1.5B and so on.

Did plex spike a large amount as opposed to a gradual increase this year? Yes it did. Will people unsub alts because of this? Yes they will. Will people quit the game because of this? Not unless they were already on their way out.

Plex always goes up; and this is beneficial for the game in several ways. The biggest benefit is the game sheds weight in the amount of illicit users who are botting or otherwise cheating to obtain isk to sell. High Plex Prices are the biggest blow that can be struck as far as black markets and RMT are concerned - because legitimate ISK from CCP is cheaper - Which allows players to legitimately purchase their isk in the form of PLEX from CCP without the premium tax of doing it the right way. The higher the price of plex - the less valuable EVE is as a potential black market money making activity.

Plex is worth much more than 1.2B - and 200m is an increase we could have expected this year as normal. However - this year we had a very successful plex drive taking thousands of plex out of circulation - we also saw skins introduced and many plex converted into aurum. The sinks for plex this year have been tremendous and as such the peak this year should be much higher.

The prices; spikes and trends we saw of years past; all with their own doomsayer threads; are incomprable based on the amount of plex sinks and uses/conversions for plex we have today. PLEX appreciated in value this year - it buys skins. So it can be expected that in additional to the normal price hike; an additional hike occur based on its new found demand.

The price of PLEX is ordinary for a month or two from today - given what happened this year I don't think its out of line; we should see higher peaks as winter commences. You say PLEX is not worth 1.2B and think it should be valued at 500m. I say plex should be 1.2B and more and I have provided details as to why this would be the case. This year is different and you should expect CCP knows this and will take it into account. Do not expect CCP to step in.

motie one
Secret Passage
#702 - 2015-09-21 21:07:24 UTC  |  Edited by: motie one
Do not focus on the price.
Whilst that is indicative, the actual issue is what is Happening to plex as a service.

If it still functions well, as intended for the service, the velocity of isk is stable, and signed in players is stable or growing, then all is well, people can speculate away,driving it to any price, and buy as a store freely.

If however the removal of plex from the active economy, by it being used as a wealth store, and the high prices due to limited remaining availability and rampant speculation, is preventing it being used MAINLY as a service, leading to reduced player logins, and the overall economy showing a reduction in the velocity of money. Then there is a critical and existential need to deal with the issue.

CCP have the full data and can decide whether these concerns have validity, and act accordingly.

All I am suggesting may happen, is likely is in fact an approriate form of QE (actually quite different in economic terms, but better understood by non economists) , this will stimulate the wider economy into healthier directions, where player made and mined commodities become primary stores, and sources of speculative activity, moderated by real demand.

There is no alternative to Plex aurum and Multiple training certificates. They are ABSOLUTELY not suitable for Speculative activities or a a storage of wealth product, there are no options or workarounds for players available, the choice is either pay wildly inflated prices, or hibernate alts. This is not a reasonable choice to have to make and benefit no one in the long term.

Correcting Plex redemption functionality, through an NPC sell order at an appropriately chosen price, will rebalance Aurum tokens and Multiple training certificates accordingly and automatically.

Regarding NPC sell orders CCP can sterilise any NPC sales that are made at any time at no cost to themselves by Buying them back at an appropriate time of their choosing. whist returning Plex to it's primary role as a service.

Price changes will still happen, seasonal variation will still occur, and the market will still be free, just within market maker/central bank boundries, just like a real market.

The large holders need to diversify their holdings to allow the plex market to regain it's primary role. This has been said for a while and does not appear to have occured. I doubt that anyone belives there is much point waiting for a day that will never come, and as a result action is required to resolve the disparity, and damage done.

There has been ample opportunity for them to limit their risks and potential loss of profits.

We should all look forward to Restoring plex into being a viable and economically service once again, used by the majority of players at some time.
Katja Andrard
Katja Andrard Shipping Corporation
#703 - 2015-09-21 21:57:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Katja Andrard
And that all assuming that plex prices are subject of reactive control. Again.

