These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Walking in stations

First post
Author
Jill Xelitras
Xeltec services
#1181 - 2015-09-12 19:23:43 UTC
Johan Civire wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
try p0rnhub, its much more staisfying ;)


You are thinking lets troll its more funny than the topic? some people want answer not troll if you have nothing to say then trolling stfu and let those people talk. Sick of those kind of people posting this nonsense every time just for stupid thumbs up.


DEV remove my post and that post. Thank you.


Please don't.

Don't anger the forum gods.

ISD Buldath:

> I Saw, I came, I Frowned, I locked, I posted, and I left.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#1182 - 2015-09-12 19:31:56 UTC
Johan Civire wrote:

You are thinking lets troll its more funny than the topic? some people want answer not troll if you have nothing to say then trolling stfu and let those people talk.

Answer to what? There haven't been any new developments, including any new and unanswered questions, on this topic for many years now.
Erica Dusette
Division 13
#1183 - 2015-09-12 19:32:39 UTC
Jill Xelitras wrote:
I wanted to open a bar in Amamake and name it "Amagankme Bar" ... now I will never be able to fulfill that dream.

Why not? I have a restaurant in Matari space.

It doesn't have a witty or edgy name, though the lobster is unparalleled.

Just poke if you and your special someone ever wish to utilize the channel sometime.

Blink

Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate Full-Time Supermodel

worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕвσss

Amber Starview
Doomheim
#1184 - 2015-09-12 21:03:12 UTC
They have station interior for dust I think can't we just have that ?
Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#1185 - 2015-09-13 09:50:51 UTC
I hope that CCP start development of avatar base gameplay soon, seeing how they have almost fixed every ship based issue that needed fixing back when CQ was introduced.

I'm not interested in WIS as a social area, I would rather CCP focus on some meaningful gameplay. It could be used to revitalise PVE and exploration... Imagain traveling into a wormhole, docking with a sleeper structure and exploring what is hidden inside.

I strongly believe avatar gamplay is vital if EVE is to survive another 5-10 years.
Salvos Rhoska
#1186 - 2015-09-13 10:35:12 UTC
Its chance came and went when all that time, effort and money invested came up with nothing.

Too bad. Too sad.
Hal Morsh
Doomheim
#1187 - 2015-09-14 00:25:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Hal Morsh
Amber Starview wrote:
They have station interior for dust I think can't we just have that ?



I said the same damn thing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58UeNWldAaI&index=35&list=FLWZW72v-IYwPH5IC-mg_U7g

The reason this one existed was for the playstation avatar lobby thing, which no longer exists entirely i'm pretty sure.





It's pretty old, but here's what progress they had 2008 or previous.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8sfaN8zT8E&list=FLWZW72v-IYwPH5IC-mg_U7g&index=9

I thought of it as a waste to have finished it THAT far then quit. They had actual pod bays.

Oh, I perfectly understand, Hal Morsh — a mission like this requires courage, skill, and heroism… qualities you are clearly lacking. Have you forgotten you're one of the bloody immortals!?

Desslok VonReich
Acadia Investment Group
#1188 - 2015-09-14 04:19:49 UTC
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:

Welcome, noob. You don't know what was discussed when it was the time to discuss ways in which CCP could save Incarna. More importantly, you weren't here taking a endless barrage of flak form every troll in the forums for two years, until it was made evident that CCP had abandoned WiS forever.


Cripes, I have alts older than your character...

Its hard to tell between your attacks on myself and CCP, but I think you'd agree then there there has not been shown any compelling game play presented that has a hope of being implemented?
Delt0r Garsk
Shits N Giggles
#1189 - 2015-09-14 10:03:36 UTC
Rek Seven wrote:
I hope that CCP start development of avatar base gameplay soon, seeing how they have almost fixed every ship based issue that needed fixing back when CQ was introduced.


You don't undock much do you.

AKA the scientist.

Death and Glory!

Well fun is also good.

Commissar Kate
Kesukka
#1190 - 2015-09-14 16:05:03 UTC
Walking in stations already exists. All we need to add is guns, blood and more rooms.
Bagrat Skalski
Koinuun Kotei
#1191 - 2015-09-14 17:43:00 UTC
Delt0r Garsk wrote:
Rek Seven wrote:
I hope that CCP start development of avatar base gameplay soon, seeing how they have almost fixed every ship based issue that needed fixing back when CQ was introduced.


You don't undock much do you.

http://i.imgur.com/2Pcaf3G.jpg

You cant satisfy everyone. Pirate
Bagrat Skalski
Koinuun Kotei
#1192 - 2015-09-14 17:51:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Bagrat Skalski
Hal Morsh wrote:

It's pretty old, but here's what progress they had 2008 or previous.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8sfaN8zT8E&list=FLWZW72v-IYwPH5IC-mg_U7g&index=9

I thought of it as a waste to have finished it THAT far then quit. They had actual pod bays.


I remember the video from fanfest where they presented Ambulation and it was fully interactive. There were some bugs, but, I subscribed because of that video also.

CCP I am still waiting. 5 years was not enough to fix this game? Roll
Erin Crawford
#1193 - 2015-09-14 18:20:21 UTC
Bagrat Skalski wrote:
Hal Morsh wrote:

It's pretty old, but here's what progress they had 2008 or previous.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8sfaN8zT8E&list=FLWZW72v-IYwPH5IC-mg_U7g&index=9

I thought of it as a waste to have finished it THAT far then quit. They had actual pod bays.


I remember the video from fanfest where they presented Ambulation and it was fully interactive. There were some bugs, but, I subscribed because of that video also.

