Player Features and Ideas Discussion

They just cant grasp that point we keep on making. How many ways can we say having to respond trollcepters attacking sov is more boring than the old sov mechanics?

The point you're making is that essentially you're crying over a roamer who uses entosis without "fighting over a system" (thus making goal #1 inapplicable) just to force some holed up bears to undock their battle badger and waste 1 minute to deal with him. 30 seconds if he's entosising a station.

Is that a "nerf roam" tears I see?

So first gewns teach others backbones, now decency? With all the ad gewnminems you thrown, decency? THE IRONY.

And I'm a bit lazy to browse posts (you may have deleted the relevant ones by now anyway) but it was exactly the tune you turned 180 degrees somewhere this night.

Remove entosis COMPLETELY from frigates and T3 (avoid the nullification issue).

Give ab onus to Combat Battecruiser using entosis ( finaly they will have a role again)

And when we look at sov space we find we find that only two regions had high industrial index so most of sov null fall under your "people whos rear parts gets on fire when mining laser is used". You can also attack station services at any time. So that comment you made saying we only needed to spend 30 seconds to a minute defending space is an outright lie, glad you admitted it.

We also know that the vast bulk of entosising is being done with interceptors followed by nullified cloaky t3s, built to avoid fights which is the exact opposite of the goals set for the new sov system.

gewnull is not all null.
There is a lot of systems various alliances will not be able to hold, give it time. Not getting ADM at 6 in a system you use is what I'm talking about, obviously.
You somehow talk sov based on regions, well, it's not region-quantity game anymore, gewnie. Catch up.


Except you cannot attack them if you have an active entosis cycle after being chased away and have to redo warmup.
Seriously, I had no idea you are so bad at fozziesov. I started handing you advanced stuff and now I know why you couldn't understand it - it's because you haven't even drilled the basics yet.


The fact you understood nothing from what I said, rather. Gewn's trademark reading comprehension failure.


Citation needed (c).

Once again, and I'll repeat it till even the dimmest of gewns get it, trollceptor can only grab uncontested sov, and if your sov goes uncontested, you don't deserve it.

I've yet to see T3 used in entosis in south, but how the hell does it avoid being caught? Can't even imagine, unless it's a T2 entosis fit, which I admittedly haven't seen yet. Is it?
I mean, you can just land on it like you do on a 100MN links T3 except entosis T3 can't just warp away, which is like the only defense link T3 has. So how?

bye bye caps, hello troll ceptors and 10 man frigate gangs.... we hope.

They are legit roamers with a newfound ability to make bears undock. Except that, nothing is there which wasn't there in roams, except roams don't get self-tackled on your station.


Citation needed (c).
I don't see a lot of people in trollceptors, because there's no uncontested sov they can grab nearby.
If your sov can be grabbed uncontested, it shouldn't be yours in the first place.


Well sorry if defending your territory from a mighty 90 dps self-tackled threat is too much to ask.

Citation needed is one of the most stupid thigns you can post on a forum discussion, specially when you are posting with a NPC corp character. People that are in the sov hodlers corps are the ones that get the bennefit of not needign a citiation, if YOU want to prove otherwise it is up to you to bring proof, because you are not in a position to make anyoen beleive in you when you post from an NPC corp that has no place in sov game.

The fact that you point the 90 dps as even a factor just proves how ignorant of the problem you are, a gunless ship is as dangerous to sov as a a 1 trillion dps ship would be.

If you cannot understand that sacrificing a interceptor every few minutes just to anger other players is too effective way of MEta warfare tha do nto generate combat, just play the psycological game, then you do nto deserve new answers.

Trollceptors are just the new version of the "DENY ALL CONTENT"problem of the previous system.

Fozzie, we need content, not trolceptors. Banish frigates from using them and you will achieve it.

I would like to take this opportunity to repeat my earlier suggestion. Have it so entosis link now gives a 5% speed boost, qualifies as a prop mod, and thusly you cannot activate another prop mod with it engaged. This way interceptors and T3's cannot be used to troll nearly as much, as they are a near-guaranteed kill while entosising unless they have a supporting fleet and they have genuine control of the grid.

I'd rather that, than strip the entosis link from any given ship class, due to Fozzie having stated that he wants to put the most minimal impact on ship doctrines to capture sov.