Interesting enough, we might have to ponder some facts:

- If CCP were to dump plex in the market to control the prices, it would be actually CCP unfairly "bailing out" the people who put up buy orders filled by internal plex supply. Which I might not take as something very "CCPist".
- The reverse is also true. If CCP were to buy plex to dry up the market, they would be in fact giving ISK for people from nothing.

The most reasonable outcome if it were done by that way is that the control of plex prices would end up being a ISK generator system that would be abused to oblivion by anyone and their neighbour.

FYI, that is what banks do in the bank internal market of IBB (a kind of bank only market of debt), and I know that doest end up well because I used to work in a bank.

So you gotta come up with another theory on how plex price is controlled by CCP.

I should remind you that CCP does have had, and I dont know, but assume, still do, in house finance geeks to control the way the market goes, and that is why the tools, the techniques and the aspect of the market is very kin to its IRL form.
motie one
Secret Passage
#704 - 2015-09-21 22:00:03 UTC  |  Edited by: motie one
Katja Andrard wrote:
And that all assuming that plex prices are subject of reactive control. Again.

Interesting enough, we might have to ponder some facts:

- If CCP were to dump plex in the market to control the prices, it would be actually CCP unfairly "bailing out" the people who put up buy orders filled by internal plex supply. Which I might not take as something very "CCPist".
- The reverse is also true. If CCP were to buy plex to dry up the market, they would be in fact giving ISK for people from nothing.

The most reasonable outcome if it were done by that way is that the control of plex prices would end up being a ISK generator system that would be abused to oblivion by anyone and their neighbour.

FYI, that is what banks do in the bank internal market of IBB (a kind of bank only market of debt), and I know that doest end up well because I used to work in a bank.

So you gotta come up with another theory on how plex price is controlled by CCP.

I should remind you that CCP does have had, and I dont know, but assume, still do, in house finance geeks to control the way the market goes, and that is why the tools, the techniques and the aspect of the market is very kin to its IRL form.



"Dumping" plex is a wasteful and inefficient process that only yields short term gains. It is a primitive process that gives no opportunity for sterilisation. The problem is that a commodity that is a service, has become illiquid for it's primary function, due in the main by it being used as a wealth store with the chance of speculative gains. Just providing a temporary burst of liquidity would be absorbed by this process in moments.
Drying up liquidity is totally contrary to needs and not considered.

"Dumping" is not being suggested at this point as it would be not only wasteful, unfair and inefficient. It would have minor benefit and not restore the role of plex as a service. The action needs to come from the sell side of the equation. NPC sell orders, would effectively cap the market, with free trade operating below this cap, as done in markets, and central banks worldwide today. (Just dressed up a bit to not frighten the unaware) think swiss central bank with their EURO/swiss franc cap.
Katja Andrard
Katja Andrard Shipping Corporation
#705 - 2015-09-21 22:21:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Katja Andrard
motie one wrote:
Katja Andrard wrote:
And that all assuming that plex prices are subject of reactive control. Again.

Interesting enough, we might have to ponder some facts:

- If CCP were to dump plex in the market to control the prices, it would be actually CCP unfairly "bailing out" the people who put up buy orders filled by internal plex supply. Which I might not take as something very "CCPist".
- The reverse is also true. If CCP were to buy plex to dry up the market, they would be in fact giving ISK for people from nothing.

The most reasonable outcome if it were done by that way is that the control of plex prices would end up being a ISK generator system that would be abused to oblivion by anyone and their neighbour.

FYI, that is what banks do in the bank internal market of IBB (a kind of bank only market of debt), and I know that doest end up well because I used to work in a bank.

So you gotta come up with another theory on how plex price is controlled by CCP.

I should remind you that CCP does have had, and I dont know, but assume, still do, in house finance geeks to control the way the market goes, and that is why the tools, the techniques and the aspect of the market is very kin to its IRL form.