CCP I am still waiting. 5 years was not enough to fix this game? Roll

Could an Icelandic thing... Maybe they should give it to the Germans? They may have it all done in a week or two..? Roll

"Those who talk don’t know. Those who know don’t talk. "

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#1194 - 2015-09-14 18:51:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Desslok VonReich wrote:
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:

Welcome, noob. You don't know what was discussed when it was the time to discuss ways in which CCP could save Incarna. More importantly, you weren't here taking a endless barrage of flak form every troll in the forums for two years, until it was made evident that CCP had abandoned WiS forever.


Cripes, I have alts older than your character...

Its hard to tell between your attacks on myself and CCP, but I think you'd agree then there there has not been shown any compelling game play presented that has a hope of being implemented?


A person with a realistic way of looking at things would surely agree with you. I don't think you would get much of that from your average WiS advocates. Not trying to be mean to them, they just aren't the realistic sort.

If they were they would understand that not only is CCP not the company to undertake such an endeavor (God love em, but super complicated projects aren't their forte, see WoD), but EVE is the wrong platform for it. It's an old game still plagued with legacy issues so deep it takes a major effort to do relatively minor things (like letting you return to the account lobby instead of having to log completely out and restart the client). A game needs to be created for the ground up for something like integrated WiS, and even when you do that you run into problems, as the makers of Star Citizen/Star Marine are finding out.

Continually trying to tack things on to a game with a Code Base from the late 90s is stupid. If the WiS types were asking for EVE II that would make more sense than what they are actually asking for.
Bagrat Skalski
Koinuun Kotei
#1195 - 2015-09-14 19:05:58 UTC
Quote:
super complicated projects aren't their forte, see WoD

Are we talking about a company that is making EVE?

They only tried a new model of pshhhhh management technique on them. It failed.
Salvos Rhoska
#1196 - 2015-09-14 19:15:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
I dont think WiS would ever have contributed or produced anything meaningful or productive in EVE.

You need to be out in space to do everything that matters in EVE.

Station trading is an exception, but even then you are looking at the market interface, and not a WiS environment.

Its an alternative to ship spinning, but really, is it?
A player who is shipspinning is already bored with the space content of EVE.
Him walking around the station with other likewise bored people is not likely to result in anything constructive.
Just a huge amount of tickets sent for inappropriate behavior, especially by "kalsarikänni" (meaning "underwear drunks" in Finnish) players on a weekend.

Corps meetings in station to plan things might have been interesting, but this is already facilitated through forums, ingame chat and voice comms.

WiS seemed to feature some playable "chess" rendition minigame, and some latent potential for gambling systems (enormously frought with legal liabilities). I dont think either of these would improve retention or interest.

It was a failed concept from the start, barring actual FPS style content elsewhere than in a standard station.
Underdstandable they pursued it, due to the remarkable character creation customisation system that, really weirdly, accompanied EVE development, and the forays into various avatar options explored and developed in the WoD effort. Some of that was implemented in DUST, but that too is now fail.

As Jenn says, an EVE II would perhaps make this, and more, possible.
We can only hope.
Crowdfunding alone could be an enormous impetus to support its development.

Unfortunately, concurrently to that and uncomfortably close to EVE, is the escalating situation in Star Citizen, which may end up killing crowdfunding and confidence in it.

As the cliche goes, CCP might want to ask itself:
"Where do you see yourself in 10 years"?

Gunjack isn't going to cover that. Neither will Valkyrie, nor DUST.
Seems unlikely EVE, as it exists today, with all its legacy code issues, could persist that long either, despite updates.

Tbh its a bit concerning that there doesn't seem to be any indication of development of an EVE II.
EVE in its current format, isnt going to last forever.
Unless perhaps as something similar to the inexplicable perpetual continuity of Runescape (?!), which would be a rather sad result.

Sooner or later, it needs to go EVE 2.0...
Bagrat Skalski
Koinuun Kotei
#1197 - 2015-09-14 19:26:04 UTC
Quote:
You need to be out in space to do everything that matters in EVE.

Or in chat. Jita local.
Salvos Rhoska
#1198 - 2015-09-14 19:32:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Bagrat Skalski wrote:
Quote:
You need to be out in space to do everything that matters in EVE.

Or in chat. Jita local.

Nothing matters in Jita local.

Its just endless streams of spam.

And as I said, ingame chat already provides that.
You don't need a WiS station for it.
You can do it while ship-spinning or standing idly in your Captains Quarters.
Erica Dusette
Division 13
#1199 - 2015-09-14 19:43:26 UTC
Everywhere that you have social interaction you have space content being generated as a result.

Forums. Local. Convos. Teamspeak. Slack. Off-game forums/sites. You name it.

To say providing more social platforms tied within the game won't produce any space content is kinda naive tbh.

Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate Full-Time Supermodel

worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕвσss

Salvos Rhoska
#1200 - 2015-09-14 19:48:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Erica Dusette wrote:
Everywhere that you have social interaction you have space content being generated as a result.

Forums. Local. Convos. Teamspeak. Slack. Off-game forums/sites. You name it.

To say providing more social platforms tied within the game won't produce any space content is kinda naive tbh.


Its naive that you dont realize that exact same social content is already provided by exactly the forums, local, convos, teamspeak,mslack, offgame forums/sites that you mention.

Being able to walk around in a station while doing so does not add anything to those existing formats of social interaction.

It just means you can walk, while you talk.
Who cares?
You really think people give a damn about your avatar except for the first 1 second impression?

Furthermore, WiS station content systemically REDUCES space content, because you cant do both at once.
Either you are trying to catfish desperate nerds with your sexy avatar in a station bar (!?) (and yours isnt attractive, btw), or you are out in space, making space content.