"Dumping" plex is a wasteful and inefficient process that only yields short term gains. It is a primitive process that gives no opportunity for sterilisation. The problem is that a commodity that is a service, has become illiquid for it's primary function, due in the main by it being used as a wealth store with the chance of speculative gains. Just providing a temporary burst of liquidity would be absorbed by this process in moments.
Drying up liquidity is totally contrary to needs and not considered.

"Dumping" is not being suggested at this point as it would be not only wasteful, unfair and inefficient. It would have minor benefit and not restore the role of plex as a service. The action needs to come from the sell side of the equation. NPC sell orders, would effectively cap the market, with free trade operating below this cap, as done in markets, and central banks worldwide today. (Just dressed up a bit to not frighten the unaware) think swiss central bank.


I dont know if you read what you quote, but your answer has nothing really to do with what I wrote.

I was talking about the people who says that plex prices are controlled in that manner, and all time there is someone to say that. 4 times in this post, and to exhaustion in others, almost everytime you talk about plex prices or market in this forums someone come up with the genial idea that plex prices are controlled by CCP dumping or drying plex.
motie one
Secret Passage
#706 - 2015-09-21 22:24:28 UTC  |  Edited by: motie one
Katja Andrard wrote:
motie one wrote:
Katja Andrard wrote:
And that all assuming that plex prices are subject of reactive control. Again.

Interesting enough, we might have to ponder some facts:

- If CCP were to dump plex in the market to control the prices, it would be actually CCP unfairly "bailing out" the people who put up buy orders filled by internal plex supply. Which I might not take as something very "CCPist".
- The reverse is also true. If CCP were to buy plex to dry up the market, they would be in fact giving ISK for people from nothing.

The most reasonable outcome if it were done by that way is that the control of plex prices would end up being a ISK generator system that would be abused to oblivion by anyone and their neighbour.

FYI, that is what banks do in the bank internal market of IBB (a kind of bank only market of debt), and I know that doest end up well because I used to work in a bank.

So you gotta come up with another theory on how plex price is controlled by CCP.

I should remind you that CCP does have had, and I dont know, but assume, still do, in house finance geeks to control the way the market goes, and that is why the tools, the techniques and the aspect of the market is very kin to its IRL form.



"Dumping" plex is a wasteful and inefficient process that only yields short term gains. It is a primitive process that gives no opportunity for sterilisation. The problem is that a commodity that is a service, has become illiquid for it's primary function, due in the main by it being used as a wealth store with the chance of speculative gains. Just providing a temporary burst of liquidity would be absorbed by this process in moments.
Drying up liquidity is totally contrary to needs and not considered.

"Dumping" is not being suggested at this point as it would be not only wasteful, unfair and inefficient. It would have minor benefit and not restore the role of plex as a service. The action needs to come from the sell side of the equation. NPC sell orders, would effectively cap the market, with free trade operating below this cap, as done in markets, and central banks worldwide today. (Just dressed up a bit to not frighten the unaware) think swiss central bank.


Ah it has.

4 times in this post, and to exhaustion in others, almost everytime you talk about plex prices or market in this forums someone come up with the genial idea that plex prices are controlled by CCP dumping or drying plex.


Well, people believe in Fairies and fair taxation too!
They would be a lot more professional than that. Just buying and selling plex on the market, Naked, would be quite silly, and totally pointless. There are plenty of ways, but the big issue is how to return plex to function as a service.

Burning speculators with a temporary price drop, may appeal to the EvE in people, but does nothing for long term stability, I forsee them taking a rare One off position, that not only sends a clear signal, but a Hard cap on the market for the service and differentiates it from player generated commodities. After all Switzerland has a hard cap on the swiss frank against the Euro but a free market below that, and free prices on all commodities sold in the country or for export.
Katja Andrard
Katja Andrard Shipping Corporation
#707 - 2015-09-21 22:28:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Katja Andrard
motie one wrote:
Katja Andrard wrote:
motie one wrote:
Katja Andrard wrote:
And that all assuming that plex prices are subject of reactive control. Again.
(...)



"Dumping" plex is a wasteful and inefficient process that only yields short term gains. It is a primitive process that gives no opportunity for sterilisation. The problem is that a commodity that is a service, has become illiquid for it's primary function, due in the main by it being used as a wealth store with the chance of speculative gains. Just providing a temporary burst of liquidity would be absorbed by this process in moments.
Drying up liquidity is totally contrary to needs and not considered.

"Dumping" is not being suggested at this point as it would be not only wasteful, unfair and inefficient. It would have minor benefit and not restore the role of plex as a service. The action needs to come from the sell side of the equation. NPC sell orders, would effectively cap the market, with free trade operating below this cap, as done in markets, and central banks worldwide today. (Just dressed up a bit to not frighten the unaware) think swiss central bank.


Ah it has.

4 times in this post, and to exhaustion in others, almost everytime you talk about plex prices or market in this forums someone come up with the genial idea that plex prices are controlled by CCP dumping or drying plex.


Well, people believe in Fairies and fair taxation too!
They would be a lot more professional than that. Just buying and selling plex on the market, Naked, would be quite silly, and totally pointless.


Edited, but still the same thing. But I understand that as most people doing combat are not fighter pilots, and most people doing industry are not engineers, so must traders not be market experts in the average.

LOL
motie one
Secret Passage
#708 - 2015-09-21 22:34:19 UTC  |  Edited by: motie one
Katja Andrard wrote:
motie one wrote:
Katja Andrard wrote:
motie one wrote:
Katja Andrard wrote:
And that all assuming that plex prices are subject of reactive control. Again.
(...)



"Dumping" plex is a wasteful and inefficient process that only yields short term gains. It is a primitive process that gives no opportunity for sterilisation. The problem is that a commodity that is a service, has become illiquid for it's primary function, due in the main by it being used as a wealth store with the chance of speculative gains. Just providing a temporary burst of liquidity would be absorbed by this process in moments.
Drying up liquidity is totally contrary to needs and not considered.

"Dumping" is not being suggested at this point as it would be not only wasteful, unfair and inefficient. It would have minor benefit and not restore the role of plex as a service. The action needs to come from the sell side of the equation. NPC sell orders, would effectively cap the market, with free trade operating below this cap, as done in markets, and central banks worldwide today. (Just dressed up a bit to not frighten the unaware) think swiss central bank.


Ah it has.

4 times in this post, and to exhaustion in others, almost everytime you talk about plex prices or market in this forums someone come up with the genial idea that plex prices are controlled by CCP dumping or drying plex.


Well, people believe in Fairies and fair taxation too!
They would be a lot more professional than that. Just buying and selling plex on the market, Naked, would be quite silly, and totally pointless.


Edited, but still the same thing. But I understand that as most people doing combat are not fighter pilots, and most people doing industry are not engineers, so must traders not be market experts in the average.

LOL


Lol I have added to mine too Big smile

Very true, most trading in eve is absolutely not that, apart from possibly some major alliances, on the whole, playing at speculation, or arbatrage, but that's fine, it is a game.

You have to love the simplistic answers from those who think their gameplay represents either real world economics or the activities of economics experts in CCPRoll
Leetmcfeet
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#709 - 2015-09-21 22:44:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Leetmcfeet
I had a post; and it was emotionally charged and against the ideas of Motie One. I have decided it does not forward or do any justice to this thread or the ideas within and I have removed it. The premise was more than 30 seconds of thought would likely be required to formulate any idea that wouldn't be torn to hell within seconds by more experienced players with no economic experience.

Instead I offer this; Plex has risen and fallen several times over the years. Bubbles have occured thousands of times in thousands of areas in EVE. Plex rises every year for the winter and drops every year for the summer. Dr. Eyjólfur oversought this activity for many years. He taught the staff which monitors this activity today. it is no doubt they keep in touch with the good doctor whose lifes work to date could be defined by his contributions and work as EVE onlines ecomist. He knows better than all and should a situation appear to be critical; either he would be consulted or the expert staff he left behind would be able to determine if interference is needed.
motie one
Secret Passage
#710 - 2015-09-21 22:56:19 UTC  |  Edited by: motie one
Leetmcfeet wrote:
I had a post; and it was emotionally charged and against the ideas of Motie One. I have decided it does not forward or do any justice to this thread or the ideas within and I have removed it. The premise was more than 30 seconds of thought would likely be required to formulate any idea that wouldn't be torn to hell within seconds by more experienced players with no economic experience.

Just Tell the swiss Central bank, just how bad an idea it is.
Or market makers, or..... Or....... Or...... The whole international finance community.

But if you are talking Exploit? They are less permitted in EVE than the real world and much clearer to see here.

Permaban incoming in 3...2...1Roll

But Do not let me prevent you retaining your opinion in many other posts that Plex will always keep heading for stratospheric levels.
If you believe that Plex is just an item that can generate never ending gains, without considering that PLEX is a tool issued by CCP to allow it to be used to purchase services from them, then do not let me alter your beliefs.But I do point out that player made commodities are far less likely to provide your finances with an existential shock If and When CCP act.

Dr. Eyjólfur would be unlikely to be advising you to render CCP's tool for buying services unviable, as a good market strategy, or would any of his students/colleagues who remain.

As regarding never ending PLEX price growth there is a saying

There's one born every minute, or the https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_fool_theory

Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be enough any more, funny that.

Because unless Plex can be realistically, and viably used to purchase services from CCP there will be fewer by the day.

Let's see what CCP decide, but I personally believe they will act in the best interests of the game, and of themselves and the wider player base. You may well believe otherwise, good luck with that.

Edit:- I refer you to this to prevent the need to repeat myseld.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6052701#post6052701

Edit:- simple examples for simple people, You don't really expect a free education do you?
Zihao
Doomheim
#711 - 2015-09-22 01:38:50 UTC
So CCP would benefit themselves and the game... by emulating European central banks?
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#712 - 2015-09-22 03:38:58 UTC
I don't know what you people are talking about.

PLEX is still massively underpriced.
Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#713 - 2015-09-22 05:38:51 UTC
There are no stupid ideas, only stupid people...

...

One of the hilarious things I've seen here is the idea that CCP should dump PLEX on the in-game market at a lower amount in ISK than the market is presently paying, and this would punish speculators.

...

...

...

REALLY? People actually think this?

How would selling 1000 PLEX at a billion ISK each punish speculators?

A few players would buy one or two each, then someone with a liquid trillion would buy the remaining 950 and resell them over time. CCP would literally lose over ten grand in potential future revenue in order to give an ISK handout to a trillionaire.

I do expect CCP to intervene with a PLEX sale soon, which will not be a conscious strategy to adjust the price of PLEX, but instead a strategy to profit from the recent increases in price. And if someone with a liquid trillion buys up a lot of those PLEX from the market during the sale, CCP will likely end up selling more.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

Fornost Fornostsen
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#714 - 2015-09-22 09:55:52 UTC
As an almost 2 years old trader, there was a moment when I switched from "I wish i had the ISK to trade this item" to "I whish I found an item to invest my ISK".

When you begin to have tens of billions of liquid ISKs I think you can follow 2 paths:
1) Start speculation(s) = High risks / High rewards
2) Stockpile ISKs / Assets = Low risks / Low rewards

Personaly, I choose the latter, because I prefer spending time blowing ships. And I suppose a lot of people agree with me.

Now, what's the best asset to stockpile? Nobody knows it, like in real life.
But PLEXs are the best "retirement fund".

I know that if I have the ISKs to afford 24 PLEXs, I will play for free for two years, whatever happens to their price.

And if you think how many people have enough ISKs to afford a fitted Titan (about 90 PLEXs, or 7,5 yrs of game time) you can figure how many people have enough ISKs to stockpile tens of PLEXs to be sure to be able to play the game for free in next years.

And they probably will not 'panic sell' if the price begins to fall, because it's a "retirement fund".

What if CCP shuts servers down in the meantime?
Your PLEXs will be worth nothing, but so will do your liquid ISKs and/or your assets.
Katja Andrard
Katja Andrard Shipping Corporation
#715 - 2015-09-22 10:13:31 UTC
The people IRL have been working the popular consensus that market is driven by supply and demand for centuries, it is not so far fetched that people in EVE do the same. If you take a time to look at eve market, you will see that there is a place of powerful control over prices in a given hub by just placing a large order, lowering the prices gradually and to make people lower theirs in the hopes that works, then when you have a bunch of wanna be traders with orders as low as the price you would buy, you take of your order and buy them off before they can change their orders. Is the "Average Down", when your own prices being bought in low from a large order sum up with the cheap product you crashed the price, in average, making your bulk have cheap cost.

The reverse, buying higher in the hopes people will place orders to rise you, in order to artificially change the price up so you can afterwards dump your product in the market by higher price, the "Average up" where the product you bought at inflated prices dont matter as in average your sale at inflated prices will cover it and open window for the cheap product you bought to be also sold at inflated prices, in average granting profit.

Those only work in EVE for 2 reasons: 1) People believe in supply and demand law - 2) People act as if ISK was play money

That is pretty much why no matter how politics go, IRL or in EVE, the money doesnt really change hands equally, and concentrate in the hands of those who already have the money, and know how to use it.

But in the "Big Picture" the one who owns the EVE universe, CCP, is the richest power in EVE Universe, and not only owns the means of making things in EVE Universe, but the power of NPC corps, as mentioned.

In a dev blog you will find the concepts of "ISK mine" and "ISK sink", which are the means on how CCP controls the total ammount of ISK pottentially ingame. While the "its just a game folks" simple dont care (tl;dr and what not), the traders ingame are very much devouring all the material over ships, prints, mines and sinks, in order to understand how to avoid sinks.

While we do that in the internal market of EVE, CCP does that outside the EVE market, much like nations do with colonies and neo-colonies IRL.

So for that reason, they dont need to buy or sell plex in EVE market to control its prices. Like IRL central banks, they tweak the ratio of earning and losing ISK ingame to tweak the value of plex.

While some people assume the value of plex is derived from their own interests, the savvy trader will know that the value of plex is related directly to an equilibrium between the people farming ISK and the people sinking ISK. The priciple is very simple: Reasonable farming ability.

If ISK is to costly earned by plex, prices too low, it does not matter how the market is flooded, there is no interest in sell plex. If it is too costly to farm ISK for a plex, no matter how much the market is dry, there is no people buying it.

So the control is applied there, the "GDP" of New Eden. IT changes, plex prices changes naturally. We traders have little to say over and below the opening of the will of farmers and sinkers.
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#716 - 2015-09-22 10:14:26 UTC
Fornost Fornostsen wrote:
Personaly, I choose the latter, because I prefer spending time blowing ships. And I suppose a lot of people agree with me.
I certainly do.

Fornost Fornostsen wrote:
But PLEXs are the best "retirement fund".

I know that if I have the ISKs to afford 24 PLEXs, I will play for free for two years, whatever happens to their price.
Indeed. Unless someone finds a way to turn me into an immortal and I become a RL pod pilot, I'm subbed in this game until I die.

Fornost Fornostsen wrote:
And they probably will not 'panic sell' if the price begins to fall, because it's a "retirement fund".

What if CCP shuts servers down in the meantime?
Your PLEXs will be worth nothing, but so will do your liquid ISKs and/or your assets.

Yep, when the apocalypse comes, none of these minor concerns will matter.

Plus it's important to remember that PLEX doesn't just pay for subs. I've paid for about 40 collectors editions, HD steams, loads of dual training and a whole bunch of other stuff with PLEX. Someday I'm hoping to be able to make it to Fanfest and eve-Vegas and when I do I'll be buying those tickets with PLEX too.

Generally speaking, the RL buying power of PLEX makes it somewhat distinct from pretty much everything else in EVE.
motie one
Secret Passage
#717 - 2015-09-22 18:21:17 UTC  |  Edited by: motie one
Zihao wrote:
So CCP would benefit themselves and the game... by emulating European central banks?


Well I am pleased to confim that your Geography, if not your political awareness is accurate.

Switzerland is in Europe but not in either the EU or the Eurozone.

The swiss central bank has a cap against the euro because of the issue of the swiss frank becoming a store of wealth harming the wider economy, and manipulated mercilessly by speculators.

Sound familiar?

It has been stunningly successful in preventing ongoing excesses, and the markets trade freely beneath this cap with confidence, efficiently.

When the speculators made an attempt recently to drive the frank out of it's range, It crushed them ..... Mercilessly by resetting a new cap and bankrupting them. It is in the stage of sterilising purchases, and then the cap will be eased somewhat again.

So to those who claim they would break any attempt by CCP, just make sure you have deeper pockets than the Central bank, bearing in mind they can issue, and sterilise Plex at will.

Pilot's services are a special case, they are CCP's interface to their real world income. Do not expect that CCP will allow plex to be treated like just some other player created commodity indefinitely. Once Plex - (assuming it hasn't already) ceases to be an effective means for players to buy gametime or other services, and thereby acting to sterilise plex created when Plex comes into game-.beware!
Each plex is designed to have a life, ending in it's exchange. It should be self sterilising,and if traded,and later redeemed, an isk liquidity system. Transferring from isk rich to isk light. It is Not a wealth store, designed to stay in the Game indefinitely.

Then expect an equivalent system coming into play, putting a Hard cap on price Via NPC sales setting the range it trades in. ( it will trade freely in this range, this is what is meant by a free market, not an uncontrolled disfunctional market.)
Zihao
Doomheim
#718 - 2015-09-22 19:34:24 UTC
How do you quantify "excess," and why is it desirable to stifle this ambiguous thing?
Alexi Stokov
State War Academy
Caldari State
#719 - 2015-09-22 21:09:43 UTC
Why do you keep claiming that the Swiss central bank have a hard currency cap? They removed that back in January.
motie one
Secret Passage
#720 - 2015-09-23 04:19:05 UTC  |  Edited by: motie one
Alexi Stokov wrote:
Why do you keep claiming that the Swiss central bank have a hard currency cap? They removed that back in January.

No, no they did not (well they announced they had) , they allowed it to reset it to a new level, the currency is still receiving central bank intervention (together with negative interest rates) but I agree the "public" cap removal sent shockwaves through the market, burning speculators, quite thoroughly, but it is expected that the "public" cap will be reapplied shortly, at a new level. The Core problem they have is that The currency is still acting as a safe haven or wealth store, they have been unable to solve that as they only have control of their own currency.
Whilst it was understood that the ECB printing billions of euro (QE) would make it a requirement to remove/reset the public Cap, the Swiss franc is not currently helping the Local economy. Thankfully In EvE there is not another Supplier of Real world money into EVE other than CCP. This is the difference and where the Example of a hard NPC sell order driven cap would work, and a Cap would remain under CCP's control, as I repeat, there is no competing Plex generation source into the game.

One must be aware, that there is an "arms race" between speculators and the central banks of the world, one looks at what they do as much as what they say.

One also has to bear in mind that the Swiss franc does not exist in isolation, it has to contend with instabilities in and attempts to "game" the value of the Euro from official and unofficial sources. CCP only has one economy to manage, and therefore has control of that side of the equation. So whilst the Swiss are a good example, lets not get TOO bogged down with that.

The core issue is that the swiss franc and plex have both been used to a large degree as a safe Haven, a store of wealth.
There are many efforts by the swiss to break this expectation,switching this burden to the Dollar, allowing the franc to eventually trade in a less distorted manner. In Eve terms this would be switching the store of wealth, into player produced commodities. CCP will also need to act to ensure Plex is able to be used effectively and mainly as the means to buy player services again.